Congress
Viral 2019 Debate Clip Shows Democrats Back Healthcare for Illegal Immigrants
A debate moment from 2019 has resurfaced and gone viral again. As Congress struggles with a government shutdown, the question of health coverage for undocumented immigrants has become a major political flashpoint. Because the clip shows ten Democratic candidates raising their hands to support health benefits for those living in the country illegally, it is fueling sharp controversy now. (RELATED NEWS: Maxine Waters’ “Healthcare for Everybody” Stance Fuels Government Shutdown Fight) NBC: “Raise your hand if your government plan would provide coverage for [illegal aliens].” Democrats: *all raise their hands* pic.twitter.com/OOX5JCb0VV — Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) October 2, 2025 What Happened in the Debate Clip During a June 2019 Democratic primary debate, NBC News anchor Savannah Guthrie asked: “Raise your hand if your government plan would provide coverage for undocumented immigrants.” To the surprise of many, all ten candidates on stage raised their hands. The moment stayed mostly forgotten for years. However, it resurfaced as the government shutdown fight placed immigration and health care back in the headlines. The debate clip went viral again after former Democratic Sen. Al Franken posted on X (now deleted) questioning Vice President JD Vance’s claim. Franken wrote: “Is JD Vance a liar or just woefully ignorant when claiming that Democrats want to give health benefits to undocumented immigrants?” A user responded in the comments by sharing the debate footage, which quickly spread across social media. Because several of those candidates now serve in Congress, the clip draws direct lines between past statements and today’s policy debates. Why the Clip Matters Now The clip reignites public debate about what role, if any, undocumented immigrants should have in access to health care. At a time when budgets are tight and constituents demand accountability, opponents argue that offering benefits to people here illegally diverts resources from citizens. Meanwhile, proponents say health care is a human right and that excluding people can worsen public health. (RELATED NEWS: Rising Socialism Exposes the Democratic Party’s Identity Crisis) The timing is critical. The U.S. is currently experiencing a government shutdown, and Congress is locked in battles over funding. One central issue is whether to continue subsidies under the Affordable Care Act. The debate reveals a strategic weapon in political messaging. Republicans are using the clip to challenge Democrats on consistency and accountability. House Speaker Mike Johnson even pointed to previous Democratic votes and the language in their bills to argue the party has supported health care access for illegal immigrants. Political Stakes and Public Perception This viral clip now serves as a reminder that online memory is long. As campaigns amplify it, voters see whether politicians stick to past promises. On the one hand, Republicans argue Democrats are hiding their past positions now that publicly opposing undocumented coverage polls better. On the other hand, Democrats argue that legislative proposals have changed, and that nuance must be considered—such as differences between state and federal rules. Media coverage also shapes how the issue is perceived. For example, CNN defended Democrats by claiming that House Speaker Mike Johnson falsely said Democrats want to provide health care to undocumented immigrants. Yet the resurfaced debate clip clearly shows every Democrat on stage raising a hand in support, underscoring that Johnson’s statement was not unfounded. This clash between video evidence and media framing highlights how narratives are built and contested in real time. CNN’s ratings are in the toilet because they’re a propaganda machine for Democrats. Here are the actual FACTS: Democrats shut down the federal government to try to give taxpayer-funded benefits to illegal aliens. The funding proposal put forward by the Democrats would result… pic.twitter.com/mQzgCMLHQA — Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) October 2, 2025 Moreover, the clip intensifies scrutiny on swing districts and moderates, who must navigate pressure from both their base and opponents. Because media coverage amplifies this issue, electoral and messaging consequences could be significant. In addition, public opinion plays a role. Some Americans support limited benefits for undocumented immigrants—especially when framed around emergency care or maternal health. But outright full access is not supported by most. Therefore, this debate could shift how both parties craft future health and immigration policies. What to Watch Going Forward To see how this plays out, follow three key developments. First, legislation and budget proposals will reveal how lawmakers frame health funding and whether they include or exclude undocumented provisions. Second, state-level actions will matter because states often take independent steps. Changes in Medicaid rules, audits, or lawsuits could create new flashpoints. Third, public messaging and media coverage will shape perceptions as campaigns roll out ads or statements referencing the viral clip. Ultimately, this debate moment proves how past rhetoric can shape present politics. As the nation debates health, immigration, and funding, that raised-hand moment from 2019 now echos with powerful influence. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin. Deliver the truth. At The Modern Memo, we’re not here to soften the blow — we’re here to land it. The media plays defense for the powerful. We don’t. If you’re done with censorship, half-truths, and gaslighting headlines, pass this on. Expose the stories they bury. This isn’t just news — it’s a fight for reality. And it doesn’t work without you.
