Crime
ICE Blocked by Pritzker’s Sanctuary Law After Fatal Crash
A heartbreaking crash in Coles County, Illinois, has reignited fierce debate between ICE and the state’s sanctuary policies. Michael and Gail Clayton — a respected Republican county official and his wife — were killed when an alleged illegal immigrant, driving under the influence, crossed into their lane and struck their car head-on. The Claytons were well known in Charleston for their kindness and community service. Their sudden deaths have shaken the town — and raised serious questions about whether Illinois Governor Pritzker’s decision to shield illegal immigrants from federal law enforcement contributed to this tragedy. The Crash and the Suspect On October 24, 34-year-old Edwin Pacheco-Meza, a Honduran national living illegally in the United States, allegedly veered his van into oncoming traffic. The impact killed both Michael, 71, and Gail Clayton, 66, at the scene. (MORE NEWS: Kamala Teases 2028 Run — Democrats Scramble for Strategy) Authorities reported that Pacheco-Meza appeared intoxicated. In his vehicle, police found open alcohol containers, drugs, and even an extended ammunition magazine. An 18-year-old Guatemalan passenger, Juan Morales-Martinez, also in the country illegally, was charged with drug and weapons offenses. Prosecutors quickly filed charges of reckless homicide and aggravated DUI against Pacheco-Meza. ICE officials later confirmed both men were in the country unlawfully and lodged detainer requests to take them into custody. Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at the Department of Homeland Security Tricia McLaughlin said: “Two innocents were killed because this criminal illegal alien chose to drive under the influence. President Trump and Secretary Noem have unleashed ICE and CBP in Illinois to restore law-and-order and remove criminal illegal aliens from our communities. Anyone who is in the U.S. illegally and thinks they can roam free while breaking our laws and harming Americans is in for a rude awakening. If you are in our country illegally and break our laws, we will find you, arrest you, remove you, and you will never return.” How Illinois’ Sanctuary Law Comes Into Play Here is where the story becomes more complicated — and controversial. Illinois law bars local police and county jails from cooperating with federal immigration detainers. Under Governor J.B. Pritzker’s “Trust Act,” state and local agencies are prohibited from holding someone for ICE unless there is a federal court order. In practice, this means that even when immigration authorities ask to take custody of criminal suspects, local jails must ignore those requests. According to reports, detainers were placed on both men after the crash, but local officials initially refused to honor them. This policy undermines public safety and invites exactly the kind of tragedy that took the Claytons’ lives. There is a human cost when those laws shield people accused of serious crimes. Community Shock and Grief The deaths of Michael and Gail Clayton have devastated the small town of Charleston. Their obituary describes the couple as warm, dependable, and deeply involved in local life. They volunteered in civic projects, attended the farmers’ market, and supported small businesses. Their loss has left the community in deep shock and mourning. It’s a reminder of how policy decisions made in the state capital can reach into the heart of a small community. What Sanctuary States Get Wrong This crash has revived a national conversation about what sanctuary states owe their citizens. Opponents of these policies say Illinois’ refusal to cooperate with ICE leaves law enforcement powerless to prevent known offenders from remaining in the country. (RELATED NEWS: Portland Police Go Easy on Antifa…Again) When local officials ignore federal detainers, they effectively place politics above public safety. Federal immigration law exists to identify and remove individuals who commit crimes after entering the country illegally. When states block that process, they weaken both accountability and deterrence. Even those who support a compassionate immigration system are now questioning whether blanket non-cooperation makes sense. Compassion should not come at the expense of safety — and laws meant to protect the vulnerable should not allow reckless behavior that endangers innocent families. The Federal-State Divide This case highlights a growing rift between federal immigration enforcement and certain state governments. ICE and the Department of Homeland Security maintain that immigration law is a federal responsibility. Yet states like Illinois, California, and New York have passed legislation to limit cooperation, often citing civil rights concerns. The result is confusion, uneven enforcement, and, in tragic cases like this one, deadly outcomes. Local police are caught in the middle — bound by state restrictions yet facing the real-world consequences when things go wrong. Calls for Change As details of the crash spread, public pressure on state leaders has intensified. Lawmakers are calling for a review of Illinois’ sanctuary statutes, arguing that local agencies must be able to communicate with federal authorities when crimes involve non-citizens. Others insist on a balanced approach — maintaining trust with immigrant communities while ensuring that those who commit crimes are not protected from accountability. Regardless of where one stands politically, the deaths of the Claytons are forcing an uncomfortable but necessary conversation about the limits of sanctuary policies. A Case That Demands Accountability Michael and Gail Clayton should still be alive. Their deaths were not a random accident; they were the foreseeable result of a system that failed to put public safety first. When state officials choose to defy federal law, they assume responsibility for what happens next. Every ignored detainer, every preventable crime, every family left grieving — these are the consequences of decisions made in Springfield and echoed across other sanctuary states. The Takeaway The tragedy in Charleston, Illinois, is a national warning. When state leaders prioritize ideology over enforcement, the victims are often ordinary citizens like the Claytons. As the investigation continues, one thing is clear: the sanctuary model is under scrutiny. States that reject cooperation with federal law must reckon with the outcomes of that choice. The Claytons’ memory deserves more than condolences. It deserves action and a renewed commitment to laws that protect every American, regardless of politics or policy debates. Cut Through the Noise. Slice Through the…
