Crime
John Bolton Pleads Not Guilty to Classified Documents Charges
A federal grand jury has indicted former National Security Advisor John Bolton on 18 counts tied to improper handling of classified materials, per the U.S. Department of Justice. The charges include eight counts of transmitting national defense information and 10 counts of retaining national defense information. From about April 2018 through August 2025, the indictment claims Bolton shared more than a thousand pages of classified documents—some marked TOP SECRET/SCI—with two unauthorized individuals. In addition, the papers were allegedly stored in his Maryland home in violation of federal law. FBI Director Kash Patel said, “The FBI’s investigation revealed that John Bolton allegedly transmitted top secret information using personal online accounts and retained said documents in his house in direct violation of federal law. The case was based on meticulous work from dedicated career professionals at the FBI who followed the facts without fear or favor. Weaponization of justice will not be tolerated, and this FBI will stop at nothing to bring to justice anyone who threatens our national security.” (MORE NEWS: China’s Rare Earth Clampdown Threatens U.S. Tech, Defense) He turned himself in to federal authorities today and pleaded not guilty after being indicted in the classified information probe. Alleged Mishandling: Transmission and Retention According to the Department of Justice: “Bolton illegally transmitted NDI by using personal email and messaging application accounts to send sensitive documents classified as high as Top Secret. These documents revealed intelligence about future attacks, foreign adversaries, and foreign-policy relations. “ Beyond the transmissions, the indictment charges Bolton with retaining classified documents. The DOJ Press Release reads: “Bolton illegally retained NDI documents within his home. These documents included intelligence on an adversary’s leaders as well as information revealing sources and collections used to obtain statements on a foreign adversary.” FBI Raid and Seizures In August 2025, FBI agents raided John Bolton’s home under a search warrant tied to a long-running investigation into classified document handling. Items Seized The FBI removed multiple devices and materials, including: Two iPhones (one red, one black) Three computers (a Dell XPS laptop, a Dell Precision Tower, another Dell model) One Seagate hard drive Two SanDisk 64 GB USB drives A white binder labeled “Statements and Reflections to Allied Strikes…” Four boxes of printed daily activities Typed folders labeled Trump I-IV These items are central to the government’s case that Bolton stored and processed classified data improperly. Legal Context Judge’s Warning in the 2020 Memoir Case The 2025 indictment revives concerns from his 2020 legal battle over Bolton’s “tell-all” book, The Room Where It Happened, about his service in the first Trump administration. In United States v. Bolton (Case No. 1:20-cv-1580-RCL), the government alleged he violated book prepublication review protocols by publishing without security clearance, risking classified information exposure. Seeking to block further distribution, including the audiobook, the government requested an injunction. U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth denied this, citing the digital age’s irreversible information spread. He stated: “If nothing else, the government argues, an injunction today would at least prevent any further spread of the book… In the Internet age, even a handful of copies in circulation could irrevocably destroy confidentiality… The damage is done. There is no restoring the status quo.” Lamberth warned: “Defendant Bolton has gambled with the national security of the United States. He has exposed his country to harm and himself to civil (and potentially criminal) liability.” Although no injunction was issued, Bolton’s royalties were placed in a constructive trust. 2021 Biden DOJ Probe Dropped In 2021, a Biden-era DOJ probe into Bolton’s retention of classified documents was dropped for political reasons, and prosecutors concluded the memoir contained no classified information. 2025 Indictment and Trump DOJ Response The 2025 charges, alleging Bolton shared over a thousand pages of TOP SECRET/SCI documents and improperly stored them at his Maryland home, echo these earlier concerns. Attorney General Pamela Bondi emphasized, “There is one tier of justice for all Americans. Anyone who abuses a position of power and jeopardizes our national security will be held accountable. No one is above the law.” Why This Case Matters This indictment raises important issues about how top officials should treat classified information—and whose oversight they face. It also ties into broader debates over document handling policies, accountability for former officials, and national security. In particular: The case tests whether a former high-ranking official can be held criminally liable for retaining or disseminating classified intelligence after leaving government. It underscores tensions between public commentary, such as memoirs and speeches, and legal boundaries around classified materials. It spotlights the challenge of safeguarding intelligence while preserving certain free speech rights for former officials. Moreover, the case could influence future decisions about how strictly courts and prosecutors enforce laws on classified materials—especially for people who once held government security clearances. (MORE NEWS: Shock at the Vatican: Muslim Prayer Room Approved Inside Historic Library) The Takeaway The indictment of John Bolton marks one of the most consequential national security cases in recent history. Federal prosecutors allege that a former top U.S. official—trusted with the nation’s most sensitive intelligence—knowingly shared and stored highly classified information outside secure channels. The charges and FBI’s detailed findings suggest an extensive pattern of misconduct that could carry serious legal consequences if proven. This case also serves as a reminder that no individual, regardless of past position or political influence, is immune from accountability. As Bolton faces the legal process, the broader question remains: how should America safeguard its secrets while balancing transparency, free speech, and justice? The outcome of this case will likely shape how future administrations handle classified information and the standards to which their senior officials are held. Expose the Spin. Shatter the Narrative. Speak the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t cover politics to play referee — we swing a machete through the spin, the double-speak, and the partisan theater. While the media protects the powerful and buries the backlash, we dig it up and drag it into the light. If you’re tired of rigged narratives, selective outrage,…
Des Moines Superintendent Arrested by ICE: Fake Degrees, Crimes