Maxine Waters’ “Healthcare for Everybody” Stance Fuels Government Shutdown Fight
OPINION Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) recently summed up the Democrat position on healthcare during a tense moment on Capitol Hill. When asked if Democrats were pushing healthcare for illegal immigrants, she replied: “Democrats are demanding healthcare for everybody.” (RELATED NEWS: Trump Meeting with Congressional Leaders as Shutdown Nears) Maxine Waters admits Democrats are going to shutdown the government to try to secure healthcare for illegal immigrants. Reporter: “Are Democrats demanding healthcare for illegal aliens?” Rep. Waters: “Democrats are demanding healthcare for everybody.” pic.twitter.com/e5rxdIJrjP — Alex Pfeiffer (@AlexPfeiffer) September 30, 2025 That statement may sound broad and compassionate, but it goes straight to the heart of why Congress is deadlocked and the government is on the brink of shutting down. Democrats are willing to tie federal spending to handouts for noncitizens, while Republicans are refusing to let taxpayer dollars be used as a magnet for illegal immigration. Why the Continuing Resolution Stalled The fight is over a continuing resolution, or CR — a short-term funding bill that keeps the government open. Republicans pushed for a “clean” CR, one that simply funds essential services without adding controversial policies. Democrats, however, blocked it in the Senate, with 44 of them voting “no.” Their reasoning? They want healthcare expansion, including coverage that extends to illegal immigrants, tied into the negotiations. This is the sticking point. Democrats are holding out for benefits that reach beyond American citizens. Republicans are standing firm, insisting that the government stay focused on its constitutional responsibilities and not on expanding handouts. The White House reacted to the shutdown by changing the official website to a government shutdown clock. Citizens Are Still Struggling This entire debate exposes misplaced priorities. Millions of American citizens still can’t afford quality healthcare. Families face skyrocketing premiums and deductibles. Veterans fight for timely care. Seniors stretch their savings to cover prescriptions. Yet Democrats are willing to risk a government shutdown to push healthcare for those who came here illegally. That choice is a slap in the face to hardworking taxpayers. It shows where their priorities lie — and it’s not with the American people. (MORE NEWS: Miami Mayor’s Warning: NYC’s Mamdani Echoes Castro) The Taxpayer Burden Healthcare is not free. Every new expansion comes with a price tag that lands on the backs of taxpayers. By demanding that healthcare extend to “everybody,” Democrats are asking American citizens to shoulder even more costs. This is ignoring basic math in the name of “compassion.” The United States already runs massive deficits. Adding millions of undocumented immigrants into our healthcare system would balloon costs, put more on already strained hospitals, and create even longer wait times for citizens. Republicans are right to push back and say “enough.” Republican members of Congress weighed in on the shutdown: Remember this: House Republicans did our job by passing a temporary funding extension to keep the government open. If there’s a shutdown, it’s because Democrats put their radical agenda ahead of the American people. — Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office (@RepTimBurchett) September 29, 2025 During shutdowns, federal workers are told to “do more with less.” Meanwhile, Congress still cashes paychecks. That’s wrong. I’ve reintroduced an Amendment to end Member pay during shutdowns. Zero. No back pay either!! pic.twitter.com/WU7fxhetH7 — Rep. Ralph Norman (@RepRalphNorman) September 30, 2025 We’re going to have a government shutdown. Why? Because the loon wing of the Democratic Party is mad at Chuck Schumer, and Chuck wants them to love him. pic.twitter.com/EiIS6MrBSz — John Kennedy (@SenJohnKennedy) September 30, 2025 A Magnet for More Illegal Immigration Offering government-funded healthcare to anyone who crosses the border is not just expensive — it’s reckless. It would act like a magnet, drawing even more people to enter illegally. Why wouldn’t they, if they know free medical care awaits? Border states are already overwhelmed with surging arrivals. Hospitals, schools, and social services feel the impact daily. Expanding healthcare access to illegal immigrants would only make the crisis worse. Republicans understand this, which is why they dug in their heels during CR negotiations. Handouts vs. Responsibility Democrats frame this as an issue of compassion. But true compassion starts with responsibility — responsibility to the citizens who built this country, pay the taxes, and follow the laws. Handouts for noncitizens are not compassionate; they are unfair. They reward illegal