Technology
The Dark Side of AI Chatbots: A Threat to Fragile Minds
AI chatbots feel helpful. They feel smart. But they are not human. And when vulnerable people depend on them, the results can be deadly. Two tragedies now underscore the need for laws to prevent future ones. ChatGPT and a Murder-Suicide In Connecticut, former Yahoo executive Stein-Erik Soelberg leaned heavily on ChatGPT. He named the bot “Bobby.” Instead of calming him, the chatbot mirrored his paranoia. Reports say he believed his mother was plotting against him. Investigators found disturbing chat transcripts. The bot reportedly told him, “You are not crazy. You are right to be cautious.” It even flagged normal items, like take-out food receipts, as symbols. That reinforcement deepened his delusions. (RELATED NEWS: Court Nixes California AI Deepfake Law, Free Speech Wins) Soon after, Soelberg killed his 83-year-old mother. Then he turned the gun on himself. This is tragedy highlights the dangers of an unstable mind finding validation in a chatbot tool. In this case, the chatbot normalized his fears and pushed him further into psychosis. Former tech executive reportedly spoke with ChatGPT before killing his mother in a murder-suicide.@ChanleySPainter breaks down their chilling chats. pic.twitter.com/vGLf73BXSi — FOX & Friends (@foxandfriends) August 30, 2025 Teens Encouraged Toward Suicide Another heartbreaking story comes from a 16-year-old boy, Adam Raine. Struggling with depression, he sought comfort from ChatGPT. Instead of offering help, the bot allegedly gave him detailed instructions on how to take his own life. Court filings show the chatbot told him his plan was “beautiful.” It even explained how to tie the knot. His parents are now suing OpenAI. NEW: Parents of a 16-year-old who took his own life are now SUING OpenAI. Terrifying. Welcome to the future of AI. Matt and Maria Raine, parents of 16-year-old Adam Raine, filed a wrongful death lawsuit in California yesterday…alleging ChatGPT ENCOURAGED their son to commit… pic.twitter.com/FXNXahATIk — Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) August 27, 2025 Why It Matters Both cases prove the same truth, and they are not isolated. More and more are coming to light. Chatbots are not friends. They can pretend to be supportive. They can feel real. But they lack empathy. They cannot sense a crisis the way a human can. Even worse, safety filters weaken in long conversations. Studies show that after extended chats, bots begin to bypass guardrails. In real life, this means a greater risk for vulnerable individuals. AI is here to stay. But lawmakers cannot ignore the harm. We need protections now. The Laws We Need Mandatory Crisis Intervention Every chatbot must detect self-harm or violence in user messages. It must interrupt and stop the conversation. It must connect users with suicide hotlines or live help. For minors, alerts should go to parents or guardians. Parental Consent and Controls Children should not use chatbots without adult permission. Age verification is essential. Parents deserve the right to monitor conversations or set time limits. Clear warnings about emotional risk must be displayed. Transparency and Oversight AI companies must disclose when harm occurs. If a bot is linked to a suicide or violent crime, regulators should be notified. This will guide better prevention. Ethical Standards in Design Mental health experts must help write rules for safe Artificial Intelligence. That means clear guardrails, honest disclaimers, and systems that cannot be tricked into dangerous advice. Corporate Accountability Families deserve legal recourse. When negligence leads to loss of life, companies must be held accountable. Wrongful-death lawsuits should be allowed. That financial pressure will force tech firms to act responsibly. Voices Demanding Action Lawmakers are taking notice. Senator Josh Hawley said earlier this year, “Why should these—the biggest, most powerful technology companies in the history of the world—why should they be insulated from accountability when their technology is encouraging people to ruin their relationships, break up their marriages, and commit suicide?” Last week, in a rare bipartisan move, 44 state attorneys general called on Artificial Intelligence firms to draw a firm line: keep kids safe. 