A major scandal has erupted in Iowa. Authorities arrested Ian Andre Roberts, then–superintendent of Des Moines Public Schools, raising fresh questions about his past. Investigators say his history includes drug convictions, weapons charges, fraudulent credentials, and immigration violations. As the full account unfolds, officials and the public alike are demanding answers. Background: From Education Leader to Arrested Suspect Roberts began working as superintendent in Des Moines in 2023. At first, there were few signs that serious legal trouble loomed. However, when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents moved in on September 26, Roberts attempted to flee. They pursued his vehicle, found him hiding in nearby brush, and ultimately took him into custody. His ICE arrest triggered a bombshell disclosure by the Department of Homeland Security. In a public statement, DHS asserted Roberts had a long record of criminal conduct and maintained he should never have been serving in a role overseeing children. Shortly after, Roberts resigned his position. (MORE NEWS: Apple Pulls ICE-Tracking Apps from App Store) Criminal Allegations: Drugs, Guns, and Fraud The roster of charges against Roberts is extensive and severe. Investigators allege that a search of his home revealed multiple firearms: a loaded 9 mm pistol tucked under a couch cushion, a rifle in the master bedroom closet, and a shotgun behind a headboard. Moreover, one handgun was found in a vehicle he used while fleeing ICE. 🚨Holy crap. DHS just released more info on the Iowa school superintendent and illegal alien Ian Andre Roberts. He has a very long, violent criminal record, combined with immigration fraud. He also voted in elections. pic.twitter.com/lZDeRJKmnw — Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) October 3, 2025 But weapons are not the only concern. The DHS and FBI allege Roberts has a decades-long history of drug crimes. In New York, his record reportedly includes criminal possession of narcotics with intent to sell, forgery, and related offenses dating back to the mid-1990s. In Pennsylvania, the accusation includes unlawful possession of a loaded firearm in 2022. On top of that, Maryland records allegedly show reckless driving, unsafe operation, and speeding convictions from 2012. Compounding these allegations are claims that Roberts also held fake or unverified academic credentials. He listed Morgan State University as his alma mater and claimed to be an incoming MBA candidate at MIT’s Sloan School of Management. But Morgan State confirmed to the Des Moines Register that he attended without earning a degree. MIT’s registrar also told the Register that no record exists of him ever being enrolled in that program. Immigration Violations and Status Issues Beyond criminal allegations, Roberts faces severe immigration-related accusations. DHS says he entered the U.S. multiple times under different visas—first as a visitor, then on a student visa in 1999. An immigration judge in Dallas ordered his removal in absentia in May 2024. Nevertheless, Roberts filed applications for work authorization in 2000, 2018, and 2019—each granted for just one year. Those ultimately expired. (MORE NEWS: Cartel “La Diabla” Busted for Baby, Organ Ring in Mexico) DHS also claims Roberts was illegally registered to vote as a Democrat in Maryland, raising serious concerns about voter registration controls. While some aspects remain under investigation, the combined allegations portray a complex web of alleged misconduct. Impact on Public Education and Trust The arrest has rattled the Des Moines Public Schools system. The school board initially placed Roberts on paid leave, then switched to unpaid leave, and finally accepted his resignation. Many parents, teachers, and stakeholders feel blindsided. How did someone with such a background secure a leadership role in a major school district? Furthermore, the scandal calls into question hiring and vetting practices in public education. If school systems failed to detect fictitious degrees or an extensive criminal history, then oversight mechanisms may be deeply flawed. Beyond internal processes, the case risks damaging public confidence. Schools play a central role in community trust. When a leader falls under suspicion for crimes and deceit, that trust erodes quickly. Des Moines Public School Board is now suing JG Consulting: 🚨 BREAKING: The Des Moines Public School Board is now deflecting all responsibility for hiring former Superintendent Ian Roberts by taking legal action against the search firm that assisted in the hiring, JG Consulting. Roberts passed background checks conducted by both JG… pic.twitter.com/RPdqgRFPp0 — Dustin Grage (@GrageDustin) October 3, 2025 Voices from DHS and Reactions In response, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin stated: “Ian Andre Roberts, a criminal illegal alien with multiple weapons charges and a drug trafficking charge, should have never been able to work around children. When ICE officers arrested this Superintendent, he was in possession of an illegal handgun, a hunting knife, and nearly $3,000 in cash. This criminal illegal alien is now in U.S. Marshals custody and facing charges for being an illegal alien in possession of a firearms. Under Secretary Noem, ICE will continue to arrest the worst of the worst and put the safety of America’s children FIRST.” Meanwhile, local and state-level officials have faced pressure to explain how Roberts gained access to influential education roles. As more revelations emerge, the scrutiny has intensified. Conclusion: A Scandal That Demands Clarity The arrest of Ian Andre Roberts marks a serious and complicated turning point in public education oversight. The charges span drugs, weapons, fraud, and immigration violations. His alleged falsification of academic credentials only deepens the concerns. In the wake of the revelations, Des Moines Public Schools faces not only legal fallout but a crisis of credibility. As authorities move forward, stakeholders and the public alike deserve transparency and reform. Through this case, we are reminded that leadership roles—especially those entrusted with children’s lives and future—demand rigorous scrutiny. Public systems must apply higher standards, not lower them. If that standard is not met, the consequences affect more than one man—they affect the integrity of public education itself. Forget the narrative. Reject the script. Share what matters. At The Modern Memo, we call it like it is — no filter, no apology, no corporate leash. If you’re tired of being lied to,…
James Comey Indicted for False Statements, Obstruction
Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted on two serious charges. A grand jury brought counts of making false statements to Congress and obstruction of a congressional proceeding. These charges focus on his testimony in 2020 about the FBI’s Russia-related investigation known as “Crossfire Hurricane.” Known to many as Russiagate, this case now brings fresh attention to Comey’s past leadership at the bureau. Details of the Charges According to the indictment, Comey lied during his September 2020 testimony. Prosecutors allege he falsely denied authorizing an FBI employee to serve as an anonymous source. In addition, the obstruction charge claims he interfered with a congressional investigation into sensitive information leaks. Both charges carry potential fines and prison time if he is convicted. Importance of Timing The indictment comes at the last possible moment under the statute of limitations. Federal prosecutors had exactly five years to act, and they filed just before that deadline. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia is leading the case. This timing adds to the drama and shows the investigation had been active behind the scenes for years. Strong Reactions from Leaders Attorney General Pam Bondi responded quickly. She said that no one, regardless of status or past power, stands above the law. She explained that the Department of Justice has a duty to act when powerful people mislead Americans. No one is above the law. Today’s indictment reflects this Department of Justice’s commitment to holding those who abuse positions of power accountable for misleading the American people. We will follow the facts in this case. — Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) September 25, 2025 FBI Director Kash Patel also issued a statement. He said the FBI must hold itself accountable. According to Patel, restoring trust requires that even former leaders face consequences if they break the rules. Today, your FBI took another step in its promise of full accountability. For far too long, previous corrupt leadership and their enablers weaponized federal law enforcement, damaging once proud institutions and severely eroding public trust. Every day, we continue the fight to… — FBI Director Kash Patel (@FBIDirectorKash) September 25, 2025 President Donald Trump reacted strongly as well. He labeled Comey one of the worst figures ever to serve in government. Trump added that the indictment represents the beginning of long-delayed accountability. (RELATED NEWS: Ryan Routh Attempts To Stab Himself After Guilty Verdict For Trump Assassination Plot) Government Spying on Trump The case also ties into confirmed surveillance of Donald Trump’s campaign during the 2016 election. Under James Comey’s leadership, the FBI secured secret warrants from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. Later investigations revealed that the FBI relied heavily on the Steele dossier, which contained unverified and false claims. A Justice Department inspector general’s report found that the FBI made serious errors and omitted key facts in its FISA applications. Those mistakes misled the court and enabled improper spying on a presidential campaign. These findings confirmed that the government spied on Trump’s campaign through flawed surveillance methods. This abuse of power eroded public trust and showed how political motives can corrupt law enforcement. The surveillance scandal now serves as a backdrop to Comey’s indictment. It highlights a pattern of misconduct under his leadership that continues to raise questions about the FBI’s role in politics and justice. The Background of Crossfire Hurricane The controversy reaches back to 2016, when the FBI opened its Russia election interference investigation. Inside the bureau, officials referred to the effort as “Crossfire Hurricane.” James Comey oversaw this probe while serving as FBI Director. Later, special counsel Robert Mueller took over. In 2019, Mueller’s report concluded there was not enough evidence to prove criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives. Soon afterward, another special counsel, John Durham, began reviewing how the FBI launched the investigation in the first place. Durham’s report criticized the bureau, saying it ignored warning signs and allowed itself to be influenced by political pressure. These findings added weight to claims that FBI leadership mishandled the case. Legal Stakes for Comey If convicted, James Comey could face years in prison as well as steep fines. For making false statements to Congress, the maximum penalty is up to five years in prison and significant fines. For obstruction of a congressional proceeding, the penalty is also up to five years. Combined, Comey could face as much as 10 years in prison, though sentencing would depend on the court. His defense team is expected to argue that he did not knowingly mislead Congress. They may claim memory lapses or confusion rather than deliberate lies. Lawyers could also argue that congressional testimony often leaves room for interpretation. The burden of proof lies with prosecutors, who must show deliberate deception beyond a reasonable doubt. What Happens Next The indictment is only the beginning. The case will move to federal court, where a judge will oversee pretrial motions and hearings. Both sides will exchange evidence during discovery. After that, the court will determine whether to proceed to trial. (MORE NEWS: AOC Slams Charlie Kirk with Scathing House Floor Comments) Media attention will remain intense throughout the process. Because Comey once held one of the most powerful positions in law enforcement, every development will be closely examined. Political leaders from both parties are already weighing in, ensuring that the trial will shape public debates. Why This Case Matters The James Comey indictment matters for several reasons. It tests the principle that no government official is above the law. If prosecutors succeed, it will send a message that accountability reaches the highest levels of power. In addition, this case raises concerns about public trust in institutions. The FBI has faced criticism from across the political spectrum. By charging a former director, the Department of Justice signals that even the bureau’s top leaders must answer to the public. The Comey trial could set a powerful precedent for how cases involving Congress are handled. Lying to Congress is rarely prosecuted…
Ryan Routh Attempts To Stab Himself After Guilty Verdict For Trump Assassination Plot
OPINION Ryan Wesley Routh has been found guilty of attempting to assassinate President Trump. A jury in Florida delivered the verdict after weeks of testimony and evidence. The 59-year-old now faces a possible life sentence. The conviction includes multiple felony counts. These charges range from attempted assassination of a presidential candidate to weapons offenses and assaulting a federal officer. Prosecutors argued that his actions were deliberate and dangerous, while the jury agreed the evidence proved intent beyond a reasonable doubt. How the Plot Unfolded The case stems from an incident in September 2024. Routh hid in the bushes near Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida. Armed with an SKS-style rifle, he aimed through a fence in the direction of Trump’s security detail. Secret Service agents spotted Routh 12 hours later. One agent opened fire, causing Routh to drop his weapon and run. He was quickly arrested after fleeing the scene. Investigators later revealed that Routh had been preparing for weeks. They found burner phones, notes tracking Trump’s movements, and detailed plans to avoid detection. Prosecutors stated that this demonstrated a high level of planning and intent. Drama Inside the Courtroom The trial reached its most dramatic moment when the guilty verdict was read. Routh suddenly grabbed a pen and tried to stab himself in the neck. Courtroom marshals immediately rushed forward, tackling him and pulling him out of the room. (MORE NEWS: Rising Socialism Exposes the Democratic Party’s Identity Crisis) As officers restrained him, his daughter, Sara Routh, screamed through tears: “Dad, I love you. Don’t do anything. I’ll get you out. He didn’t hurt anybody!” Her desperate words echoed through the courtroom as marshals dragged him away. Routh was later brought back in shackles to hear the remainder of the proceedings. The tense exchange underscored just how volatile the case had become, both for the defendant and his family. The Stakes at Sentencing Routh is scheduled to be sentenced on December 18, 2025. If the court applies the maximum penalties, he could spend the rest of his life in prison. Federal officials say the conviction sends a clear message. Political violence will not be tolerated, and attempts on the lives of public officials will be met with the harshest consequences. President Trump also responded after the verdict with a lengthy statement. He praised prosecutors and law enforcement, saying: His remarks underscored the gravity of the crime while also crediting the teamwork and vigilance that led to Routh’s capture. For Trump, the conviction represented not only justice for himself but also a reminder of the importance of security and accountability in American democracy. A Growing Concern Over Political Violence The conviction