Jasmine Crockett’s Senate Run and the Past That Could Derail It
Jasmine Crockett enters the U.S. Senate race as a candidate already familiar to voters — not because of long policy achievements or bipartisan work, but because of a series of viral and controversial statements that have defined her public image. Her remarks about Governor Greg Abbott, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, and illegal immigration, among other things, have circulated widely across Texas media and national platforms. As a result, she steps into the statewide arena with a reputation already shaped by her own rhetoric. In her safe Dallas district, these moments helped build her profile and energize supporters who appreciate her combative style. But statewide U. S. Senate elections are different. They require candidates to appeal beyond their base, earn trust from independents, and demonstrate judgment, steadiness, and maturity. Crockett’s Senate challenge is not introducing herself to Texans — it is overcoming the version of herself that voters already know. Key Controversies Shaping Voter Perception • Insult Toward the Governor In March, Crockett referred to Governor Greg Abbott as “Hot Wheels,” which prompted a House motion to censure her. Many Texans viewed the comment as mocking a disability and questioned her maturity and judgment. Jasmine Crockett continues to embarrass herself, the state of Texas, and the US Congress by referring to Governor Greg Abbott as “Governor Hot Wheels.” Gov. Abbott was paralyzed at the age of 26 when an oak tree fell and crushed his spine while jogging. This woman is trash. pic.twitter.com/ddiwCBkaHL — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) March 25, 2025 • False Claims About Trump Assassination Attempts In July, she claimed that individuals who attempted to assassinate Donald Trump were Trump supporters, adding that “violence doesn’t come from Democrats.” The statement lacked evidence and was widely criticized as misleading and partisan. Rep. Jamsime Crockett: “VioIence is all coming from MAGA, not the left. Even the 2 who tried kiIIing Trump are Trump supporters.” pic.twitter.com/ddyL7TqwYn — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) July 9, 2025 More Stories Drowning in Bills? These Debt Solutions Could Be the Break You Need Out-of-Town Renters Are Driving Up Demand in These Five Cities Under Siege: My Family’s Fight to Save Our Nation – Book Review & Analysis • Aggressive Statements About Public Figures Crockett said: “All I want to see happen on my birthday is for Elon to be taken down.” Rep. Jasmine Crockett asks activists to take down Tesla and Elon Musk on her birthday pic.twitter.com/Y0chSa8IB1 — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) March 20, 2025 She also stated that Senator Ted Cruz should be “knocked over the head.” Rep Jasmine Crockett says to “punch” your opponents and calls to knock Ted Cruz over the head. Rep Jasmine Crocket is explicitly calling for violence. She needs to be investigated. pic.twitter.com/GYJqsgmsi8 — Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) March 24, 2025 These remarks reinforced concerns about her tone, hostility, and suitability for statewide office. • Controversial Immigration Framing She argued that deportations and strict immigration enforcement caused worker shortages in farming, construction, and hospitality, driving up food and housing costs. Her remarks suggested Americans will not do low-wage labor, implying the economy depends on illegal immigrant workers. Rep. Jasmine Crockett: “Connect the dots. You cannot afford your home, groceries thanks to deportations” pic.twitter.com/sg8ggsp4sG — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) April 10, 2025 The controversy intensified when she added: “We done picking cotton,” a statement many saw as racially charged and dismissive of American workers. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX): “We done picking cotton.” She told a Baptist church congregation that’s what the illegals were for — working the fields. pic.twitter.com/JFzCRr0mSD — toddstarnes (@toddstarnes) April 8, 2025 • Thinks Hispanics Have ‘Slave Mentality She argued that Hispanics in Texas who voted for President Trump and oppose illegal immigration have ‘slave mentality.’ She compared them to slaves who hated themselves. • Supports Racial Inequality and DEI Hiring She doesn’t think black people should have to pay taxes, and she supports reparations. Texas Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett suggests exempting black people from paying taxes, but then says she prefers reparations instead for this reason: CROCKETT: “If you do the no tax thing, for people that are already struggling and aren’t really paying taxes in the first… pic.twitter.com/octD9GKWY9 — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) April 10, 2024 She bragged about being DEI hire. Jasmine Crockett brags about being a DEI hire: “When I first became a public defender, I had no criminal defense experience. And I walked in and I told my boss, ‘You should hire me…because I’m black.’” pic.twitter.com/uM3bCrtMac — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) April 2, 2025 The Larger Question: Is Viral Fame Enough for a Statewide Campaign? These controversies highlight a consistent pattern: Crockett’s most high-profile moments come from confrontation and inflammatory rhetoric rather than constructive policy engagement. While this approach has strengthened her brand inside her own district, it complicates her path in a statewide race where a broader coalition is essential. As she tries to step beyond the cocoon of her district, she faces the harsh reality that going viral is not the same as being qualified. Name recognition will gain her attention while running for Senate. But responsibility, honesty, and maturity win statewide elections — especially in Texas. At this point, her greatest obstacle is not her opponent or her party. It’s the image she has created with her own words. The Takeaway Her challenge becomes even more complex as she faces a primary contest against Texas State Representative James Talarico, who is expected to frame her as “fringe” and not representative of the decorum required to serve the entire state. Meanwhile, the Republican field is equally competitive, with long-term incumbent John Cornyn, frontrunner Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, and Congressman Wesley Hunt all vying for their party’s nomination. With both primaries shaping up to be hard-fought battles, this Texas race promises to be one of the most closely watched Senate showdowns in the country. Unmask the Narrative. Rip Through the Lies. Spread the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t polish propaganda — we tear it to shreds. The corporate press censors, spins, and sugarcoats. We don’t. If you’re…
