COVID-19
Revealed: Johnson & Johnson Lead Scientist Admits COVID-19 Vaccine Was Not Well Tested Or Effective
By James Davis for WokeSpy Investigative journalist and Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe recently exposed the vaccine industrial complex acknowledging the shortcomings of its COVID-19 vaccines. O’Keefe recorded pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson’s Lead Scientist in Regulatory Affairs, Joshua Rys, admitting that the company did not exhaustively test its COVID-19 vaccine and that it was not actually effective. Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine was among the top approved injections that many Americans were forced to take to continue working during the height of the pandemic. Many Americans lost their jobs when they questioned the efficacy of these vaccines or refused to take them altogether. However, authorities assured Americans that all approved vaccines were well tested before distributing them to the public and were effective in preventing the spread of COVID. ‘Safe & Effective’ “While public officials claimed the vaccines were ‘safe and effective,’ Rys pushed back,” OMG reported. “There’s no proof. None of that stuff was safe and effective.” Many vaccinated individuals contracted COVID-19 while others developed complications linked to the vaccines. However, the political elite, backed by the media and big tech, denied there were any issues with the vaccine, instead blaming “disinformation” from “right-wing conservative conspiracy theorists and anti-vaxxers.” However, the J&J lead scientist confirmed what many Americans feared, despite assurances from elite politicians, bureaucrats, and big pharma. (RELATED: Post-COVID Homeowners Are In Dire Financial Situation And No One Is Talking About It) “We didn’t do the typical tests,” said Rys, adding that the company abandoned the typical clinical process for the COVID-19 vaccine by knowingly bypassing standard testing protocols under pressure from the U.S. government and public demand. “This was just, ‘let’s test it on some lab models… and just throw it to the wind and see what happens,’” he added. Misleading Americans Based on his remarks, U.S. authorities knew that the vaccine was not well tested. Nonetheless, they knowingly misled Americans and imposed punitive measures on those who questioned their efficacy or refused to take them. According to Rys, the government fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccine uptake through Operation Warp Speed, which was determined to solve the problem at all costs. “The government is like, ‘We need help… You’re solving this problem,’” he said. “People panic, so they try to solve it in whatever way they think is good.” However, a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) spokesperson asserted that pharmaceutical companies are required to follow strict testing protocols, “even during a public health emergency.” (RELATED: Adverse Effects Of COVID-19 Vaccination Observed In Women’s Reproductive Cycle) The spokesperson added that, during health emergencies, pharmaceutical companies must demonstrate that any exceptions outweigh the risks of rolling out their vaccines. Additionally, health authorities closely monitor the vaccines after their rollout to ensure that they remain safe for public use. “Oversight doesn’t stop at approval — the FDA and other agencies also monitor products closely once they’re in use,” the spokesperson added. However, the aggressiveness with which authorities tried to silence concerned individuals, including scientists, raises serious questions about the governments’ complicity in light of the recent admission. (RELATED: COVID-19 mRNA Shots Linked To Higher Death Toll Amongst Cancer Patients) Trump’s HHS Secretary, FRK Jr., has promised to restore the gold standard in medical science to ensure that politics do not direct health decisions. His vision aligns with Trump’s executive order to restore gold standard science across federal departments. TMM Analysis When a new disease hits the population, it can take up to at least 10 years for scientists to develop, test, and roll-out a vaccine. We also know, from historical context, that most of the diseases we vaccinate against today were already eradicated thanks to the growth in cleanliness measures throughout the Western population. This is common sense, but unfortunately this is not so common anymore. And while we do not judge those who received a dose of the COVID-19 vaccination, you have to ask yourself why the fundamentals of vaccine science are so unknown to a majority of the population. It is almost like there is a concerted efforts within scientific communities — of all kinds — to limit general knowledge in favor of control and profit. Here at The Modern Memo, we are not okay with this process. If you’re not okay with this process either, perhaps you should join us.