adds to growing concern about rising political violence in America. It comes just months after a separate attempt on Trump’s life in Pennsylvania in July 2024, when a gunman opened fire at a campaign rally. That earlier attempt left one person dead and another seriously injured. (RELATED NEWS: AOC Slams Charlie Kirk with Scathing House Floor Comments) Security experts warn that heated rhetoric and division can inspire dangerous actions. The Routh case demonstrates how quickly words and hostility can turn into serious threats. Law enforcement agencies are now reassessing protective measures for candidates and officials in an increasingly polarized environment. Defense Arguments and What Comes Next Routh attempted to defend himself by claiming he never intended to pull the trigger. He argued that since the gun was never fired, the government had failed to prove assassination intent. The jury rejected that argument, citing his careful planning and the position he had put himself in. His legal team may still file appeals. They could argue over how intent was defined or whether some evidence should have been excluded. However, given the jury’s unanimous verdict and the mountain of evidence, legal experts believe an appeal is unlikely to change the outcome. Why This Case Matters This conviction is not only about one man’s actions. It reflects a broader issue facing the nation: the danger of escalating political hostility. When violent plots move from threats to real attempts, the stability of the system is at risk. Routh’s sentencing in December will be closely watched. A life sentence would be a strong statement from the justice system. It would underscore that attempts to silence political leaders through violence will never succeed. At the same time, the case forces Americans to reckon with the reality of modern politics. Security for candidates must be stronger than ever. Media outlets, celebrities, and even legislators must also consider how their rhetoric and division contribute to the rise of dangerous individuals willing to act on extreme beliefs. The Takeaway The conviction of Ryan Wesley Routh marks one of the most serious legal cases in recent political history. He carefully planned, armed himself, and positioned himself to strike at President Trump. The jury’s decision shows that intent and preparation can carry the same weight as action when it comes to protecting leaders and preserving democracy. In the wake of several high-profile assassinations — including the murder of Charlie Kirk and two attempts on President Trump’s life — the time is now to turn down the temperature. But that will not happen as long as figures on the left, like former Vice President Kamala Harris, continue giving interviews where they call Trump a tyrant and compare him to a communist dictator. That kind of rhetoric only fuels hostility and division. Kamala Harris calling President Trump a “tyrant” is a masterclass in projection. Under the previous administration: – Raided political opponent’s home – Fired military members over the COVID shot – Targeted Catholics – Spied on school parents – Censored free speech pic.twitter.com/uxHv3dKOLf — Christian Collins (@CollinsforTX) September 23, 2025 The conviction of Ryan Routh speaks for itself. The reckless propaganda needs to end. Until then, we will not stay silent about it. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin. Deliver the truth. At The Modern Memo, we’re not here to soften the blow — we’re here…
BREAKING: Charlie Kirk Memorial: Armed Man ID’d at Stadium
Authorities arrested an armed man at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, just days before thousands are expected to gather for the Charlie Kirk memorial service. The man, identified as 42-year-old Joshua Runkles, was in fact working as guest security for the event but had not properly coordinated with the Secret Service. “We do not believe this person was attempting anything nefarious,” Turning Point USA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet posted on X. Even so, his arrest has heightened awareness around security as the nation prepares to honor Kirk. I want to add a note of clarity here. This individual was doing advance security for a known guest planning to attend the memorial service tomorrow. We do not believe this person was attempting anything nefarious, however the advance was not done in proper coordination with the… https://t.co/i6YvnMUog1 — Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) September 20, 2025 The Arrest Law enforcement intervened after spotting behavior that raised concern. Runkles was carrying several weapons, including a firearm and multiple knives, and presented expired law enforcement credentials. He explained that he was on-site as part of a private security detail, but officials noted he had not gone through proper channels with the Secret Service. Officers moved quickly to detain him before he could access areas that were still being locked down for the memorial. He was booked into the Maricopa County Jail and later released on bond. Investigators are still piecing together what happened. Heightened Security Charlie Kirk’s memorial is expected to draw more than 100,000 attendees, including former President Donald Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance, and many other political leaders. Because of the size of the gathering and its national importance, the Department of Homeland Security designated it a Level-1 Special Event Assessment Rating. That is the highest security classification possible, reserved for events such as presidential inaugurations and major national ceremonies. This designation means extraordinary precautions are in place. Security teams have set up multiple checkpoints, metal detectors, and no-bag policies. Hundreds of officers from local, state, and federal agencies will work together to maintain order. Aerial surveillance will monitor crowds from above, while plainclothes agents will move among attendees. Authorities are also using intelligence-sharing systems to track any potential risks in real time. Why It Matters The arrest highlights the ongoing risks facing large public gatherings in today’s political climate. With tensions running high after Kirk’s tragic death earlier this month, even small disruptions could have dangerous consequences. Unauthorized armed individuals not only put attendees at risk but also raise concerns for the safety of dignitaries and officials. In this case, Runkles was working as guest security but had not obtained the necessary Secret Service credentials. Carrying multiple weapons and presenting expired law enforcement credentials created confusion and raised alarms among authorities. Investigators are now focused on understanding how the lapse occurred and ensuring tighter coordination so that similar breaches cannot happen again. A Nation on Edge Charlie Kirk’s death in Utah shook millions of Americans. The young conservative activist and founder of Turning Point USA was gunned down in a shocking act of political violence. His memorial service is not only a chance to honor his life but also a moment for the nation to reflect on the cost of division and hostility. (RELATED NEWS: AOC Slams Charlie Kirk with Scathing House Floor Comments) Many who plan to attend see the gathering as a public stand for faith, family, and the values Kirk spent his life defending. But the heightened security shows that public events, especially those with symbolic importance, are now potential flashpoints. Communities across the country are grappling with how to balance free expression and public safety in an era of rising tension. What