Sleep Positions That May Damage Your Nerves, Experts Warn
Many people assume that sleep position is simply a matter of comfort. However, experts warn that certain positions can place harmful pressure on nerves, joints, and muscles. Over time, this pressure can cause tingling, numbness, or even long-term nerve irritation. Because we stay in the same position for hours while sleeping, the way we arrange our arms, legs, and neck can have a major impact on our health. The Hidden Risks of “T. Rex” Arm Positioning One of the most common yet risky sleep habits is tucking the arms close to the chest or under a pillow. This curled posture resembles a “T. Rex” shape and can compress nerves in the elbows or wrists. When nerves stay compressed for hours, the result can be numbness or tingling upon waking. For some people, the sensation becomes chronic. This happens because repeated pressure slowly irritates the nerve pathways that control hand and arm movement. More Stories Drowning in Bills? These Debt Solutions Could Be the Break You Need Out-of-Town Renters Are Driving Up Demand in These Five Cities Under Siege: My Family’s Fight to Save Our Nation – Book Review & Analysis How Stomach Sleeping Affects the Spine and Nerves Another risky position is sleeping on the stomach. This requires twisting the neck to breathe, which can misalign the spine. Over time, the twisting motion puts strain on the nerves in the neck and shoulders. Many stomach sleepers report waking with headaches, stiff shoulders, or burning sensations down the arms. These symptoms often point to nerve compression caused by poor spinal alignment. Back Sleeping: Helpful for Some, Risky for Others Sleeping on the back is often considered neutral, but it is not perfect for everyone. People who snore or who struggle with acid reflux may find their symptoms worsen in this position. In addition, back sleepers may place their arms above their heads without realizing it. This posture can irritate the nerves in the upper arms and shoulders. However, with proper pillow support and relaxed arm placement, back sleeping can still be a healthy option. Why Side Sleeping Is Usually the Safest Choice Experts widely recommend side sleeping because it naturally aligns the spine and reduces pressure on nerves. This position keeps the airway open, supports circulation, and reduces strain on the lower back. To improve comfort, many people place a pillow between their knees. This helps prevent the hips from rotating and keeps the spine straight. With the right mattress and pillow, side sleeping can significantly reduce nerve-related discomfort. Small Adjustments That Make a Big Difference Improving sleep posture does not require major changes. Simple adjustments can relieve pressure and improve nerve health. For example, keeping the arms straight instead of bent reduces nerve compression. Choosing a supportive pillow that keeps the neck aligned can prevent pinched nerves in the shoulders. A medium-firm mattress helps distribute body weight evenly, minimizing pressure points on the hips and lower back. When Sleep Positions Lead to Long-Term Problems Ignoring nerve-related symptoms can lead to lasting damage. Persistent numbness, tingling, or burning sensations may indicate chronic nerve compression. Over time, compressed nerves can weaken muscles, reduce grip strength, or cause ongoing pain. Because sleep takes up a large portion of our lives, repeated harm each night can accumulate quickly. This is why experts encourage people to take nighttime posture seriously. How to Transition to a Healthier Sleeping Style Changing sleep habits can feel difficult at first. However, gradual adjustments make the transition easier. You can place pillows behind your back to prevent rolling onto your stomach. You can also adjust pillows under your arms to keep them straight. If you need to shift to side sleeping, start by doing it for part of the night. Over time, your body will adapt and the new position will begin to feel natural. Final Word Good sleep isn’t just about feeling rested — it plays a powerful role in your long-term health. When you sleep in positions that support your spine and protect your nerves, you help your entire body function more efficiently. Quality sleep improves cardiovascular health by lowering stress hormones, supporting healthy blood pressure, and giving your heart the downtime it needs to recover from daily strain. It also reduces brain fog by allowing your brain to clear out waste, strengthen memory, and restore mental clarity. And because your muscles and nervous system finally have a chance to relax, proper sleep positions help decrease overall fatigue, making you feel more energized and alert throughout the day. In short, choosing the right position does far more than prevent numbness or discomfort — it enhances your whole-body wellness. A few simple adjustments can protect your nerves, improve your physical performance, sharpen your thinking, and support a healthier heart. Good sleep is one of the easiest and most effective ways to strengthen your overall health from the inside out. Unmask the Narrative. Rip Through the Lies. Spread the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t polish propaganda — we tear it to shreds. The corporate press censors, spins, and sugarcoats. We don’t. If you’re tired of being misled, silenced, and spoon-fed fiction, help us expose what they try to hide. Truth matters — but only if it’s heard. So share this. Shake the silence. And remind the powerful they don’t own the story. The Modern Memo may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you click or buy through our links. Featured pricing is subject to change. 📩 Love what you’re reading? Don’t miss a headline! Subscribe to The Modern Memo here! Explore More News Trump Designates Muslim Brotherhood a Terrorist Organization Trump and Elon Musk Reunite, Boosting GOP Unity Top 5 Essential Survival Gear Items For Any Adventure Epstein Files Bill Sparks New Questions as Jeffries Email Emerges
AI “Best Friend” Encouraged Man to Stalk Women in Multiple States