High-Tech Bank Scam Leaves Victims Penniless in Seconds
A ruthless new wave of bank fraud is sweeping across the U.S., leaving victims stunned and financially shattered. According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), more than 516,000 Americans reported falling prey to a so-called “imposter scam” in 2025, with total losses nearing $1.7 million, the New York Post reports. How the Scam Works First, the victim gets a call, email, or pop-up message claiming their account has been compromised. Then, a scammer posing as a bank or tech support agent creates panic and urgency. After that, the victim is told to transfer money to a “safe” account—or to install software that secretly gives the fraudster access to their computer. This layered trick, often called the “phantom hacker” scheme, uses fear and confusion to push victims into acting fast. The scammers often bring in a second voice—someone pretending to be law enforcement or a government agent—to make the ruse even more believable. (MORE NEWS: Boost Your Metabolism Naturally with This Easy 30-Minute Daily Habit) Real Victims, Devastated Lives One of the most shocking stories comes from 33-year-old journalist Noel Phillips of New York, who spoke exclusively to The Post. “It’s devastating,” he said. “They used fear-tactics to basically hypnotize me into handing over all the money I’d worked so hard to earn and save over the last four years.” Phillips watched in disbelief as scammers, posing as bank employees and law enforcement, emptied his account. “My entire world just came crashing down within the few minutes it took to walk into the bank,” he recalled. Another victim, 65-year-old caterer Deborah Moss from Northern California, lost a staggering $162,000 after someone posing as a friendly “Miss Barbara” convinced her to give up verification codes and approve wire transfers. “I started screaming like you wouldn’t believe,” Moss said. “I was, like, ‘Oh, my f—ing God.’ I was just hysterical. That was all my money.” Why It’s Getting Worse — And Smarter Scammers aren’t just using old tricks anymore. With advanced technology like AI-generated voices and caller ID spoofing, they sound more convincing than ever. “AI can certainly amplify the scams, making them more believable,” said Christopher Brown of the FTC. The phone numbers that appear on victims’ caller IDs often look legitimate—but they’re completely fake. Spoofed calls now number in the billions each month. With each fake call, scammers are perfecting their psychological tactics, learning exactly how to manipulate fear and urgency to make people act. A Broken Safety Net Even worse, victims say they aren’t getting enough help after the fact. One 86-year-old woman, Nina Mortellito, lost $700,000 after scammers convinced her to move large sums from several banks. Her attorney argues that the banks ignored obvious red flags. “This is a well-known epidemic in America. All the banks are aware that this is a major problem, but we don’t feel that banks are doing a reasonable job to protect people,” he said. Phillips agreed that his bank failed to protect him. “The bigger injustice than a scammer stealing money is when your bank doesn’t help customers who fall victim to such a crime,” he told reporters. What You Must Do Now Thankfully, there are ways to protect yourself from these high-tech criminals. Experts urge consumers to stay alert and follow a few key steps: Hang up immediately if you get an unsolicited call asking you to move money or install software. Verify independently by using the phone number on your bank card or official website. Never trust the number shown on caller ID. Never give remote access to anyone who calls you out of the blue claiming to represent your bank or tech support. Speak up quickly if you think you’ve been targeted. Reporting suspicious activity can prevent others from becoming victims. These steps may sound simple, but scammers rely on panic to override logic. Taking a deep breath and verifying before acting can save your entire savings. The Urgent Warning As the crisis deepens, regulators are under pressure to act. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has implemented new technologies like STIR/SHAKEN to authenticate caller numbers, but fraudsters keep finding ways around them. (MORE NEWS: Retirement 2025: America’s Safest and Wealthiest Towns to Call Home) “This is a scam that can destroy someone’s entire retirement,” warns Brown. “If you delay even a few hours, it could be too late.” Cybersecurity experts say that banks and telecom companies must do more to protect their customers, but for now, the responsibility often falls on individuals to stay vigilant. Final Take You’ve worked hard for your savings—don’t let them vanish because of one phone call or email. These scammers are no longer clumsy amateurs. They build elaborate fake worlds of fear and authority, then exploit your trust and urgency to drain your accounts in seconds. As one victim put it bluntly, “All my money is gone, and there’s no guarantee that I’ll ever get it back.” Stay alert. Ask questions. Trust your instincts. Because if you don’t, you could find yourself fighting alone to reclaim what’s yours. To report a suspected scam, contact your bank and local law enforcement immediately. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin. Deliver the truth. At The Modern Memo, we’re not here to soften the blow — we’re here to land it. The media plays defense for the powerful. We don’t. If you’re done with censorship, half-truths, and gaslighting headlines, pass this on. Expose the stories they bury. This isn’t just news — it’s a fight for reality. And it doesn’t work without you.
