Zohran Mamdani
Miami Mayor’s Warning: NYC’s Mamdani Echoes Castro
Miami Mayor Francis Suarez ignited a firestorm this week in an interview with the New York Post. He made a bold comparison that links New York City’s mayoral frontrunner to one of history’s most notorious dictators. Drawing from his family’s painful escape from Cuba, Suarez likened Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani to a young Fidel Castro. He cautions that electing Mamdani could steer the Big Apple down a “very dark path” of economic ruin and repression. As the November 4, 2025, election looms, Suarez’s words cut deep, urging New Yorkers to confront the ghosts of socialism head-on. His call to the people of NYC is rooted in personal history and political conviction. Suarez’s Family Legacy Fuels His Fierce Stance Francis Suarez, Miami’s dynamic mayor since 2017, carries the weight of his parents’ exile from Castro’s Cuba in the early 1960s. They fled a regime that promised equality but delivered despair. In an exclusive with the New York Post, Suarez channeled that trauma into a vivid warning. He recounted, “My parents fled [Cuba] . . . because a young charismatic leader said ‘Give us all your property, give us all your businesses, and don’t worry, we’ll make everybody equal.’ And he did.” Suarez didn’t mince words: “He made everybody equally poor, equally miserable, and equally repressed. And that’s all that communism has delivered throughout the history of humanity.” At 47, Suarez embodies Miami’s transformation into the “Capital of Latin America.” Term-limited and eyeing national ambitions, he refuses to watch silently as New York flirts with policies he sees as disastrous. (RELATED NEWS: Rising Socialism Exposes the Democratic Party’s Identity Crisis) His father, Xavier Suarez, Miami mayor from 1985 to 1993 and then from November 1997 to March 1998, is running again, but Francis stays neutral there. Instead, he trains his focus northward, where the stakes feel personal. Transitioning from family scars to public alarm, Suarez begs New Yorkers to heed history’s lessons before it’s too late. Mamdani’s Rise: Charisma Meets Controversy Enter Zohran Mamdani, the Queens Assemblyman positioning himself as the Democratic socialist frontrunner in the 2025 NYC mayoral race. At just 33, Mamdani pushes an agenda of so-called “affordable” housing, government-run healthcare, and heavy wealth taxes—policies critics warn could destabilize the city’s fragile economy. Despite his limited experience, Mamdani’s rhetoric has gained traction in a city already struggling with soaring costs. Polls suggest he could even unseat incumbent Eric Adams, now running as an independent. But many see his rise less as a sign of strength and more as a symptom of voter frustration. Suarez, however, sees dangerous echoes in Mamdani’s appeal. He compares the young Assemblyman’s charisma to that of Fidel Castro in his early days—the polished revolutionary who promised hope but delivered repression. Mamdani’s public missteps have only added fuel. His inability to bench-press 135 pounds at a Brooklyn “Men’s Day” event became an embarrassing moment that Suarez quickly capitalized on. The Miami mayor later posted an Instagram reel showcasing his own strength—benching 225 pounds 13 times—captioned “Socialism VS Capitalism.” The clip went viral, underlining the contrast. Mamdani’s campaign brushed off the criticism, but Suarez points to it as a broader symbol of weakness—ideological and literal. Even as supporters brand him a fresh voice against corporate greed, opponents fear his “seize the means” mindset would chase businesses and jobs out of the city. Most telling, perhaps, is Mamdani’s silence. He refused to address Suarez’s attacks, leaving voters to wonder if he can withstand scrutiny. In a city of 8.8 million, the whispers of “Castro 2.0” grow louder with each passing week. (MORE NEWS: Pregnant Women Take Tylenol to Defy Trump in Viral Trend) A “Dark Path” Looms: Suarez’s Dire Predictions Suarez doesn’t sugarcoat the fallout. He envisions New York crumbling under socialist weight: businesses fleeing, taxes soaring, and innovation stifled. “There’s some people that say . . . that maybe [electing a socialist mayor in NYC] is best for America in a backwards way because, once you see the abject failure that it will be, there will be a correction and a reset,” he told the New York Post. But Suarez rejects that cruelty: “I don’t want people to suffer for that to happen.” He implores New Yorkers to feel “terrified” of socialism’s track record, from Cuba’s ration lines to Venezuela’s collapse. He also praised Adams, calling him a “good relationship” ally as the two mayors have connected over shared urban challenges. Broader forces shape the narrative: National Republicans cast Mamdani’s rise as a cautionary tale, while Democrats defend his equity-driven proposals. Suarez’s Castro analogy isn’t isolated—it resonates strongly in Cuban-American communities and beyond. As election day nears, his words ripple through op-eds and talk shows, sharpening the stakes of the contest as one of freedom versus folly. Echoes in Miami: A Tale of Two Cities Contrast Miami’s boom with New York’s struggles, and Suarez’s warning becomes clearer. The Sunshine City continues to attract tech leaders and investors with its low taxes, limited regulation, and unapologetically pro-business climate. As host of the American Business Forum on November 5-6, 2025—just after the election—Suarez plans to