Kimmel’s Italian Citizenship: Turning Away From America
Jimmy Kimmel Chooses Italian Citizenship Jimmy Kimmel, the well-known late-night host, recently revealed that he has obtained Italian citizenship. At 57, Kimmel took this step through his grandmother, who was originally from Italy. Why? He says it’s because of President Trump and policies he strongly disagrees with. On Sarah Silverman’s podcast—Silverman is a longtime friend and former girlfriend—Kimmel shared his thoughts about the current state of America. He said things are much worse than he expected. “A lot of people I know are thinking about where are they going to get citizenship?” Silverman said. (RELATED: Trump: New Census Will Omit Illegal Immigrants) “I did get Italian citizenship,” Kimmel replied. He added, “As bad as you thought it was going to be — it’s so much worse. It’s just unbelievable. I feel like it’s even worse than he would like it to be.” See Ya! Late night host Jimmy Kimmel announces he has secured Italian citizenship – declares Donald Trump’s presidency is “so much worse” than he ever imagined. Can we hope he will ACTUALLY leave the country? pic.twitter.com/Q1cPTRlcg1 — Conservative Brief (@ConservBrief) August 9, 2025 Choosing Another Country Over Your Own Kimmel’s choice raises a serious question: why would a U.S. citizen, with every right and opportunity here, seek citizenship elsewhere? He does not have work overseas. He is a public figure who is choosing a second country because of political policies he disagrees with. This is part of a “fashionable” trend. Celebrities like Rosie O’Donnell and Ellen DeGeneres have also pursued citizenship in other countries. The message is clear: America is easy for some to give up if policies are inconvenient or uncomfortable. Instead of staying and fighting for their beliefs, they choose to leave. Dual Citizenship and Loyalty Dual citizenship has long allowed people to live, work, and vote in two countries—depending on the laws and residency requirements of the other country. But this can create a conflict of interest. If two countries have opposing policies, where does your loyalty lie? Full allegiance should always remain with the United States. Kimmel’s decision highlights this debate. When public figures turn their back on their home country, it sends a message that America is not worth defending or supporting. (MORE NEWS: SNAP Soda Ban: Ending Taxpayer Junk Food Subsidies) Immigration Rules Abroad Kimmel’s decision also underscores a reality many ignore: other countries do not welcome immigrants as freely as some assume. Many have strict guidelines for immigration—including secure borders. Many European countries actively deport illegal immigrants. Italy deports asylum seekers to Albania and strictly controls immigration. Ireland also has strict immigration laws and has deported Nigerian nationals and others. Most countries protect their borders and citizens, and some that face immigration challenges are actively working to correct them. Americans considering foreign citizenship often overlook these restrictions. Kimmel’s move benefits from his heritage and elite celebrity status. The average U.S. citizen would not find the same opportunities. Kimmel Keeping an Open Mind on Former Trump Supporters Despite his harsh views of President Trump, Kimmel defended the right to reconsider one’s stance. “Now you see these clips of Joe Rogan saying, ‘Why is he doing this? Why are you deporting people?’ And people go, ‘…you supported him.’ I don’t buy into that,” Kimmel said. “The door has to stay open. If you want to change your mind, that’s so hard to do. If you want to admit you were wrong, that is so hard and so rare to do. You are welcome.” Contrary to what this statement implies, Rogan questioning Trump’s deportation efforts doesn’t mean he is no longer a Trump supporter. People can disagree with specific policies or actions while still supporting the administration overall. The Real Cost of Convenience Policies may change, leaders may come and go, but walking away from the United States out of protest—or as a virtue signal—is not the solution. Americans enjoy freedoms and opportunities that no other country provides. Choosing another country reflects disloyalty to the very nation that gave them the platform they are now using to criticize it. Kimmel’s story is not just about one celebrity. It illustrates a larger discussion about loyalty, dual citizenship, and the responsibilities Americans have to their own country. Leaving the U.S. demonstrates that, in difficult times, some Americans prioritize personal comfort over national pride. Should dual citizenship be allowed? Some say no. And if it is allowed, should those individuals retain the right to vote in U.S. elections? If their total allegiance is not to the United States, probably not. The fact remains that only the elite can afford to pack up and move to a different country when they dislike how things are going. It’s not a realistic option for most people, and that further exemplifies the divide between Hollywood and real life. And let’s be honest—someone should probably tell him who the current Prime Minister of Italy is. Unmask the Narrative. Rip Through the Lies. Spread the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t polish propaganda — we tear it to shreds. The corporate press censors, spins, and sugarcoats. We don’t. If you’re tired of being misled, silenced, and spoon-fed fiction, help us expose what they try to hide. Truth matters — but only if it’s heard. So share this. Shake the silence. And remind the powerful they don’t own the story.