Portland Police Go Easy on Antifa…Again
Late on a Saturday evening, chaos erupted outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Portland. A large group of masked Antifa dressed in black clashed with conservative activists — one of whom wore a “Make America Great Again” flag. Federal agents fired rubber bullets and used smoke grenades in an attempt to break up the confrontations. The violence left several injured and reignited questions over the role of police in controlling unrest. Threat at the Gate What began as a demonstration quickly spiraled out of control. Witnesses described a chaotic scene as both sides hurled objects and shouted across barriers. Federal agents stationed at the ICE facility responded with crowd control measures to prevent the building from being overrun. Despite the heavy presence of law enforcement, the violence continued for hours, according to Breitbart News. Escalation in the Early Hours As the night progressed, tensions only intensified. Antifa threw fireworks and smoke bombs, and the masked group surged toward the facility’s entrance. ICE agents, facing a volatile crowd, deployed forceful deterrents to keep violent offenders back. Meanwhile, local police stood by and observed. No arrests were made during or after the melee. The Portland Police Bureau later stated that officers did not observe any crimes that required immediate action. (MORE NEWS: Rebuttal to Hakeem Jeffries: When Your Own Words Go Too Far) Why No Arrests? The lack of arrests triggered widespread criticism. City residents, reporters, and peaceful protestors questioned how a large-scale brawl could occur without a single person being detained. Police officials defended their response, explaining that their priority was to maintain safety and avoid escalating tensions. However, others accused the department of turning a blind eye to politically motivated violence. Video footage circulated online showing masked rioters standing behind city officers as federal agents tried to regain control of the scene. Funding, Structure, and Allegations The clashes appeared to be part of a larger, organized movement rather than a spontaneous protest. Investigators have pointed to potential funding and coordination among activist groups, including Antifa. Reports claim that several well-known advocacy networks and donors have supported these riots, possibly channeling funds through nonprofit organizations. Federal officials have also said that foreign contributors could be involved, adding another layer of complexity to the unrest. The Department of Justice has stated that it is actively investigating how these groups organize and sustain their operations. 🚨 Make no mistake: Antifa is a radical terrorist organization that explicitly calls for the overthrow of the U.S. Government, law enforcement authorities, and our system of law. Under the Trump Administration, Antifa’s days are over. MUST WATCH. ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/2M6qvzTQ29 — The White House (@WhiteHouse) October 9, 2025 The Federal Government Responds As the unrest continues, federal authorities have taken a closer interest in Portland’s recurring clashes. Officials are seeking to lift a restraining order that currently prevents the president from sending the National Guard into the city. The goal is to restore order around the ICE facility and reestablish peace in nearby neighborhoods that have endured months of nightly conflict. The request has drawn national attention, reigniting debate about the balance between federal and local control in crisis situations. Local Consequences and Public Reaction The ongoing turmoil has taken a toll on Portland residents. Fireworks and explosions echo through nearby neighborhoods, keeping families awake and anxious. Small business owners worry about property damage and dwindling foot traffic. Many locals feel caught between two extremes: violent Antifa on one side and an increasingly passive police response on the other. Critics argue that the Portland Police Bureau’s decision not to intervene sends a troubling message about public safety and accountability. At the same time, civil liberties advocates caution that increasing police or military presence could worsen tensions and threaten constitutional rights. The debate underscores the difficult balance between maintaining order and protecting free expression. Implications Going Forward The events outside the Portland ICE facility highlight a fine line between protest and riot. While peaceful activism is protected by law, the use of explosives, masks, and aggression pushes those boundaries. Without enforcement, future confrontations could become even more dangerous. (MORE NEWS: Trump’s East Wing Demolition and Ballroom Plan Explained) The potential funding and coordination behind these actions also raise questions about transparency and influence. If outside organizations or foreign donors are financing domestic unrest, lawmakers and investigators will likely pursue deeper inquiries. This could shape new laws on protest funding, national security, and law enforcement strategy. Finally, the division between local and federal agencies remains a critical issue. While federal officers took active measures to secure the facility, city police chose restraint. Determining when and how each level of authority should act remains an unresolved challenge, one that could shape the city’s policies for years to come. What to Watch Next Observers are watching several key developments. Federal investigators may soon reveal evidence about how protest groups coordinate and fund their activities. Portland’s police leadership might face public pressure to clarify its policies on nonintervention. Courts could also decide whether to lift restrictions on deploying the National Guard. Each decision will affect how Portland, and possibly other cities, respond to future unrest. Final Word The clash outside the Portland ICE facility reflects deeper divisions in American society. It raises questions about law enforcement’s responsibilities, the influence of political movements, and the fragile balance between civil rights and security. The absence of arrests after hours of Antifa-led violence has become a symbol of broader frustration — both with unrest in the streets and inaction by authorities. As Portland braces for what comes next, the outcome could redefine how the nation handles protest, policing, and public order. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin. Deliver the truth. At The Modern Memo, we’re not here to soften the blow — we’re here to land it. The media plays defense for the powerful. We don’t. If you’re done with censorship, half-truths, and gaslighting headlines, pass this on. Expose the stories they bury. This isn’t just news — it’s a fight…
Thieves Steal Napoleon’s Jewels in Daring Daylight Heist
