Latest News
Kilmar Abrego Garcia and the Deep Immigration Divide
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, age 30, has become the center of immigration controversy. His case highlights deep divisions over asylum, deportation, and U.S. immigration enforcement. The left has embraced him as a victim. But his record tells a very different story. Refusing Deportation Deals Abrego Garcia had options. Immigration officials offered him a deal: remain in jail, accept deportation to Costa Rica, and plead guilty to human smuggling. He refused. BREAKING NEWS: Immigration officials said they intend to deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia to Uganda, after he declined an offer to be deported to Costa Rica in exchange for remaining in jail and pleading guilty to human smuggling charges. pic.twitter.com/CctJFocRib — NEWSMAX (@NEWSMAX) August 23, 2025 Why Costa Rica? Because a federal immigration judge had already ruled he could not be deported to his home country of El Salvador. The judge determined it was unsafe for him there due to gang violence. That decision forced the U.S. government to find third countries willing to accept him. Costa Rica was one option. Uganda became another. (RELATED POST: New Census Will Omit Illegal Immigrants) But instead of taking the deal, Abrego Garcia gambled. He rejected Costa Rica, pushed asylum claims in U.S. courts, and now finds himself trapped in legal limbo. Seeking Asylum in the U.S. This week, his attorneys requested asylum in the United States to stop his deportation to Uganda. The East African country recently agreed to accept illegal immigrants from the U.S. That move gave the Trump administration another option for relocation. But here’s the problem: Abrego Garcia already lost an asylum case in 2019. Back then, he filed too late. Immigration law requires that applications be submitted within one year of arrival. He came to the U.S. in 2012 at age 16 and waited years to apply. A judge denied it. Despite that denial, his lawyers are back in court. They filed a lawsuit before U.S. District Court Judge Paula Xinis in Maryland. She admitted she has no jurisdiction over immigration. But she did order that Abrego Garcia cannot be removed before an October hearing. He remains in detention in Virginia, within 200 miles of her court, so he can meet with his attorneys. Criminal Allegations and MS-13 Ties In 2019, the Prince George County Police Gang Unit identified Abrego Garcia as a member of MS-13. He was arrested outside a Home Depot with two other MS-13 gang members. He denies membership, but his record raises questions. A tip suggested he was affiliated with the dangerous gang. He was arrested with rolls of cash and drugs. The evidence against him has piled up. In 2022, Tennessee police stopped him for speeding. Body cam footage showed nine passengers in the car. They all listed the same address. He carried $1,400 in cash and no one had luggage. Authorities suspected human smuggling. According to Attorney General Pam Bondi a federal grand jury indicted him in 2025 for conspiracy to transport illegal immigrants through Mexico into Texas. The indictment claimed this was his full-time work. They said he used altered vehicles with hidden compartments. Guns, narcotics, women, and children were involved. 🚨 #BREAKING: Pam Bondi officially announces Kilmar Abrego Garcia will be returned to the US after the DOJ uncovered he made OVER 100 SMUGGLING TRIPS of illegals A grand jury found human trafficking was Garcia’s FULL TIME JOB, and he frequently ABUSED women. THIS IS THE… pic.twitter.com/MHbmJ4PpnX — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) June 6, 2025 Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem also did not mince words this week. She called him an “MS-13 gang member, human trafficker, wife beater, child predator, criminal illegal alien.” A Pattern of Abuse The personal side of Abrego Garcia’s story is no cleaner. Court documents reveal that his wife, Jennifer Vasquez, filed for a protection order in 2021. She accused him of punching her, scratching her, and tearing off her shirt. Federal filings also allege he solicited explicit photos and videos of a minor beginning in 2020. NEW: @FoxNews has obtained the written domestic violence allegations from Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s wife in 2021, in which she alleges he is a repeat wife beater & writes “At this point, I am afraid to be close to him. I have multiple photos/videos of how violent he can be and all… pic.twitter.com/s7yCji9jjq — Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) April 16, 2025 Playing the Legal System Despite this record, his attorneys frame him as a victim of Trump’s “mass deportations.” They argue he fears death at the hands of gangs in El Salvador. Yet that claim only arose after he allegedly participated in the murder of a rival gang member’s mother. The courts have repeatedly bent to keep him in the U.S. In March, he was deported to El Salvador. His wife sued. The Trump administration brought him back in June, only to charge him with federal smuggling. Now he is attempting asylum yet again. (MORE NEWS: Kimmel’s Italian Citizenship: Turning Away From America) Why the Left Defends Him Why does this man matter so much to the left? The answer is politics. He represents their narrative against President Trump. They see him as a living example of what they call “cruel” deportation policies. They even traveled to El Salvador to meet with him and push for his release. Final Word Abrego Garcia has lived in the United States for 13 years. In all that time, he never pursued legal citizenship. He never showed commitment to the laws of this nation. Instead, he chose shortcuts and excuses. Being American is not about having kids in this country, working a job that may or may not “contribute to society,” or appearing at court dates. It is about personal responsibility. It is about respect for the laws that create order and safety. You cannot claim love for America while ignoring its laws. You cannot demand rights while refusing to fulfill your duty to handle your business. And you cannot expect sympathy while engaging in crime. Kilmar Abrego Garcia is not a victim, although he likes to…
Back-to-School 2025: How Parents Are Spending