SNAP Soda Ban: Ending Taxpayer Junk Food Subsidies
The push to Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) has made significant strides with the signing of waivers by U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins. These waivers allow 12 states to ban the purchase of sugary drinks, candy, and desserts using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) vouchers, which are intended to help low-income families access nutritious food. This move marks a pivotal step in ending taxpayer subsidies for junk food. Six new states are joining the MAHA movement! Yesterday at the Great American Farmers Market, @secrollins and @seckennedy signed food choice state waivers for West Virginia , Florida, Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas to remove unhealthy foods from SNAP.… pic.twitter.com/Q8sAqaDBQP — Dept. of Agriculture (@USDA) August 5, 2025 A Bold Step in SNAP Reform These states have approval and are now set to remove high-calorie, nutrient-poor foods from SNAP: Florida, West Virginia, Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, Iowa, Nebraska, Arkansas, Indiana, and Idaho. This reform comes amid President Trump’s broader initiative to tackle the nation’s rising health crisis and prioritize food quality. “The number one purchase by SNAP recipients is sugary drinks,” said Secretary Rollins. “SNAP is a supplemental NUTRITION program, meant to provide health food benefits to low-income families to supplement their grocery budget, so they can afford the nutritious food essential to health and well-being.” .@SecRollins announces the signing of waivers removing unhealthy foods from SNAP in six more states: “SNAP is a supplemental NUTRITION program meant to provide health food benefits to low income families… the law states it and @POTUS‘ @USDA plans to deliver on it.” pic.twitter.com/Mby4uoQIdu — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) August 4, 2025 Despite the progress, implementing this policy at the federal level remains a challenge. Many lobbyists are fiercely advocating for the continuation of junk food eligibility, making it an uphill battle. Yet, the states are leading the charge, and 12 have now taken action, with 38 more to go. (RELATED: Tracy Beanz Reveals MAHA’s Mission & What Comes Next In Fascinating Interview) A Nationwide Call to Action Each state follows its own process to determine which foods are unhealthy and should be excluded. After this, they submit a formal request for approval from the USDA. The new food bans will take effect in 2026. The Trump administration is actively encouraging more states to apply for waivers, with each state playing a key role in shaping the future of SNAP. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary joined Rollins in announcing these waivers. Their support underscores the significance of this initiative in tackling the nation’s growing obesity and diabetes crisis. Ending the Sugar Subsidy Dr. Makary emphasized the importance of focusing on healthier alternatives to junk food, stating, “This begins the end of the government subsidization of our obesity, diabetes, insulin resistance epidemic.” He urged a national focus on the nutritional quality of food, rather than relying on medications to address the health crisis. “Forty percent of our nation’s kids now have a diagnosed chronic disease,” Dr. Makary added. “Thirty-one percent have diabetes, pre-diabetes, or insulin resistance. We have to talk about nutrients and fiber, not just Ozempic and other medications to medicate our nation.” Support for States and Local Leaders SNAP reform is a direct result of proactive state leadership. Governors from West Virginia, Florida, and other states have stepped up, requesting waivers and setting an example for the rest of the nation. Dr. Makary also praised the initiative, stating, “I hope to see all 50 states join this bold commonsense approach. For too long, the root causes of our chronic disease epidemic has been addressed with lip service only. It’s time for powerful changes to our nation’s SNAP program.” (MORE NEWS: Sweeney ‘Good Jeans’ Outrage Explained) What’s Next for MAHA? As the USDA and the Trump administration push forward with their efforts to reform SNAP, the question remains: Will other states follow suit? The battle is far from over. With 38 states still to act, the momentum needs to continue. But the steps taken up to this point have proven that meaningful change is possible. “It’s time for a change,” said RFK Jr. “And we’re seeing that change happen, state by state. We’re putting real food back at the center of SNAP, empowering states to lead the way in protecting public health.” Changing the Status Quo The fight to Make America Healthy Again is a real, tangible effort to reshape the way we view food, health, and public policy. With the signing of these waivers, we are witnessing the first steps toward a future where healthier food choices are accessible and where taxpayer dollars are spent wisely. As more states join this movement, the impact on public health could be profound. This is not just about banning soda and candy—it’s about changing the narrative around nutrition and ensuring that the poorest Americans are no longer subsidizing the very foods that contribute to chronic disease. The journey has just begun, but with the leadership of Secretary Rollins, Dr. Makary, and Secretary Kennedy, America is taking significant strides toward a healthier future. Forget the Headlines. Challenge the Script. Deliver the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe through talking points — we swing a machete through the media’s favorite lies. They protect power. We confront it. If you’re sick of censorship, narrative control, and being told what to think — stand with us. Share the story. Wake the people. Because truth dies in silence — and you weren’t made to stay quiet.
BREAKING ALERT: Crime in D.C.: Trump’s Historic Action to Restore Order
President Donald Trump made bold moves to address the escalating crime in Washington, D.C. His recent actions come in response to the rising violence, car thefts, and carjackings plaguing the city. Trump signed an Executive Order and outlined a comprehensive plan to restore law and order, signaling a new era of federal intervention in local crime control. (RELATED: Trump Takes On Crime in D.C.) The D.C. Crime Crisis The crime rate in Washington, D.C., has reached alarming levels. Trump pointed out that “The murder rate in Washington today is higher than that of Bogota, Columbia, Mexico City…” He continued, “The number of car thefts has doubled over the past five years, and the number of carjackings has more than tripled.” These shocking statistics underscore the urgent need for action. FACT: D.C. Crime Is Out of Control. ⬇️ Our nation’s capital should be a symbol of patriotism for the American people—NOT a city of lawlessness. It ends today. pic.twitter.com/TdLERGXVVP — The White House (@WhiteHouse) August 11, 2025 The situation became even more dire last week. Edward “Big Balls” Coristine, a former DOGE staffer, was injured while defending a woman from a carjacking. A group of about a dozen young men attacked the woman. Coristine intervened, resulting in a concussion. Police arrested two 15-year-olds involved in the attack, but others remain at large. This event and others prompted President Trump to take immediate action. Federalizing D.C. Law Enforcement In a historic move, President Trump invoked Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act. This action places the D.C. Metropolitan Police under direct federal control. It gives the federal government the authority to oversee local law enforcement and take strong action to combat crime. Trump announced, “I am announcing a historic action to rescue our nation’s capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam, squalor, and worse. This is Liberation Day in D.C. and we’re going to take our capital back.” His declaration marked the start of a major federal effort to restore safety in the city. It’s “Liberation Day” in Washington, D.C. “Today, President Donald J. Trump took bold executive action to liberate Washington, D.C., from the cesspool of crime and homelessness that it has become after decades of unilateral Democrat leadership.”https://t.co/mL6oRxBW4Y — Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) August 11, 2025 National Guard Deployed to D.C. Trump also ordered the deployment of the National Guard. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed, “This morning, we have mobilized the D.C. National Guard… You will see them flowing through the streets of D.C.” A total of 1,000 National Guard troops have been sent to assist in law enforcement efforts. The deployment also leaves open the possibility of deploying active-duty military personnel if necessary. . @SecDef “Mr. President, it is an honor to be here and at your direction, this morning we’ve mobilized the D.C. National Guard… They will be STRONG and TOUGH, and they will STAND with their law enforcement partners.” pic.twitter.com/L6Bk5spgY2 — DOD Rapid Response (@DODResponse) August 11, 2025 Attorney General Pam Bondi, now in charge of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, was clear: “Crime in D.C. is ending and ending today. We are going to use every power we have to fight criminals here.” Immediate Law Enforcement Operations Trump’s plan includes aggressive law enforcement operations. These operations will target gangs, drug dealers, and criminal networks in D.C. U.S. Attorney for D.C. Jeanine Pirro emphasized, “We need to recognize that the people who matter are the law-abiding citizens! President Trump is going to make sure these emboldened criminals understand: We see you, we’re watching you, and we’re going to change the law to catch you!” FBI Director Kash Patel echoed this sentiment, pointing to a similar operation in Northern Virginia. “We stood up a task force in Northern Virginia, [and] we said ‘Let’s let good cops be cops.’ In one month, we arrested 545 violent felons,” Patel said. “That simplicity in law enforcement is what’s coming to Washington, D.C.” Addressing Homelessness and Public Safety Trump’s plan goes beyond crime. He is also addressing the issue of homelessness in the city. “We are going to be removing homeless encampments from all over our parks… We’re getting rid of the people from underpasses and public spaces,” Trump said. The president emphasized that while law enforcement will be the priority, helping the homeless will still be part of the solution. “We’ll help them as much as you can help,” he added. A Nationwide Push Against Cashless Bail In addition to federalizing D.C. law enforcement, Trump is targeting the issue of cashless bail. He has called on Republicans in Congress to outlaw cashless bail systems nationwide. “That is what started the problem,” Trump said, blaming the practice for the rise in crime. He pointed to the Democratic Party’s weak stance on crime, accusing them of enabling criminals to avoid consequences. Trump’s legislative push would ensure that violent offenders are held accountable before they are allowed to return to the streets. (RELATED: Newsome Attacks Republicans On Violent Crime — Data Tell Different Story) Expanding Federal Control to Other Cities While Trump’s immediate focus is on D.C., he hinted at expanding this strategy to other cities facing similar crime issues. Trump mentioned that after federalizing D.C., he is considering the same approach for New York City and Chicago. Both cities have also seen rising crime rates, and Trump’s federalization strategy could be a model for other urban centers. The Path Forward: A Vision for Safer Cities Trump’s actions represent a significant shift in how the federal government deals with crime in American cities. By federalizing D.C. law enforcement, deploying the National Guard, and focusing on aggressive law enforcement tactics, Trump is taking unprecedented steps to restore order in Washington. His push to outlaw cashless bail and sanctuary cities, and his plans for further federal involvement in other cities, show his commitment to cracking down on crime nationwide. As the operation in Washington unfolds, Trump’s efforts may serve as a blueprint for other cities struggling with rising crime. His federal approach to crime…
Trump Takes on Crime in D.C.
A Bold Move to Address Crime and Renovation President Trump has made it clear he is determined to address the ongoing issues with crime in Washington, D.C. In a series of Truth Social posts, he announced plans for a press conference on “Crime and ‘Beautification’” at 10 a.m. EST on August 11th. His dual goals are to combat crime and restore the physical beauty to the nation’s capital. He said the press conference, “will not only involve ending the Crime, Murder, and Death in our Nation’s Capital, but will also be about Cleanliness and the General Physical Renovation and Condition of our once beautiful and well-maintained Capital.” (MORE NEWS: Trump: New Census Will Omit Illegal Immigrants) He emphasized his commitment to restoring the city to its former glory, pledging to “take care of our cherished Capital.” Key Points from Series of Posts Regarding D.C. Crime • Urgent action to remove the homeless people, clear tents • Criminals will be jailed • Fast action expected, similar to the border • Trump pledges to federalize D.C. • Calls for changes to laws to prosecute teenagers, ages 14-16, involved in violent crimes Rising Crime in D.C.: A Personal Concern for President Trump Last week, Edward “Big Balls” Coristine, a former DOGE staffer, was injured while defending a woman from an attempted carjacking. A group of about a dozen young men attacked the woman, and Coristine intervened, resulting in a concussion. Police arrested two 15-year-olds involved in the attack and are searching for more perpetrators. This incident has prompted President Trump to direct federal law enforcement to increase their presence in D.C. (MORE NEWS: Trump’s EPA Pushes Green New Deal Into Political Obscurity) Trump also praised D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, calling her a “good person” but suggesting that crime was beyond her control. The Legal Path to Federalizing D.C. To federalize Washington, D.C., Congress would need to repeal The Home Rule Act of 1973, a law that grants local officials governance authority over the city. However, Congress retains the power to overrule local legislation. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress authority to “exercise exclusive legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such district… as may… become the Seat of the Government of the United States.” Trump’s legal team is exploring options to make a federal takeover a reality. Senator Mike Lee has called D.C. Home Rule a “disaster,” arguing it contradicts the Constitution’s intent. He has pushed for a legislative change to restore Congressional oversight in D.C., as originally intended. Lee has also suggested that Washington, D.C. could return to its original status by returning residential areas to Maryland, similar to how Arlington and Alexandria were returned to Virginia in 1846. Lee’s proposal is part of a broader push to correct what he sees as the failure of local governance in D.C. Federal Law Enforcement to Tackle Crime in D.C. Under Trump’s direction, federal law enforcement agencies, including Homeland Security Investigations, the FBI, and the DEA, are tasked with increasing their presence in D.C. The operation will focus on high-profile areas like the National Mall, Union Station, Rock Creek Park, and other monuments and memorials. The operation, initially planned to last seven days, could be extended if necessary. Congressional Efforts to Reinstate Oversight Senator Mike Lee has introduced the Bowser Act (S.440)—the Bringing Oversight to Washington and Safety to Every Resident Act. This bill seeks to repeal the D.C. Home Rule Act and return oversight of D.C. to Congress. Lee’s proposal is in line with efforts to ensure that Washington D.C. is properly governed and safe for its residents. 11/12 Congress needs to reclaim the power it delegated away with DC Home Rule That’s why I’ve introduced the BOWSER Act—the Bringing Oversight to Washington and Safety to Every Resident Act—to repeal DC Home Rule and restore congressional oversight as the Constitution intended — Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) August 6, 2025 The land that became Washington D.C. was donated by Maryland and Virginia in 1790. The district was designed as a neutral ground to serve as the nation’s capital, ensuring no single state could exert undue influence over the federal government. The area was initially 100 square miles but was later reduced when portions were returned to Virginia. Today, Washington D.C. covers 61.1 square miles, but Senator Lee’s proposal could return the residential areas to Maryland, further limiting D.C.’s autonomy. What’s Next for President Trump and D.C.? While the path to federalizing D.C. may require congressional approval, Trump has made it clear that he is ready to take swift and decisive action. He warned, “There will be no ‘Mr. Nice Guy.’” Although a full federal takeover may require changes to the 1973 law, Trump could temporarily take control of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department if an emergency is declared. This marks the beginning of what could be a significant shift in the governance of Washington, D.C. President Trump’s next steps remain uncertain, but his focus on restoring safety and order to the capital is clear. Expose the Spin. Shatter the Narrative. Speak the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t cover politics to play referee — we swing a machete through the spin, the double-speak, and the partisan theater. While the media protects the powerful and buries the backlash, we dig it up and drag it into the light. If you’re tired of rigged narratives, selective outrage, and leaders who serve themselves, not you — then share this. Expose the corruption. Challenge the agenda. Because if we don’t fight for the truth, no one will. And that fight starts with you.