Federal prosecutors recently announced charges against Brett Michael Dadig, a social media influencer now accused of using AI while he continued to stalk and threaten at least eleven women across more than five states, according to Breitbart News. What investigators uncovered paints a disturbing picture: a long-running pattern of harassment that included repeated threats, unwanted messages, and violating restraining orders. He even tried to physically approach women in places where he had already been banned. Authorities say Dadig didn’t stop even after multiple confrontations. Instead, he created new aliases so he could return to gyms that had thrown him out, slipping back in and continuing the same predatory behavior. As his actions crossed state lines and grew more brazen, federal officials stepped in — and what they found about his motivations was even more unsettling. ChatGPT: From Troubled Thoughts to Dangerous Encouragement One of the most shocking parts of this case is how Dadig justified what he was doing. Prosecutors say he turned again and again to ChatGPT, asking it for guidance about his so-called “future wife” and treating the artificial intelligence like a trusted adviser. When the chatbot mentioned he might meet someone “at a boutique gym or in an athletic community,” he took that vague, generic answer as a green light to return to gyms where he had already harassed multiple women. Instead of viewing ChatGPT as a neutral tool, Dadig treated it as a supportive voice — almost like a friend cheering him on. Investigators say he believed the chatbot encouraged him to keep pushing forward, even when people criticized his behavior. He interpreted its general replies as validation that he should build a louder, more aggressive online presence. In his mind, the AI wasn’t just responding. It was rooting for him. More Stories Drowning in Bills? These Debt Solutions Could Be the Break You Need Out-of-Town Renters Are Driving Up Demand in These Five Cities Under Siege: My Family’s Fight to Save Our Nation – Book Review & Analysis The Broader Issue: AI as an Echo Chamber for Harmful Behavior This case has reignited serious concerns about how conversational AI can unintentionally reinforce dangerous thinking. Experts warn that people who are already struggling with delusional or obsessive behavior may easily misinterpret AI’s friendly tone as emotional agreement. Because the replies feel warm, humanlike, and conversational, some users see them as personal guidance rather than automated text. Researchers say people who feel isolated or misunderstood may latch onto chatbots, treating them like friends, mentors, or even spiritual authorities. That creates a dangerous echo chamber where unhealthy ideas go unchecked and can quickly grow stronger. A Growing Dependency on AI “Companions” Mental health professionals say this growing reliance on AI for emotional support is becoming more common. While chatbots can offer general conversation, they aren’t designed to recognize warning signs. They can’t challenge irrational beliefs or intervene when someone is heading down a dangerous path. AI doesn’t understand context. It doesn’t know when advice might be misinterpreted. It can’t sense instability. But to someone struggling, its neutral responses can feel like encouragement. In Dadig’s case, investigators believe he leaned heavily on ChatGPT to justify choices he had already made, using its responses to strengthen his own distorted beliefs. Legal and Ethical Implications for AI Developers Cases like this raise serious questions about how artificial intelligence platforms should handle situations where users may be spiraling into harmful behavior. Developers face increasing pressure to improve security on their products. While AI can’t control how a user interprets its replies, smarter safeguards could help prevent misuse. Lawmakers are also discussing whether a person’s reliance on AI “companions” should influence criminal cases, especially when technology becomes part of a dangerous ideology. Why AI Cannot Replace Real Mental Health Support This case reinforces something mental health experts have been saying for years: Artificial intelligence is not a substitute for real emotional or psychological support. While chatbots can feel comforting or helpful, they cannot recognize red flags or intervene when someone’s thoughts are escalating in a harmful direction. For people with obsessive tendencies, AI can unintentionally feed the problem. Even neutral statements can be misread as approval. And once that happens, breaking the cycle becomes much harder. Final Word The case of Brett Michael Dadig is a stark reminder of how vulnerable and unstable individuals can spiral when they use AI as emotional validation instead of seeking real help. For someone already struggling with obsession or distorted thinking, even a neutral chatbot response can feel like a push in the wrong direction. That can be enough to send a fragile person over the edge. As AI becomes more deeply woven into everyday life, tech companies must take greater responsibility for the tools they create. That means building clear parameters, stronger behavioral safeguards, and automatic shutdown features when a user’s pattern of questions signals potential harm. Without these protections, AI risks becoming an accidental accomplice in situations where the stakes are far too high. Expose the Spin. Shatter the Narrative. Speak the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t cover politics to play referee — we swing a machete through the spin, the double-speak, and the partisan theater. While the media protects the powerful and buries the backlash, we dig it up and drag it into the light. If you’re tired of rigged narratives, selective outrage, and leaders who serve themselves, not you — then share this. Expose the corruption. Challenge the agenda. Because if we don’t fight for the truth, no one will. And that fight starts with you. The Modern Memo may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you click or buy through our links. Featured pricing is subject to change. 📩 Love what you’re reading? Don’t miss a headline! Subscribe to The Modern Memo here! Explore More News Trump Designates Muslim Brotherhood a Terrorist Organization Trump and Elon Musk Reunite, Boosting GOP Unity Top 5 Essential Survival Gear Items For Any Adventure Epstein Files Bill Sparks New Questions as…
Somali Immigrant Fraud in Minnesota and the Collapse of State Oversight
When photos surfaced showing Somali criminal immigrant Abdul Dahir Ibrahim posing with prominent Minnesota Democrats, the images spread fast. People wanted to know why a man with a long record of fraud — and a long-standing deportation order — was anywhere near elected leaders. But the conversation didn’t stop with the photos. Instead, it kicked open a deeper discussion about Minnesota’s growing list of taxpayer-funded fraud scandals, including the massive Feeding Our Future pandemic case and even a recent decision by a judge to overturn a multimillion-dollar Medicaid-fraud conviction. A lot has happened in Minnesota over the past few years, and each story connects to a much larger pattern: serious failures in state government oversight, slow responses by state agencies, and enormous losses of taxpayer money. The Ibrahim Case: A Symbol of Bigger Problems Abdul Dahir Ibrahim had a long history of fraud before U.S. authorities arrested him in December 2025. Before arriving in Minnesota, he’d already been convicted of asylum and welfare fraud in Canada. After his arrival, he was involved in