Comes Next Officials are reassessing screening procedures to prevent similar lapses in the future. At the time of Runkles’ arrest, full security protocols for the memorial had not yet been activated. Protective fencing and additional barriers were only installed today. Workers are out here in 99° heat building a steel fence all around State Farm Arena to secure Charlie’s memorial tomorrow pic.twitter.com/8Y530SesV2 — Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) September 20, 2025 For those attending the memorial, organizers are urging compliance with all security measures. Guests should prepare for longer wait times at checkpoints and restrictions on personal items. There is also a no bag policy in force, similar to other large events. These precautions may be inconvenient, but they are necessary to protect lives and preserve the integrity of the service. There is a strict No Bag Policy for tomorrow’s memorial service for Charlie This includes purses, backpacks, and even clear bags Security WILL be enforcing this and you will have to go to the back Share this to prevent any confusion tomorrow with staff just doing their jobs — Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) September 20, 2025 Honoring Charlie Kirk As investigators continue their work, the nation’s attention turns to honoring the life and legacy of Charlie Kirk. His leadership, advocacy, and passion for civic engagement inspired countless young people. For his supporters, the memorial is not just a farewell but a call to continue the work he championed. (RELATED NEWS: Charlie Kirk: A Patriot Remembered, A Legacy Unbroken) This situation is a sobering reminder of the threats that come with standing boldly in the public square. Yet it also underscores why Kirk’s message mattered so deeply. He spoke about courage in the face of opposition, and that message now resonates more strongly than ever. The Final Word The events in Glendale reveal the challenges of hosting a national memorial in a time of division and unrest. But they also highlight the determination of law enforcement to safeguard Americans as they gather to mourn. With strong security measures in place, Charlie Kirk’s memorial will go forward as planned. In moments like this, unity and vigilance matter most. Security scares should not overshadow the purpose of the day: to remember a life lost too soon and to recommit to a vision of America that values faith, truth, and freedom. Update:…
Utah Arrests: Explosive Device Found Under Fox News Vehicle
Utah is once again in the national spotlight, and not for the reasons anyone would want. Not even a week after the shocking assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk during a campus event at Utah Valley University, federal agents have now arrested two men accused of planting an explosive device under a FOX 13 News vehicle in Magna. The timing of these incidents has left many asking: What is going on in Utah? The Incident in Magna According to FOX 13, one of their employees noticed something unusual under their station vehicle. Police and bomb squads rushed to the scene and confirmed the object was a functioning incendiary device. Investigators later said it had been lit but failed to explode. Even so, the vehicle was parked next to an occupied building, meaning the risk wasn’t just to the station—it was to the entire neighborhood. Nearby homes were evacuated, and specialized bomb technicians disabled the device. What could have been a devastating explosion ended instead with a massive FBI investigation. Adeeb Nasir, 58, and Adil Justice Ahmed Nasir, 31, were arrested in Magna, Utah, after their bomb placed under a FOX 13 News vehicle failed to detonate. FBI found firearms, explosives, narcotics & two weapons of mass destruction at the 2700 S 8500 W home. Both were under… pic.twitter.com/bTZsO9dO25 — GeoTechWar (@geotechwar) September 15, 2025 The Arrests Federal agents later arrested Adeeb Ahamed Nasir, 58, and his son Adil Justice Ahmed Nasir, 31, both of Magna. Court documents state they lived together in the home where the FBI executed a search warrant. (RELATED NEWS: Charlie Kirk Murder Suspect Tyler Robinson Arrested) Inside, investigators reportedly found more than just one device. Authorities say they discovered firearms, explosive materials, electronic evidence, narcotics, and even what the suspects claimed were weapons of mass destruction. That expanded the charges far beyond a single crime scene. An upside-down American flag and political signs were found in the yard. The far left refers to President Trump as “Taco.” Both men now face federal counts of terrorism threats, possession of explosives, and possession of weapons of mass destruction. They are being held without bail. Press Freedom at Risk The attack on a news outlet carries broader implications. Journalists are often on the front lines of covering news stories. If they become targets themselves, the ripple effects could be chilling. Reporters may feel less safe covering controversial stories, and the public could end up less informed. FOX 13 issued a statement to ABC News emphasizing that employee safety is their top priority, and the station is working with law enforcement and risk management teams to protect staff. Their response underscores the reality that the media landscape has become more dangerous in recent years. Law Enforcement’s Role In both the Kirk assassination and the Magna bomb case, law enforcement acted quickly. Police, FBI agents, and bomb squads coordinated to neutralize threats and bring suspects into custody. The speed of their response undoubtedly prevented further harm. Officials are now under pressure to not only prosecute these crimes but also reassure the public that Utah is not becoming a new hub for politically charged violence. What’s Next The Nasirs will face federal prosecution. Investigators will likely present evidence from the search of their home, including explosive components and digital devices, to show intent and capability. Motive, however, remains unclear. (MORE NEWS: London: 100K Rally-Goers Unite Against Mass Immigration) As for the broader picture, Utah residents are left to grapple with unsettling questions. Was the FOX 13 incident a result of the climate that produced the Kirk assassination? Is Utah now at the center of a larger trend of political anger spilling into violence? Takeaway In less than a week, two headline-grabbing incidents have made one thing clear: violence against political leaders and the free press is becoming a weapon of intimidation. The assassination of Charlie Kirk and the attempted bombing of FOX 13 News both send the same message—those who speak out are now targets. The Magna arrests may have prevented another tragedy, but they are also a warning. Communities, media outlets, and political organizations are left wondering how to protect themselves in an environment that feels increasingly unstable. The question is no longer if another incident will happen, but how much deeper this spiral of political violence will cut into the heart of American life. Expose the Spin. Shatter the Narrative. Speak the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t cover politics to play referee — we swing a machete through the spin, the double-speak, and the partisan theater. While the media protects the powerful and buries the backlash, we dig it up and drag it into the light. If you’re tired of rigged narratives, selective outrage, and leaders who serve themselves, not you — then share this. Expose the corruption. Challenge the agenda. Because if we don’t fight for the truth, no one will. And that fight starts with you.