USAID Quietly Sent Thousands Of Viruses To Chinese Military-Linked Biolab (DCNF Exclusive)
By Daily Caller News Foundation investigative reporter Emily Kopp The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) shipped thousands of viral samples to a lab in Wuhan over the course of a 10-year program even though it had no formal agreement with the lab in place, according to previously unreported documents. The documents show that USAID funded the exportation of 11,000 samples from Yunnan Province, where some of the closest relatives of the COVID-19 virus circulate, to Wuhan, the epicenter of the pandemic, with no apparent plan for ensuring the samples were not misdirected to bioweapons and remained accessible to the U.S. government. Something Out Of A Horror Movie A $210 million USAID public health program called PREDICT, steered by the University of California-Davis, collected viral samples in countries throughout the globe but lacked long-term storage when funding dried up, according to rudimentary plans in 2019. USAID’s sample dispensation plan for China is sparse: “No need [sic] information from Yunnan. They were never an official lab partner for PREDICT. All samples they helped collected [sic] are sent to, tested, and stored in Wuhan.” The “lab” refers to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). WIV was a close partner of USAID contractor EcoHealth Alliance and a slated partner for a PREDICT-like program supported by the State Department. The lab has poor biosafety practices and ties to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). COVID-19 Included One of the closest known relatives of the COVID virus is among the viruses sampled with USAID funding. “Investigations involving USAID’s former funding of global health awards remain active and ongoing,” a senior State Department official said in a statement to the Daily Caller News Foundation. “The American people can rest assured knowing that under the Trump Administration we will not be funding these controversial programs.” (RELATED: COVID-19 mRNA Shots Linked To Higher Death Toll Amongst Cancer Patients) The internal documents were obtained through a FOIA lawsuit brought by U.S. Right to Know, a nonprofit newsroom and public health research group. The shuttering of USAID – which was officially completed Tuesday – has ignited a debate about its net impact on global health. A study in The Lancet projected an association between a dropoff in USAID funding and 14 million deaths based on an epidemiological model. Undermining American Interests Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement Tuesday that USAID spending has often undermined rather than strengthened American interests. “Beyond creating a globe-spanning NGO industrial complex at taxpayer expense, USAID has little to show since the end of the Cold War,” Rubio said. “Development objectives have rarely been met, instability has often worsened, and anti-American sentiment has only grown.” The now-defunct agency’s connection to the Wuhan lab complicates its global health legacy. (RELATED: China Continues Stealth Invasion Of US With More Biological Warfare) “The USAID $210 million contract for PREDICT should have included contractual terms that required all samples, or at least copies of all samples, be transferred to and stored by a US government facility,” said Rutgers University molecular biologist Richard Ebright told the DCNF. “The PREDICT grift did none of this.” UC Davis did not respond to a request for comment. The State Department did not respond to a request for comment. Did USAID Fund COVID’s Ancestor? Many of the viruses stored at the lab in Wuhan may have been sampled with U.S. funding yet remain out of reach for U.S. government entities investigating the origins of COVID. The samples were set to be preserved for testing – with human samples preserved for 10 years – the documents show. But the documents suggest that requirement was never incorporated into a formal contract with USAID. The two scientists supervising the samples were: Ben Hu, a virologist at the WIV, who reportedly became sick with COVID-like symptoms in 2019; and Peter Daszak, a scientist who was debarred from federal funding after the U.S. government deemed him a threat to public safety for inadequate oversight of the research in Wuhan. Hu and Daszak did not reply to requests for comment. The documents show PREDICT contractors discussing viral samples taken from wildlife and stored in India, Liberia, Malaysia, the Republic of Congo and China. Some of the samples were stored in virus-transport media (VTM), which allows researchers to store live viruses for later use in the lab. (RELATED: Adverse Effects Of COVID-19 Vaccination Observed In Women’s Reproductive Cycle) “It’s not rocket science to require a contract and supporting paperwork which establishes a relationship, testing protocol, and chain of custody, when one is sending out lab samples,” said Reuben Guttman, a partner at Guttman, Buschner & Brooks PLLC who specializes in ensuring the integrity of government programs, in an interview with the DCNF. “In any scientific endeavor, you need confidence in your results. That requires paperwork to prove your methodology is sound.” TMM Analysis Honestly, Emily hit it out of the park on this one. Our biggest concern is that a huge amount of our money goes to the government every year, and we are still not sure what it all gets spent on. Do you know where your tax dollars go?