In a stunning daylight robbery, a commando-style team of thieves broke into the Louvre Museum in Paris and stole crown jewels tied to Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte and Empress Eugénie. The theft shocked France and the wider world. It also raised urgent questions about security at the planet’s most visited museum. The Heist Unfolds On Sunday morning, around 9:30 a.m., four masked men targeted the Apollo Gallery, home to France’s imperial jewels. They reached a second-floor balcony with a furniture hoist known as a monte-meuble. Then they breached a window and moved fast. Video shows one thief cutting into a display with a handheld saw. Others smashed a second case. Within minutes, the crew grabbed several pieces, including a tiara, a necklace, a brooch, and emerald earrings linked to Empress Eugénie. They fled to waiting scooters and vanished into city streets. Later, investigators found a damaged crown near the gallery, suggesting a dropped or abandoned item during the rush to escape. (MORE NEWS: FBI Probes Hunting Stand Near Trump’s Air Force One Area) A Commando Team of Four Police now describe the suspects as a coordinated unit. They wore construction gear to blend in with renovation activity. Two entered the gallery. Two stayed outside as lookouts and drivers. Their timing looked deliberate and precise. They struck as the museum transitioned to opening hours, a moment when attention divides between staff duties and incoming visitors. Moreover, the thieves brought the right tools: a lift, cutting equipment, and likely glass-rated blades. Their plan hinted at advance scouting and knowledge of the floor plan. Consequently, investigators are examining prior access, contractor movements, and any unusual activity near the Apollo Gallery in the days before the heist. Why This Theft Matters The Louvre draws millions each year. Yet these jewels carry weight beyond tourism. They are national symbols. They link modern France to the Second Empire and the legacy of Napoleon III and Empress Eugénie. Because the pieces are highly recognizable, experts fear the thieves could melt settings or re-cut stones. If that happens, the trail grows cold. The historic objects become raw materials. Heritage turns into anonymous bullion. Therefore, the race to recover the jewels is on. Security Questions for a Global Icon Security at the Louvre has faced scrutiny before. Staff have warned about crowding and staffing pressures. Now, this daylight breach magnifies those concerns. Did the thieves exploit maintenance routines? Did equipment left on-site ease access? And did alarm responses meet the challenge of power tools and determined intruders? In response, museum leaders and cultural officials are reviewing protocols. Expect tighter controls around construction zones, more checks on contractor gear, and faster response playbooks for tool-based attacks. In addition, other major museums will reassess their own vulnerabilities, especially for small, portable, high-value objects. Political and Public Reactions National leaders condemned the crime as a humiliation and a shock to cultural identity. Opposition figures pointed to a broader decline in public order. Meanwhile, the Louvre closed for forensic work and an immediate inventory. Technicians collected prints, fiber, and tool marks. They also pulled footage from museum cameras and nearby streets, hoping to map every step of the crew’s approach and escape. The Historical Stakes The missing pieces are not merely luxury. They are artifacts of statecraft, ceremony, and image-making under the Second Empire. Empress Eugénie’s jewels embodied power and elegance. They told a story of ambition—artfully cut in diamonds, emeralds, and gold. Their loss is a cultural wound. It weakens the public’s direct connection to a pivotal chapter of French history. The Investigation So Far Authorities launched a nationwide manhunt and alerted Interpol. Customs posts and borders received warnings about distinctive gemstones and imperial designs. Detectives are reviewing bike, traffic, and street cameras across likely routes. They also monitor resale channels, both physical and online. Above all, they know time matters. Experts say the first 48 hours often determine whether intact jewels can be found before stones are removed or metal is melted. (MORE NEWS: George Santos a Free Man After Trump Commutes His Sentence) How Museums Can Respond Globally, museums face a tough balance: access and awe versus armor and alarms. This heist tips the scale. Expect more human patrols, smarter sensors, and rapid-lockdown procedures. Expect, too, fresh attention to insider risk, contractor vetting, and after-hours equipment control. Because thieves innovate, defenders must adapt—fast and continuously. What Happens Next The Louvre is expected to reopen soon, but rebuilding trust will take time. Visitors will want proof that its treasures are secure. Donors will question whether protections truly match the value of what’s inside. And the public will be watching for arrests, confessions, and, hopefully, the return of the stolen jewels. In the meantime, vigilance matters. Jewelers, auction houses, and collectors should keep an eye out for anything suspicious. Investigators will follow leads and monitor trade networks. Recovering the pieces would mean more than solving a crime — it would show that France can still defend its history. Final Thoughts The Louvre robbery is a reminder of how fragile history can be, even in the world’s most secure museums. The thieves relied on speed and precision; investigators now counter with patience and determination. With some luck — and relentless pressure — the jewels might find their way home. Whatever the outcome, this heist shows that protecting the past takes more than alarms and glass cases — it takes constant vigilance. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin. Deliver the truth. At The Modern Memo, we’re not here to soften the blow — we’re here to land it. The media plays defense for the powerful. We don’t. If you’re done with censorship, half-truths, and gaslighting headlines, pass this on. Expose the stories they bury. This isn’t just news — it’s a fight for reality. And it doesn’t work without you.
John Bolton Pleads Not Guilty to Classified Documents Charges
A federal grand jury has indicted former National Security Advisor John Bolton on 18 counts tied to improper handling of classified materials, per the U.S. Department of Justice. The charges include eight counts of transmitting national defense information and 10 counts of retaining national defense information. From about April 2018 through August 2025, the indictment claims Bolton shared more than a thousand pages of classified documents—some marked TOP SECRET/SCI—with two unauthorized individuals. In addition, the papers were allegedly stored in his Maryland home in violation of federal law. FBI Director Kash Patel said, “The FBI’s investigation revealed that John Bolton allegedly transmitted top secret information using personal online accounts and retained said documents in his house in direct violation of federal law. The case was based on meticulous work from dedicated career professionals at the FBI who followed the facts without fear or favor. Weaponization of justice will not be tolerated, and this FBI will stop at nothing to bring to justice anyone who threatens our national security.” (MORE NEWS: China’s Rare Earth Clampdown Threatens U.S. Tech, Defense) He turned himself in to federal authorities today and pleaded not guilty after being indicted in the classified information probe. Alleged Mishandling: Transmission and Retention According to the Department of Justice: “Bolton illegally transmitted NDI by using personal email and messaging application accounts to send sensitive documents classified as high as Top Secret. These documents revealed