School is in full swing for most of the country. According to the Pew Research Center, about 70% of U.S. schools start classes before Labor Day. The other 30% begin after the holiday, mostly in New England and the Mid-Atlantic states where tradition and state laws shape school calendars. This long-standing divide over school start dates often sparks debate, but no matter when the first bell rings, families are preparing in similar ways. The 2025 Deloitte Back-to-School Survey of 1,200 parents reveals how spending habits, technology, and children’s influence are shaping this year’s shopping season. Spending Stays Steady Parents are spending almost the same amount on school supplies and necessities as they did last year. Deloitte found that: $587 per child was the average spend in 2024. $570 per child is expected in 2025. Our 2025 Deloitte Back-to-School Survey: Parents plan to spend more, shop earlier 🎒 Parents expect to spend an average of $597 per student this year 🛍️ 31% of families plan to start shopping earlier than last year 📈 77% of parents are concerned about rising prices impacting… pic.twitter.com/dIwLVVQ6R1 — Paul do Forno 🛒 🇺🇸🇨🇦🇵🇹 (@dofornop) July 14, 2025 That’s a small dip, but still a significant investment for households with multiple children. Deloitte also estimates over $30 billion in sales tied to back-to-school shopping this year, proving how vital the season is for retailers. “Parents are laser-focused on preparing their children for the school year, but we expect back-to-school spending to remain flat amid economic headwinds and financial concerns across income groups,” said Natalie Martini, vice chair and U.S. Retail & Consumer Products sector leader at Deloitte. (RELATED NEWS: Catherine Zeta-Jones and the U.S. Homeownership Divide) Children Drive Many Purchases Kids are not just along for the ride. They’re influencing spending decisions in a big way: 9 in 10 parents said their child has “must haves” on their list. 62% of parents said their child influences them to buy more. 57% are willing to spend extra on first-day outfits. Extracurriculars, fashion, and technology are top priorities. Parents continue to value how these purchases support their children’s well-being and social development. Shoppers Hunt for Value Even with inflation easing—Bankrate notes it sits at 2.7%—families remain cautious. Ted Rossman, senior industry analyst at Bankrate, explained: “While inflation has come down considerably, back-to-school shoppers are still being thoughtful about their buying habits and looking to save money where possible.” The Deloitte survey backs this up: 49% spread shopping across months to chase sales. 46% took advantage of Amazon Prime Day. 75% of parents are more willing to switch brands if prices rise, compared to 67% in 2024. This mindset reflects a clear shift. Value, flexibility, and deals drive decisions more than brand loyalty. (MORE NEWS: Phone Scrolling: The Top 10 States and Hidden Costs) Technology Is Changing the Game The most striking trend is the role of technology in shopping habits. Younger parents, especially Gen Z, lean heavily on digital tools to save money and personalize their purchases. Deloitte reports: 31% of parents use AI tools to compare prices, read reviews, and build shopping lists. 67% of Gen Z parents use AI. 41% of all parents shop through social media. 75% of Gen Z parents shop through social media. “As younger generations navigate ways to value seek, they’re turning to technology to find the best deals and compare prices,” Deloitte researchers explained. “For retailers that can appeal to the tech-savvy, there could be real rewards, as respondents who plan to use social media in their shopping journey spend 1.8x compared to non-social-media shoppers.” Brian McCarthy, principal in Deloitte’s Retail Strategy group, noted: “This year, parents are strategically approaching back-to-school shopping by spreading out purchases, leveraging promotions, and shopping across multiple discount retailers to maximize their budgets. Meanwhile, younger generations are embracing technology and social media at a higher rate as they hone their value-seeking strategies.” Where Parents Are Spending Mass merchant retailers are this year’s winners. Deloitte found: 46% of parents plan to spend the most at big-box and discount retailers. That’s up from 40% in 2024. Specialty stores and online platforms still play a role, but the convenience and competitive pricing of mass merchants are attracting the bulk of spending. Parents Still Cautious, Even as Pressure Eases The share of parents who feel financially strained has dropped, but careful budgeting remains the norm. 20% feel financially pressured to overspend, according to Bankrate. That’s down from 31% in 2022 and 26% in 2024. Bankrate also reports that only 30% of shoppers are rethinking their spending habits this year, compared to 41% in 2022. These numbers suggest families may be adjusting to inflation. However, Deloitte emphasizes that parents are still strategically stretching budgets, switching brands, and shopping sales to make every dollar count. The Bigger Picture The 2025 back-to-school season highlights three major shifts: Technology is central. Gen Z parents are leading the way in using AI and social media for shopping. Children’s influence is strong. Must-have lists, first-day outfits, and extracurricular needs shape spending. Value drives choice. Families spread purchases, hunt sales, and move away from strict brand loyalty. As Brian McCarthy noted, “Value for the money is the top driver of retailer choice, and parents are increasingly willing to switch brands or retailers to find the best deals.” Education by the Numbers According to Census.gov, 54.1 million students and 5.7 million teachers will head back into classrooms this fall. Whether school begins in August or after Labor Day, every household faces the same question: how to prepare, how to save, and how to balance budgets while meeting children’s needs. Final Word The 2025 Deloitte survey—now in its 18th year—makes one thing clear: Back-to-school shopping remains a major annual event for American families. While retailers who adapt to current trends stand to gain, parents are also finding new ways to win. Families are stretching budgets more effectively, using technology to uncover deals, and teaching kids how to prioritize needs versus wants. The result is a shopping season that feels more manageable…
Texas House Passes “One Big Beautiful Map” in GOP Victory
The Texas House approved a sweeping new congressional redistricting plan on Wednesday. Republicans call it “One Big Beautiful Map.” In an 88–52 party-line vote, lawmakers passed House Bill 4, a plan designed to strengthen GOP control and deliver up to five additional congressional seats ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Governor Greg Abbott praised the win on X. “Congrats to the Texas House on passing the One Big Beautiful Map. It will make Texas, and Congress, a brighter shade of Red.” House Speaker Dustin Burrows said, “The Texas House today delivered legislation to redistrict certain congressional districts to address concerns raised by the Department of Justice and ensure fairness and accuracy in Texans’ representation in Congress… This work has helped us deliver the legal, remedied maps Texas voters deserve.” Rep. Tony Tinderholt framed the outcome more bluntly: “Democrats broke quorum to try and stop us—but they FAILED. Texas now has a big, beautiful map, legally adding 5 more Republican seats.” Democrats broke quorum to try and stop us—but they FAILED. Texas now has a big, beautiful map, legally adding 5 more Republican seats. A huge win for all Republicans! #txlege pic.twitter.com/RhXvL0L191 — Rep. Tony Tinderholt (@reptinderholt) August 20, 2025 The Map Democrats Couldn’t Stop The new map redraws districts in Dallas, Houston, and other fast-growing areas. Republicans say it ensures fairness, accuracy, and compliance with federal requirements. Democrats tried to delay or derail the measure with a dozen amendments, including one pushing implementation to 2028 and another tying it to an independent redistricting commission. One amendment even attempted to block the map until the federal government released unrelated files about Jeffrey Epstein. All were