additional criminal activity, including providing false information to police and driving without a valid license. Because of these offenses, he’d been under a deportation order since 2004. For years, though, that order wasn’t enforced. So when photos emerged showing the Somali criminal immigrant standing next to Minnesota political figures, it didn’t sit well with the public. And honestly, it wasn’t just about him — it was about what he represented. His arrest happened at the same time Minnesota was dealing with some of the largest fraud cases in state history, many involving public-benefit programs. This was the moment people started connecting dots. Feeding Our Future: The Massive $250M Pandemic Fraud Case The Feeding Our Future scandal remains one of the biggest COVID-era fraud cases in America. Federal prosecutors charged dozens of Somali immigrants with stealing roughly $250 million from the federal child-nutrition program. That’s not speculation — that’s the number straight from federal indictments. The scheme worked like this: Fake meal sites were set up across Minnesota. Fraudulent invoices were submitted to claim reimbursed meals. Very few — if any — actual meals were served to children. Those involved then spent the money on luxury cars, real estate, and travel. Dozens of defendants have since pleaded guilty or been convicted. It’s a staggering case, and Minnesota is still dealing with the fallout. White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller didn’t mince words. In an interview with Fox News, he called the scandal: “the single greatest theft of taxpayer dollars through welfare fraud in American history.” His comment reflected a growing national opinion: that this fraud wasn’t just large — it was a catastrophic failure of Minnesota state government oversight. More Stories Drowning in Bills? These Debt Solutions Could Be the Break You Need Out-of-Town Renters Are Driving Up Demand in These Five Cities Under Siege: My Family’s Fight to Save Our Nation – Book Review & Analysis Scott Jensen: “Their timeline’s a year off.” Minnesota gubernatorial candidate Dr. Scott Jensen also weighed in, specifically pointing the finger at Governor Tim Walz and the Minnesota Department of Education. According to Jensen, the administration knew a serious problem existed a year earlier than they’ve publicly claimed. Jensen told the New York Post: “Tim Walz and the Minnesota Department of Education knew in 2020 that there was a problem… but they didn’t get the FBI involved until 2021. And yet they’ve made claims that as soon as they learned about it, they got the FBI involved. That’s not true. Their timeline’s a year off.” This disagreement about the timeline matters. If state officials really waited a year to bring in federal investigators, that delay may have allowed the fraud to grow far beyond what it could have been. And that’s exactly what many Minnesotans are concerned about. Another Case That Shocked the State: Judge Overturns $7.2M Medicaid Fraud Conviction As if Minnesota didn’t have enough controversy already, a judge recently overturned a $7.2 million Medicaid fraud conviction involving a Somali couple accused of using taxpayer money to fund luxury living. According to reporting, Judge Sarah West threw out the conviction, citing problems with how the evidence tied the couple directly to the fraudulent billing. The case had drawn public outrage because of how the stolen money was allegedly spent — expensive clothing, high-end vehicles, and lavish travel. When the conviction was tossed, critics argued that Minnesota’s legal system was becoming too soft on major fraud cases. The timing of the reversal made the situation even more volatile, landing right in the middle of public anger over Feeding Our Future and other ongoing investigations. For many Minnesotans, it felt like yet another example of accountability slipping through the cracks. A Pattern That’s Hard to Ignore When you step back and look at all of this together — the Feeding Our Future scandal, the overturned Medicaid-fraud conviction, and the Ibrahim arrest — the common threads become obvious: Minnesota has a systemic oversight problem and a Somali criminal immigrant problem. Millions of taxpayer dollars have been stolen or misused. Feeding Our Future alone costs $250 million, and state and federal investigators now estimate the total Medicaid fraud in Minnesota has climbed to roughly $1 billion, revealing just how widespread and organized these schemes have become. Warning signs were overlooked. And political leaders are still giving conflicting timelines about when they first knew something was wrong. This is why the outrage hasn’t died down. Dr. Mehmet Oz, Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, sent Governor Walz a letter giving Minnesota 60 days to comply with directives to clean up Medicaid fraud and abuse. Dr. Oz also released a public video: You’ve probably heard the news by now: Minnesota fraudsters stole over $1 billion from Medicaid. And you deserve an explanation. Our staff at CMS told me they’ve never seen anything like this in Medicaid — and everyone from Gov. Tim Walz on down needs to be investigated,…
Elon Musk Calls for EU to be Abolished After Hefty Fine
Elon Musk made waves once again — and this time, he went straight for the European Union. On December 6, 2025, right after the EU hit his platform X with a massive €120 million ($140 million) fine, Musk fired back with a bold message. He said the EU should be abolished completely, and that member countries should take back full control of their own governments. As expected, his comments spread like wildfire. Everyone from policymakers to everyday social media users had something to say about it. The people of Europe should withdraw from the EU to regain their sovereignty https://t.co/QTbkSgePrh — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 6, 2025 Musk has never been shy about sharing his views, but this statement hit differently. It wasn’t just about a fine or a disagreement over rules. It was a full-on challenge to one of the world’s most powerful political institutions. Whether people agreed with him or not, it was clear that his comments struck a nerve across the globe. Fine: What Triggered the Outrage The spark that set everything off was the European Commission’s fine against X under the Digital Services Act (DSA). The DSA is the EU’s big effort to rein in online platforms by making them more transparent, more responsible, and more accountable for harmful or illegal content. According to regulators, X wasn’t doing enough — especially when it came to dealing with misinformation and extremist material. Musk didn’t take the accusation lightly. He said the fine had nothing to do with safety or compliance and everything to do with trying to control free speech online. To him, the EU’s enforcement felt like punishment for allowing open discussion, even when that discussion included unpopular or controversial opinions. Instead of quietly paying the fine, Musk escalated the situation in a way only he could. More Stories Drowning in Bills? These Debt Solutions Could Be the Break You Need Out-of-Town Renters Are Driving Up Demand in These Five Cities Under Siege: My Family’s Fight to Save Our Nation – Book Review & Analysis Growing US-European Diplomatic Strain Musk’s comments didn’t stay in the business world. They quickly became a diplomatic issue when top American officials weighed in. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio slammed the fine, calling it an attack on American companies and American innovation. His message was clear: the EU was crossing a line by imposing such a heavy penalty on X. U. S. Ambassador to the EU, Andrew Puzder, also spoke out about the incident: Today’s excessive €120M fine is the result of EU regulatory overreach targeting American innovation. The Trump Administration has been clear: we oppose censorship and will challenge burdensome regulations that target US companies abroad. We expect the EU to engage in fair, open,… https://t.co/EAld2QJaen — U.S. Ambassador to the EU (@USAmbEU) December 6, 2025 All of this made a tense situation even more complicated. What started as a regulatory fine quickly turned into a broader political debate between two major global players. Musk’s Broader Pattern of Opposition to EU Influence If you’ve followed Musk over the past few years, his criticism of the European Union probably doesn’t surprise you. He has repeatedly questioned the union’s authority, especially when it comes to digital policy and speech regulation. Critics insist Musk is looking out for his own interests. After all, the EU’s regulations could affect everything from Tesla to SpaceX to X. They argue that he wants the union weakened because its oversight makes it harder for tech giants to operate freely. But his supporters see him as a champion of personal freedom and innovation. Whether people view him as a disruptor or a defender, one thing is clear: Musk has become one of the most vocal opponents of EU regulatory power. What’s at Stake: Democracy, Regulation, and Global Tech The fight between Musk and the European Union isn’t really about one fine. It’s part of a much bigger debate about how digital spaces should be governed. European officials say the DSA is essential for protecting citizens from misinformation, dangerous content, and foreign manipulation. They believe strong rules help maintain order and keep the online world safer. Musk, however, argues that too much regulation can become a threat in itself. He believes it limits creativity, restricts the exchange of ideas, and gives too much power to unelected officials. He sees X as a platform where people should be able to talk openly, even if those conversations get messy. From his perspective, the EU’s approach leans too far toward control, while his vision champions freedom and innovation. This clash of philosophies is at the heart of the debate. And because it involves global tech giants, European governments, and the United States, the consequences reach far beyond one company’s bottom line. Musk isn’t likely to let this go. His comments could inspire other tech leaders to question EU authority, and they may also influence public opinion in several countries already debating issues of sovereignty. The conflict may even shape upcoming elections or policy discussions as governments decide how much control they want to hand over to Brussels. Final Word Elon Musk’s stand against the European Union is a direct challenge to a system that has grown far too controlling. He’s calling out a bureaucracy that restricts free speech, slows innovation, and tries to dictate how tech platforms operate. Musk’s push for national sovereignty and open communication aligns with the values many Americans already champion. By confronting EU overreach head-on, he’s defending the principle that people and individual nations — not distant institutions — should shape the future of technology. His willingness to speak plainly and push back is driving a conversation that needed to happen, and he’s showing once again that he isn’t afraid to take on powerful systems when freedom is on the line. Cut Through the Noise. Slice Through the Lies. Share the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe around the narrative—we swing a machete through it. The mainstream won’t say it, so we will. If you’re…
Army Veteran, 88, Still Working Full-Time After Losing Pension — Internet Raises Nearly $1.5M to Help
At 88 years old, Army veteran Ed Bambas still works full-time as a grocery store cashier in Brighton, Michigan. He shows up five days a week, often standing for more than eight hours at a time. While most people his age spend their days relaxing in retirement, Bambas continues to work simply because he has no other choice. He shared that he would prefer to slow down, but his income is too limited to cover his expenses. As a result, he keeps going with steady determination and a positive spirit. His story has touched millions, not only because of his age but because of the heartbreaking reason behind his financial struggle. A Promised Pension That Disappeared Bambas once believed he would enjoy a secure retirement. After retiring from General Motors in 1999, he counted on the pension and benefits he had earned through decades of hard work. However, everything changed in 2012 when GM went bankrupt. In the fallout, Bambas lost his pension, his health care coverage, and most of his life insurance. The timing could not have been worse. His wife became seriously ill around the same time, leading to mounting medical bills. Without the benefits he expected to rely on, Bambas was forced to sell his home and other property to stay afloat. The financial pressure grew even heavier after his wife of more than 50 years passed away. Left alone and without a safety net, Bambas did what he had always done—he kept working. @itssozer 88 year old veteran still working.. 