intelligence about future attacks, foreign adversaries, and foreign-policy relations. “ Beyond the transmissions, the indictment charges Bolton with retaining classified documents. The DOJ Press Release reads: “Bolton illegally retained NDI documents within his home. These documents included intelligence on an adversary’s leaders as well as information revealing sources and collections used to obtain statements on a foreign adversary.” FBI Raid and Seizures In August 2025, FBI agents raided John Bolton’s home under a search warrant tied to a long-running investigation into classified document handling. Items Seized The FBI removed multiple devices and materials, including: Two iPhones (one red, one black) Three computers (a Dell XPS laptop, a Dell Precision Tower, another Dell model) One Seagate hard drive Two SanDisk 64 GB USB drives A white binder labeled “Statements and Reflections to Allied Strikes…” Four boxes of printed daily activities Typed folders labeled Trump I-IV These items are central to the government’s case that Bolton stored and processed classified data improperly. Legal Context Judge’s Warning in the 2020 Memoir Case The 2025 indictment revives concerns from his 2020 legal battle over Bolton’s “tell-all” book, The Room Where It Happened, about his service in the first Trump administration. In United States v. Bolton (Case No. 1:20-cv-1580-RCL), the government alleged he violated book prepublication review protocols by publishing without security clearance, risking classified information exposure. Seeking to block further distribution, including the audiobook, the government requested an injunction. U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth denied this, citing the digital age’s irreversible information spread. He stated: “If nothing else, the government argues, an injunction today would at least prevent any further spread of the book… In the Internet age, even a handful of copies in circulation could irrevocably destroy confidentiality… The damage is done. There is no restoring the status quo.” Lamberth warned: “Defendant Bolton has gambled with the national security of the United States. He has exposed his country to harm and himself to civil (and potentially criminal) liability.” Although no injunction was issued, Bolton’s royalties were placed in a constructive trust. 2021 Biden DOJ Probe Dropped In 2021, a Biden-era DOJ probe into Bolton’s retention of classified documents was dropped for political reasons, and prosecutors concluded the memoir contained no classified information. 2025 Indictment and Trump DOJ Response The 2025 charges, alleging Bolton shared over a thousand pages of TOP SECRET/SCI documents and improperly stored them at his Maryland home, echo these earlier concerns. Attorney General Pamela Bondi emphasized, “There is one tier of justice for all Americans. Anyone who abuses a position of power and jeopardizes our national security will be held accountable. No one is above the law.” Why This Case Matters This indictment raises important issues about how top officials should treat classified information—and whose oversight they face. It also ties into broader debates over document handling policies, accountability for former officials, and national security. In particular: The case tests whether a former high-ranking official can be held criminally liable for retaining or disseminating classified intelligence after leaving government. It underscores tensions between public commentary, such as memoirs and speeches, and legal boundaries around classified materials. It spotlights the challenge of safeguarding intelligence while preserving certain free speech rights for former officials. Moreover, the case could influence future decisions about how strictly courts and prosecutors enforce laws on classified materials—especially for people who once held government security clearances. (MORE NEWS: Shock at the Vatican: Muslim Prayer Room Approved Inside Historic Library) The Takeaway The indictment of John Bolton marks one of the most consequential national security cases in recent history. Federal prosecutors allege that a former top U.S. official—trusted with the nation’s most sensitive intelligence—knowingly shared and stored highly classified information outside secure channels. The charges and FBI’s detailed findings suggest an extensive pattern of misconduct that could carry serious legal consequences if proven. This case also serves as a reminder that no individual, regardless of past position or political influence, is immune from accountability. As Bolton faces the legal process, the broader question remains: how should America safeguard its secrets while balancing transparency, free speech, and justice? The outcome of this case will likely shape how future administrations handle classified information and the standards to which their senior officials are held. Expose the Spin. Shatter the Narrative. Speak the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t cover politics to play referee — we swing a machete through the spin, the double-speak, and the partisan theater. While the media protects the powerful and buries the backlash, we dig it up and drag it into the light. If you’re tired of rigged narratives, selective outrage,…
Des Moines Superintendent Arrested by ICE: Fake Degrees, Crimes
A major scandal has erupted in Iowa. Authorities arrested Ian Andre Roberts, then–superintendent of Des Moines Public Schools, raising fresh questions about his past. Investigators say his history includes drug convictions, weapons charges, fraudulent credentials, and immigration violations. As the full account unfolds, officials and the public alike are demanding answers. Background: From Education Leader to Arrested Suspect Roberts began working as superintendent in Des Moines in 2023. At first, there were few signs that serious legal trouble loomed. However, when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents moved in on September 26, Roberts attempted to flee. They pursued his vehicle, found him hiding in nearby brush, and ultimately took him into custody. His ICE arrest triggered a bombshell disclosure by the Department of Homeland Security. In a public statement, DHS asserted Roberts had a long record of criminal conduct and maintained he should never have been serving in a role overseeing children. Shortly after, Roberts resigned his position. (MORE NEWS: Apple Pulls ICE-Tracking Apps from App Store) Criminal Allegations: Drugs, Guns, and Fraud The roster of charges against Roberts is extensive and severe. Investigators allege that a search of his home revealed multiple firearms: a loaded 9 mm pistol tucked under a couch cushion, a rifle in the master bedroom closet, and a shotgun behind a headboard. Moreover, one handgun was found in a vehicle he used while fleeing ICE. 