defeated. (RELATED NEWS: Texas Dems Flee to Stop Redistricting Map) Republicans stayed united, rejecting every amendment and moving HB 4 to a quick vote. Conservatives say the map will “ungerrymander the gerrymandered” and help secure a stronger GOP majority in Washington. The Walkout That Backfired The vote followed the dramatic return of Democratic lawmakers who fled Texas two weeks earlier to block the bill. More than 50 Democrats traveled to Chicago to deny the House a quorum, halting business in Austin. Their absence drew national headlines, but the tactic failed. During the standoff, Speaker Burrows issued arrest warrants for absent members. He warned that Democrats who came back would only be allowed to leave the chamber under strict conditions, including release into the custody of Department of Public Safety officers who would ensure their return. Rep. Nicole Collier refused to sign the required permission slip and camped out in the chamber instead of going home. The walkout also carried financial costs. Democrats faced $500 fines for each missed day and had their pay withheld. By the time they returned, pressure from penalties and threats of arrest forced them back into the chamber, where Republicans swiftly advanced the map. Governor Abbott is now calling for added penalties and punishments for legislators who willfully leave during a session. Will they face prosecution? Attorney General Ken Paxton says, “We made that argument about 13 of the legislators… and we will be in front of the Texas Supreme Court.” WILL TX DEMS WHO FLED THE REDISTRICTING FIGHT FACE PROSECTUION?@KenPaxtonTX: “We made that argument about 13 of the legislators… and we will be in front of the Texas Supreme Court.” pic.twitter.com/Q2ymO9b6tz — The Will Cain Show (@WillCainShow_) August 20, 2025 Democrats Spin, Republicans Deliver Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu tried to cast the quorum break as a success, claiming it “rallied Democrats nationwide” and “reshaped the 2026 landscape.” But Republicans say the numbers tell the real story: Democrats delayed the inevitable and returned to pass the very map they tried to block. Conservatives frame the episode as proof of GOP discipline. Democrats relied on theatrics, while Republicans held the line, complied with legal requirements, and delivered results. What’s Next The bill still needs a vote from the full Texas Senate, but it is expected to pass overwhelmingly. Democrats will undoubtedly challenge the map in court, claiming it discriminates against minority voters. Republicans say HB 4 is constitutional, remedies DOJ concerns, and will stand up to scrutiny. (MORE NEWS: Phone Scrolling: The Top 10 States and Hidden Costs) For conservatives, the fight was about more than lines on a map. It also showed how far Democrats will go to block legislation. In the end, Republicans prevailed. For Republicans, the “One Big Beautiful Map” is a win and a promise of more victories to come. Expose the Spin. Shatter the Narrative. Speak the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t cover politics to play referee — we swing a machete through the spin, the double-speak, and the partisan theater. While the media protects the powerful and buries the backlash, we dig it up and drag it into the light. If you’re tired of rigged narratives, selective outrage, and leaders who serve themselves, not you — then share this. Expose the corruption. Challenge the agenda. Because if we don’t fight for the truth, no one will. And that fight starts with you.
Phone Scrolling: The Top 10 States and Hidden Costs
We scroll. A lot. Researchers at Toll Free Forwarding ran the numbers and found the states racking up the most phone “scrolling mileage. ”Their baseline is stark: “The average American spend[s] 6 hours and 35 minutes a day on screens, adding up to 2,403 hours annually… People check their devices an average of 58 times a day… Half of those checks happen within just three minutes of the last.” That’s not just habit. That’s a loop. How They Calculated “Scrolling Miles” First, they converted average daily screen time into seconds. Then they used a simple model of scrolling behavior. As the report explains, they multiplied seconds by “6.3 (length of an iPhone 16 Pro screen) over 10 (frequency of a scroll, in seconds), resulting in the distance traveled in inches per day.” Next, they converted inches to feet, feet to miles, and multiplied by 365 to find annual mileage. It’s an estimate. But it’s a vivid one. And it helps us picture the invisible distance our thumbs travel. (MORE TECH NEWS: Pregnancy Robots: Miracle or Ethical Nightmare?) The Top 10 Scrolling States Some states scroll far more than others. Here are the leaders: Arizona — 8h 50m daily — 115.37 miles/year Washington — 8h 17m — 108.18 miles/year Kentucky — 8h 3m — 105.18 miles/year Missouri — 7h 49m — 102.17 miles/year New Mexico — 7h 20m — 95.90 miles/year Texas — 7h 19m — 95.77 miles/year Maryland — 7h 14m — 94.59 miles/year Louisiana — 7h 9m — 93.42 miles/year South Carolina — 7h 6m — 92.76 miles/year Georgia — 6h 58m — 91.07 miles/year Those numbers reflect daily habits. They also reflect a decade-long surge. According to HostingAdvice.com, “Mobile media consumption grew 460% from 2011 to 2021.” So the trend isn’t subtle. It’s a tidal shift in how we spend time. The Productivity Price Tag Constant checking has a cost. It fractures attention. It delays deep work. It turns minutes into hours. And it adds up globally. As the analysis notes, “Wasted productivity costs the global economy an estimated $8.8 trillion each year.” That number is staggering. But it matches what many feel at work: more notifications, fewer focused hours. Here’s the kicker. Over half of those device interruptions “happen during work hours.” So the problem doesn’t wait until evening. It steals prime time. Is It Phone Addiction? Key Symptoms to Watch Not all heavy use equals addiction. But patterns matter. If you see several of these, take notice: You reach for your phone constantly. Dangerous situations, such as driving, don’t deter you from checking. Waking up at night to check notifications is commonplace. Anxiety, anger, or sadness take over when you can’t check your phone. Screen time is hurting work, school, or relationships. Any effort to cut back doesn’t last. These behaviors fit a cycle. Check. Reward. Repeat. And that cycle runs on brain chemistry. The Brain Behind the Scroll Dopamine drives motivation. Phones can hijack it. Likes, pings, and fresh content act as micro-rewards. Over time, that can blunt the system. You may feel less pleasure from everyday life. Even loved ones. That’s why heavy scrolling can foster isolation. (MORE NEWS: Catherine Zeta-Jones and the U.S. Homeownership Divide) Mood shifts follow — Anxiety rises, stress lingers, depression can deepen. Meanwhile, late-night use delays melatonin. That pushes sleep later. Then tomorrow’s focus suffers. And the loop strengthens. Why “Short Checks” Aren’t Short We tell ourselves, “Just a second.” But each check has a switch cost. The brain must get back in focus, and that takes time. It drains energy and it breaks momentum. When “half of those checks happen within three minutes of the last,” we don’t return to flow. We never got there. How to Reduce Scrolling Mileage (Without