highlight Miami’s success as a model. “Miami is a truly great global city,” he says, framing it as the antidote to socialist experiments. Attendees will see firsthand how free enterprise and hard work have turned exile stories into prosperity. Meanwhile, New York—once the envy of the world—faces a shrinking tax base, businesses leaving, and mounting fiscal troubles. Suarez warns that a Mamdani victory would only accelerate the decline, echoing the collapse seen in nations that embraced socialism and paid the price. Mamdani’s supporters push for sweeping reforms, but socialism is no bold new idea—it has been tried repeatedly, and it has failed every time. The choice is stark: stay on the proven path of growth and opportunity, or repeat history’s mistakes and risk turning America’s greatest city into another cautionary tale. Backlash and Broader Ripples Mamdani’s camp stays quiet, while allies dismiss Suarez’s warning as “fearmongering.” Progressive voices call it a smear, but critics argue it’s simply…
Rising Socialism Exposes the Democratic Party’s Identity Crisis
OPINION The Democratic Party is moving further left, and it’s starting to show in ways that should make voters pay attention. Democrats used to keep socialism at arm’s length. Now, many are embracing it. Polls reveal that more Democrats say socialism is “great” while capitalism, the very system that built this country, is being trashed as “bad.” That shift isn’t just a talking point—it’s changing who gets power inside the party. CNN analyst Harry Enten recently admitted it’s no surprise Governor Kathy Hochul backed a socialist like Zohran Mamdani. Democrats no longer treat socialism as fringe. They celebrate it. And Hochul, a so-called centrist, clearly decided it was smarter to join the trend than fight it. (MORE NEWS: London: 100K Rally-Goers Unite Against Mass Immigration) Enten says, “The net popularity of socialism is up 29 pts since 2010 with Dems. Capitalism, however, has a net negative rating with Dems. This should leave the GOP/Trump salivating as socialism remains unpopular overall.” Re: Mamdani/Hochul, Dems see socialism as five letter word: “great”. The net popularity of socialism is up 29 pts since 2010 with Dems. Capitalism, however, has a net negative rating with Dems. This should leave the GOP/Trump salivating as socialism remains unpopular overall. pic.twitter.com/9txWvJQVuJ — (((Harry Enten))) (@ForecasterEnten) September 16, 2025 Hochul’s Gamble on Mamdani In the middle of New York City politics, Hochul decided to throw her weight behind Mamdani, a proud democratic socialist, for mayor. On the surface, it looked like a strange move. Hochul isn’t exactly running around calling herself a socialist. But her endorsement tells the story of where Democrats are heading. Rents are out of control, people feel crushed by debt, and Democrats want voters to believe socialism is the answer. By siding with Mamdani, Hochul tried to look in touch with the progressive base that has been growing louder every year. She wanted their energy on her side. She wanted to prove she wasn’t out of step. President Trump was shocked at Hochul’s endorsement: The Refusal That Exposed Her Weakness Here’s the kicker: Mamdani announced he would not endorse Hochul for her 2026 re-election campaign. For someone who just received the governor’s backing, you’d think he might return the favor. Instead, he made it clear he wasn’t going to tie himself to her. (MORE NEWS: Charlie Kirk: A Patriot Remembered, A Legacy Unbroken) That left Hochul looking weak. She took the risk of backing a socialist in hopes of winning points with progressives. But when it came time for him to stand with her, he didn’t. It proves what conservatives have said for years: trying to appease the radical left never works. They’re not interested in building bridges with moderates. They’re interested in pulling the party further to the left, no matter who gets trampled along the way. The subject came up on Fox’s The Five and here was the reaction from Kennedy: HOCHUL ENDORSES MAMDANI BUT HE DOESN’T ENDORSE HER BACK@KennedyNation : “Kathy Hochul is so bad with her political instincts” pic.twitter.com/HAa9ggOZbS — The Five (@TheFive) September 17, 2025 What This Means for Democrats This little drama shows how fractured the Democratic Party has become. Hochul wanted to bridge the gap between the establishment and the socialists. Instead, she ended up looking weak. She lost credibility with moderates, and she still didn’t win over the progressives. Meanwhile, Mamdani comes out looking strong to his base. He looks “authentic” because he refuses to cozy up to party insiders. That’s the new standard for Democrats: prove you’re independent from the establishment, even if it means throwing your own governor and state party head under the bus. A Party Pulled to the Left The rise of socialist politics isn’t about Mamdani alone. It’s part of a bigger trend. Democrats are sprinting to the left because they think that’s what younger voters want. They promise free programs, government takeovers, and redistribution schemes as if those will magically fix the economy. But let’s be honest—New York is already a test case for these ideas. High taxes, crime waves, and endless regulations are driving people and businesses out of the state. If socialism is the answer, why are so many families fleeing to Florida, Texas, and other red states that actually value capitalism and freedom? The Voter Backlash Waiting to Happen There’s a lesson