Alaska Hosts Historic Summit Between Trump and Putin
Alaska Hosts Historic Summit Between Presidents Trump and Putin Next Friday, Alaska will serve as the backdrop for a historic summit between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. The meeting, focused on the future of the ongoing war in Ukraine, comes at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions. (MORE NEWS: Trump’s EPA Pushes Green New Deal Into Political Obscurity) Alaska’s Strategic Role Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy expressed his support for the summit, emphasizing the state’s unique strategic position: “Alaska is the most strategic location in the world, sitting at the crossroads of North America and Asia, with the Arctic to our north and the Pacific to our south.” With just two miles separating Russia from Alaska, Governor Dunleavy highlighted the region’s crucial role in U.S. national defense, energy security, and Arctic leadership. I welcome the upcoming meeting between President Donald J. Trump and Russia’s President Putin being held here in the great state of Alaska. Alaska is the most strategic location in the world, sitting at the crossroads of North America and Asia, with the Arctic to our north and… — Governor Mike Dunleavy (@GovDunleavy) August 8, 2025 U.S. Legislative Reaction The announcement of the summit took many by surprise, particularly members of the three-member congressional delegation. Rep. Nick Begich III, who Trump endorsed during last year’s U.S. House elections, expressed cautious optimism. He stated: “The pursuit of peace requires open dialogue. And it’s encouraging that the dialogue will be occurring at the highest levels here in Alaska, where Russia and America share a historic relationship and geographic proximity.” The pursuit of peace requires open dialogue. And it’s encouraging that the dialogue will be occurring at the highest levels here in Alaska, where Russia and America share a historic relationship and geographic proximity. My prayer is that the conversations are productive and… pic.twitter.com/0HiaHngpnb — Congressman Nick Begich (@RepNickBegich) August 8, 2025 Putin’s Visit: No Risk of Arrest The United States remains a safe venue for President Putin, as the U.S. does not recognize the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, which has issued a warrant for Putin’s arrest for war crimes. This is the first time the two leaders have met since their 2019 summit in Osaka, Japan. It remains unclear whether Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will attend the summit. Historical Context: Alaska’s Russian Roots Alaska’s history adds another layer of significance to this meeting. Once part of the Russian Empire, Alaska was sold to the U.S. for $7.2 million in 1867 under President Andrew Johnson. The decision was largely motivated by Russia’s struggle to defend the region and fears of a potential British takeover, as Canada was under British rule at the time. Since the sale, no Russian leader has visited Alaska, although international meetings have taken place there twice before: President Richard Nixon met with Japanese Emperor Hirohito in Anchorage in 1971, and President Ronald Reagan met with Pope John Paul II in Fairbanks in 1984. Trump’s Controversial Proposal The summit’s timing is noteworthy, coming just hours after President Trump suggested that Ukraine might need to cede some territory to end the war. At a press conference, Trump remarked: “You’re looking at territory that’s been fought over for three and a half years, a lot of Russians have died. A lot of Ukrainians have died. It’s very complicated. We’re going to get some back, we’re going to get some switched. There will be some swapping of territories, to the betterment of both.” JUST IN: President Trump says Russia and Ukraine are looking at “some swapping of territories to the betterment of both” as part of peace negotiations pic.twitter.com/dbbSYVV2K2 — Fox News (@FoxNews) August 8, 2025 Diplomatic Backchannels and Offers According to CBS News, the White House is attempting to garner European support for a plan that would involve Russia taking control of the entire Donbas region, while Ukraine would cede the partially occupied Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. The Wall Street Journal reports that Putin presented a similar proposal during a meeting with Trump’s Envoy, Steve Witkoff, in Moscow. The plan would end the war if Russia could claim the eastern Donetsk region, including the annexed Crimean Peninsula. On Saturday night, several European leaders issued a joint statement on Trump’s meeting with Putin: “We welcome President Trump’s work to stop the killing in Ukraine, end the Russian Federation’s war of aggression, and achieve just and lasting peace and security for Ukraine… Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny. Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities. The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force.” (RELATED: The Trade Deal That Changed Everything: U.S.–EU Breakthrough) Zelensky’s Stance Ukrainian President Zelensky has steadfastly rejected any territorial concessions. In a statement on Telegram, Zelensky reaffirmed his commitment to Ukraine’s territorial integrity: “We will not reward Russia for what it perpetrated. The answer to the Ukrainian territorial issue is already in the Constitution of Ukraine.” He further stated: “Any solutions that are against us, any solutions that are without Ukraine, are at the same time solutions against peace.” He emphasized that Ukraine is ready for “real solutions” that can bring lasting peace, working alongside President Trump and other partners to achieve this goal. The Toll of War and the Need for Peace The ongoing Russia-Ukraine war has taken a devastating toll, with over a million lives lost and billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars spent. Despite the immense cost, little progress has been made toward ending the conflict. Both Presidents Putin and Zelensky continue to hold steadfast to their demands for peace, but neither side has achieved the necessary conditions for a resolution. Trump’s Track Record as a Peace Broker President Trump has a proven history of negotiating peace deals in seemingly impossible situations. Some of his notable successes include: Azerbaijan and Armenia Cambodia and Thailand Israel and Iran Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the…