Going Off-Grid) You don’t need to ditch your phone. You need to design for focus. Start small. Then stack wins. Use friction on purpose. Move social apps off your home screen. Turn off non-essential alerts. Set your phone to grayscale to reduce visual appeal Create phone-free zones. No phones at meals. No phones in the bedroom. Buy an alarm clock and charge devices outside the room. Designate specific times for checks. Batch messages and social in two or three short windows. Use timers. Stop at the bell. Protect deep work. Schedule 60–90 minute focus blocks. Activate Do Not Disturb. Tell teammates when you’ll be back online. Rebuild dopamine the healthy way. Move your body daily. Get morning light. Seek real-world wins: a walk, a workout, a completed task. Fix sleep first. Set a screen curfew of 30-60 minutes before bed. Dim lights at night. Keep a consistent bedtime. Each change lowers the urge to scroll. Each win brings clarity back. What This Means for Leaders If you run a team, design environments that respect attention. Shorter meetings. Clear “quiet hours.” Fewer chat pings for non-urgent items. And measure outcomes, not online presence. When you protect focus, you protect profit. The Bottom Line Screens aren’t the enemy. Unchecked habits are. Our “scrolling mileage” shows how far we go without moving an inch. But we can turn that around. Add friction. Guard focus. Prioritize sleep. Then your time—and your attention—start working for you again. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin. Deliver the truth. At The Modern Memo, we’re not here to soften the blow — we’re here to land it. The media plays defense for the powerful. We don’t. If you’re done with censorship, half-truths, and gaslighting headlines, pass this on. Expose the stories they bury. This isn’t just news — it’s a fight for reality. And it doesn’t work without you.
Catherine Zeta-Jones and the U.S. Homeownership Divide
Catherine Zeta-Jones, born in Swansea, Wales, to working-class parents, came from humble beginnings. She told The Sunday Times that she and her husband, Michael Douglas, enjoy a life of homeownership with four properties: one in Canada, one in Spain, and two in New York — a country house and an apartment. She said, “I know it sounds very jet set, and I love to surround myself with beauty but it’s not excessive, it’s very comfortable.” The couple spends much of their time in Spain. Michael, now 80 and retired from acting, says he likes to “watch my wife work.” The lifestyle of celebrities like Catherine Zeta-Jones and Michael Douglas, with multiple properties around the world, stands in sharp contrast to the reality for most people. Their story raises a bigger question: what does homeownership actually look like for ordinary Americans today? (RELATED: Kimmel’s Italian Citizenship: Turning Away From America) How Many Americans Are Homeowners? According to Realtor.com, 65.1% were homeowners in the first quarter of 2025. That figure is down 0.06 percentage points from the last quarter of 2024 and 0.05 from the same time last year. The rate has stayed above 62.9% since 1965, with the peak at 69.2% in 2004. Housegrail.com shows that home ownership varies by region: 62% in northeastern states like Maine and Pennsylvania 67% in the southeast and south-central U.S., from Virginia to Texas 71% in north-central states like North Dakota and Minnesota 60% in the west, from Washington to New Mexico Mortgages and Second Homes In 2023, only 39.8% of homes were mortgage-free. Mississippi and West Virginia had the highest share of mortgaged homes. California, Washington, Utah, Colorado, Virginia, and Massachusetts had the lowest. Housegrail states, “approximately 2.7% of the 78.7 million occupied homes are second homes — about 1.5 million properties. Vacant homes make up 11% of the national total.” While many Americans struggle to pay off a single mortgage, a growing number of wealthy buyers are looking beyond U.S. borders and investing in property overseas. Americans Buying Property Abroad A 2022 Coldwell Banker survey found that 67% of affluent Americans already owned investment property abroad. The largest share was held by those 55 and older. Overseas properties owned by U.S. citizens: 47,000 homes in 2019 29,800 homes in 2020 53,500 homes in 2021 61,000 homes in 2022 Top destinations to buy a home: Central America – 23% (Belize 16.2%, Costa Rica 15.2%, Honduras 15.2%, Panama 14.3%, El Salvador 13.7%, Guatemala 13.2%, Nicaragua 12.2%) North America (Canada & Mexico) – 20.5% Asia – 20.4% South America – 18.1% Europe – 14.1% Australia & New Zealand – 10.8% Caribbean – 9.4% Main reasons for buying a home abroad: rising cost of living (26.5%), surging home prices (26.5%), political climate (25.6%), and strong dollar (20.8%). While affluent buyers like Catherine Zeta-Jones and others expand their portfolios abroad, younger generations in the U.S. are finding it harder than ever to afford even a first home. The Homeownership Reality for Young Americans Younger generations are far less likely to own homes than their parents at the same age, according to Motley Fool Money: Millennials (age 27–42 in 2024): 51.5% own homes, much lower than Gen X and Boomers at the same age. Baby Boomers: At age 30, around 60% owned homes. By their early 40s, about 70%. Gen Z (under 27 years old): Only a small share own homes, in the single digits to low teens. These numbers show a sharp generational divide, but they also beg the question: why are young Americans falling so far behind? Why Young People Struggle Housing Costs: Home prices have outpaced wages. Student Debt: Younger buyers carry more education debt. Delayed Milestones: Many aren’t getting married or having kids. If they do, it’s delayed. Mortgage Barriers: High interest rates from 2022–2024 worsened affordability in recent years. Young Americans face steep barriers, making homeownership — once a standard milestone — harder to reach than ever. (RELATED: Post-COVID Homeowners Are In Dire Financial Situation And No One Is Talking About It) The Future of the American Dream From celebrities like Catherine Zeta-Jones with homes around the world to young Americans struggling to buy their first home, housing in 2025 shows a sharp divide. For many, homeownership is still the dream. But for younger generations, it feels further away than ever. For homeownership to become more attainable, interest rates must come down. Higher borrowing costs have crushed affordability and reduced purchasing power. Lower rates would ease monthly payments, open the market to first-time buyers, and make homeownership a reality for those just starting out. Without real relief, the next generation risks becoming a generation of renters, locked out of ownership and the wealth-building it brings. With the right economic conditions, however, young Americans could finally begin to turn the tide. Forget the Headlines. Challenge the Script. Deliver the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe through talking points — we swing a machete through the media’s favorite lies. They protect power. We confront it. If you’re sick of censorship, narrative control, and being told what to think — stand with us. Share the story. Wake the people. Because truth dies in silence — and you weren’t made to stay quiet.