😭❤️ (donate in B1O) #love #kind #veteran ♬ original sound – Samuel Weidenhofer More Stories Drowning in Bills? These Debt Solutions Could Be the Break You Need Out-of-Town Renters Are Driving Up Demand in These Five Cities Under Siege: My Family’s Fight to Save Our Nation – Book Review & Analysis Showing Up With Humility and Strength Despite the physical demands of the job, Bambas remains grateful that his body still allows him to work. He told WXYZ ABC he is “fortunate” to be able to stand for long hours and help customers with a smile. Co-workers and shoppers often describe him as polite, hardworking, and dedicated. Yet behind the scenes, he continues to work not out of passion, but out of necessity. His story is a reminder of how quickly retirement plans can collapse, especially for older Americans who depend on pensions that disappear during economic downturns. A Viral Video Sparks Nationwide Support Everything changed when Australian influencer Samuel Weidenhofer visited the Michigan supermarket and met Bambas. After hearing his story, the influencer posted a video highlighting the veteran’s situation and surprising him with a $400 tip. The video quickly gained traction across TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube. Millions of viewers were moved by Bambas’ humility and resilience. Weidenhofer decided to launch a GoFundMe campaign to help Bambas finally retire. Within hours, donations began pouring in. People from across the country—and even around the world—contributed what they could. Some gave $5. Others sent hundreds, and even thousands. Many shared stories of their own struggles or their appreciation for veterans like Bambas. Celebrities, including singer Charlie Puth, amplified the campaign by sharing it on social media. Each post helped draw even more attention to Bambas’ story and the need for change in how society supports aging veterans and retirees. Fundraising Surges to Nearly $1.5 Million Because of the overwhelming response, the GoFundMe campaign skyrocketed. At the time of this publication, the GoFundMe fund has reached just under $1.5 million—a powerful demonstration of nationwide compassion. The donations will be placed into a secure account or trust once the campaign closes. From there, the funds will help provide stability, cover living expenses, and give Bambas the financial freedom he has lived without for so many years. Most importantly, the support may finally allow him to retire with dignity. Technology Isn’t His Priority — But Kindness Is Although his story has gone viral, Bambas himself has not seen the video that changed his life. He still uses a flip phone and says he has never been on TikTok or Instagram. While the online attention feels surreal to him, he remains deeply grateful and humbled by the generosity of strangers. For him, the fundraiser is not about fame or recognition. Instead, it represents the kindness of people willing to step forward and help someone in need. A Story That Raises Larger Questions Beyond Bambas’ personal journey, his experience brings important issues into the spotlight. His situation raises questions about: The security of pensions for retirees The stability of health care and insurance benefits The support available to older veterans The financial challenges seniors face in today’s economy His story highlights how quickly life can change and how easily older Americans can fall through the cracks—even after a lifetime of hard work and service. Hope, Dignity, and a Brighter Future As donations continue to grow, Bambas’ life may soon look very different. After years of loss, sacrifice, and financial uncertainty, he now has a chance to experience comfort in his later years. With support from millions, he may finally be able to rest, enjoy his time, and live free from the constant pressure to work full-time just to survive. In the end, the response to his story proves something powerful: when people come together, even one small video can create real change. For Ed Bambas, that change is life-altering. And for the rest of us, his story is a reminder that compassion still makes a difference—one person, one share, and one act of generosity at a time. Forget the Headlines. Challenge the Script. Deliver the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe through talking points — we swing a machete through the media’s favorite lies. They protect power. We confront it. If you’re sick of censorship, narrative control, and being told what to think — stand with us. 📩 Love what you’re reading? Don’t miss a headline! Subscribe to The Modern Memo here! Explore More News Michael & Susan Dell…
Menopause: Turning Down the Heat, One Flash at a Time
The Modern Memo may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you click or buy through our links. Featured pricing is subject to change. Menopause can bring unexpected changes, and hot flashes are often the most disruptive. These sudden surges of heat can happen at any time—at work, during a conversation, or even in the middle of the night. While every woman’s experience is different, understanding what may trigger hot flashes is an important step toward feeling more in control. (RELATED NEWS: Health, Wellness & Preparedness for Today’s 40+ Mature Adults) Many women notice flare-ups tied to things like stress, certain foods, warm environments, or shifting sleep patterns. Others find their symptoms appear without warning. If hot flashes are becoming uncomfortable or unpredictable, you’re not alone. The key is learning how your body responds and discovering what can help you stay balanced throughout this transition. If you’re looking for practical ways to manage menopause symptoms, reduce discomfort, and regain confidence in your daily routine, you don’t have to figure it out on your own. Click below to access our in-depth guide, where you’ll learn: Common triggers that may be intensifying your hot flashes Simple lifestyle adjustments that can ease symptoms Ways to feel more comfortable, day and night What to do when hot flashes become overwhelming Your personalized path to menopause relief starts with the right information. Tap into the full guide to take your next step toward feeling better. Find Your Relief
Michael and Susan Dell Donate $6.25 Billion to Trump Accounts for Kids
Michael and Susan Dell Step Up for America’s Future Michael and Susan Dell surprised the country with a massive $6.25 billion commitment to support the new Trump Accounts program — a donation so large it instantly reshaped the national conversation about how America invests in its children. Their contribution arrives at a time when families across the country are feeling squeezed, raising kids is getting more expensive, and fewer Americans are choosing to have children at all. The timing of their generosity naturally taps into a larger question facing the country: how do we make it easier and more hopeful to raise a family in today’s economy? Michael Dell posted this on X: “The last sentence of the Declaration of Independence ends with… we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.” This belief framed their commitment to this cause in a way that feels deeply American. It’s their way of saying that Americans still owe something to one another, especially to the next generation. If the country expects stronger families, stronger kids, and a stronger future, then those with the means can help lead the way. The last sentence of the Declaration of Independence ends with… we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor. 