Sydney Sweeney ‘Good Jeans’ Outrage Explained
Welcome to The Modern Memo — where lifestyle news isn’t shallow, soft, or sold out. From what you eat to what you buy, we cover the choices that shape your freedom, health, and future—without the influencer fluff or corporate agenda. Real life deserves real reporting. And we’re here to give it to you straight. When a Pair of Jeans Becomes a Political Flashpoint It was just an ad. At least, that’s what most people saw—a playful nod to style and wordplay. But in 2025, even a lighthearted fashion campaign can set off a political firestorm. And when American Eagle teamed up with Sydney Sweeney, the backlash revealed more about America’s culture wars than it did about denim. (MORE NEWS: Trump: New Census Will Omit Illegal Immigrants) From Clever Wordplay to Culture War On July 23rd, American Eagle released its new campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney with the tagline: “Sydney Sweeney has good jeans.” The ad played on the words jeans and genes. In a short video, the Euphoria actress joked: “Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color… My jeans are blue.” For most viewers, it was harmless fun. But for loudest voices on the left, it became something darker. Online commentators and media outlets compared the Sydney Sweeney American Eagle ad to “Nazi propaganda” and “white supremacist eugenics” because she’s blonde and blue-eyed. CNN even called it a “scary white supremacist dog whistle.” Why American Eagle Isn’t Backing Down Despite removing the “genes” video from social media, American Eagle hasn’t abandoned the campaign. The company is still running the Sydney Sweeney “good jeans” ads across its platforms and has issued a public statement defending its decision on their Instagram. And it’s paying off. American Eagle’s stock price is up 20% since the campaign launch, boosted by a high-profile post from President Donald Trump praising the ad. Other prominent conservative voices have rallied to Sweeney’s defense. Megyn Kelly posted on X: Look how scared they are about the Sweeney ad – “it’s all a right-wing invention!!” Their party is paying millions to learn how to talk to young male voters and then their lunatic voters say you’re a Nazi if you like this gorgeous white blonde actress & it’s all blown to hell. https://t.co/JeJntXHlyE — Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) August 5, 2025 Vice President JD Vance also weighed in, posting: “[Democrats] have managed to so unhinge themselves over this thing. And it’s like — did you learn nothing from the November 2024 election?” “They have managed to so unhinge themselves over this thing.” Vice President JD Vance rips the left’s overreaction to Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle ad on @RuthlessPodcast pic.twitter.com/K2A59xwfHa — Fox News (@FoxNews) August 1, 2025 These defenses underline a growing belief on the right that the backlash is only helping the brand and pushing more young voters toward conservative politics. Amid the controversy, one major part of the campaign has been largely overlooked: the cause it supports. According to the American Eagle website: “A butterfly motif on the back pocket represents domestic violence awareness, an issue Sweeney is passionate about. 100% of the purchase price from The Sydney Jean will be donated to Crisis Text Line, a nonprofit offering free, 24/7, confidential mental health support.” Woke Advertising Is Losing Its Grip For years, corporations pushed political activism into ads. Many customers walked away. They wanted products, not politics. Now brands are moving back toward the middle. Sydney Sweeney fits that shift—beautiful, stylish, and a touch of old-school appeal. The “girl next door” is making a comeback. People are tired of the chaos of leftism. Now, companies are shifting to relatable ads with <gasp> sex appeal, like the days of Marilyn Monroe and Farrah Fawcett. It’s a cultural reset, and it’s working. (RELATED: Court Nixes California AI Deepfake Law, Free Speech Wins) What’s Driving the Cultural Divide Pew Research shows men—especially under 50—are moving toward the Republican Party. 55% of men voted for Trump in 2024, up from 50% in 2020. 46% of women voted for Trump in 2024, compared with 44% in 2020. Charlie Kirk tied this shift directly to the Sweeney outrage: Everytime they call Sydney Sweeney a fascist, 100 young men become registered Republicans. — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) August 4, 2025 Young men are waking up. They want to marry a “normie.” They want kids, a home, and a steady life. They don’t want the drama of woke culture. Sydney Sweeney isn’t just a woman in an ad. She represents what many men—and women—want back: normalcy, beauty, and stability. Sometimes an Ad Is Just an Ad The Sydney Sweeney “good jeans” backlash proves how quickly harmless marketing can become a political lightning rod. But here’s the truth: NO ONE should be shamed for being proud of their genes or their jeans. Appreciating beauty isn’t an insult to anyone else. We live in a culture that twists everything into controversy. Sometimes an ad really is just an ad. Unmask the Narrative. Rip Through the Lies. Spread the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t polish propaganda—we tear it to shreds. The corporate press censors, spins, and sugarcoats. We don’t. If you’re tired of being misled, silenced, and spoon-fed fiction, help us expose what they try to hide. Truth matters—but only if it’s heard. So share this. Shake the silence. And remind the powerful they don’t own the story.
