Abortion
‘What’s Your Favorite?’: Rep. Brandon Gill Stuns American University Scholar with Graphic Abortion Takedown
The euphemisms of the pro-choice lobby were stripped away on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, April 28, 2026, during a Judiciary Committee hearing that has sent shockwaves through the Beltway. In a clinical and relentless line of questioning, Representative Brandon Gill (R-TX) confronted Jessica Waters, a senior scholar at the American University School of Public Affairs, demanding she name her “favorite” abortion procedure. At The Modern Memo, we analyze the exchange that has the Left reeling, the strategic significance of Gill’s “graphic detail” approach, and why the pro-life movement is hailing this as a masterclass in exposing the reality of the abortion industry. The Clash: “What’s Your Favorite Type of Abortion?” The hearing, originally convened to discuss “reproductive access,” took a sharp turn when Gill—a Texas freshman who has quickly become a standout for the GOP—decided to bypass the usual political niceties. The Question: “What’s your favorite type of abortion?” Gill asked Waters, leaning in over his microphone. The room went silent as the scholar, who had been testifying about the “necessity” of abortion access, struggled to respond. The Follow-up: When Waters attempted to pivot to the “patient-provider relationship,” Gill pressed harder, describing various procedures in graphic, anatomical detail. “If this is a positive good, if this is healthcare, then you should have a preference. Is it the one where the child is chemically burned, or the one where it is surgically dismembered?” The Silence: Waters refused to answer the question, a move Gill’s supporters say proves that even the most seasoned academic advocates are uncomfortable defending the physical reality of the procedures they champion. Brandon Gill: The Texas Firebrand Representative Gill’s performance is being viewed as a significant shift in how the GOP handles the life issue in a post-Roe world. The Tactical Pivot: Unlike older generations of Republicans who often sought middle ground, Gill’s strategy is rooted in moral clarity. By using the word “favorite,” he effectively mocks the “Shout Your Abortion” movement, turning their own rhetoric of “abortion as a positive” against them. Exposing the Academic Shield: By targeting a senior scholar from American University, Gill aimed at the intellectual heart of the pro-choice movement, arguing that their academic theories cannot survive a brush with the physical reality of the procedure. The Left’s Reaction: “Ghoulish” vs. “Grounded” Predictably, the corporate press and Democratic lawmakers were quick to condemn Gill’s questioning as “inappropriate” and “ghoulish.” The Outrage: Pro-choice activists on social media accused Gill of “harassing” a witness. They argued that the question was designed solely for a “viral clip” rather than substantive policy debate. The GOP Defense: Conservative leaders in the House stood by Gill, noting that if the Left wants to treat abortion as “standard healthcare,” they shouldn’t be offended when asked to discuss the “standards of care” in detail. Final Word The Gill-Waters showdown is a landmark moment in the 2026 legislative session. When you look past the noise of the “outrage” and focus on the data—the witness’s refusal to describe the act she advocates for and the graphic reality of the procedures discussed—you gain a clearer picture of the current state of the debate. Quality information replaces the “healthcare” abstraction with the physical reality of what an abortion actually entails. It allows you to see that Brandon Gill isn’t just seeking a soundbite; he is seeking to bridge the gap between the sanitized language of D.C. and the reality of the clinic. By choosing to ask the “favorite” question, Gill has ensured that the “choice” can no longer hide behind a curtain of academic jargon. Where Facts, Context, and Perspective Matter At The Modern Memo, our goal is simple: to provide clear, well-researched reporting in a media landscape that often feels overwhelming. We focus on substance over sensationalism, and context over commentary. If you value thoughtful analysis, transparent sourcing, and stories that go beyond the headline, we invite you to share our work. Informed conversations start with reliable information, and sharing helps ensure important stories reach a wider audience. Journalism works best when readers engage, question, and participate. By reading and sharing, you’re supporting a more informed public and a healthier media ecosystem. The Modern Memo may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you click or buy through our links. Featured pricing is subject to change. 📩 Love what you’re reading? Don’t miss a headline! Subscribe to The Modern Memo here!
So-Called ‘Equality Act’ Could Undo Free Speech, Mandate Murder Of Unborn Children, Make Pedophiles A ‘Protected Class’
A bill positioned as the “Equality Act” is gradually moving its way through Congress, and is designed to “crush moral decency and religious freedom beneath the feet of the radical LGBT & Q lobby,” says experts. We included all of the Equality Act details we feel you need to know about. The so-called “Equality Act” aims to make abortion a federal right, and seeks to punish anyone (particularly Christians and other religious institutions) that do not promote the murder of unborn children, according to the bill language and analysis by Liberty Counsel Action. (RELATED: ‘Separation Of Church And State Is A Lie’: Legal Precedent Collapses Bringing Religious Freedom To US) The bill is being called a “dangerous ambush of religious freedoms,” and may also allow pedophiles to become a “protected class” under the specific language used. Normalizing Abuse Of Children This abhorrent attack against children comes from the “Q” in the LGBTQ definition of sexual orientation, which Cosmopolitan described as “Queerness is an umbrella term that is both an orientation and a community. … The vagueness of the term is intentional— queer is an identity created for anyone outside of the heterosexual norm and meant to be inclusive.” LGBTQ Nation added in their analysis that “… the Q in LGBTQ can also signify other sexual orientations and genders not covered by the acronym’s preceding letters. If you’re gender-neutral, non-binary, agender, genderfluid, pansexual, asexual, solosexual or something else not covered by LGBT, the Q has got you covered!” (RELATED: IRS Rules Churches Can Endorse Candidates To Congregation) There is also a revolting movement trying to rebrand pedophiles as “minor-attracted people,” which would also pretty much guarantee their protection under the bill. And things only get worse when you break down the rest of the bill. Liberty Action Counsel Analysis: Among other things, the “Equality Act” will mean that: Biological men will have the “right” to use women’s bathrooms, showers and locker rooms — even in schools. Churches will be forced to provide equal access to LGBTQ ceremonies if the facilities are open to natural marriage ceremonies. Churches and religious schools would be forced to hire staff involved in LGBTQ conduct; give men access to restrooms, locker rooms, showers and sports; allow boys to bunk with girls on camping and overnight trips; and provide insurance to cover hormones, mutilating surgeries, and chemical and surgical abortions. Noncompliant churches and schools will lose federal, state, and local tax exemptions and accreditations. From pre-K, children will be taught that they can choose their gender, will be encouraged to experiment with each other to find their “identities” and will be able to demand opposite, both and neither sex pronouns (he for a girl, zie for neither, mx for both). Pregnancy centers will be forced to provide abortion referrals. Read The Full ‘Equality Act’ Here