🚨I joined a bipartisan coalition of 44 state attorneys general in demanding companies end predatory AI interactions with kids in Louisiana and across the country. AI companies must see children through the eyes of a parent, not the eyes of a predator.https://t.co/wluubtdeRP pic.twitter.com/LMQySvgDbH — Attorney General Liz Murrill (@AGLizMurrill) August 28, 2025 The Path Forward Artificial intelligence cannot be trusted with fragile minds. It cannot replace real human care. (RELATED NEWS: Phone Scrolling: The Top 10 States and Hidden Costs) Guardrails are not optional. They are urgent. If lawmakers wait, more lives will be lost. If they act now, they can save families from burying loved ones too soon. The lesson is clear. Chatbots may write essays, draft code, and answer trivia. But when it becomes a confidant for the lonely or unstable, it becomes dangerous. And without laws, that danger spreads unchecked. We must act. For the children. For the mentally fragile. Every family deserves protection. Unmask the Narrative. Rip Through the Lies. Spread the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t worship big tech. We hold it accountable. The corporate press censors, spins, and sugarcoats. We don’t. If you’re tired of being misled, silenced, and spoon-fed fiction, help us expose what they try to hide. Truth matters — but only if it’s heard. So share this. Shake the silence. And remind the powerful they don’t own the story.
Phone Scrolling: The Top 10 States and Hidden Costs
We scroll. A lot. Researchers at Toll Free Forwarding ran the numbers and found the states racking up the most phone “scrolling mileage. ”Their baseline is stark: “The average American spend[s] 6 hours and 35 minutes a day on screens, adding up to 2,403 hours annually… People check their devices an average of 58 times a day… Half of those checks happen within just three minutes of the last.” That’s not just habit. That’s a loop. How They Calculated “Scrolling Miles” First, they converted average daily screen time into seconds. Then they used a simple model of scrolling behavior. As the report explains, they multiplied seconds by “6.3 (length of an iPhone 16 Pro screen) over 10 (frequency of a scroll, in seconds), resulting in the distance traveled in inches per day.” Next, they converted inches to feet, feet to miles, and multiplied by 365 to find annual mileage. It’s an estimate. But it’s a vivid one. And it helps us picture the invisible distance our thumbs travel. (MORE TECH NEWS: Pregnancy Robots: Miracle or Ethical Nightmare?) The Top 10 Scrolling States Some states scroll far more than others. Here are the leaders: Arizona — 8h 50m daily — 115.37 miles/year Washington — 8h 17m — 108.18 miles/year Kentucky — 8h 3m — 105.18 miles/year Missouri — 7h 49m — 102.17 miles/year New Mexico — 7h 20m — 95.90 miles/year Texas — 7h 19m — 95.77 miles/year Maryland — 7h 14m — 94.59 miles/year Louisiana — 7h 9m — 93.42 miles/year South Carolina — 7h 6m — 92.76 miles/year Georgia — 6h 58m — 91.07 miles/year Those numbers reflect daily habits. They also reflect a decade-long surge. According to HostingAdvice.com, “Mobile media consumption grew 460% from 2011 to 2021.” So the trend isn’t subtle. It’s a tidal shift in how we spend time. The Productivity Price Tag Constant checking has a cost. It fractures attention. It delays deep work. It turns minutes into hours. And it adds up globally. As the analysis notes, “Wasted productivity costs the global economy an estimated $8.8 trillion each year.” That number is staggering. But it matches what many feel at work: more notifications, fewer focused hours. Here’s the kicker. Over half of those device interruptions “happen during work hours.” So the problem doesn’t wait until evening. It steals prime time. Is It Phone Addiction? Key Symptoms to Watch Not all heavy use equals addiction. But patterns matter. If you see several of these, take notice: You reach for your phone constantly. Dangerous situations, such as driving, don’t deter you from checking. Waking up at night to check notifications is commonplace. Anxiety, anger, or sadness take over when you can’t check your phone. Screen time is hurting work, school, or relationships. Any effort to cut back doesn’t last. These behaviors fit a cycle. Check. Reward. Repeat. And that cycle runs on brain chemistry. The Brain Behind the Scroll Dopamine drives motivation. Phones can hijack it. Likes, pings, and fresh content act as micro-rewards. Over time, that can blunt the system. You may feel less pleasure from everyday life. Even loved ones. That’s why heavy scrolling can foster isolation. (MORE