Trump: New Census Will Omit Illegal Immigrants
Welcome to The Modern Memo — where our readers expect the truth, not the talking points. We don’t regurgitate headlines or echo the approved narrative. We ask the questions corporate media won’t and expose what they’d rather you ignore. If you’re looking for clarity in the chaos and facts without the filter, you’re in the right place. Trump: Don’t Count Illegal Immigrants in the Census As national redistricting debates continue, President Donald Trump has called for a major shift in how the U.S. counts its population. He recently announced plans for a new approach to the 2030 census — one that would exclude illegal immigrants. “People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS,” Trump said. He directed the Department of Commerce to begin work on a “highly accurate” count using modern data and lessons from the 2024 election. The Constitutional Mandate vs. Modern Reality The constitutional mandate for the U.S. census began in 1790, as required by Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which was ratified in 1788. A census has been taken every 10 years since, and helps count the total number of people living in the country. However, the Constitution does not say whether illegal immigrants should be included. Congress decides how the count is done and what rules are used. That’s where the debate begins. The U.S. Census, since it began, has counted the “whole number of persons” living in the United States: Through the 1940s the census asked about citizenship and noted whether the person was: Naturalized Born in the U.S. An alien (non-citizen) Beginning in 1950-2000, the citizenship question was on the long form of the census and most households didn’t see it. In 2010, the citizenship question was removed. In 2020, when President Trump signed a memo to add the question back to the census, the Supreme Court blocked it in 2019. President Biden revoked the memo in 2021. Today, there is no citizenship question and all people living in the country are included. BUT, with mass immigration during the Biden Administration, the U.S. has never faced this kind of threat to elections through the census. (MORE NEWS: Trump’s EPA Pushes Green New Deal Into Political Obscurity) Why the Census Matters: Power and Money The census affects many things. It helps decide: How many seats each state gets in the House of Representatives How billions of federal dollars are shared between states Where new roads, hospitals, and schools are built How voting districts are drawn If illegal immigrants are counted, areas with more of them will get more representation and more money. This would unfairly boost political power in certain areas. Immigration Surges Raise the Stakes The Department of Homeland Security reported about 11 million encounters with people crossing the border illegally during the Biden Administration. Migrant crossings are down 99.99% under the Trump Administration. Many Americans are now asking: Should people who entered the country illegally be counted the same as those who are here legally? (RELATED: ICE Cooperation Gets CO Deputy Sued By AG) Proof of Citizenship and the Push for Integrity Although the census doesn’t decide who votes, it plays a critical role in shaping the electoral map. As concerns over election integrity grow, many are calling for stronger safeguards. This includes proof of citizenship requirements in voter registration and voting. In April of this year, Wisconsin voters overwhelmingly supported enshrining voter ID requirements into the state constitution — 63% for and 37% against. (RELATED: RESULTS: Wisconsin Supreme Court Election, Voter ID – Special Election) Federal Legislation Under Debate The SAVE Act — a federal bill requiring all voters in federal elections to prove their citizenship has passed the U.S. House of Representatives. It now awaits debate in the Senate. If passed, it would establish a uniform national standard and remove confusion between states. If the bill fails, however, the responsibility will fall back on states — each left to craft their own solutions, some of which may face legal hurdles. The Need for Census Clarity and Accuracy Whether for representation or handing out federal funding, accurate census data matters. Supporters of reform believe that counting the legal population is the only way the U.S. can maintain the legitimacy of a representative system. In a democratic republic, numbers don’t just guide decisions — they shape the whole government. That’s why who gets counted, and how, remains one of the most important questions facing the country. Final Thoughts The mass immigration we saw over the last four years was never just about “compassion.” It was about manipulating the map. We can stop pretending these are random people who came for a “better life.” This was a STRATEGY. From day one, the plan was clear. Flood deep blue cities and swing states with illegals, count them in the census, and boost seats, electoral votes, and political power. Endless federal money through NGOs funded this well-orchestrated plan of attack. Once they were in, amnesty would be granted, and those same people would become voters. That was the long game. It’s the reason sanctuary cities are so important to the left. And why court dates were set years away. It’s why voter ID laws are fought tooth and nail. Political design. Every caravan, busload, red-eye jet in the dead of night wasn’t about taking care of people. It was a ballot box delivery system. It bypasses the will of American voters and uses the census as a weapon. They never counted on a Trump win in 2024. They almost had it made. ALMOST. If we don’t stand up now, support strict immigration policies, and President Trump’s plan to reform the census, illegal immigrants will be the new blue voting bloc in the years ahead. The Constitution was written to make sure the citizens of this country were represented. It was NOT meant to be a tool for political gain through population padding. If we don’t draw a line here, we may never get a fair vote again….
Court Nixes California AI Deepfake Law, Free Speech Wins
Welcome to The Modern Memo — where our readers don’t come for fluff, filters, or focus-grouped headlines. They come for the truth. We don’t spin. We don’t censor. And we don’t dance around the narrative — we swing a machete straight through it. If it matters to America, we cover it — raw, real, and relentlessly honest. AI Deepfake Ruling a Major Win for Elon Musk’s X Platform A federal court has struck down an unconstitutional California law that limited free speech by controlling the use of AI-generated “deepfake” videos during elections. The law is one of the strictest in the United States. Elon Musk and his platform, X, joined the lawsuit to challenge the law and scored a major victory with this decision. However, the judge avoided ruling directly on free speech claims. Instead, he based his decision on Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act. This act protects online platforms from being held responsible for what their users post. What Was the Law About? In direct conflict with the First Amendment, the law signed by California Governor Gavin Newsom in 2024 aimed to block social media platforms from hosting AI-generated videos featuring politicians or public figures. Newsom pushed for the legislation after Elon Musk shared a viral AI video of then-Vice President Kamala Harris. She was portrayed as saying she was the “ultimate diversity hire.” Newsom said the video “should be illegal” and said he would sign a bill “in a matter of weeks to make sure it is.” (RELATED: Trump Dismisses Rumors of Targeting Elon Musk’s Companies, Calls for American Business to “Thrive Like Never Before”) Manipulating a voice in an “ad” like this one should be illegal. I’ll be signing a bill in a matter of weeks to make sure it is. pic.twitter.com/NuqOETkwTI — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) July 29, 2024 Why Was the Law Challenged in Court? The law gave the government too much control over what people could post online. It was designed to punish parody, comedy, and political satire—all forms of speech protected under the First Amendment. Those who challenged the law included: Christopher Kohls, the video creator who posted the Kamala Harris deepfake Elon Musk’s X platform, in a 65-page lawsuit, said the law targeted free expression The Babylon Bee, a conservative comedy and satire site Rumble, a video-sharing platform that competes with YouTube The plaintiffs argued that the law would: Discourage parody or humor about politicians Pressure platforms to over-censor content Violate the First Amendment by favoring some views over others Musk described the law as an attempt to “make parody illegal,” and said it would lead to unnecessary censorship. You’re not gonna believe this, but @GavinNewsom just announced that he signed a LAW to make parody illegal, based on this video 🤣🤣 https://t.co/bdykNuxe6G — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 18, 2024 What Did the Judge Say? On Tuesday, Federal Judge John Mendez struck down the law. According to Politico, Mendez said that platforms hosting deepfakes, “don’t have anything to do with these videos that the state is objecting to,” and that Section 230 releases them from liability. This ruling means the state cannot force platforms to remove deepfakes simply because they are politically misleading. Free Speech Question Left Unanswered—Or Is It? Even though the case was largely about First Amendment rights, Mendez did not rule on that issue. He said it was not necessary because the law already failed under Section 230. “I’m simply not reaching that issue,” he told the lawyers during the hearing. (RELATED: So-Called ‘Equality Act’ Could Undo Free Speech, Mandate Murder Of Unborn Children, Make Pedophiles A ‘Protected Class’) BUT this ruling is still a major victory for free speech advocates everywhere. In a free society, government officials don’t police political speech—especially during election season, when open debate matters most. The Constitution protects the First Amendment. It’s not a privilege granted by politicians. Final Thoughts This case isn’t just about deepfakes. It’s about who controls the narrative. The California government—from the governor down—tried to silence speech they didn’t like. They hid behind AI fears and “disinformation panic.” Judge Mendez saw through it. And free speech won. Let’s be clear: the law was never about protecting voters from disinformation. It was about protecting politicians. This bill was designed from the beginning to shut down criticism and uncomfortable truths in the name of “election integrity.” That is NOT what freedom is about. That is tyranny in disguise. If free speech is so easily discarded every time a politician doesn’t like a joke, a meme, or an article—like this one—then we don’t have a republic. We have a regime. Make no mistake. This ruling draws a line in the sand. It tells every governor, state legislature, every activist dreaming of being the thought police: you don’t get to dictate what Americans say, share, or criticize online. The PEOPLE hold the government accountable—even when it’s inconvenient. Especially when it’s inconvenient. The battle over AI is just beginning. While AI technology poses new risks, lawmakers will need to find ways to address those risks without infringing on constitutional rights. This ruling shows that broad, sweeping restrictions won’t survive in court. Other states that have or are considering similar laws will do well to remember this ruling. The Constitution isn’t optional. Protecting elections is important, but you can’t legislate your way around the First Amendment. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin. Deliver the truth. At The Modern Memo, we’re not here to soften the blow — we’re here to land it. The media plays defense for the powerful. We don’t. If you’re done with censorship, half-truths, and gaslighting headlines, pass this on. Expose the stories they bury. This isn’t just news — it’s a fight for reality. And it doesn’t work without you.
Trump’s EPA Pushes Green New Deal Into Political Obscurity
Democrats Go Silent on the Green New Deal The Green New Deal was once the main climate push for Democrats. Now it’s barely mentioned in Washington. According to a Quorum chart posted by Axios, in the past three months, Democrats in Congress used the term only a handful of times on social media or in speeches. That is the lowest count since 2018, when it was first introduced. Meanwhile, Republicans are still talking about it — a lot. They brought it up more than 300 times in the same period, using it as proof that Democrats back costly and extreme policies. Axios: “Democrats aren’t explicitly disavowing the Green New Deal, but they’ve abruptly stopped talking about it” pic.twitter.com/mVM4F19SJD — Steve Everley (@saeverley) August 1, 2025 Big Names Drop the Plan Rep. Alexandria Ocasio‑Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey, the lawmakers who first pushed the Green New Deal, have not reintroduced it since April 2023. Many Democrats are moving away from strict climate mandates. Instead, they are talking about jobs, cost savings, and energy security. (MORE NEWS: Energy Department Admits Millions Of Americans Are At Risk Thanks To Grid Vulnerabilities) Some governors are supporting natural gas projects. Even a few lawmakers have traded in their electric cars for gas‑powered SUVs. The tone is different now, and the Green New Deal is no longer the centerpiece it once was. The 2009 EPA Climate Ruling That Started It All In 2009, the Obama‑era EPA issued the Endangerment Finding — a ruling that labeled carbon dioxide and several other greenhouse gases as a danger to public health and welfare. That single decision became the legal basis for almost every major climate regulation in the years that followed. It opened the door to: Federal electric vehicle production mandates Restrictions on gas‑powered appliances Strict tailpipe emission rules Airline emission standards Power plant shutdown orders By declaring CO₂ a threat, the EPA gave itself broad power to regulate entire industries. That authority survived multiple court challenges and was used heavily by both the Obama and Biden administrations. Zeldin Moves to Kill the Endangerment Finding On July 29, 2025, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced a plan to repeal the Endangerment Finding entirely. He called it “the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States.” Zeldin said: “Many stakeholders have told me that the Obama and Biden EPAs twisted the law, ignored precedent, and warped science to achieve their preferred ends and stick American families with hundreds of billions of dollars in hidden taxes every single year.” The EPA also stated: “We heard loud and clear the concern that EPA’s GHG emissions standards themselves, not carbon dioxide … was the real threat to Americans’ livelihoods. If finalized, rescinding the Endangerment Finding and resulting regulations would end $1 trillion or more in hidden taxes on American businesses and families.” An August 3rd X post further solidified Zeldin’s stance on the Endangerment Finding. The Trump EPA won’t play along with the MANY mental leaps the Obama & Biden Admins used with the 2009 Endangerment Finding to creatively hoard themselves max power to jam through trillions of dollars of regulation, EV Mandates, and economic strangulation.pic.twitter.com/Mk5cTCzAX0 — Lee Zeldin (@epaleezeldin) August 3, 2025 A Blow to Costly Climate Rules Zeldin’s proposal would wipe out more than $1 trillion in regulations tied to the Endangerment Finding. These rules have hit vehicle manufacturers, power plants, heavy industry, and working Americans with higher costs and fewer choices. If the repeal is finalized: Federal climate mandates would be removed Electric vehicle quotas would be ended Regulatory control would shift back to states and local communities ESG‑driven industry restrictions would take a major hit The EPA under Zeldin is moving aggressively, framing this as a return to energy freedom and economic growth. It will lift the crushing burden from businesses and households. Critics warn it would remove key protections against climate change. (MORE NEWS: Texas Dems Flee to Stop Redistricting Map) Green Groups Lose Power While the EPA moves to dismantle its own authority, public enthusiasm for sweeping climate plans is also fading. Wind and solar still have majority support, but not as much as before. Republicans now strongly favor fossil fuel expansion. Environmental groups are struggling. The Sunrise Movement — once one of the most aggressive Green New Deal backers — raised less than $30,000 in the first half of 2025. That’s a fraction of what they raised during Trump’s first term. The Bottom Line Trump’s second term is changing climate politics at every level. Democrats are talking less about the Green New Deal. The EPA’s main legal authority to regulate greenhouse gases is under direct challenge. If Lee Zeldin’s repeal succeeds, the Endangerment Finding — and the regulations built on it — will be gone. That would mark the end of an era for federal climate policy and a dramatic shift in how the U.S. approaches energy, industry, and the environment. The once‑loud Green New Deal is now just a faint echo in Washington. Cut Through the Noise. Slice Through the Lies. Share the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe around the narrative—we swing a machete through it. The mainstream won’t say it, so we will. If you’re tired of spin, censorship, and sugar-coated headlines, help us rip the cover off stories that matter. Share this article. Wake people up. Give a voice to the truth the powerful want buried. This fight isn’t just ours—it’s yours. Join us in exposing what they won’t tell you. America needs bold truth-tellers, and that means you.