🚨Holy crap. DHS just released more info on the Iowa school superintendent and illegal alien Ian Andre Roberts. He has a very long, violent criminal record, combined with immigration fraud. He also voted in elections. pic.twitter.com/lZDeRJKmnw — Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) October 3, 2025 But weapons are not the only concern. The DHS and FBI allege Roberts has a decades-long history of drug crimes. In New York, his record reportedly includes criminal possession of narcotics with intent to sell, forgery, and related offenses dating back to the mid-1990s. In Pennsylvania, the accusation includes unlawful possession of a loaded firearm in 2022. On top of that, Maryland records allegedly show reckless driving, unsafe operation, and speeding convictions from 2012. Compounding these allegations are claims that Roberts also held fake or unverified academic credentials. He listed Morgan State University as his alma mater and claimed to be an incoming MBA candidate at MIT’s Sloan School of Management. But Morgan State confirmed to the Des Moines Register that he attended without earning a degree. MIT’s registrar also told the Register that no record exists of him ever being enrolled in that program. Immigration Violations and Status Issues Beyond criminal allegations, Roberts faces severe immigration-related accusations. DHS says he entered the U.S. multiple times under different visas—first as a visitor, then on a student visa in 1999. An immigration judge in Dallas ordered his removal in absentia in May 2024. Nevertheless, Roberts filed applications for work authorization in 2000, 2018, and 2019—each granted for just one year. Those ultimately expired. (MORE NEWS: Cartel “La Diabla” Busted for Baby, Organ Ring in Mexico) DHS also claims Roberts was illegally registered to vote as a Democrat in Maryland, raising serious concerns about voter registration controls. While some aspects remain under investigation, the combined allegations portray a complex web of alleged misconduct. Impact on Public Education and Trust The arrest has rattled the Des Moines Public Schools system. The school board initially placed Roberts on paid leave, then switched to unpaid leave, and finally accepted his resignation. Many parents, teachers, and stakeholders feel blindsided. How did someone with such a background secure a leadership role in a major school district? Furthermore, the scandal calls into question hiring and vetting practices in public education. If school systems failed to detect fictitious degrees or an extensive criminal history, then oversight mechanisms may be deeply flawed. Beyond internal processes, the case risks damaging public confidence. Schools play a central role in community trust. When a leader falls under suspicion for crimes and deceit, that trust erodes quickly. Des Moines Public School Board is now suing JG Consulting: 🚨 BREAKING: The Des Moines Public School Board is now deflecting all responsibility for hiring former Superintendent Ian Roberts by taking legal action against the search firm that assisted in the hiring, JG Consulting. Roberts passed background checks conducted by both JG… pic.twitter.com/RPdqgRFPp0 — Dustin Grage (@GrageDustin) October 3, 2025 Voices from DHS and Reactions In response, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin stated: “Ian Andre Roberts, a criminal illegal alien with multiple weapons charges and a drug trafficking charge, should have never been able to work around children. When ICE officers arrested this Superintendent, he was in possession of an illegal handgun, a hunting knife, and nearly $3,000 in cash. This criminal illegal alien is now in U.S. Marshals custody and facing charges for being an illegal alien in possession of a firearms. Under Secretary Noem, ICE will continue to arrest the worst of the worst and put the safety of America’s children FIRST.” Meanwhile, local and state-level officials have faced pressure to explain how Roberts gained access to influential education roles. As more revelations emerge, the scrutiny has intensified. Conclusion: A Scandal That Demands Clarity The arrest of Ian Andre Roberts marks a serious and complicated turning point in public education oversight. The charges span drugs, weapons, fraud, and immigration violations. His alleged falsification of academic credentials only deepens the concerns. In the wake of the revelations, Des Moines Public Schools faces not only legal fallout but a crisis of credibility. As authorities move forward, stakeholders and the public alike deserve transparency and reform. Through this case, we are reminded that leadership roles—especially those entrusted with children’s lives and future—demand rigorous scrutiny. Public systems must apply higher standards, not lower them. If that standard is not met, the consequences affect more than one man—they affect the integrity of public education itself. Forget the narrative. Reject the script. Share what matters. At The Modern Memo, we call it like it is — no filter, no apology, no corporate leash. If you’re tired of being lied to,…
James Comey Indicted for False Statements, Obstruction
Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted on two serious charges. A grand jury brought counts of making false statements to Congress and obstruction of a congressional proceeding. These charges focus on his testimony in 2020 about the FBI’s Russia-related investigation known as “Crossfire Hurricane.” Known to many as Russiagate, this case now brings fresh attention to Comey’s past leadership at the bureau. Details of the Charges According to the indictment, Comey lied during his September 2020 testimony. Prosecutors allege he falsely denied authorizing an FBI employee to serve as an anonymous source. In addition, the obstruction charge claims he interfered with a congressional investigation into sensitive information leaks. Both charges carry potential fines and prison time if he is convicted. Importance of Timing The indictment comes at the last possible moment under the statute of limitations. Federal prosecutors had exactly five years to act, and they filed just before that deadline. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia is leading the case. This timing adds to the drama and shows the investigation had been active behind the scenes for years. Strong Reactions from Leaders Attorney General Pam Bondi responded quickly. She said that no one, regardless of status or past power, stands above the law. She explained that the Department of Justice has a duty to act when powerful people mislead Americans. No one is above the law. Today’s indictment reflects this Department of Justice’s commitment to holding those who abuse positions of power accountable for misleading the American people. We will follow the facts in this case. — Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) September 25, 2025 FBI Director Kash Patel also issued a statement. He said the FBI must hold itself accountable. According to Patel, restoring trust requires that even former leaders face consequences if they break the rules. Today, your FBI took another step in its promise of full accountability. For far too long, previous corrupt leadership and their enablers weaponized federal law enforcement, damaging once proud institutions and severely eroding public trust. Every day, we continue the fight to… — FBI Director Kash Patel (@FBIDirectorKash) September 25, 2025 President Donald Trump reacted strongly as well. He labeled Comey one of the worst figures ever to serve in government. Trump added that the indictment represents the beginning of long-delayed accountability. (RELATED NEWS: Ryan Routh Attempts To Stab Himself After Guilty Verdict For Trump Assassination Plot) Government Spying on Trump The case also ties into confirmed surveillance of Donald Trump’s campaign during the 2016 election. Under James Comey’s leadership, the FBI secured