behavior while leaving American families behind. That’s why Republicans are saying no. This shutdown fight isn’t just about numbers in a budget; it’s about drawing a line between serving our citizens and incentivizing illegal immigration. The Bigger Picture The government shutdown showdown reveals a larger truth: Democrats are willing to gamble with government operations to advance their progressive agenda. Republicans, on the other hand, are standing on principle. They are insisting that before we even talk about expanding benefits, Washington must get its house in order, secure the border, and put citizens first. The Takeaway For once, we finally got an honest answer from someone on the left. Maxine Waters admitted that Democrats want “healthcare for everybody,” even for those here illegally. That stance is exactly why the government is on the verge of shutting down. Democrats are blocking funding because they want to slip handouts for noncitizens into the deal. Republicans are refusing because they believe citizens come first. This is the real issue at stake. Will America prioritize its own people, or will it spend taxpayer dollars on benefits for those who entered illegally? Conservatives know the answer — and that’s why they are willing to fight, even if it means enduring a shutdown to hold the line. Forget the Headlines. Challenge the Script. Deliver the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe through talking points — we swing a machete through the media’s favorite lies. They protect power. We confront it. If you’re sick of censorship, narrative control, and being told what to think — stand with us. Share the story. Wake the people. Because truth dies in silence — and you weren’t made to stay quiet.
Trump Meeting with Congressional Leaders as Shutdown Nears
President Donald Trump has called a high-stakes meeting with leaders from both parties as a possible government shutdown edges closer. He canceled a previous meeting with congressional Democrats, insisting their demands were “unserious and ridiculous.” As the September 30 funding deadline nears, the White House and Capitol Hill scramble to find common ground. Who Will Attend the Meeting Trump will meet with: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) These leaders will gather at the White House to negotiate a path forward and avert a government shutdown. Schumer and Jeffries released a joint statement confirming the rescheduled meeting and reaffirming their willingness to meet at “any time and with anyone.” (MORE NEWS: Trump Admin and Musk’s xAI Launch Federal AI Partnership) Why the Earlier Meeting Fell Apart The meeting that Trump had planned with Democrats last week was canceled after he accused them of pushing “radical Left policies” and making unreasonable demands. At that time, he said that a productive discussion would not be possible under current conditions. Meanwhile, Democrats had criticized a short-term funding extension proposed by Republicans as “dirty” because of policy riders and healthcare cuts embedded in it. They warned that a shutdown could disrupt hospitals and other essential services. Speaker Johnson defended the earlier cancellation, calling it premature and arguing that Republicans must first do the “basic governing work” of keeping the government open before engaging in major negotiations. Stakes and Timeline If Congress and the White House fail to reach a deal by midnight ET on September 30, a partial government shutdown would begin. Many federal services and programs would face interruption, from staffing and payments to federal agencies. Time is running out. The Senate is scheduled to reconvene on September 29 after the Jewish New Year break. The House, however, is expected to remain in recess until the deadline looms. That gap could limit the flexibility each chamber has to respond at the last minute. Key Points of Contention Healthcare and Medicaid funding A major sticking point is how the funding proposals treat healthcare policy. Trump and Republicans are fighting to keep government funding lean, rejecting Democrat demands to fund healthcare for illegal immigrants through Medicaid. Democrats’ push for over $1 trillion in new spending, including Obamacare handouts, puts a heavy burden on American families. The GOP’s smart cuts, like slashing $1 trillion in Medicaid waste, show they’re focused on putting citizens first. (MORE NEWS: James Comey Indicted for False Statements, Obstruction) House Speaker Mike Johnson says, “What Chuck Schumer is demanding…He wants to reinstate free health care for illegal aliens paid for by American taxpayers. We are not doing that. We can’t do that. That’s just one of the crazy things he’s requested.” President Trump will now bring the four top congressional leaders to the White House in an effort to avoid the potential Tuesday night government shutdown. “What Chuck Schumer