COVID-19 mRNA Shots Linked To Higher Death Toll Amongst Cancer Patients
A study published in June in the journal Cancers found that patients who received three or more COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations were more likely to die of pancreatic cancer than those who did not. A team of Japanese researchers retrospectively examined the impact of the COVID-19 vaccination on the survival rates of 272 pancreatic cancer patients at their hospital between January 2018 and November 2023, and found that repeat vaccinations were a statistically significant “poor prognostic factor in PC patients.” The repeated use of the COVID-19 vaccine was associated with the immune suppressor IgG4, with those patients who received more than three vaccinations having higher levels of the spike-specific IgG4. (RELATED: Adverse Effects Of COVID-19 Vaccination Observed In Women’s Reproductive Cycle) “The overall survival (OS) of PC patients was shortened in those vaccinated three times or more, and the total serum IgG4 levels increased with the number of vaccinations. Of note, OS was significantly shorter in the high IgG4 group, and Foxp3-positive cells in the tumor tissues were increased,” the authors noted in the abstract. “Repeated vaccinations increased the spike-specific IgG4 levels, and a positive correlation was observed between spike-specific IgG4 and the total IgG4.” Berenson’s Analysis Of COVID-19 Vaccine Cancer Deaths Former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson’s analysis of the study noted how earlier reports, also out of Japan, found other cancer deaths rose after the mRNA vaccinations were instituted throughout the nation. Specifically, leukemia deaths rose 6 percent after years of decline throughout the nation. Even when controlling for the aging population of the archipelago nation, there were still excess deaths post-roll out of the vaccine. (RELATED: Kennedy Removes COVID-19 Vaccine From Recommended Childhood, Pregnancy Schedule) The trend as it relates to pancreatic cancer follows similar results to leukemia, with years of positive gains in increasing life expectancy dropping a significant amount within the vaccinated population. “Even when they matched patients one-to-one to try to equalize them by tumor spread, they found those who had received more shots died three months sooner,” Berenson wrote, noting that those who received none or fewer shots lived almost 15 months longer. (RELATED: EXCLUSIVE: 20,000,000 Sick Americans Abandoned By Medical ‘Oligarchy’ Controlled By Elites; Can We Fix It?) TMM Analysis Once again we are faced with a truth that we all know to be, but even our most significant health organizations deny. This study should set the foundation for future research of COVID-19 vaccine cancer deaths. As we described in previous reportage on the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccination, the long-term consequences of this disease and the so-called “cure” probably will not be truly felt — or acknowledged by major health institutions — for possibly decades to come. In 2026, the people of America have an opportunity to change this likely outcome. When you go to the polls next year, why not pick candidates who promise, and then actually fulfill, their duty to serve and protect you as your elected officials? We’re working with groups like Million Voices to bring you the most up-to-date, bipartisan knowledge on each of the prospective candidates you can choose in the 2026 midterms. And you can bet that the COVID-19 vaccine and pandemic response will be part of our investigations.