Texas Dems Flee to Stop Redistricting Map
In a high-stakes political standoff, dozens of Texas House Democrats fled the state on Sunday to block a scheduled vote on a redistricting proposal that could significantly favor Republicans. Their departure leaves the House without the quorum required to conduct official business and has ignited fierce legal and political backlash from state leaders. The group of Democrats flew to Chicago, where they held a press conference with Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker. Over 50 members have left Texas, effectively paralyzing House operations. The redistricting plan, introduced last week by Texas House Republicans, could deliver up to five additional Republican U.S. House seats in the 2026 midterm elections by reshaping districts in key Democratic areas such as Dallas and Houston. Republicans currently hold 25 of Texas’ 38 congressional seats. The new map has already drawn national attention, including threats of legal action from House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who vowed to pursue “all options” to stop the GOP redistricting plan. (MORE NEWS: ICE Cooperation Gets CO Deputy Sued By AG) Texas GOP Response Texas Governor Greg Abbott responded with a scathing letter, blasting the fleeing lawmakers for what he called a premeditated attempt to shut down the legislative process. “Real Texans do not run from a fight. But that’s exactly what most of the Texas House Democrats just did,” Abbott wrote. He emphasized that this wasn’t an unavoidable absence due to emergencies or illness, but rather a deliberate effort to obstruct the legislative process. “That amounts to an abandonment or forfeiture of an elected state office… The absconded Democrat House members were elected to meet and vote on legislation—not to prevent votes that may not go their way.” Abbott cited Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0382, suggesting that Democratic members who broke quorum could be removed from office through legal action. He stated his intent to invoke his authority under the Texas Constitution to fill vacancies if courts determine the seats were abandoned. Threats of Arrest and Legal Fallout Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton doubled down, threatening to arrest the absent Democrats over what he called civil violations of legislative duty. “They should be found and arrested no matter where they go,” Paxton said. Democrats in the Texas House who try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately. We should use every tool at our disposal to hunt down those who think they are above the law. — Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) August 3, 2025 The Governor also warned that Democrats fundraising to cover potential fines might be in violation of state bribery laws. According to the letter, any legislator or outside party offering or accepting money to facilitate absenteeism could face criminal charges. “Any Democrat who solicits or accepts funds to skip a vote may have violated bribery laws,” Abbott wrote. “I will use my full extradition authority to demand the return to Texas of any potential out-of-state felons.” Illinois Governor Defends Democrats At the Chicago press conference, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker pledged support for the Texas Democrats. “They’re here in Illinois. We’re going to do everything we can to protect every single one of them and make sure that — ’cause we know they’re doing the right thing, we know that they’re following the law,” Pritzker said. He also criticized Texas officials for their threats and actions. “It’s Ken Paxton who doesn’t follow the law. It’s the leaders of Texas who are attempting not to follow the law. They’re the ones that need to be held accountable.” High Stakes and Political Theater Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin expressed full support for the fleeing lawmakers, accusing Republicans of attempting to rig the system. “For too long, Donald Trump and Republicans have tried to get away with rigging the system, breaking the rules, and scheming to hold onto power,” Martin said. “We will fight alongside these legislators to stop this anti-democratic assault.” We’ve been warning Texas Republicans for weeks that if they want a showdown, we’d give them a showdown. That’s exactly what Texas Democrats did today. The DNC will proudly fight alongside them to stop this anti-democratic assault. pic.twitter.com/a66aIXaFAE — Ken Martin (@kenmartin73) August 3, 2025 Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows issued a stern warning of his own: The Texas House will be convening at 3:00pm tomorrow. If a quorum is not present then, to borrow the recent talking points from some of my Democrat colleagues, all options will be on the table. . . — Dustin Burrows (@Burrows4TX) August 3, 2025 What’s Next for Texas While the Democrats’ absence has stalled the vote temporarily, it may carry significant personal and legal consequences for those involved. If Abbott follows through with his legal threats, the walkout could escalate into a prolonged constitutional battle over quorum-breaking, legislative duty, and state power. (MORE NEWS: The Final Bell: Remembering Hulk Hogan, Legend of the Ring) Meanwhile, the redistricting proposal remains a flashpoint in a larger national battle over election control and congressional power. This is a developing story. The Modern Memo will provide updates as more details emerge. Cut Through the Noise. Slice Through the Lies. Share the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe around the narrative—we swing a machete through it. The mainstream won’t say it, so we will. If you’re tired of spin, censorship, and sugar-coated headlines, help us rip the cover off stories that matter. Share this article. Wake people up. Give a voice to the truth the powerful want buried. This fight isn’t just ours—it’s yours. Join us in exposing what they won’t tell you. America needs bold truth-tellers, and that means you.