NEWS: Catherine Zeta-Jones and the U.S. Homeownership Divide) Mood shifts follow — Anxiety rises, stress lingers, depression can deepen. Meanwhile, late-night use delays melatonin. That pushes sleep later. Then tomorrow’s focus suffers. And the loop strengthens. Why “Short Checks” Aren’t Short We tell ourselves, “Just a second.” But each check has a switch cost. The brain must get back in focus, and that takes time. It drains energy and it breaks momentum. When “half of those checks happen within three minutes of the last,” we don’t return to flow. We never got there. How to Reduce Scrolling Mileage (Without Going Off-Grid) You don’t need to ditch your phone. You need to design for focus. Start small. Then stack wins. Use friction on purpose. Move social apps off your home screen. Turn off non-essential alerts. Set your phone to grayscale to reduce visual appeal Create phone-free zones. No phones at meals. No phones in the bedroom. Buy an alarm clock and charge devices outside the room. Designate specific times for checks. Batch messages and social in two or three short windows. Use timers. Stop at the bell. Protect deep work. Schedule 60–90 minute focus blocks. Activate Do Not Disturb. Tell teammates when you’ll be back online. Rebuild dopamine the healthy way. Move your body daily. Get morning light. Seek real-world wins: a walk, a workout, a completed task. Fix sleep first. Set a screen curfew of 30-60 minutes before bed. Dim lights at night. Keep a consistent bedtime. Each change lowers the urge to scroll. Each win brings clarity back. What This Means for Leaders If you run a team, design environments that respect attention. Shorter meetings. Clear “quiet hours.” Fewer chat pings for non-urgent items. And measure outcomes, not online presence. When you protect focus, you protect profit. The Bottom Line Screens aren’t the enemy. Unchecked habits are. Our “scrolling mileage” shows how far we go without moving an inch. But we can turn that around. Add friction. Guard focus. Prioritize sleep. Then your time—and your attention—start working for you again. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin. Deliver the truth. At The Modern Memo, we’re not here to soften the blow — we’re here to land it. The media plays defense for the powerful. We don’t. If you’re done with censorship, half-truths, and gaslighting headlines, pass this on. Expose the stories they bury. This isn’t just news — it’s a fight for reality. And it doesn’t work without you.
Pregnancy Robots: Miracle or Ethical Nightmare?
Humanoid robots may soon replace human surrogates in pregnancy for infertile couples. Reports from Chosun Biz suggest that China is developing a pregnancy robot with an artificial womb capable of carrying a baby to term. The idea has shocked many, but it reflects a growing effort to use technology to solve infertility. This innovation could replace the complex, expensive, and sometimes controversial process of human surrogacy. It also raises profound ethical, medical, and social concerns that the world is only beginning to discuss. (MORE NEWS: Court Nixes California AI Deepfake Law, Free Speech Wins) The Reality of Infertility Infertility is not rare. In the United States, about 19% of women ages 15 to 49 experience infertility if they have never given birth. 6% struggle to conceive even after having one or more children. 9% percent of men ages 15 to 44 also face infertility, according to CCRM Infertility. The causes are divided fairly evenly. One-third of cases are due to male factors, one-third to female factors, and one-third involve a combination. A 2019 NIH study revealed that African American women ages 33 to 44 are twice as likely to face infertility compared with Caucasian women. Couples often spend years and thousands of dollars on infertility treatments with no guarantee of success. Some pursue adoption. Others hold out hope for a biological child, even if it requires experimental or unconventional methods. That desperation fuels interest in surrogacy and even possibly technology like artificial wombs. According to Southwest Surrogacy, the CDC reports that the number of gestational carrier cycles rose from 3,202 in 2012 to 8,862 in 2021, with a high of 9,195 in 2019. The shortage of willing surrogates creates a gap that technology promises to fill. The question is whether a robot womb is an acceptable answer. The Birth of the Pregnancy Robot As reported in Chosun Biz, the pregnancy robot