Adverse Effects Of COVID-19 Vaccination Observed In Women’s Reproductive Cycle
A peer reviewed study published in June revealed a relationship between women who’d received the COVID-19 vaccine and lowered rates of successful conception leading to live births. The study, published in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, used data from the Czech Republic to examine any differences in rates of successful conception (ie: conception that led to live births) between women who had received the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA vaccine and those who had not. The results found that rates of successful conception were “substantially lower for women vaccinated against COVID-19 … than for those who were not vaccinated.” While this is still a preliminary study, the results should lead to further research on the extent to which women who received the COVID-19 vaccine were able to have successful conceptions — that lead to live births — compared to their unvaccinated counterparts. Data Silenced For Years After COVID-19 Vaccines Were Forced On Population A systematic review of literature published by the National Library of Medicine during the Biden administration’s control of the U.S. argued that there were no differences in pregnancy rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated women (and men). Unfortunately, this study was conducted during a time when a majority of research into the COVID-19 vaccine and its detrimental impacts to the human population were ignored or shut down by Big Medicine. (RELATED: China Continues Stealth Invasion Of US With More Biological Warfare) For example, researchers identified a link between COVID-19 vaccinations and post-COVID vaccine syndrome (PCVS) and long COVID in 2021, but their research was silenced until 2025. This appears to be a fairly common trend, as the NLM also recently published a study on the detrimental impact of the vaccine in rats. https://t.co/5HFCsoRify Detection of S1 spike protein in CD16+ monocytes up to 245 days in SARS-CoV-2-negative post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome (PCVS) individuals Took us 4 years to get our post-COVID vaccine syndrome paper (PCVS) peer reviewed and published. We knew back in… — Dryostradamus MD MPH 
(@dryostradamus) May 13, 2025 A study on the impact of COVID-19 vaccines on the ovarian reserves of rats also found the drugs may cause significant detrimental impacts via “accelerated follicular loss and alterations in apoptotic pathways during folliculogenesis.” However, most studies into animals are not taken particularly seriously (even by us). Other studies have found a potential link between the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein and spermatogenesis-related antigens, potentially leading to an impact on the infected patient’s fertility. The autoimmune response from the Spike protein — also identified in patients who received the mRNA vaccine — was found to potentially have human consequences as far as male fertility was concerned. (RELATED: Kennedy Removes COVID-19 Vaccine From Recommended Childhood, Pregnancy Schedule) A large-scale study conducted among 2,733 women undergoing in vitro fertilization-frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) conducted within the first year of the roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccines found that clinical pregnancy and live births were lower within vaccinated populations compared to unvaccinated women to a significant degree. “Inactivated COVID-19 vaccination may be associated with a modest reduction in IVF-FET success, particularly when administered before ovarian stimulation,” the researchers wrote in the conclusions, but added that “a vaccination administered more than 90 days prior to ovarian stimulation may help mitigate these potential adverse effects,” though more research is needed. Fertility In Decline A report from Unusual Whales detailed a United Nations study into 14,000 women across 14 countries — South Korea, Thailand, Italy, Hungary, Germany, Sweden, Brazil, Mexico, the U.S., India, Indonesia, Morocco, South Africa, and Nigeria — from high to low-income backgrounds, with high and low fertility rates, showed an “unprecedented decline” in fertility rates. Thirty-nine percent of those surveyed blamed money as the core reason for not having children, but many believe the real issues are health and society-related. (RELATED: EXCLUSIVE: 20,000,000 Sick Americans Abandoned By Medical ‘Oligarchy’ Controlled By Elites; Can We Fix It?) “We found that alarmingly high proportions of adults are unable to realize their fertility intentions,” the UNFPA noted in their study. The study also noted the need for greater education and support, such as the importance of having “supportive partners who will share the load of childbearing equitably.” “The real solution to the crisis of reproductive agency we are facing is to build a more equitable, sustainable and caring world that supports individuals to have the families they aspire to,” the report added, begging the question: why have we made it easier for women to kill their unborn children than to raise them successfully? TMM Analysis A lot of people read academic journals and are completely misled in the efficacy of the findings. When we deep-dive into published data here at TMM, we also like to look at the schools or institutions conducting the research, as well as the individual researchers themselves to assess any potential conflicts of interest — even when these studies claim there is no conflict, that is not a guarantee. The biggest takeaway from this report is that the Czech study clearly shows a need for detailed independent investigation into any potential links between fertility and the COVID-19 vaccine. We are only a few years