President Trump has revoked Kamala Harris’s extended Secret Service detail. The protection ended on September 1, 2025. Normally, former vice presidents receive only six months of coverage. President Biden had extended Harris’s protection for a year before leaving office. Trump ended that early, citing his authority over federal security assignments.
California Scrambling For Local Solutions
After the revocation, LAPD stepped in. The LAPD’s Metro Division assigned about 14 officers to guard Harris. These officers were pulled from regular duties, including gang suppression and active case work. An unmarked LAPD vehicle now sits outside her Brentwood home day and night. Plain-clothes officers rotate shifts to maintain constant watch—on the taypayer dime.
The California Highway Patrol also offered help. However, deploying CHP security requires Governor Gavin Newsom’s approval. His office has not confirmed any final decision. Newsom’s spokesperson stressed that safety should not depend on politics. The state continues to review options for providing additional protection if needed. (MORE NEWS: Democrats Fume as Trump’s Crime Crackdown Delivers Results)
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told Fox11 LA that it is political retaliation and warned that Kamala Harris’s safety was at risk:
“This is another act of revenge following a long list of political retaliation in the form of firings, the revoking of security clearances and more. This puts the former Vice President in danger and I look forward to working with the Governor to make sure Vice President Harris is safe in Los Angeles.”
Governor Newsom’s office echoed her concerns:
“Our office does not comment on security arrangements. The safety of our public officials should never be subject to erratic, vindictive political impulses.”
Both leaders promised to coordinate on long-term solutions. They argued that protection for former national leaders must never become a partisan issue. Never mind the six-month protocol that has been in place for years. (MORE NEWS: Newsom’s Press Office Attacks Victims Of Palisades Fire For Demanding Answers)
A Pattern of Cuts
Trump has ended protection for several Biden-era officials and allies. The list includes former DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Dr. Anthony Fauci, John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, and Biden’s adult children. Democrats say this shows a troubling pattern and claim Trump is using security assignments to punish rivals. But should the federal government waste taxpayer money on unnecessary details? Especially when the people in question are millionaires and can afford their own security.
🚨 #BREAKING: President Donald Trump terminates Dr. Anthony Fauci’s security detail – CNN
It was pulled last night.
Fauci will now have to pay for his own private security. pic.twitter.com/rnkxHU5GkK
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) January 24, 2025
Harris’s Book Tour Raises Stakes
The timing adds to the controversy. Kamala Harris is preparing for a nationwide book tour later this month. Her memoir, 107 Days, releases on September 23. Public appearances will draw crowds and increase exposure. Without federal protection, she will have to rely on local law enforcement and possibly private contractors—which would be her obligation as a private citizen.
Officers Face New Demands
For now, LAPD’s Metro Division will carry the responsibility. These officers specialize in tactical response and dignitary protection. They have experience working with the Secret Service. Still, pulling them from crime suppression adds pressure on a department already stretched thin. Rising crime rates in Los Angeles make the trade-off controversial.
The Debate Over Protection and Costs
Democrats in Washington called the decision dangerous. They argue it undermines security norms and sets a bad precedent. Security, they insist, should never depend on partisan rivalries. Critics fear future leaders will face the same risks if protection becomes a political weapon.
As the first woman and Black person elected Vice President, Kamala Harris faced elevated threats. This move by Trump is dangerous.
I saw the VP last week and was grateful for her Secret Service protection. They were incredibly professional and kept her safe. Shameful. https://t.co/ttveXPDXou
— Congressman Robert Garcia (@RepRobertGarcia) August 29, 2025
The controversy raises larger questions. Who decides which former leaders deserve protection? Should states carry the burden when the federal government steps away? And how should costs be divided between taxpayers and private funds? These issues will likely shape future policy.
Harris’s case shows how quickly coverage can shift. Local police now fill the gap as state officials weigh their role. The outcome will affect not just Kamala Harris but every future leader navigating life after Washington.
Final Word
Kamala Harris now has LAPD officers parked outside her mansion while Los Angeles struggles with rising crime. Regular citizens wait longer for police response because detectives have been reassigned to protect a former vice president who chose politics over results. Trump’s critics scream about danger, but everyday Americans face danger daily in neighborhoods where crime goes unchecked. That is the real scandal.
Instead of fixing broken policies or supporting law enforcement, Democrats treat Harris’s driveway like a national emergency. They demand more taxpayer money and more political theater. Meanwhile, criminals walk free, and police are stretched thin. Protecting politicians at the expense of public safety tells you everything about their priorities. The message is simple: leaders should protect the people—not the other way around.
Cut Through the Noise. Slice Through the Lies. Share the Truth.
At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe around the narrative—we swing a machete through it. The mainstream won’t say it, so we will.
If you’re tired of spin, censorship, and sugar-coated headlines, help us rip the cover off stories that matter. Share this article. Wake people up. Give a voice to the truth the powerful want buried.