here for voters across the country. Hochul thought she was being clever by endorsing a socialist. Instead, she got exposed. And Mamdani showed that socialists don’t want to share power with moderates. They want to replace them. For Democrats, this is a warning sign. If the party keeps running toward socialism, it risks alienating the very Americans who still believe in hard work, free markets, and individual liberty. Those people may not get the media attention, but they are still the backbone of the country. And they are paying attention. The Conservative Takeaway The Hochul-Mamdani feud is proof that the Democratic Party is being eaten alive from the inside. Socialists aren’t content to be part of the coalition—they want to run it. Hochul thought she could keep them close and use their energy. Instead, she ended up being used herself. That’s the reality of today’s Democratic Party. Moderates get pushed aside. Socialists get the spotlight. And voters are left to deal with the fallout: higher taxes, failed policies, and leaders who care more about ideology than results. Final Word Ultimately, Hochul’s gamble backfired. By endorsing Mamdani, she revealed just how desperate establishment Democrats are to keep up with the radical left. Mamdani’s refusal to back her only confirms that socialism is no longer a side note in the Democratic Party—it’s becoming the main act. The good news is voters have a choice. They can look at New York, see the mess created by left-wing policies, and decide they don’t want the same future for the rest of America. Conservatives must keep pointing out these failures, because if Democrats continue down this path, the country will pay the price. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin….
NYC Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani’s Comments on Domestic Violence Spark Outrage from Abuse Survivors
This article was written by John Zambenini for WokeSpy. Communist New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani continues to receive backlash online, this time from victims of domestic violence. Recently, Mamdani provoked the ire of domestic violence victims by opposing police responding to domestic violence incidents. According to the CDC, one in four women and one in ten men experience some form of domestic violence in their lifetime, ranging from stalking, mental abuse, to physical abuse, and life-threatening injuries involving knives and firearms. However, the Mamdani does not believe that armed police should respond to these situations. Horrifying Potential Future For Victims In NYC “Police do not create safety… there are so many responsibilities we’ve given to police that, frankly, should have nothing to do with their departments… if somebody is jaywalking, if somebody is surviving, going through domestic violence—there are so many different, different situations that would be far better handled by people trained to deal with those specific situations, as opposed to an individual with a gun,” he said, according to the Washington Free Beacon. (RELATED: Wealthy White Liberals Reportedly Urge Democrats To ‘Be Willing To Get Shot’ Opposing Trump) It is highly unlikely, however, that marriage counselors are the best choice for first-time responders when a spouse is being held at gunpoint. According to Victims Rights Reform Council founder, Michelle Esquenazi, domestic violence is often a life and death situation. It remains unclear how mental health counselors and social workers would be able to respond to a spouse holding their partner captive at gunpoint or knifepoint – as Mamdani would want. Victims Must Not Support Mamdani “There’s a lot of humans who are victims in the city of New York, and they need protection because sometimes it’s a matter of life and death,” Esquenazi told Fox News Digital. “They’re hiding in the bathroom with their children, and they need someone to come immediately.” Esquenazi claims that Mamdani’s statements affect her personally, as the New York Police Department (NYPD) saved her life when her ex-husband attacked her while she was pregnant in 1993. “I called 911, and they came running. They made sure that me and my children, and I was pregnant at the time, were safe. One of the officers took us to a back bedroom and made sure that we were calmed down and made sure that we had what we needed. They separated him from the situation immediately and essentially saved our lives,” she said. Make NYC A Death-Trap Again? Meanwhile, Mamdani’s comments align anti-police sentiments stoked by the George Floyd riots, resulting in calls for the defunding of entire law enforcement departments. Many deep blue cities have even changed their emergency response protocols for domestic violence, with some ending armed police response altogether. (RELATED: ‘If I Was Waiting For FEMA, I Would Be Screwed’: You’ll Sob Watching What’s Happening In NC Months After Hurricane Helene) Mamdani has repeatedly called for the defunding of the police, including proposals to delegate certain law enforcement responsibilities to the “Department of Community Safety.” However, in classic liberal subterfuge, Mr. Mamdani later denied pushing for the defunding of police, and even promised to work with them. TMM Analysis If you are pro-domestic violence, then you should vote for Mamdani. If you are in favor of women, children, and even men being murdered by their parents or partners, vote for Mamdani. If you are a fundamental monster, vote for Mamdani, Is it that simple.