Trump and His ‘Art of the Deal’ for Ukraine Peace
President Trump met with Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday to see if a deal could be reached to end the war in Ukraine. After the meeting, Trump told European allies that Putin proposed Russia take full control of the Donbas region. This move, Putin argued, would stop the fighting and bring peace. A European diplomat told Fox News that “President Trump supports the terms of this proposal.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio, however, pushed back on that claim on “Sunday Morning Futures,” saying, “The president has said that, in terms of territories, these are things that Zelenskyy is going to have to decide on. These are things that the Ukrainian side is going to have to agree to.” Another masterclass from Secretary Marco Rubio. A must watch! pic.twitter.com/7NY6EHZHyh — Brigitte Gabriel (@ACTBrigitte) August 17, 2025 Donbas at the Heart of the Deal The Donbas region, home to 6.5 million people, includes Luhansk and Donetsk, according to the Ukrainian Research Institute of Harvard University. Ukraine still holds about 30% of Donetsk. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has vowed not to surrender that land. He insists giving up Donbas would be unconstitutional and warns it could enable future Russian offensives. NOW – Zelensky says Ukraine’s constitution makes giving up land “impossible,” and should only be discussed at a trilateral meeting; if Russia “refuses,” more sanctions “must” be imposed. pic.twitter.com/7wicKa5erW — Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) August 17, 2025 Despite this, Trump urged Zelenskyy to accept Putin’s offer. Zelenskyy will meet Trump at the White House on Monday to discuss the peace proposal. Trump Shifts Toward Peace Agreement Trump initially supported a ceasefire. But after his talks with Putin, he shifted toward a full peace deal. Russia, Trump said, wants a long-term settlement, not just a temporary fix. On Truth Social, Trump said on Saturday: “It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.” On Sunday, he said, “BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA. STAY TUNED! President DJT.” Mixed Reaction From Europe European leaders reacted cautiously. While they did not endorse Putin’s plan, they praised Trump’s leadership in seeking peace. (RELATED : The Trade Deal That Changed Everything: U.S.–EU Breakthrough) German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told ZDF television, “And the good news is that America is ready to participate in such security guarantees and is not leaving it to the Europeans alone.” About the possibility of a peace agreement, he said, “If that works out, it’s worth more than a ceasefire.” The European Commission issued a statement on Trump’s efforts, saying they: “welcomed President Trump’s efforts to stop the killing in Ukraine, end Russia’s war of aggression, and achieve just and lasting peace.” But skepticism remained. Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavský posted: “From Putin, we heard the same propagandistic nonsense about the ‘roots of the conflict’ that his state television promotes. The problem is Russian imperialism, not Ukraine’s desire to live freely.” (RELATED: Alaska Hosts Historic Summit Between Trump and Putin) EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas posted on X: “President Trump’s resolve to get a peace deal is vital. The EU and our European partners worked to coordinate with President Trump ahead of Alaska meeting. But the harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war anytime soon.” Hungarian Prime Minister and friend of Trump, Viktor Orban expressed optimism, writing: “For years we have watched the two biggest nuclear powers dismantle the framework of their cooperation and shoot unfriendly messages back and forth. That has now come to an end. Today the world is a safer place than it was yesterday. May every weekend be at least this good!” Putin and Zelenskyy Respond Putin said his talk with Trump was “very frank.” He added: “We, of course, respect the position of the American administration, which sees the need for a speedy end to military actions. We would like to move to resolving all issues by peaceful means.” Several European leaders will join Zelenskyy in Washington by invitation of President Trump to continue negotiations for a peace deal and to keep them part of the process, as they are close to the region. On Sunday, Zelenskyy met in Brussels with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who will travel with him. Zelenskyy posted on X: “We agreed on the necessity of a ceasefire for subsequent diplomatic steps, effective security guarantees for Ukraine, and continued sanctions pressure on Russia.” I had an important meeting with President of the European Commission @vonderleyen in Brussels. Significant support for Ukraine in the context of the upcoming meeting with President Trump. Today, together and in several formats, we are determining what we will discuss in… pic.twitter.com/I8doSrACqR — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 17, 2025 Tomorrow will be the day to watch. Will Trump be able to make progress with Zelenskyy? Up to this point, he has been unwilling to make concessions. It remains to be seen if both sides can agree on a lasting deal. If anyone can make it happen, it is the Dealmaker-in-Chief. For him, negotiation is an art form he has long mastered. Forget the Headlines. Challenge the Script. Deliver the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe through talking points — we swing a machete through the media’s favorite lies. They protect power. We confront it. If you’re sick of censorship, narrative control, and being told what to think — stand with us. Share the story. Wake the people. Because truth dies in silence — and you weren’t made to stay quiet.