🫡🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/Wq20HegeY3 — Michael Dell 🇺🇸 (@MichaelDell) December 1, 2025 A Practical Way to Help Families Build Something Real The Trump Accounts program is designed to give children an early financial foundation — not a windfall, but a meaningful start. Parents will be able to open a tax-advantaged account for their child, and the federal government will deposit $1,000 for kids born between 2025 and 2028. Families can begin contributing on July 4, 2026, once the IRS provides final guidance. It’s a simple idea, but a powerful one. For many families, building long-term assets feels impossible when day-to-day costs keep climbing. Even a modest investment started early can grow into something substantial by the time a child reaches adulthood. The Dells clearly believe in that long-term power. More Stories Drowning in Bills? These Debt Solutions Could Be the Break You Need Out-of-Town Renters Are Driving Up Demand in These Five Cities Under Siege: My Family’s Fight to Save Our Nation – Book Review & Analysis Christian Music Goes Mainstream With Brandon Lake & Forrest Frank Why the Dells Decided to Give — In Their Own Words Michael and Susan Dell didn’t base their donation on cultural debates. Their reason was straightforward and grounded in research. As Michael Dell told CNBC: “It’s designed to help families feel supported from the start and encourage them to keep saving as their children grow. We know that when children have accounts like this, they’re much more likely to graduate from high school, from college, buy a home, start a business and less likely to be incarcerated.” To them, this is about outcomes. When a child knows they have something waiting for them, something that belongs to them, their entire mindset shifts. They plan differently. They dream differently. They take school more seriously and they make more ambitious choices. The Dells want more American children — not just the wealthy — to experience that sense of possibility. $6.25 billion. 25 million children. $250 each. Susan and I believe the smartest investment we can make is in children. That’s why we’re so excited to contribute $6.25 billion from our charitable funds to help 25 million children start building a strong financial foundation… pic.twitter.com/4Bcv3RKp0q — Michael Dell 🇺🇸 (@MichaelDell) December 2, 2025 Extending Opportunity to Millions of Kids Because the government’s $1,000 seed money only applies to newborns from 2025 to 2028, millions of children would have missed out entirely. The Dells stepped in to fill the gap. Their pledge includes $250 for up to 25 million kids age 10 and under, with a special focus on low- and middle-income communities where saving and investing can be the hardest. This is not a small gesture. It is one of the largest philanthropic commitments ever made toward giving children long-term financial hope. The Dells didn’t want older siblings to watch their younger siblings get a government-funded account while they got nothing. They didn’t want millions of kids to miss out simply because of timing. Their gift helps level the playing field in a meaningful way. At a Time When Families Need Encouragement The United States is facing a well-documented decline in birth rates. Fewer young adults are choosing to have children, often citing financial insecurity, rising costs, and lack of support. The Dells’ generosity naturally speaks into that moment. It tells parents they matter. It tells them that raising children is something worth supporting. And it reminds the country that children are not a burden — they’re the future. Giving families even a modest financial head start can help restore confidence in the idea of growing a family, especially as more couples feel financially uncertain. Giving Tuesday With Bigger Purpose Announcing the donation on Giving Tuesday wasn’t a coincidence. It amplified the message that philanthropy can work hand-in-hand with national programs. But this wasn’t just another seasonal act of generosity. It was a strategic move that demonstrates how private wealth can strengthen a public initiative designed to uplift millions of families. The Dells’ donation also challenges other successful Americans to think about how their resources could shape the next generation. It made clear that big problems don’t always require new bureaucracies — sometimes they require bold individuals willing to act. What This Means for Parents Parents will be able to open Trump Accounts starting July 4, 2026. Many are already watching for IRS updates so they can prepare. With the Dells’ help, children who weren’t originally eligible for the government seed money will still receive a meaningful deposit that can grow alongside family contributions. Even small regular contributions — $5, $10, $20 a month — can compound into something substantial over 18 years. The Dells’ $250 kickstart helps families who might…
Matt Van Epps Wins Decisively in Tennessee Special Election
Matt Van Epps, a West Point graduate and Lieutenant Colonel in the Tennessee Army National Guard, delivered a solid win for Republicans in the special election for Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District. Despite the race falling in an off year and just days after Thanksgiving, when turnout is typically low, Van Epps still secured a decisive and confident victory. His performance shows the GOP base remains energized and engaged. He ultimately defeated progressive Democrat Aftyn Behn by 9 points — a clear and commanding margin in any special election. The Power of a Trump Endorsement Van Epps ran with the endorsement of President Donald Trump, and that support still carries tremendous influence in conservative circles. Republican voters trust the president’s judgment, and his backing helped energize the district. Trump remains the leader of the Republican Party, and his endorsement continues to hold real power. Even so, candidates must build their own following. Van Epps showed he is well on his way with this election win. President Trump congratulated Van Epps tonight on a solid win for the Republican Party: More Stories Drowning in Bills? These Debt Solutions Could Be the Break You Need Out-of-Town Renters Are Driving Up Demand in These Five Cities Under Siege: My Family’s Fight to Save Our Nation – Book Review & Analysis Media and Polling Tried to Shape a Different Narrative Throughout the campaign, mainstream media coverage and selective polling pushed the idea that the race was neck-and-neck. Commentators repeatedly claimed Behn was within reach, creating a dramatic storyline that didn’t match the mood on the ground. When the votes were counted, that narrative collapsed. The final results made clear that the race was not the close contest the media tried to sell. Instead of a photo finish, voters delivered a confident Republican win that outpaced the