Mamdani’s Shocking Claim: Blames America For al-Qaeda Terrorist’s Rise
This article was originally published by JoePags.com Zohran Mamdani, the self-described socialist who is the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor, has faced renewed scrutiny over past comments regarding Anwar al-Awlaki, the former head of Al Qaeda in Yemen. The New York Post reports, in previous social media posts, Mamdani appeared to suggest that U.S. law enforcement actions contributed to al-Awlaki’s radicalization and eventual embrace of jihadist ideology. These remarks were made in the context of a New York Times article that criticized the FBI’s surveillance of al-Awlaki, noting his ties to the 9/11 hijackers. According to The Post, “Mamdani, in a series of tweets in 2015, bizarrely criticized the terrorism — after reading a New York Times account of the snooping, which revealed the cleric’s hooker fetish. ‘Why no proper interrogation of what it means for FBI to have conducted extensive surv. into Awlaki’s private life?’ the socialist candidate wrote. (RELATED: What’s America Gonna Look Like? Shocking Video from Rome Gives Preview) In another post, Mamdani wrote, “How could #Awlaki have ever trusted@FBI to not release surveillance esp. if he continued to critique [the] state? Why no further discussion of how #Awlaki’s knowledge of surv. eventually led him to #alqaeda? Or what FBI’s surveillance of al-Awlaki — and claimed the G-Men actually pushed him into that says about [the] efficacy of surv?” Anwar al-Awlaki, born in New Mexico to Yemeni parents, was an American Islamic who became one of the most influential figures in Al Qaeda. He was linked to several terrorist plots. According to The Post, al-Awlaki directed the failed attempt to blow up an airplane on Christmas Day in 2009. He directed the failed attempt to blow up US cargo planes in 2010,’ Obama said at the time. ‘And he repeatedly called on individuals in the United States and around the globe to kill innocent men, women and children to advance a murderous agenda.’” Anwar al-Awlaki was killed in a U.S. drone strike in Yemen in 2011. Al-Awlaki’s journey from a mainstream Muslim preacher to a prominent jihadist leader was marked by his growing hostility toward the United States, especially after being imprisoned in Yemen—a development he blamed on U.S. pressure. The cleric was regarded as such a significant threat that President Barack Obama authorized the 2011 drone strike that killed him. Mamdani’s comments have drawn criticism from opponents who argue that he was excusing or defending a notorious terrorist. (RELATED: ‘THE DISASTER CYCLE’ Trailer Will Make Your Blood Run Cold; What Do The Elites Know About What Happens Next?) According to The Post, “retired FDNY Lt. Jim McCaffrey — whose brother-in-law, FDNY Battalion 7 Chief Orio Palmer, rushed into the World Trade Center’s south tower to try to help people before the building collapsed on him and hundreds of others during the hijacked-plane strike — called Mamdani’s comments ‘very offensive’ to 9/11 victims and their families,” adding that Mamdani’s candidacy in New York City is both “eye-opening” and “frightening.” TMM Analysis It is certainly scary to think that America may elect a politician who is so open about his disdain for the nation that gave him everything. Like so many other faux-liberals before him, Mamdani is a danger to each and every citizen of this nation, as his hatred can easily bleed into the soft minds of younger generations and old, corrupting them against the only country in the world where they can truly live in freedom. (Use Your Voice Today to Stop The Degradation of American Values) If you are terrified of a future dictated to you by socialists and extremists, have you considered upping your political engagement to be an actual change maker? No one listens to your keyboard warrior attitude on platforms like Meta and X (not even your friends) so why not check out organizations like Million Voices, who actually bridge the gap between your voice and true political action?