BREAKING: Charlie Kirk Murder Suspect Tyler Robinson Arrested
President Donald Trump was the first to reveal that a suspect, Tyler Robinson, 22, has been taken into custody in the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. He broke the news on Fox & Friends. Trump told the nation that investigators had captured the man believed responsible for the deadly shooting at Utah Valley University. According to authorities, the suspect confessed the murder to a family member. He is not a student of Utah Valley University. Trump announces the arrest Trump used his morning interview to deliver the news that many had been waiting for. “I think, with a high degree of certainty, we have him in custody,” he said. According to Trump, the suspect was recognized by someone close to him: “Somebody that was very close to him said, ‘hmm, that’s him.’” Fox News later confirmed the suspect’s identity. (RELATED NEWS: Charlie Kirk: A Patriot Remembered, A Legacy Unbroken) President Trump didn’t hold back his emotions, praising Kirk as a remarkable leader and calling for the strongest possible punishment. “What he did, Charlie Kirk was the finest person, he didn’t deserve this,” Trump said. He added, “I hope he’s going to be found guilty, I would imagine. And I hope he gets the death penalty.” The shocking attack The shooting took place while Kirk was speaking outdoors at Utah Valley University in Orem. Roughly 20 minutes into his remarks, a single shot from the roof of the Losee Center struck him in the neck. Witnesses described a scene of panic as students and attendees ran for cover. Kirk was rushed to Timpanogos Regional Hospital, but he later died from his injuries. His killing sent shockwaves across the country and quickly drew comparisons to a political assassination. The investigation Law enforcement launched an immediate manhunt, locking down the campus and scouring the rooftop area where the shot originated. Investigators recovered a high-powered rifle and physical evidence including footprints and palm prints. Two people were briefly detained earlier in the week but were later cleared of involvement. Federal agents and Utah police worked day and night following leads, reviewing surveillance footage, and interviewing witnesses. Their efforts culminated in the arrest that Trump broke to the public. Political and public response Utah Governor Spencer Cox condemned the murder as a political assassination and pledged that those responsible would be brought to justice. The FBI has maintained a visible presence in the area, asking the public for tips and offering a reward for information. For Kirk’s supporters, the arrest marks the first sign of justice in a case that has shaken faith in public safety at campus events. Trump’s decision to break the news himself reflects both the seriousness of the crime and Kirk’s influence within the conservative movement. What comes next Officials are expected to release more details soon about Tyler Robinson, potential motives, and pending charges. Court proceedings will likely draw intense national attention, as the murder of Charlie Kirk has already become one of the most high-profile political crimes in recent memory. For now, Trump’s announcement brings a turning point in the investigation. It signals the end of the manhunt and the beginning of the legal battle to hold the killer accountable. Forget the narrative. Reject the script. Share what matters. At The Modern Memo, we call it like it is — no filter, no apology, no corporate leash. If you’re tired of being lied to, manipulated, or ignored, amplify the truth. One share at a time, we dismantle the media machine — with facts, boldness, and zero fear. Stand with us. Speak louder. Because silence helps them win.
Democrats Fume as Trump’s Crime Crackdown Delivers Results
Outrage From the Left Democrats are in full meltdown mode over President Trump’s aggressive move to take on crime in Washington, D.C. They accuse him of overreach, authoritarianism, and election-year grandstanding. But beneath the outrage lies a deeper fear: that his approach might work—and that he plans to replicate it in other Democrat-run cities. From Capitol Hill to city halls in Chicago, Los Angeles, and Baltimore, Democrat leaders are scrambling to frame Trump’s actions as dangerous. Instead of celebrating safer streets in the nation’s capital, they appear more determined to deny Trump a victory than to bring relief to their own communities. (RELATED NEWS: Crime in D.C.: Trump’s Historic Action to Restore Order) Trump Points to Falling Crime Trump is already claiming success. He cites plunging homicide numbers and dramatic drops in carjackings since federal forces entered D.C. His allies argue the crackdown proves what voters have long suspected: when leaders back police and enforce the law, crime falls. That puts Democrats in a bind. Their opposition isn’t just to Trump—it looks like opposition to public safety itself. And it comes at a time when voters across the country list crime among their top concerns. HOME RULE: Democrats claimed crime was not an issue in DC, but given the fact homicides in Washington DC plummeted 71% and robberies by 60% following the takeover by President Trump i hope we can all agree they were lying. pic.twitter.com/f63wZ2hSvI — @amuse (@amuse) August 30, 2025 Expanding Beyond Washington The bigger story is Trump’s stated plan to bring the same strategy to other cities. He has publicly named Chicago, Baltimore, New York, and Los Angeles as possible targets. These are places long plagued by violent crime and failed leadership. For residents in those cities, the results in D.C. are hard to ignore. Trump’s message is simple: if Democrats won’t protect their own people, the federal government will. Democrats Circle the Wagons The response from blue-state leaders has been swift and furious. California Governor Gavin Newsom said Trump’s approach was “militarizing American cities.” Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker claimed it could be a plot to interfere with elections. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson signed an order blocking local police from cooperating with federal troops. None of those responses directly address the falling crime numbers. Instead, they show Democrats more focused on preserving political power than on delivering peace and safety to neighborhoods desperate for both. (MORE NEWS: Minneapolis: Innocent Lives Lost and a Culture in Crisis) Mayor Bowser’s Balancing Act D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser illustrates the Democrats’ dilemma. At first, she denounced Trump’s move as authoritarian and even backed lawsuits against it. But as crime dropped, she began acknowledging the benefits of federal support. Bowser now tries to walk a tightrope—criticizing Trump’s methods while cautiously welcoming the results. “We greatly appreciate the surge of officers that enhance what MPD has been able to do in this city,” she said during a Wednesday press conference. “We know that when carjackings go down, when the use of gun goes down, when homicide or robbery go down, neighborhoods feel safer and are safer. So, this surge has been important to us for that reason.” Her shifting tone