Hunter Biden Mocks Melania Trump’s $1B Defamation Lawsuit
Biden Responds to Defamation Threat Hunter Biden isn’t backing down. On Thursday, the former first son responded to Melania Trump’s threat of a $1 billion defamation lawsuit. The claim stems from his statement that Jeffrey Epstein introduced her to Donald Trump. His answer was blunt: “F— that. That’s not going to happen,” he told Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan on YouTube. First Lady Melania Trump has threatened to sue Hunter Biden for $1B unless he retracts his false Epstein claims. “F**k that, that’s not going to happen.” – Hunter Biden Hunter is a low-life loser who belongs in a prison cell. Sue him into oblivion, Melania! pic.twitter.com/cTPE3aXnea — Christian Collins (@CollinsforTX) August 14, 2025 Public Challenge and Refusal to Retract “I also think they’re bullies, and they think that a billion dollars is going to scare me,” he said. “If they want to sit down for a deposition and clarify the nature of the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein — if the president, the first lady want to do that, and all of the known associates around them at the time of whatever time that they met, I’m more than happy to provide them the platform to be able to do it.” (MORE NEWS: Kimmel’s Italian Citizenship: Turning Away From America) Biden made it clear he wouldn’t retract his comments. He brushed off Melania Trump’s warning and doubled down during the interview. He framed the lawsuit threat as intimidation and showed no signs of backing down. Legal Demands and Early Retractions Melania Trump’s legal team sent Biden a formal notice the day before the interview. The letter stated that he could be sued for defamation if he didn’t withdraw the comments. Two others also received similar warnings: James Carville and The Daily Beast. Both complied quickly. Carville deleted an episode of his podcast and issued an apology after speculating about a possible Epstein connection. The Daily Beast removed its article. Unlike Biden, they backed down immediately. Details of the Demand Letter Fox News obtained details of the August 6 demand letter written by Melania Trump’s attorney, Alejandro Brito. In the letter, Brito wrote: “Failure to comply will leave Mrs. Trump with no choice but to pursue any and all legal rights and remedies available to her to recover the overwhelming financial and reputational harm that you have caused her to suffer.” Brito gave Biden a deadline of August 7, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. to issue a full retraction and apology. The letter also accused Biden of trying to profit off Melania’s name and reputation. “Given your vast history of trading on the names of others – including your surname – for your personal benefit, it is obvious that you published these false and defamatory statements about Mrs. Trump to draw attention to yourself,” Brito wrote. Source Material and Public Record Biden defended his comments by citing several sources. (More News: EPA Pushes Green New Deal Into Political Obscurity) “What I said was what I have heard and seen, reported and written, primarily from Michael Wolff, but also dating back all the way to 2019 when the New York Times, I think … reported that sources said that Jeffrey Epstein claimed to be the person to introduce Donald Trump to Melania at that time,” he said in the interview that dropped Thursday. Michael Wolff is known for making controversial and unverified claims about Donald Trump. The 2019 New York Times reference added more fuel to a rumor that’s long been denied by the Trumps. Competing Accounts and Escalating Stakes Both Donald and Melania Trump have firmly denied the Epstein rumor. They maintain that they met in 1998 during New York Fashion Week at a party hosted by Paolo Zampolli at the Kit Kat Club. In her memoir, Melania Trump described their first meeting. She said Trump sat down next to her and started a conversation. “I found myself drawn to his magnetic energy,” she wrote. The couple married in 2005. Despite that timeline, Biden’s remarks have put the former first lady in a defensive position. And now that the deadline has passed with no apology or retraction, it’s unclear whether her legal team will file suit. President Trump’s Reaction President Trump confirmed his support for Melania’s lawsuit on Thursday, saying her told her to “go forward.” “I said, go forward. You know, I’ve done pretty well on these lawsuits lately. Jeffrey Epstein has nothing to do with Melania and I introducing. But they do that. They make up stories,” he told Brian Kilmeade on Fox News radio. Legal Exposure and Political Implications Biden’s refusal to retract has now moved from warning to reality. He continues to dismiss the legal threat and to stand by his statements. That could bring serious legal consequences. If Melania sues and proves her case, the damages could be massive. Biden is no stranger to legal battles. In January, hs father, former President Joe Biden pardoned him before two federal judges in California and Delaware were scheduled to sentence him on separate convictions. Without the pardon, he faced significant prison time. Hunter also sued multiple people for defamation. His targets included Garrett Ziegler, founder of Marco Polo, and Patrick Byrne, former owner of Overstock.com, over the salacious content of a laptop he left with a repairman in Delaware. He allegedly dropped the lawsuits because he ran out of money to pay his attorneys. With the deadline gone and no retraction, the fight could land in court. Legal experts note that public figures like Melania must prove “actual malice” in defamation cases — meaning the defendant knowingly lied or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. That’s a high bar, but not impossible. For now, Biden shows no sign of backing down. Melania’s team is equally firm. Whether the dispute ends with a retraction or a courtroom showdown, the feud between the former first son and the former first lady is set to keep making headlines. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin. Deliver the truth. At…
Kimmel’s Italian Citizenship: Turning Away From America
Jimmy Kimmel Chooses Italian Citizenship Jimmy Kimmel, the well-known late-night host, recently revealed that he has obtained Italian citizenship. At 57, Kimmel took this step through his grandmother, who was originally from Italy. Why? He says it’s because of President Trump and policies he strongly disagrees with. On Sarah Silverman’s podcast—Silverman is a longtime friend and former girlfriend—Kimmel shared his thoughts about the current state of America. He said things are much worse than he expected. “A lot of people I know are thinking about where are they going to get citizenship?” Silverman said. (RELATED: Trump: New Census Will Omit Illegal Immigrants) “I did get Italian citizenship,” Kimmel replied. He added, “As bad as you thought it was going to be — it’s so much worse. It’s just unbelievable. I feel like it’s even worse than he would like it to be.” See Ya! Late night host Jimmy Kimmel announces he has secured Italian citizenship – declares Donald Trump’s presidency is “so much worse” than he ever imagined. Can we hope he will ACTUALLY leave the country? pic.twitter.com/Q1cPTRlcg1 — Conservative Brief (@ConservBrief) August 9, 2025 Choosing Another Country Over Your Own Kimmel’s choice raises a serious question: why would a U.S. citizen, with every right and opportunity here, seek citizenship elsewhere? He does not have work overseas. He is a public figure who is choosing a second country because of political policies he disagrees with. This is part of a “fashionable” trend. Celebrities like Rosie O’Donnell and Ellen DeGeneres have also pursued citizenship in other countries. The message is clear: America is easy for some to give up if policies are inconvenient or uncomfortable. Instead of staying and fighting for their beliefs, they choose to leave. Dual Citizenship and Loyalty Dual citizenship has long allowed people to live, work, and vote in two countries—depending on the laws and residency requirements of the other country. But this can create a conflict of interest. If two countries have opposing policies, where does your loyalty lie? Full allegiance should always remain with the United States. Kimmel’s decision highlights this debate. When public figures turn their back on their home country, it sends a message that America is not worth defending or supporting. (MORE NEWS: SNAP Soda Ban: Ending Taxpayer Junk Food Subsidies) Immigration Rules Abroad Kimmel’s decision also underscores a reality many ignore: other countries do not welcome immigrants as freely as some assume. Many have strict guidelines for immigration—including secure borders. Many European countries actively deport illegal immigrants. Italy deports asylum seekers to Albania and strictly controls immigration. Ireland also has strict immigration laws and has deported Nigerian nationals and others. Most countries protect their borders and citizens, and some that face immigration challenges are actively working to correct them. Americans considering foreign citizenship often overlook these restrictions. Kimmel’s move benefits from his heritage and elite celebrity status. The average U.S. citizen would not find the same opportunities. Kimmel Keeping an Open Mind on Former Trump Supporters Despite his harsh views of President Trump, Kimmel defended the right to reconsider one’s stance. “Now you see these clips of Joe Rogan saying, ‘Why is he doing this? Why are you deporting people?’ And people go, ‘…you supported him.’ I don’t buy into that,” Kimmel said. “The door has to stay open. If you want to change your mind, that’s so hard to do. If you want to admit you were wrong, that is so hard and so rare to do. You are welcome.” Contrary to what this statement implies, Rogan questioning Trump’s deportation efforts doesn’t mean he is no longer a Trump supporter. People can disagree with specific policies or actions while still supporting the administration overall. The Real Cost of Convenience Policies may change, leaders may come and go, but walking away from the United States out of protest—or as a virtue signal—is not the solution. Americans enjoy freedoms and opportunities that no other country provides. Choosing another country reflects disloyalty to the very nation that gave them the platform they are now using to criticize it. Kimmel’s story is not just about one celebrity. It illustrates a larger discussion about loyalty, dual citizenship, and the responsibilities Americans have to their own country. Leaving the U.S. demonstrates that, in difficult times, some Americans prioritize personal comfort over national pride. Should dual citizenship be allowed? Some say no. And if it is allowed, should those individuals retain the right to vote in U.S. elections? If their total allegiance is not to the United States, probably not. The fact remains that only the elite can afford to pack up and move to a different country when they dislike how things are going. It’s not a realistic option for most people, and that further exemplifies the divide between Hollywood and real life. And let’s be honest—someone should probably tell him who the current Prime Minister of Italy is. Unmask the Narrative. Rip Through the Lies. Spread the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t polish propaganda — we tear it to shreds. The corporate press censors, spins, and sugarcoats. We don’t. If you’re tired of being misled, silenced, and spoon-fed fiction, help us expose what they try to hide. Truth matters — but only if it’s heard. So share this. Shake the silence. And remind the powerful they don’t own the story.
SNAP Soda Ban: Ending Taxpayer Junk Food Subsidies
The push to Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) has made significant strides with the signing of waivers by U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins. These waivers allow 12 states to ban the purchase of sugary drinks, candy, and desserts using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) vouchers, which are intended to help low-income families access nutritious food. This move marks a pivotal step in ending taxpayer subsidies for junk food. Six new states are joining the MAHA movement! Yesterday at the Great American Farmers Market, @secrollins and @seckennedy signed food choice state waivers for West Virginia , Florida, Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas to remove unhealthy foods from SNAP.… pic.twitter.com/Q8sAqaDBQP — Dept. of Agriculture (@USDA) August 5, 2025 A Bold Step in SNAP Reform These states have approval and are now set to remove high-calorie, nutrient-poor foods from SNAP: Florida, West Virginia, Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, Iowa, Nebraska, Arkansas, Indiana, and Idaho. This reform comes amid President Trump’s broader initiative to tackle the nation’s rising health crisis and prioritize food quality. “The number one purchase by SNAP recipients is sugary drinks,” said Secretary Rollins. “SNAP is a supplemental NUTRITION program, meant to provide health food benefits to low-income families to supplement their grocery budget, so they can afford the nutritious food essential to health and well-being.” .@SecRollins announces the signing of waivers removing unhealthy foods from SNAP in six more states: “SNAP is a supplemental NUTRITION program meant to provide health food benefits to low income families… the law states it and @POTUS‘ @USDA plans to deliver on it.” pic.twitter.com/Mby4uoQIdu — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) August 4, 2025 Despite the progress, implementing this policy at the federal level remains a challenge. Many lobbyists are fiercely advocating for the continuation of junk food eligibility, making it an uphill battle. Yet, the states are leading the charge, and 12 have now taken action, with 38 more to go. (RELATED: Tracy Beanz Reveals MAHA’s Mission & What Comes Next In Fascinating Interview) A Nationwide Call to Action Each state follows its own process to determine which foods are unhealthy and should be excluded. After this, they submit a formal request for approval from the USDA. The new food bans will take effect in 2026. The Trump administration is actively encouraging more states to apply for waivers, with each state playing a key role in shaping the future of SNAP. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary joined Rollins in announcing these waivers. Their support underscores the significance of this initiative in tackling the nation’s growing obesity and diabetes crisis. Ending the Sugar Subsidy Dr. Makary emphasized the importance of focusing on healthier alternatives to junk food, stating, “This begins the end of the government subsidization of our obesity, diabetes, insulin resistance epidemic.” He urged a national focus on the nutritional quality of food, rather than relying on medications to address the health crisis. “Forty percent of our nation’s kids now have a diagnosed chronic disease,” Dr. Makary added. “Thirty-one percent have diabetes, pre-diabetes, or insulin resistance. We have to talk about nutrients and fiber, not just Ozempic and other medications to medicate our nation.” Support for States and Local Leaders SNAP reform is a direct result of proactive state leadership. Governors from West Virginia, Florida, and other states have stepped up, requesting waivers and setting an example for the rest of the nation. Dr. Makary also praised the initiative, stating, “I hope to see all 50 states join this bold commonsense approach. For too long, the root causes of our chronic disease epidemic has been addressed with lip service only. It’s time for powerful changes to our nation’s SNAP program.” (MORE NEWS: Sweeney ‘Good Jeans’ Outrage Explained) What’s Next for MAHA? As the USDA and the Trump administration push forward with their efforts to reform SNAP, the question remains: Will other states follow suit? The battle is far from over. With 38 states still to act, the momentum needs to continue. But the steps taken up to this point have proven that meaningful change is possible. “It’s time for a change,” said RFK Jr. “And we’re seeing that change happen, state by state. We’re putting real food back at the center of SNAP, empowering states to lead the way in protecting public health.” Changing the Status Quo The fight to Make America Healthy Again is a real, tangible effort to reshape the way we view food, health, and public policy. With the signing of these waivers, we are witnessing the first steps toward a future where healthier food choices are accessible and where taxpayer dollars are spent wisely. As more states join this movement, the impact on public health could be profound. This is not just about banning soda and candy—it’s about changing the narrative around nutrition and ensuring that the poorest Americans are no longer subsidizing the very foods that contribute to chronic disease. The journey has just begun, but with the leadership of Secretary Rollins, Dr. Makary, and Secretary Kennedy, America is taking significant strides toward a healthier future. Forget the Headlines. Challenge the Script. Deliver the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe through talking points — we swing a machete through the media’s favorite lies. They protect power. We confront it. If you’re sick of censorship, narrative control, and being told what to think — stand with us. Share the story. Wake the people. Because truth dies in silence — and you weren’t made to stay quiet.