is demanding…He wants to reinstate free health care for illegal aliens paid for by American… pic.twitter.com/zpXYZCPVYC — DeVory Darkins (@devorydarkins) September 28, 2025 Policy riders and “poison pill” provisions Republicans add practical rules to funding bills to protect taxpayer money, like limiting funds for controversial programs. Democrats call these “poison pills,” but they’re just common-sense steps to keep spending in check. While the GOP keeps things focused, Democrats demand pricey extras like foreign aid that inflate the budget. Political responsibility and public pressure Republicans are pushing a straightforward plan to avoid a shutdown and keep America’s priorities first. Democrats try to blame the GOP, but their $1.5 trillion wish list is what’s holding things up. Voters are backing the GOP’s focus on fiscal responsibility over Democratic political games. Lessons From Past Shutdowns Americans have seen shutdown battles before, and history offers important lessons. The most recent major shutdown came in late 2018 and lasted 35 days, the longest in U.S. history. Hundreds of thousands of federal workers went without pay, many relying on food banks and community support. In earlier shutdowns, the effects were similar: suspended paychecks, reduced services, and public frustration. While essential workers like air traffic controllers and TSA staff remained on duty, the lack of paychecks strained morale and daily life. Public opinion often turned quickly against those viewed as responsible for the impasse. This history is a reminder to both parties that the political costs of a shutdown can be steep. Leaders know that voters may punish them at the ballot box for failing to keep the government running. What to Watch Next Progress at the meeting — Whether the Oval Office discussion yields a framework or agreement will be critical. Legislative movement — Even if the meeting ends positively, legislation must pass both chambers before time runs out. Statements after the meeting — The tone and messaging from Trump and congressional leaders may signal who holds leverage. Last-minute amendments or compromises — In past shutdown fights, final deals emerged in the eleventh hour. What This Means for Americans A government shutdown could delay federal payments, furlough workers, and slow critical services. Federal employees, military families, and contractors would be among the first to feel the impact. Many public-facing functions, such as national parks, regulatory agencies, and services relying on federal funding, would face disruption. The economic impact can ripple far beyond Washington. Delayed contracts, reduced consumer confidence, and missed paychecks can drag on local economies across the country. Businesses that rely on government services or federal workers as customers often see an immediate downturn. Beyond the financial cost, shutdowns erode trust in government. Americans expect their leaders to keep the basic machinery of government functioning. Each time the system stalls, confidence weakens and frustration grows. Final Word As the deadline approaches, Trump and congressional leaders face a defining moment at the White House. The talks carry both the risk of a costly stalemate and the chance for a breakthrough. What emerges from this meeting will decide not only whether the government…
Free Speech Alarm: Farage’s Wake-Up Call to Congress
Nigel Farage brought a blunt message to Washington. Speaking before the U.S. Congress, he warned that Britain is slipping into a culture of suppression, abandoning free speech. His comparison cut sharp: the nation, he said, looks more like North Korea than a free democracy. 📺MUST WATCH: @Nigel_Farage outlines the importance of free speech around the world. If we lose free speech, we lose everything. pic.twitter.com/c83XW4OFID — House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@JudiciaryGOP) September 3, 2025 The Reform UK leader appeared before the House Judiciary Committee on September 3, 2025. From the start, he accused Britain’s political class of betraying core democratic values. Laws written to fight “hate speech,” he argued, now crush open debate. Police enforce speech violations instead of protecting expression. Farage urged lawmakers to pay attention. What happens in Britain, he said, will not stay in Britain. Once censorship takes hold in one Western democracy, it spreads. America must recognize the danger and refuse to stand by silently. (RELATED: Court Nixes California AI Deepfake Law, Free Speech Wins) To drive home the point, he drew on history. Free nations, he explained, have always defended speech, even offensive or unpopular speech. Citing the spirit of Voltaire, he said, “We’ve forgotten the Voltarian principles that we’ll fight and defend to the death your right to say something that we fundamentally disagree with. That is the absolute