secret warrants from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. Later investigations revealed that the FBI relied heavily on the Steele dossier, which contained unverified and false claims. A Justice Department inspector general’s report found that the FBI made serious errors and omitted key facts in its FISA applications. Those mistakes misled the court and enabled improper spying on a presidential campaign. These findings confirmed that the government spied on Trump’s campaign through flawed surveillance methods. This abuse of power eroded public trust and showed how political motives can corrupt law enforcement. The surveillance scandal now serves as a backdrop to Comey’s indictment. It highlights a pattern of misconduct under his leadership that continues to raise questions about the FBI’s role in politics and justice. The Background of Crossfire Hurricane The controversy reaches back to 2016, when the FBI opened its Russia election interference investigation. Inside the bureau, officials referred to the effort as “Crossfire Hurricane.” James Comey oversaw this probe while serving as FBI Director. Later, special counsel Robert Mueller took over. In 2019, Mueller’s report concluded there was not enough evidence to prove criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives. Soon afterward, another special counsel, John Durham, began reviewing how the FBI launched the investigation in the first place. Durham’s report criticized the bureau, saying it ignored warning signs and allowed itself to be influenced by political pressure. These findings added weight to claims that FBI leadership mishandled the case. Legal Stakes for Comey If convicted, James Comey could face years in prison as well as steep fines. For making false statements to Congress, the maximum penalty is up to five years in prison and significant fines. For obstruction of a congressional proceeding, the penalty is also up to five years. Combined, Comey could face as much as 10 years in prison, though sentencing would depend on the court. His defense team is expected to argue that he did not knowingly mislead Congress. They may claim memory lapses or confusion rather than deliberate lies. Lawyers could also argue that congressional testimony often leaves room for interpretation. The burden of proof lies with prosecutors, who must show deliberate deception beyond a reasonable doubt. What Happens Next The indictment is only the beginning. The case will move to federal court, where a judge will oversee pretrial motions and hearings. Both sides will exchange evidence during discovery. After that, the court will determine whether to proceed to trial. (MORE NEWS: AOC Slams Charlie Kirk with Scathing House Floor Comments) Media attention will remain intense throughout the process. Because Comey once held one of the most powerful positions in law enforcement, every development will be closely examined. Political leaders from both parties are already weighing in, ensuring that the trial will shape public debates. Why This Case Matters The James Comey indictment matters for several reasons. It tests the principle that no government official is above the law. If prosecutors succeed, it will send a message that accountability reaches the highest levels of power. In addition, this case raises concerns about public trust in institutions. The FBI has faced criticism from across the political spectrum. By charging a former director, the Department of Justice signals that even the bureau’s top leaders must answer to the public. The Comey trial could set a powerful precedent for how cases involving Congress are handled. Lying to Congress is rarely prosecuted…
Ryan Routh Attempts To Stab Himself After Guilty Verdict For Trump Assassination Plot
OPINION Ryan Wesley Routh has been found guilty of attempting to assassinate President Trump. A jury in Florida delivered the verdict after weeks of testimony and evidence. The 59-year-old now faces a possible life sentence. The conviction includes multiple felony counts. These charges range from attempted assassination of a presidential candidate to weapons offenses and assaulting a federal officer. Prosecutors argued that his actions were deliberate and dangerous, while the jury agreed the evidence proved intent beyond a reasonable doubt. How the Plot Unfolded The case stems from an incident in September 2024. Routh hid in the bushes near Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida. Armed with an SKS-style rifle, he aimed through a fence in the direction of Trump’s security detail. Secret Service agents spotted Routh 12 hours later. One agent opened fire, causing Routh to drop his weapon and run. He was quickly arrested after fleeing the scene. Investigators later revealed that Routh had been preparing for weeks. They found burner phones, notes tracking Trump’s movements, and detailed plans to avoid detection. Prosecutors stated that this demonstrated a high level of planning and intent. Drama Inside the Courtroom The trial reached its most dramatic moment when the guilty verdict was read. Routh suddenly grabbed a pen and tried to stab himself in the neck. Courtroom marshals immediately rushed forward, tackling him and pulling him out of the room. (MORE NEWS: Rising Socialism Exposes the Democratic Party’s Identity Crisis) As officers restrained him, his daughter, Sara Routh, screamed through tears: “Dad, I love you. Don’t do anything. I’ll get you out. He didn’t hurt anybody!” Her desperate words echoed through the courtroom as marshals dragged him away. Routh was later brought back in shackles to hear the remainder of the proceedings. The tense exchange underscored just how volatile the case had become, both for the defendant and his family. The Stakes at Sentencing Routh is scheduled to be sentenced on December 18, 2025. If the court applies the maximum penalties, he could spend the rest of his life in prison. Federal officials say the conviction sends a clear message. Political violence will not be tolerated, and attempts on the lives of public officials will be met with the harshest consequences. President Trump also responded after the verdict with a lengthy statement. He praised prosecutors and law enforcement, saying: His remarks underscored the gravity of the crime while also crediting the teamwork and vigilance that led to Routh’s capture. For Trump, the conviction represented not only justice for himself but also a reminder of the importance of security and accountability in American democracy. A Growing Concern Over Political Violence The conviction adds to growing concern about rising political violence in America. It comes just months after a separate attempt on Trump’s life in Pennsylvania in July 2024, when a gunman opened fire at a campaign rally. That earlier attempt left one person dead and another seriously injured. (RELATED NEWS: AOC Slams Charlie Kirk with Scathing House Floor Comments) Security experts warn that heated rhetoric and division can inspire dangerous actions. The Routh case demonstrates how quickly words and hostility can turn into serious threats. Law enforcement agencies are now reassessing protective measures for candidates and officials in an increasingly polarized environment. Defense Arguments and What Comes Next Routh attempted to defend himself by claiming he never intended to pull the trigger. He argued that