BREAKING ALERT: Crime in D.C.: Trump’s Historic Action to Restore Order
President Donald Trump made bold moves to address the escalating crime in Washington, D.C. His recent actions come in response to the rising violence, car thefts, and carjackings plaguing the city. Trump signed an Executive Order and outlined a comprehensive plan to restore law and order, signaling a new era of federal intervention in local crime control. (RELATED: Trump Takes On Crime in D.C.) The D.C. Crime Crisis The crime rate in Washington, D.C., has reached alarming levels. Trump pointed out that “The murder rate in Washington today is higher than that of Bogota, Columbia, Mexico City…” He continued, “The number of car thefts has doubled over the past five years, and the number of carjackings has more than tripled.” These shocking statistics underscore the urgent need for action. FACT: D.C. Crime Is Out of Control. ⬇️ Our nation’s capital should be a symbol of patriotism for the American people—NOT a city of lawlessness. It ends today. pic.twitter.com/TdLERGXVVP — The White House (@WhiteHouse) August 11, 2025 The situation became even more dire last week. Edward “Big Balls” Coristine, a former DOGE staffer, was injured while defending a woman from a carjacking. A group of about a dozen young men attacked the woman. Coristine intervened, resulting in a concussion. Police arrested two 15-year-olds involved in the attack, but others remain at large. This event and others prompted President Trump to take immediate action. Federalizing D.C. Law Enforcement In a historic move, President Trump invoked Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act. This action places the D.C. Metropolitan Police under direct federal control. It gives the federal government the authority to oversee local law enforcement and take strong action to combat crime. Trump announced, “I am announcing a historic action to rescue our nation’s capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam, squalor, and worse. This is Liberation Day in D.C. and we’re going to take our capital back.” His declaration marked the start of a major federal effort to restore safety in the city. It’s “Liberation Day” in Washington, D.C. “Today, President Donald J. Trump took bold executive action to liberate Washington, D.C., from the cesspool of crime and homelessness that it has become after decades of unilateral Democrat leadership.”https://t.co/mL6oRxBW4Y — Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) August 11, 2025 National Guard Deployed to D.C. Trump also ordered the deployment of the National Guard. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed, “This morning, we have mobilized the D.C. National Guard… You will see them flowing through the streets of D.C.” A total of 1,000 National Guard troops have been sent to assist in law enforcement efforts. The deployment also leaves open the possibility of deploying active-duty military personnel if necessary. . @SecDef “Mr. President, it is an honor to be here and at your direction, this morning we’ve mobilized the D.C. National Guard… They will be STRONG and TOUGH, and they will STAND with their law enforcement partners.” pic.twitter.com/L6Bk5spgY2 — DOD Rapid Response (@DODResponse) August 11, 2025 Attorney General Pam Bondi, now in charge of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, was clear: “Crime in D.C. is ending and ending today. We are going to use every power we have to fight criminals here.” Immediate Law Enforcement Operations Trump’s plan includes aggressive law enforcement operations. These operations will target gangs, drug dealers, and criminal networks in D.C. U.S. Attorney for D.C. Jeanine Pirro emphasized, “We need to recognize that the people who matter are the law-abiding citizens! President Trump is going to make sure these emboldened criminals understand: We see you, we’re watching you, and we’re going to change the law to catch you!” FBI Director Kash Patel echoed this sentiment, pointing to a similar operation in Northern Virginia. “We stood up a task force in Northern Virginia, [and] we said ‘Let’s let good cops be cops.’ In one month, we arrested 545 violent felons,” Patel said. “That simplicity in law enforcement is what’s coming to Washington, D.C.” Addressing Homelessness and Public Safety Trump’s plan goes beyond crime. He is also addressing the issue of homelessness in the city. “We are going to be removing homeless encampments from all over our parks… We’re getting rid of the people from underpasses and public spaces,” Trump said. The president emphasized that while law enforcement will be the priority, helping the homeless will still be part of the solution. “We’ll help them as much as you can help,” he added. A Nationwide Push Against Cashless Bail In addition to federalizing D.C. law enforcement, Trump is targeting the issue of cashless bail. He has called on Republicans in Congress to outlaw cashless bail systems nationwide. “That is what started the problem,” Trump said, blaming the practice for the rise in crime. He pointed to the Democratic Party’s weak stance on crime, accusing them of enabling criminals to avoid consequences. Trump’s legislative push would ensure that violent offenders are held accountable before they are allowed to return to the streets. (RELATED: Newsome Attacks Republicans On Violent Crime — Data Tell Different Story) Expanding Federal Control to Other Cities While Trump’s immediate focus is on D.C., he hinted at expanding this strategy to other cities facing similar crime issues. Trump mentioned that after federalizing D.C., he is considering the same approach for New York City and Chicago. Both cities have also seen rising crime rates, and Trump’s federalization strategy could be a model for other urban centers. The Path Forward: A Vision for Safer Cities Trump’s actions represent a significant shift in how the federal government deals with crime in American cities. By federalizing D.C. law enforcement, deploying the National Guard, and focusing on aggressive law enforcement tactics, Trump is taking unprecedented steps to restore order in Washington. His push to outlaw cashless bail and sanctuary cities, and his plans for further federal involvement in other cities, show his commitment to cracking down on crime nationwide. As the operation in Washington unfolds, Trump’s efforts may serve as a blueprint for other cities struggling with rising crime. His federal approach to crime…