out from the mass rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine, so much of the data related to its impact likely won’t reach any type of scale for potentially decades — more due to manipulation within Big Pharma / Big Medicine — than any legitimate reason. We also need to normalize rhetoric away from being pro-life and pro-choice. If given the choice, all women would want to raise their children in a world that they know is supportive, safe, and sustainable in the long-term, but we keep elected leaders — particularly in Europe and other Western nations — who focused on a socialist approach to governance, which ultimately makes it harder for the individual to thrive and survive. How about instead of asking people if they are pro-life, or pro-choice, we start asking if they’d prefer to kill their unborn children, or work toward a better world for…
‘Razor Blade Throat’ And Lung Cancer: How COVID-19 Mismanagement & Misinformation Is Still Killing People
Reports emerging out of emergency rooms and doctors offices across the U.S. are pointing to a series of terrifying trends within the extended COVID-19 pandemic, and our leaders are still mismanaging the response while misinformation spreads online. “Anyone who has known or follows me, knows I am not a sensationalist and take a measured approach, wanting to see well designed studies and data before commenting. A very highly respected physician researcher sent me this text a few days ago,” wrote Dr. Ram Yogendra, who famously identified the S1 spike protein, linking COVID-19 and the vaccine to both long COVID and post-COVID vaccine syndrome (PCVS). “I am not going to jump to any conclusions because these are just observations and anecdotes but [the National Institute of Health] and other health organizations should start immediately putting resources and government funding into doing studies on Long COVID and cancer. For the love of God, enough of the surveys and symptoms studies. And if the spike protein and CD16+ monocytes are contributing to Long COVID…. then you know what else we should be doing studies on [the vaccine].” (RELATED: ‘If I Was Waiting For FEMA, I Would Be Screwed’: You’ll Sob Watching What’s Happening In NC Months After Hurricane Helene) Yogendra was quick to clarify that this is not his primary research, nor his observation. He was “just sharing what someone at a top institution is observing.” Other Reports On SARS-CoV-2 & Aging Other reports shared online are linking the disease to a rapid increase in aging. “rom genomic stability and telomere integrity to mitochondrial health and immune function, emerging evidence reveals that COVID-19 has systematically targeted every hallmark of biological aging,” wrote Dr. Steven Murphy in one article. TMM could not independently verify these findings, but spoke with physicians and researchers who asked to remain anonymous, who independently and individually stated that rapid aging was likely in anyone experiencing the inflammation highly linked to both COVID-19 and the vaccines. (RELATED: China Continues Stealth Invasion Of US With More Biological Warfare) “Scientists found out that COVID-19, caused by a virus called SARS-CoV-2, can do more than just give you a cough or fever. It can speed up the way your cells—the tiny building blocks of your body—wear down. This means your body gets older faster. For example, it damages the ends of your DNA (telomeres) which protect your cells. It also messes up how cells get rid of broken parts, how they talk to each other, and how they produce energy,” Murphy proposed in his blog post. COVID-19 Variant Causing ‘Razor Blade Throat’ The latest “variant” of COVID-19, called “Nimbus” is causing painful symptoms, described by some as “razor blade throat,” according to Focal Points. The rest of the article went on to try and sell products to manage the symptoms, so we didn’t see the point in sharing it (it was extremely tacky), but it did raise a real concern: why are we still dealing with COVID-19 if the vaccines were supposed to work? Nimbus already represents roughly one-third, a massive increase from the 5% of new cases identified just over a month ago. (RELATED: So-Called Experts Cause Panic Over New COVID-19 Variant As WHO Eyes Global Takeover?) The disease appears to be spreading most rapidly in California, though experts who spoke to SFGATE argue that it is no more severe than previous outbreaks and variants. “There’s always been a range of sore throats that people have had when they have COVID,” Dr. Peter Chin-Hong, a UCSF infectious disease specialist, told SFGATE. Unfortunately, San Francisco’s department of health told readers to go and get the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine to prevent against the spread, suggesting that no one at the institution is up-to-date on the latest findings linking the vaccine to PCVS. https://t.co/5HFCsoRify Detection of S1 spike protein in CD16+ monocytes up to 245 days in SARS-CoV-2-negative post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome (PCVS) individuals Took us 4 years to get our post-COVID vaccine syndrome paper (PCVS) peer reviewed and published. We knew back in… — Dryostradamus MD MPH (@dryostradamus) May 13, 2025 TMM Analysis Even CNN’s so-called wellness expert Dr. Leana Wen, was quick to note that it is actually completely scientifically unknown if the latest vaccines will show any protection against the Nimbus variant. Per usual, every outlet you turn to for COVID-19 information — even vaccine information — pushes the vaccines while talking around its efficacy in a very generalized way. With zero medical consensus on this issue, we recommend everyone do their own research, and remember that most doctors can lose their jobs if they try to go against the mainstream narrative.