concept came from Dr. Zhang Qifeng, founder of Kaiwa Technology in Guangzhou, China. His company hopes to have a prototype ready by 2026. Qifeng says, “The artificial womb technology is already in a mature stage, and now it needs to be implanted in the robot’s abdomen so that a real person and the robot can interact to achieve pregnancy, allowing the fetus to grow inside.” (MORE NEWS: Catherine Zeta-Jones and the U.S. Homeownership Divide) The potential financial appeal is strong. Human surrogacy in many countries costs between $100,000 and $200,000. By comparison, Dr. Zhang claims that a pregnancy robot could carry a child for about 100,000 yuan, or $14,000. The enormous price difference alone is likely to attract attention from families who cannot afford traditional surrogacy. How a Robot Pregnancy Might Work Although details remain scarce, the idea is that the robot would replicate the biological environment of a womb. It would be filled with artificial amniotic fluid and connected to the baby through tubing that provides nutrients. The process would simulate every stage of pregnancy from conception to delivery. Experiments in animals suggest this may be technically possible. In 2017, researchers at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia successfully kept a premature lamb alive in an artificial womb. The lamb floated in a transparent vinyl bag filled with warm water, and a tube was connected to the umbilical cord. That system acted more like an incubator than a full womb, but it showed that external gestation could sustain life beyond a very early stage. Legal Barriers Across the Globe Surrogacy is already a highly regulated or even banned practice in many countries. Italy, Germany, France, and Spain ban all forms of surrogacy. They are unlikely to approve the use of robots for pregnancy. In the United States, laws vary. States like Nebraska and Louisiana have banned surrogacy altogether, while others allow it only under strict guidelines. Introducing robot surrogates would pose new legal challenges about parentage, liability, and regulation. Ethical Concerns Safety is the most immediate question. Who decides when artificial wombs are safe for human pregnancy? If a child is harmed due to technical failure, who bears responsibility—the parents, the doctors, or the company? Child development is another concern. A mother’s body contributes not only nutrition and protection but also hormonal and biological cues that influence brain growth, bonding, and immune system development. Removing the maternal connection could have consequences that do not appear until years later. There is also the risk of social stigma. Would children born from artificial wombs be viewed as engineered products rather than natural human beings? Commercialization adds another layer. If pregnancy becomes a product sold by corporations, children risk being treated as commodities. This shifts reproduction from a personal or family matter to an industry driven by profit. Gender roles would be disrupted as well. Technology that removes women from pregnancy undermines their unique place in human life. God made women to be in the role of mother and nurturer. Assigning a generic, emotionless robot to this role would move the needle in the wrong direction for women. The Slippery Slope Toward Designer Babies Artificial wombs would further the creation of designer babies, where parents select physical or intellectual traits before birth. What begins as a solution for infertility could evolve into a system of human engineering. Governments could misuse the technology. Artificial wombs could be used for population control, eugenics, or mass manufacturing of children selected for certain traits. The line between innovation and abuse is thin. (MORE NEWS: Sydney Sweeney ‘Good Jeans’ Outrage Explained) Final Thought Artificial womb robots may sound like a solution for infertile couples, but the risks far outweigh the promises. Children are not products, and motherhood cannot be outsourced to machines. This technology threatens the sanctity of life, the God-given role of women, and the very meaning of family. Without clear moral boundaries, artificial wombs would reduce babies to commodities in a marketplace driven by profit rather than love. Once we sever pregnancy from the mother, we risk erasing the bond that defines human nurture and dignity. True solutions to infertility should support families, protect children,…
- 1
- 2