foundation, if you think about it, of free speech, of democracy, of living in freedom. It’s kind of why we fought two world wars, at massive, massive cost. To defend that very principle for ourslves and for many, many others around the country.” His testimony framed censorship as a creeping threat. It rarely arrives with blunt force. Instead, it advances quietly, disguised as protection or safety. That, he said, makes it more dangerous. For Farage, the solution is clear: hold Britain accountable and defend free voices before they are silenced altogether. Linehan Arrest: A Comedy Writer in Handcuffs While Farage spoke in Washington, a separate story unfolded in London. Graham Linehan, the comedy writer behind hit shows like Father Ted, was arrested at Heathrow Airport. His alleged crime was not violence or fraud but a series of social media posts criticizing trans activism. One post claimed that if a “trans-identified male” entered a female-only space, the act should be treated as violent and abusive. He suggested that bystanders should make a scene, call the police, or even respond physically. The message drew swift attention from authorities. Police questioned Linehan over the post and banned him from using X, formerly Twitter, while on bail. For him, the arrest was absurd. He described it as a “dystopian clown show” and vowed to challenge it in court. In his view, the state had criminalized satire. This is how Graham Linehan shows up for trial in the UK just days after being arrested in the London airport for posting “offensive tweets” This is how you deal with the trans mob. Double down. We’re cheering you on, @Glinner 👏🏼🔥pic.twitter.com/vWVItcwUGK — Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) September 4, 2025 Linehan’s case exposes the tension between comedy and censorship. Once a staple of British humor, satire is now being dragged into police stations. To his supporters, this proves Farage’s point. What begins as regulation of speech can quickly become prosecution of thought. A Growing Storm Around Free Expression Farage’s testimony and Linehan’s arrest tell the same story from different angles. One shows political leaders tightening laws. The other shows police enforcing those laws on individuals. Together, they highlight a dangerous shift in how Britain treats free expression. (MORE NEWS: U.S. Strike on Venezuelan Drug Cartel Boat Signals New Era) Critics of these policies argue that governments are overstepping. They ask who decides where satire ends and offense begins. They warn that the power to punish speech can easily be abused. Defining “harm” too broadly, they say, allows almost any opinion to be silenced. Supporters of strict laws counter that hateful rhetoric poses real risks. They argue that social cohesion requires limits. Yet opponents point out that once the state defines harmful speech, political dissent often becomes the first casualty. In Washington, Farage urged Congress not to ignore the trend. He pressed lawmakers to use America’s influence to keep free speech alive in allied nations. Across the Atlantic, British citizens watched Linehan’s case unfold and asked whether their own freedoms were next. Why This Matters for the West Free speech shapes more than Britain. It defines the Western world. When one democracy clamps down, others copy the move. Farage warns that Britain could set the model — for censorship instead of liberty. Linehan’s arrest exhibits danger in real time. Police charged a comedian for satire. That action chills journalists, writers, and citizens who use humor to push back against authority. These events prove a hard truth: free speech survives only when people defend it. Laws must shield it, not crush it. Leaders must honor it, not bargain it away for peace. The debate cannot wait. Citizens, not governments, define acceptable thought. They must choose whether satire stays part of culture or becomes a crime by voting out of office those who threaten freedom. Conclusion: A Call to Defend Free Speech The message is clear. Societies that value freedom must defend speech in all its forms—serious or satirical, popular or unpopular. If they fail, censorship will not remain confined to Britain. It will spread across the democratic world. America once broke free from British control to secure liberty. Today, Britain drifts toward censorship, using “safety” and “tolerance” as excuses. Farage’s warning should not be ignored. If the U.K. can arrest comedians and silence debate, America must make sure it never follows down that path. Linehan’s arrest proves how quickly jokes and opinions can be turned into criminal offenses. Free nations survive only when debate is open and free speech is protected. America doesn’t need to repeat Britain’s mistakes. It needs to stand firm, defend its Constitution, and remind the world that freedom of speech is not…
Trump Takes on Crime in D.C.