Kennedy Removes COVID-19 Vaccine From Recommended Childhood, Pregnancy Schedule
Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in late May that the COVID-19 vaccine will no longer be part of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s recommended immunization schedule. Kennedy announced the removal of the controversial vaccine in a video recorded alongside National Institute of Health director Jay Bhattacharya and Food and Drug Administration commissioner Marty Markary. “Last year the Biden administration urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot despite the lack of any clinical data to support the repeat booster strategy in children,” Kennedy stated in the footage. The decision was called “common sense” and “good science” by Bhattacharya. “There’s no evidence healthy kids need it today and most countries have stopped recommending it for children,” Markay added. (MORE NEWS: Best Crops To Grow During A Nuclear Apocalypse, According To Scientists) The move comes within two weeks of the publication of an extensive study identify injuries derived from the vaccine, including serious conditions like long-COVID and post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome (PCVS). Today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from @CDCgov recommended immunization schedule. Bottom line: it’s common sense and it’s good science. We are now one step closer to realizing @POTUS’s promise to Make America Healthy Again. pic.twitter.com/Ytch2afCLP — Secretary Kennedy (@SecKennedy) May 27, 2025 TMM Analysis Experts who spoke with TMM on condition of anonymity say there is a deep commitment within the current leadership of H.H.S. to identify and mitigate the long-term consequences of mass vaccinations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Not only is there a multitude of evidence proving that as many as 10,000,000 to 20,000,000 Americans may have been harmed by the vaccine, but the longer many wait to receive adequate treatment, the worse their conditions become. Finding a way to reshape our healthcare industry can be done in conjunction with curing what might be one of the worst mass-poisonings in human history. We must hold our leaders accountable to this mission. (THREAT: Mainstream Media Finally Wakes Up To Massive Geological Threat To US) We’ll be bringing you more information on the fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic, from what we can learn, to the threats we still face. If you think you have information that could be helpful to our research, please contact us via the form on the website.
WHO Passes ‘Pandemic Agreement’ Even Though Pretty Much None Of Us Agreed To It
This article was originally published in-part by Million Voices. Click here to read more. The World Health Organization (WHO) adopted a global pandemic agreement on May 20, allowing the unelected group of representatives to create “legally binding” rules for the masses should another disease spread throughout our species. The full agreement is designed to better prevent, prepare, and respond to any potential mass disease outbreak. “This includes through the equitable and timely access to vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics,” WHO members said in a statement accompanying the agreement. The WHO Agreement only applies to the nation states that have officially signed it, which does not include the U.S. The U.S. was not part of the final stages of the pandemic agreement process following President Donald Trump’s decision to leave WHO, according to The Associated Press. (MORE NEWS: Kay Hill On Biden’s Info Blackout & The Solar Flare Threat No One’s Talking About) WHO is run by unelected (via public democratic process) Director General Tedros Ghebreyesus, who claimed the world is now “safer” as a result of the agreement. “The Agreement is a victory for public health, science and multilateral action. It will ensure we, collectively, can better protect the world from future pandemic threats. It is also a recognition by the international community that our citizens, societies and economies must not be left vulnerable to again suffer losses like those endured during COVID-19,” he added. Britain Signs Despite Previous Stance U.S. ally, Great Britain, adopted the agreement, claiming it would “protect [the] British public and NHS from future global health threats while preserving UK sovereignty,” and “will safeguard lives and [the] UK economy by improving [the] world’s collective ability to prevent, prepare for, detect and respond to global disease threats.” These statements fly in the face of previous statements from the British government. In May 2024, Britain was preparing to reject the agreement on the grounds that it created something of a “New World Order,” handing over mass control of medical, health, food, and other major infrastructural systems to a completely unelected group of people. Analysis From Others “Anyone who isn’t a fan of the coming global surveillance superstate is right to be concerned about the recent approval of the WHO Pandemic Agreement at the World Health Assembly meetings in