predictions and undercut the polling hype. Realistic Expectations for a First-Time Candidate Some observers compared Van Epps to President Trump’s historic vote totals, but such expectations were unrealistic. Trump’s numbers are unique in modern American politics. No first-time congressional candidate — especially in an off-year special election — can replicate presidential-level turnout. Even with those inflated expectations circulating, Van Epps performed exceptionally well. He held the district with ease, energized Republican voters, and proved he can build momentum without relying on a presidential-year turnout surge. The Takeaway Matt Van Epps’ win deserves recognition for what it is: a firm, disciplined, and decisive Republican victory. He entered a uniquely timed race, faced a well-funded progressive opponent, and still delivered a strong and steady performance. Media outlets may try to downplay it, but his supporters saw a clear, well-earned win that positions him as a rising conservative voice. Republicans held the seat. President Trump’s endorsement proved influential. And Van Epps demonstrated that he has both the message and the momentum to make an impact in Congress. Cut Through the Noise. Slice Through the Lies. Share the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe around the narrative—we swing a machete through it. The mainstream won’t say it, so we will. If you’re tired of spin, censorship, and sugar-coated headlines, help us rip the cover off stories that matter. Share this article. Wake people up. Give a voice to the truth the powerful want buried. This fight isn’t just ours—it’s yours. Join us in exposing what they won’t tell you. America needs bold truth-tellers, and that means you. 📩 Love what you’re reading? Don’t miss a headline! Subscribe to The Modern Memo here! Explore More News Trump Designates Muslim Brotherhood a Terrorist Organization Trump and Elon Musk Reunite, Boosting GOP Unity Top 5 Essential Survival Gear Items For Any Adventure Epstein Files Bill Sparks New Questions as Jeffries Email Emerges
Top 10 States That Took in the Most Refugees
The United States continues to bring in thousands of refugees every year through the official U.S. Refugee Admissions Program. At the same time, the Trump administration has imposed new travel restrictions and entry bans on countries that officials link to security or terrorism concerns. Because of this, many people want to know how many refugees still arrive from those restricted nations and which states take in the most. According to the FY 2025 report “Arrivals by State and Nationality” from the U.S. Refugee Processing Center, a total of 38,102 refugees were admitted. These were legally admitted refugees, not illegal border crossers or other migrant categories. Top 10 States That Took in the Most Refugees The same federal report shows that refugee resettlement is not spread evenly across the country. Instead, a small group of states takes in most of the arrivals. Here are the top ten states by number of refugees received in FY 2025: 1. Texas – 3,923 2. California – 3,044 3. New York – 2,438 4. Florida – 1,513 5. Pennsylvania – 1,504 6. Ohio – 1,500 7. Illinois – 1,454 8. Georgia – 1,442 9. Minnesota – 1,337 10. Washington – 1,320 These ten states alone account for a large share of all refugees who arrived in the country last fiscal year. This makes them key destinations in any national discussion about refugee policy and resettlement. More Stories Drowning in Bills? These Debt Solutions Could Be the Break You Need Out-of-Town Renters Are Driving Up Demand in These Five Cities Under Siege: My Family’s Fight to Save Our Nation – Book Review & Analysis Which Countries Face Bans or Restrictions? In June 2025, the Trump administration issued Proclamation 10949, which restricts or bans entry from 19 countries. Twelve nations face a broad suspension of entry, while seven others face partial restrictions on certain visa types or categories. The restricted list includes Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. While the policy targets security risks, the refugee program still allows some people from these countries to enter after extensive vetting and under specific exceptions. How Many Refugees Came From Restricted Countries? According to the 2025 FY Refugee Processing Center report, 21,105 refugees were admitted from the 19 countries that now face full or partial entry bans or restrictions under the Trump administration. Afghanistan led all countries with 6,758 refugees, while Venezuela followed with 4,589. Burma contributed 3,547 refugees, and Somalia added another 2,496. This number highlights a critical tension. On one hand, the federal government has tightened travel rules for certain countries. On the other hand, the United States has admitted tens of thousands of people fleeing war, persecution, and instability from those same regions. As debates over immigration and national security continue, these facts help show what is really happening on the ground in our refugee program. The Takeaway More than 21,000 refugees arrived in the United States in the last year from countries the Trump administration classifies as high-risk or dangerous. These individuals entered through the legal refugee pipeline, but the sheer volume underscores why public awareness matters. The recent National Guard attack in Washington, D.C. shows why vigilance is essential — even with vetting systems in place, dangerous individuals can still slip through, proving that current screening has not fully protected American citizens from those who choose to do harm. As a populace, we must understand the scale of these arrivals, stay informed about federal resettlement decisions, and remain aware of who is entering our towns and cities. Awareness is not fear — it is responsibility. By knowing the facts, communities can better protect their values, their safety, and their future. Where does your state stand? Expose the Spin. Shatter the Narrative. Speak the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t cover politics to play referee — we swing a machete through the spin, the double-speak, and the partisan theater. While the media protects the powerful and buries the backlash, we dig it up and drag it into the light. If you’re tired of rigged narratives, selective outrage, and leaders who serve themselves, not you — then share this. Expose the corruption. Challenge the agenda. Because if we don’t fight for the truth, no one will. And that fight starts with you. 📩 Love what you’re reading? Don’t miss a headline! Subscribe to The Modern Memo here! Explore More News Trump Designates Muslim Brotherhood a Terrorist Organization Trump and Elon Musk Reunite, Boosting GOP Unity Top 5 Essential Survival Gear Items For Any Adventure Epstein Files Bill Sparks New Questions as Jeffries Email Emerges