reflects what many Democrat officials likely recognize: opposing Trump outright risks alienating residents who want results, not political posturing. How Trump Did It For context, Trump invoked Section 740 of the D.C. Home Rule Act, placing the Metropolitan Police Department under federal control. He deployed about 800 National Guard troops along with other federal law enforcement to flood the streets. Critics call it unconstitutional. Supporters call it overdue. Whatever the label, it delivered a visible law-and-order presence in the capital—something voters notice. Voters See the Contrast Polling shows most D.C. residents opposed losing local control. But nationwide, support for Trump’s move runs higher, particularly among Republicans and independents. Democrats are left trying to argue process while Trump points to outcomes. That contrast—safer streets versus political bickering—could shape how voters see both parties heading into 2026. Trump frames himself as the man who gets results. Democrats risk looking like leaders more worried about denying him credit than keeping their own citizens safe. The Bottom Line The fight over D.C. isn’t just about one city. It’s about the future of law and order in Democrat-controlled areas across the country. Trump has made it clear he’s ready to act where local leaders refuse. Democrats, meanwhile, continue to shout about overreach and lawsuits, even as the numbers in Washington shift in Trump’s favor. Voters will decide which matters more—process or results. Right now, Trump is betting that safety on the streets will outweigh partisan talking points in the minds of everyday Americans. Unmask the Narrative. Rip Through the Lies. Spread the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t polish propaganda — we tear it to shreds. The corporate press censors, spins, and sugarcoats. We don’t. If you’re tired of being misled, silenced, and spoon-fed fiction, help us expose what they try to hide. Truth matters — but only if it’s heard. So share this. Shake the silence. And remind the powerful they don’t own the story.
Minneapolis: Innocent Lives Lost and a Culture in Crisis
OPINION The Minneapolis shooter should not be the story here. The story should be about the children who died. Two young lives—10-year-old Harper Moyoski and 8-year-old Fletcher Merkel—were cut short. Eighteen others were wounded, most of them kids. Families grieve, and the community aches. Innocence Stolen Harper and Fletcher should have gone home that night. Instead, their parents have to bury their babies. They are living a nightmare. Fletcher’s father begged in a statement: “Please remember Fletcher for the person he was and not the act that ended his life.” He’s right. The focus should stay on the victims, not the killer. Jesse Merkel, the father of 8-year-old Fletcher Merkel, made the following statement the day after his son’s death: “Yesterday, a coward decided to take our 8-year-old son, Fletcher, away from us. Because of their actions, we will never be allowed to hold him, talk to him, play… pic.twitter.com/d6ZgBmPAEu — FOX 9 (@FOX9) August 28, 2025 A Culture of Confusion — The Real Crisis But the elephant in the room is still there. And no one else will talk about it. The left blames guns and the real story gets ignored. America has built a culture of confusion. Children grow up believing lies: boys can become girls, and girls can become boys. Doctors push the delusion. Allies cheer it on. Parents sign off. Schools celebrate it. Politicians protect it. Innocence disappears. (RELATED NEWS: Major Hospital Drops Trans Treatments For Kids) No one thinks ahead. What happens when those children grow into adults? The result is devastating. Some never learn how to handle rejection or fail to build emotional strength. Instead of resilience, bitterness takes root. Isolation becomes normal. Enemies appear everywhere. And in the end, a life built on lies collapses under its own weight. This is the real crisis—not guns, but the culture. When reality shatters the fantasy, despair takes over. Some spiral into rage, depression, or violence. Every other mental illness gets treatment. This one gets affirmation. Instead of help, kids get hormones, surgeries, and new names. Then they hit adulthood and realize it was all a lie. The result is addiction, hatred, or, in this and other cases—mass shootings. The Shooter’s Own Words The Minneapolis killer admitted regret. He wrote: “I’m tired of being trans, I wish I never brainwashed myself.” “I regret being trans. I wish I was a girl, I just know I cannot achieve that body with the technology we have today.” He knew the truth. He knew the ideology lied. But no one stopped him. Friends heard him praise Hitler in middle school. Hate showed itself early. Still, adults looked away until the shooting, when his hatred of Jews, Christians, and Republicans was on full display. Parental Failure, Public Tragedy His mother signed off on his name change when he was only 17. She once worked at the very Catholic school he later targeted. Police Chief Brian O’Hara revealed the frustration investigators face: “We have not been successful in talking to the shooter’s mother,” he said. Instead of answering questions, she hired high-profile defense lawyer Ryan Garry. He defended her silence in a statement to Fox News: “She is completely distraught about the situation and has no culpability but is seeking an attorney to deal with calls like this.” Families bury their children. She avoids questions. (MORE NEWS: Kilmar Abrego Garcia and the Deep Immigration Divide) A Pattern Being Ignored This wasn’t a one-off. Seven recent mass shootings involved individuals in the LGBTQ community. But networks won’t touch the story. Politicians protect the narrative. Christians get blamed. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey even defended the trans community after the massacre. He scolded those who criticize gender ideology and mocked prayer, saying: “Don’t just say this is about thoughts and prayers right now. These kids were literally praying.” This is the same guy who knelt to pray and sob at the casket of George Floyd. He shifted the blame instead of telling the truth. WOW — Dem. Mayor of Minneapolis Jacob Frey CONDEMNS praying for the victims of the Catholic mass shooting. “Don’t just say this is about thoughts and prayers…these kids were literally praying!” Cruel and callous. pic.twitter.com/5mVAQAijn1 — Townhall.com (@townhallcom) August 27, 2025 You get it yet? Final Word We refuse to remember the coward of Minneapolis. His name dies here. We remember the children. Harper Moyoski and Fletcher Merkel. Their names live on. We remember the truth. And we demand the courage to face it. This culture of lies has taken too much. It will continue until we confront it. The time is now. Forget the Headlines. Challenge the Script. Deliver the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe through talking points — we swing a machete through the media’s favorite lies. They protect power. We confront it. If you’re sick of censorship, narrative control, and being told what to think — stand with us. Share the story. Wake the people. Because truth dies in silence — and you weren’t made to stay quiet.