A Bold Move to Address Crime and Renovation President Trump has made it clear he is determined to address the ongoing issues with crime in Washington, D.C. In a series of Truth Social posts, he announced plans for a press conference on “Crime and ‘Beautification’” at 10 a.m. EST on August 11th. His dual goals are to combat crime and restore the physical beauty to the nation’s capital. He said the press conference, “will not only involve ending the Crime, Murder, and Death in our Nation’s Capital, but will also be about Cleanliness and the General Physical Renovation and Condition of our once beautiful and well-maintained Capital.” (MORE NEWS: Trump: New Census Will Omit Illegal Immigrants) He emphasized his commitment to restoring the city to its former glory, pledging to “take care of our cherished Capital.” Key Points from Series of Posts Regarding D.C. Crime • Urgent action to remove the homeless people, clear tents • Criminals will be jailed • Fast action expected, similar to the border • Trump pledges to federalize D.C. • Calls for changes to laws to prosecute teenagers, ages 14-16, involved in violent crimes Rising Crime in D.C.: A Personal Concern for President Trump Last week, Edward “Big Balls” Coristine, a former DOGE staffer, was injured while defending a woman from an attempted carjacking. A group of about a dozen young men attacked the woman, and Coristine intervened, resulting in a concussion. Police arrested two 15-year-olds involved in the attack and are searching for more perpetrators. This incident has prompted President Trump to direct federal law enforcement to increase their presence in D.C. (MORE NEWS: Trump’s EPA Pushes Green New Deal Into Political Obscurity) Trump also praised D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, calling her a “good person” but suggesting that crime was beyond her control. The Legal Path to Federalizing D.C. To federalize Washington, D.C., Congress would need to repeal The Home Rule Act of 1973, a law that grants local officials governance authority over the city. However, Congress retains the power to overrule local legislation. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress authority to “exercise exclusive legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such district… as may… become the Seat of the Government of the United States.” Trump’s legal team is exploring options to make a federal takeover a reality. Senator Mike Lee has called D.C. Home Rule a “disaster,” arguing it contradicts the Constitution’s intent. He has pushed for a legislative change to restore Congressional oversight in D.C., as originally intended. Lee has also suggested that Washington, D.C. could return to its original status by returning residential areas to Maryland, similar to how Arlington and Alexandria were returned to Virginia in 1846. Lee’s proposal is part of a broader push to correct what he sees as the failure of local governance in D.C. Federal Law Enforcement to Tackle Crime in D.C. Under Trump’s direction, federal law enforcement agencies, including Homeland Security Investigations, the FBI, and the DEA, are tasked with increasing their presence in D.C. The operation will focus on high-profile areas like the National Mall, Union Station, Rock Creek Park, and other monuments and memorials. The operation, initially planned to last seven days, could be extended if necessary. Congressional Efforts to Reinstate Oversight Senator Mike Lee has introduced the Bowser Act (S.440)—the Bringing Oversight to Washington and Safety to Every Resident Act. This bill seeks to repeal the D.C. Home Rule Act and return oversight of D.C. to Congress. Lee’s proposal is in line with efforts to ensure that Washington D.C. is properly governed and safe for its residents. 11/12 Congress needs to reclaim the power it delegated away with DC Home Rule That’s why I’ve introduced the BOWSER Act—the Bringing Oversight to Washington and Safety to Every Resident Act—to repeal DC Home Rule and restore congressional oversight as the Constitution intended — Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) August 6, 2025 The land that became Washington D.C. was donated by Maryland and Virginia in 1790. The district was designed as a neutral ground to serve as the nation’s capital, ensuring no single state could exert undue influence over the federal government. The area was initially 100 square miles but was later reduced when portions were returned to Virginia. Today, Washington D.C. covers 61.1 square miles, but Senator Lee’s proposal could return the residential areas to Maryland, further limiting D.C.’s autonomy. What’s Next for President Trump and D.C.? While the path to federalizing D.C. may require congressional approval, Trump has made it clear that he is ready to take swift and decisive action. He warned, “There will be no ‘Mr. Nice Guy.’” Although a full federal takeover may require changes to the 1973 law, Trump could temporarily take control of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department if an emergency is declared. This marks the beginning of what could be a significant shift in the governance of Washington, D.C. President Trump’s next steps remain uncertain, but his focus on restoring safety and order to the capital is clear. Expose the Spin. Shatter the Narrative. Speak the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t cover politics to play referee — we swing a machete through the spin, the double-speak, and the partisan theater. While the media protects the powerful and buries the backlash, we dig it up and drag it into the light. If you’re tired of rigged narratives, selective outrage, and leaders who serve themselves, not you — then share this. Expose the corruption. Challenge the agenda. Because if we don’t fight for the truth, no one will. And that fight starts with you.