Geneva. The point not to miss is that this sets in place a precedent for a global legal and policy architecture that will make it normative for more control to be consolidated in the hands of a few,” Family Research Council vice president of Policy and Government Affairs’ Travis Weber told the Washington Stand. (EXCLUSIVE: Cash Flowing Into Anti-ICE Group’s Coffers Came From Chinese Gov’t-Linked Sources) “The next global crisis may not be from a virus; but it will likely be a ‘health emergency’ that will be used to once again justify infringements on individual human rights and freedoms. On top of that, accelerating progress on AI will allow such global control to be very intrusive and very effectively manipulated in the hands of a few.” The WHO “agreement” also (according to another analysis from the Washington Stand): threatens national sovereignty; equates the health of humans with animals and plants; establishes a global super-government of unelected bureaucrats, who may alter the agreement at any time; transfers one-fifth of all U.S. vaccines and emergency equipment to WHO and regular monetary contributions to “developing countries” (a category that includes China); requires nations to follow WHO regulations on “routine immunization” and “social measures” including lockdowns, mask mandates, and social distancing; calls on nations to study factors that reduce public “trust” in government pandemic policies, such as mask and vaccine mandates or social distancing; would empower private-sector forces such as social media companies to ramp up censorship of disfavored viewpoints; aims to create equity-driven, universal national health care systems around the globe; does not define the terms “pandemic,” “gender,” or “women”; and has a “Hotel California” provision stating that a nation can never discharge any “obligations which accrued while it was a Party to the WHO Pandemic Agreement,” even after it withdraws. Read The Text In Full TMM Analysis We can, of course, continue to ignore the unelected authority of WHO members and pray that no future elected official of this nation bows to them during some hypothetical future pandemic. Many people ignored their rules during the COVID-19 pandemic, and they’re now falling on the right side of history. We’ve done it once, we can do it again, America. But we can only do it if we keep using our voice. Do You Know How Your Local, State & Federally Elected Officials Feel About WHO? If you care about any of the issues you learned about today, you should consider contacting your locally elected official to voice your concerns. Did you know that if a politician — from your local town Mayor, all the way up through Congress — receives as few as 10 letters on the same issue, they will be forced to take action? Learn more about this brilliant political loophole by joining Million Voices today.
WATCH: Is The Commonwealth A Lost Cause? What Are Long-COVID And ‘Long Vax’?
The Modern Memo’s Kay Smythe Hill joined “The Joe Pags Show” Monday (May 5) for her weekly installment of “Kray News with Kay on a Monday.” It looks (and feels) like the rest of the Western world is experiencing the same compounding crises and we’ve recently navigated here in the U.S. Why is that these nations have swayed further to the fundamentalist left, towards those perpetuating the problems many claim to want solved? (MORE NEWS: Soviet Spacecraft May Hit US Thanks To Uncontrolled Reentry) Kay Smythe-Hill, Editor-in-Chief at Million Voices, joins Pags to break down why countries like Canada and Australia keep electing far-left leaders while America experiences a powerful surge of nationalist momentum. From global policy trends to the cultural clash between freedom and control, Kay dives into what makes America different—and why that difference matters now more than ever. Dr. Jesse Lopez EXPOSES the Truth About Long COVID and “Long Vax” Renowned integrative physician Dr. Jesse Lopez joins Pags and brings the FACTS. No fluff, no fear mongering—just real medical studies breaking down what’s really behind “long COVID” and the even more alarming rise in what he calls “long vax.” Dr. Lopez explains the biological effects, the overlooked risks, and why so many are still in the dark. If you’ve had COVID, the jab, or know someone who has—this is must-hear, potentially life-changing information. Watch The Full Episode Here: You can subscribe to Joe Pags on YouTube by clicking here. The Modern Memo will be bringing you as many of Pags’ episodes as humanly possible, but please follow and subscribe to him across all of the following platforms. Check out Joe Pags on X: always the hottest takes and the news you need Joe Pags Official Website Rumble — Joe Pags If you care about any of the issues you learned about today, you should consider contacting your locally elected official to voice your concerns. Did you know that if a politician — from your local town Mayor, all the way up through Congress — receives as few as 10 letters on the same issue, they will be forced to take action? Learn more about this brilliant political loophole by joining Million Voices today.