BREAKING ALERT: Crime in D.C.: Trump’s Historic Action to Restore Order
President Donald Trump made bold moves to address the escalating crime in Washington, D.C. His recent actions come in response to the rising violence, car thefts, and carjackings plaguing the city. Trump signed an Executive Order and outlined a comprehensive plan to restore law and order, signaling a new era of federal intervention in local crime control. (RELATED: Trump Takes On Crime in D.C.) The D.C. Crime Crisis The crime rate in Washington, D.C., has reached alarming levels. Trump pointed out that “The murder rate in Washington today is higher than that of Bogota, Columbia, Mexico City…” He continued, “The number of car thefts has doubled over the past five years, and the number of carjackings has more than tripled.” These shocking statistics underscore the urgent need for action. FACT: D.C. Crime Is Out of Control. ⬇️ Our nation’s capital should be a symbol of patriotism for the American people—NOT a city of lawlessness. It ends today. pic.twitter.com/TdLERGXVVP — The White House (@WhiteHouse) August 11, 2025 The situation became even more dire last week. Edward “Big Balls” Coristine, a former DOGE staffer, was injured while defending a woman from a carjacking. A group of about a dozen young men attacked the woman. Coristine intervened, resulting in a concussion. Police arrested two 15-year-olds involved in the attack, but others remain at large. This event and others prompted President Trump to take immediate action. Federalizing D.C. Law Enforcement In a historic move, President Trump invoked Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act. This action places the D.C. Metropolitan Police under direct federal control. It gives the federal government the authority to oversee local law enforcement and take strong action to combat crime. Trump announced, “I am announcing a historic action to rescue our nation’s capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam, squalor, and worse. This is Liberation Day in D.C. and we’re going to take our capital back.” His declaration marked the start of a major federal effort to restore safety in the city. It’s “Liberation Day” in Washington, D.C. “Today, President Donald J. Trump took bold executive action to liberate Washington, D.C., from the cesspool of crime and homelessness that it has become after decades of unilateral Democrat leadership.”https://t.co/mL6oRxBW4Y — Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) August 11, 2025 National Guard Deployed to D.C. Trump also ordered the deployment of the National Guard. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed, “This morning, we have mobilized the D.C. National Guard… You will see them flowing through the streets of D.C.” A total of 1,000 National Guard troops have been sent to assist in law enforcement efforts. The deployment also leaves open the possibility of deploying active-duty military personnel if necessary. . @SecDef “Mr. President, it is an honor to be here and at your direction, this morning we’ve mobilized the D.C. National Guard… They will be STRONG and TOUGH, and they will STAND with their law enforcement partners.” pic.twitter.com/L6Bk5spgY2 — DOD Rapid Response (@DODResponse) August 11, 2025 Attorney General Pam Bondi, now in charge of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, was clear: “Crime in D.C. is ending and ending today. We are going to use every power we have to fight criminals here.” Immediate Law Enforcement Operations Trump’s plan includes aggressive law enforcement operations. These operations will target gangs, drug dealers, and criminal networks in D.C. U.S. Attorney for D.C. Jeanine Pirro emphasized, “We need to recognize that the people who matter are the law-abiding citizens! President Trump is going to make sure these emboldened criminals understand: We see you, we’re watching you, and we’re going to change the law to catch you!” FBI Director Kash Patel echoed this sentiment, pointing to a similar operation in Northern Virginia. “We stood up a task force in Northern Virginia, [and] we said ‘Let’s let good cops be cops.’ In one month, we arrested 545 violent felons,” Patel said. “That simplicity in law enforcement is what’s coming to Washington, D.C.” Addressing Homelessness and Public Safety Trump’s plan goes beyond crime. He is also addressing the issue of homelessness in the city. “We are going to be removing homeless encampments from all over our parks… We’re getting rid of the people from underpasses and public spaces,” Trump said. The president emphasized that while law enforcement will be the priority, helping the homeless will still be part of the solution. “We’ll help them as much as you can help,” he added. A Nationwide Push Against Cashless Bail In addition to federalizing D.C. law enforcement, Trump is targeting the issue of cashless bail. He has called on Republicans in Congress to outlaw cashless bail systems nationwide. “That is what started the problem,” Trump said, blaming the practice for the rise in crime. He pointed to the Democratic Party’s weak stance on crime, accusing them of enabling criminals to avoid consequences. Trump’s legislative push would ensure that violent offenders are held accountable before they are allowed to return to the streets. (RELATED: Newsome Attacks Republicans On Violent Crime — Data Tell Different Story) Expanding Federal Control to Other Cities While Trump’s immediate focus is on D.C., he hinted at expanding this strategy to other cities facing similar crime issues. Trump mentioned that after federalizing D.C., he is considering the same approach for New York City and Chicago. Both cities have also seen rising crime rates, and Trump’s federalization strategy could be a model for other urban centers. The Path Forward: A Vision for Safer Cities Trump’s actions represent a significant shift in how the federal government deals with crime in American cities. By federalizing D.C. law enforcement, deploying the National Guard, and focusing on aggressive law enforcement tactics, Trump is taking unprecedented steps to restore order in Washington. His push to outlaw cashless bail and sanctuary cities, and his plans for further federal involvement in other cities, show his commitment to cracking down on crime nationwide. As the operation in Washington unfolds, Trump’s efforts may serve as a blueprint for other cities struggling with rising crime. His federal approach to crime…
- 1
- 2