Hawley Champions $600 Tariff Rebate as Trump Signals Surge in Revenue
Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) introduced the American Worker Rebate Act. The bill would deliver rebate checks to U.S. families using tariff revenue generated under President Donald Trump’s trade policies. The White House is reporting that tariffs have brought in $150 billion in revenues so far. Projections are over $300 billion for 2025. Hawley says it’s time for working Americans—not Washington insiders or foreign governments—to benefit from this surge. “Like President Trump proposed, my legislation would allow hard-working Americans to benefit from the wealth that Trump’s tariffs are returning to this country,” Hawley said on Monday. How the Rebate Would Work The American Worker Rebate Act would establish a direct payment program funded by tariffs: $600 per adult and dependent child, meaning a family of four would receive at least $2,400. Larger checks if tariff revenues exceed projections for 2025. Phase-outs for high-income households: $150,000 for couples, $75,000 for single filers. Unlike past stimulus payments, this plan doesn’t rely on borrowing or new taxes. Funds come straight from tariffs foreign companies pay to access the U.S. market. Trump: “The Big Money Starts August 1” President Trump emphasized that tariff revenue is just getting started, saying: “The big money will start coming in on August 1. I think it was made clear today by the letters that were sent out yesterday and today.” To keep America in control, Trump signed an Executive Order extending key tariff rates to August 1, 2025. He also notified dozens of countries of their new reciprocal rates. These actions came after months of talks where some nations ignored warnings of higher tariffs, while others agreed to lower their own tariffs and cut trade barriers. Despite this progress, Trump says the U.S. trade deficit remains unacceptable. He seeks to continue to bring countries to the table to negotiate, protecting U.S. interests. Boost from the New U.S.–EU Trade Deal Tariff revenue is set to climb even higher thanks to a landmark trade deal with the European Union. This week, Trump finalized an agreement that will: Adopt a new tariff framework: 15% tariffs on autos, auto parts, pharmaceuticals, and semiconductors. Maintain 50% tariffs on steel, aluminum, and copper. This deal is expected to funnel billions more into U.S. Treasury accounts, adding to the funding source for Hawley’s proposed rebate checks. Historic Trade Victories Under Trump This rebate proposal builds on what many call one of the most successful trade negotiations in U.S. history. For decades, past presidents failed to secure fair trade agreements with Europe. These failures allowed trade imbalances to harm U.S. industry. Trump changed that. In just six months, he achieved a historic trade breakthrough with the EU, resetting the economic relationship between the world’s two largest economies. His leadership has revived U.S. manufacturing, attracted global investment, and made America an energy powerhouse. What others promised for decades, Trump delivered—restoring the nation’s role as the global standard-bearer for economic leadership and strength. The U.S.–EU deal is a win for American workers, farmers, inventors, and businesses of all sizes. This proves that bold, decisive leadership can reverse years of stagnant growth and reclaim prosperity for future generations. Supporters Say It’s Time to Pay Families Back Supporters argue the rebate is long-overdue payback for American families. They say in the past, Washington has: Had lopsided trade deals that worked against Americans. Wasted trillions on foreign aid, bloated agencies, and benefits for illegal immigrants. Failed to protect U.S. workers and middle-class families for decades. Tariffs now generate unprecedented revenue. Supporters believe this money should go back to citizens, not into the hands of bureaucrats or foreign governments. The Other Side of the Rebate Debate: Pay Down the Debt First Not every conservative agrees with Hawley’s proposal. Many fiscal hawks argue that with the national debt at $36.72 trillion, new payments are irresponsible. They insist every dollar of extra revenue should reduce the deficit, not create new spending. Interest costs are already consuming taxpayer funds. Handing out checks could push inflation higher, repeating mistakes made during pandemic-era stimulus programs. Debt-focused conservatives say fiscal discipline must come first. Only after the U.S. gets its finances under control, they argue, should extra funds be returned to taxpayers. Treasury Reports Stronger Finances Trump administration officials counter that tariff revenue is already strengthening the budget, making rebates possible without harming fiscal health. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Maria Bartiromo on Fox Business on June 22nd: “We’ve brought in nearly $100B in tariff revenue so far and are on track for $300B this year. That’s almost 1% of GDP. June delivered a budget surplus with higher revenue and lower spending. This is how we clean up the fiscal mess we inherited.” Supporters say this surplus proves tariffs can fund rebates and reduce deficits at the same time, undermining claims that the plan is reckless. We’ve brought in nearly $100B in tariff revenue so far and are on track for $300B this year. That’s almost 1% of GDP. June delivered a budget surplus with higher revenue and lower spending. This is how we clean up the fiscal mess we inherited. pic.twitter.com/JVfaj1ZAwU — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (@SecScottBessent) July 22, 2025 Political Fight Ahead Over Rebate Hawley’s proposal faces a challenging path in Congress. Many lawmakers from both parties prefer to keep tariff funds for pet projects, foreign aid, or deficit spending. But the idea is popular with voters, many of whom have endured high prices, high interest rates, and stagnant wages over the last four years. Trump’s backing makes the proposal a likely centerpiece in upcoming trade and economic debates, forcing lawmakers to take a clear stand. Bottom Line: Washington’s Choice Trump’s tariffs are generating historic sums. Hawley wants that money to go straight to U.S. families, not disappear into Washington’s bureaucracy or be sent overseas. Supporters call it long-overdue payback for decades of failed policies that hurt American workers. Critics say the nation must tackle its $36.72 trillion debt first. As Hawley presses forward, Congress faces a simple choice: use Trump’s trade revenue wisely or keep funding…
Indian-Born Congressman In A Wig Can’t Name Cities In His District
This op-ed was written by Josh Slocum for WokeSpy. Click here to read in full. The “anything goes” and “you do you” attitude that’s prevailed for the last 15 or so years has brought us all sorts of public behavior that no one wanted. The Human Resources dictum to “bring your whole self to work” has given permission for staff to bring their marital and emotional problems to the office so what used to be private business is now everyone’s concern. Have you noticed how there are also no grooming standards anywhere anymore? If you’re in your late 40s or 50s, you remember a time not long ago when you were expected to comb your hair, tuck in your shirt, and-gasp!-even wear a clean uniform. That’s been replaced by hairy guts hanging out below food-stained T-shirts (men) and literal prostitute-wear (women). People’s faces are full of metal like nose rings and painful lip piercings, and even middle class women are covered with the kinds of tattoos formerly seen only on bikers, prisoners, and psychopaths. This strange behavior goes on in the elite classes, too. Consider ShriThanedar, an immigrant from India who represents Michigan’s 13th district in the House of Representatives. There’s no “nice” way around this: the man looks like a creation from Jim Henson’s Muppet Studios. It’s obvious from his photographs over the years that he’s been heavily reliant on makeup and hairpieces. When you look at his Congressional portrait, you imagine that Thanedar walked into a Baltimore wig emporium and said, “I’ll take the Carol Brady in brunette.” (MORE NEWS: Kay Hill On America’s Spiritual Revival & The Battle With Secular Power) Then there’s the obviously drawn-on (tattooed?) eyebrows. Recently, they’ve taken on the in-vogue square shape, the kind that looks like they were drawn on with a Sharpie. Of course, we’re not supposed to comment on how people look, even when they choose their look specifically to get attention, as Thanedar appears to have done. So let’s examine his political actions. Thanedar has a severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome, and recently put up a video announcing his articles of impeachment against President Trump. Take a look and a listen to this weird dude. His odd priorities are not a one-off. Recently a citizen reporter interviewed Thanedar and asked him to specifically name prominent cities in the Congressional district he represents. Thanedar couldn’t do it, begging off by saying “I’m not here to answer a quiz.” Take a look. Shri’s Impeachment Vaudeville Has Been a Big Flop The congressman’s “Impeachment Town Hall” last weekend had only 27 attendees and less excitement than an AA meeting By Charlie LeDuff (@Charlieleduff) Lincoln Park — Congressman Shri Thanedar doesn’t like DOGE. He doesn’t like… pic.twitter.com/G3CeP7wCmK — Michigan Enjoyer (@mich_enjoyer) May 14, 2025 TMM Analysis: Don’t Pick Political Celebrities Surely, we can all agree that Slocum’s writing style is arguably one of the funniest around right now, even if some of us vehemently disagree with his stance on tattoos and piercings? Beneath Slocum’s wit is a very real issue: for too long we’ve normalized making celebrities out of our politicians, to the point that our politicians now look and act more likely stupid celebrities than actual leaders. Every elected official is paid for by you. Every elected official is chosen for their job by you. At no time should a politician refuse to answer a question that relates to their position. It’s just that simple. You need to stop choosing political celebrities over the folks who just want to make America a better place for all of us. Usually, the underdog — the quietest, most under-funded name in the race — is the one who deserves the chance to lead us. As we grow, The Modern Memo will be elevating the most important voices for the social sustainable future of American society. We will elevate good people, great ideas, and stuff our editorial team finds interesting, funny, or valuable to you, dear readers. At the same time, we will never be above calling out wrongdoers, stupid ideas and the things that endanger our survival as a society and species. If you’d like to be more involved, contact us today to learn more.