since the gun was never fired, the government had failed to prove assassination intent. The jury rejected that argument, citing his careful planning and the position he had put himself in. His legal team may still file appeals. They could argue over how intent was defined or whether some evidence should have been excluded. However, given the jury’s unanimous verdict and the mountain of evidence, legal experts believe an appeal is unlikely to change the outcome. Why This Case Matters This conviction is not only about one man’s actions. It reflects a broader issue facing the nation: the danger of escalating political hostility. When violent plots move from threats to real attempts, the stability of the system is at risk. Routh’s sentencing in December will be closely watched. A life sentence would be a strong statement from the justice system. It would underscore that attempts to silence political leaders through violence will never succeed. At the same time, the case forces Americans to reckon with the reality of modern politics. Security for candidates must be stronger than ever. Media outlets, celebrities, and even legislators must also consider how their rhetoric and division contribute to the rise of dangerous individuals willing to act on extreme beliefs. The Takeaway The conviction of Ryan Wesley Routh marks one of the most serious legal cases in recent political history. He carefully planned, armed himself, and positioned himself to strike at President Trump. The jury’s decision shows that intent and preparation can carry the same weight as action when it comes to protecting leaders and preserving democracy. In the wake of several high-profile assassinations — including the murder of Charlie Kirk and two attempts on President Trump’s life — the time is now to turn down the temperature. But that will not happen as long as figures on the left, like former Vice President Kamala Harris, continue giving interviews where they call Trump a tyrant and compare him to a communist dictator. That kind of rhetoric only fuels hostility and division. Kamala Harris calling President Trump a “tyrant” is a masterclass in projection. Under the previous administration: – Raided political opponent’s home – Fired military members over the COVID shot – Targeted Catholics – Spied on school parents – Censored free speech pic.twitter.com/uxHv3dKOLf — Christian Collins (@CollinsforTX) September 23, 2025 The conviction of Ryan Routh speaks for itself. The reckless propaganda needs to end. Until then, we will not stay silent about it. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin. Deliver the truth. At The Modern Memo, we’re not here to soften the blow — we’re here…
BREAKING: Charlie Kirk Memorial: Armed Man ID’d at Stadium
Authorities arrested an armed man at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, just days before thousands are expected to gather for the Charlie Kirk memorial service. The man, identified as 42-year-old Joshua Runkles, was in fact working as guest security for the event but had not properly coordinated with the Secret Service. “We do not believe this person was attempting anything nefarious,” Turning Point USA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet posted on X. Even so, his arrest has heightened awareness around security as the nation prepares to honor Kirk. I want to add a note of clarity here. This individual was doing advance security for a known guest planning to attend the memorial service tomorrow. We do not believe this person was attempting anything nefarious, however the advance was not done in proper coordination with the… https://t.co/i6YvnMUog1 — Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) September 20, 2025 The Arrest Law enforcement intervened after spotting behavior that raised concern. Runkles was carrying several weapons, including a firearm and multiple knives, and presented expired law enforcement credentials. He explained that he was on-site as part of a private security detail, but officials noted he had not gone through proper channels with the Secret Service. Officers moved quickly to detain him before he could access areas that were still being locked down for the memorial. He was booked into the Maricopa County Jail and later released on bond. Investigators are still piecing together what happened. Heightened Security Charlie Kirk’s memorial is expected to draw more than 100,000 attendees, including former President Donald Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance, and many other political leaders. Because of the size of the gathering and its national importance, the Department of Homeland Security designated it a Level-1 Special Event Assessment Rating. That is the highest security classification possible, reserved for events such as presidential inaugurations and major national ceremonies. This designation means extraordinary precautions are in place. Security teams have set up multiple checkpoints, metal detectors, and no-bag policies. Hundreds of officers from local, state, and federal agencies will work together to maintain order. Aerial surveillance will monitor crowds from above, while plainclothes agents will move among attendees. Authorities are also using intelligence-sharing systems to track any potential risks in real time. Why It Matters The arrest highlights the ongoing risks facing large public gatherings in today’s political climate. With tensions running high after Kirk’s tragic death earlier this month, even small disruptions could have dangerous consequences. Unauthorized armed individuals not only put attendees at risk but also raise concerns for the safety of dignitaries and officials. In this case, Runkles was working as guest security but had not obtained the necessary Secret Service credentials. Carrying multiple weapons and presenting expired law enforcement credentials created confusion and raised alarms among authorities. Investigators are now focused on understanding how the lapse occurred and ensuring tighter coordination so that similar breaches cannot happen again. A Nation on Edge Charlie Kirk’s death in Utah shook millions of Americans. The young conservative activist and founder of Turning Point USA was gunned down in a shocking act of political violence. His memorial service is not only a chance to honor his life but also a moment for the nation to reflect on the cost of division and hostility. (RELATED NEWS: AOC Slams Charlie Kirk with Scathing House Floor Comments) Many who plan to attend see the gathering as a public stand for faith, family, and the values Kirk spent his life defending. But the heightened security shows that public events, especially those with symbolic importance, are now potential flashpoints. Communities across the country are grappling with how to balance free expression and public safety in an era of rising tension. What Comes Next Officials are reassessing screening procedures to prevent similar lapses in the future. At the time of Runkles’ arrest, full security protocols for the memorial had not yet been activated. Protective fencing and additional barriers were only installed today. Workers are out here in 99° heat building a steel fence all around State Farm Arena to secure Charlie’s memorial tomorrow pic.twitter.com/8Y530SesV2 — Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) September 20, 2025 For those attending the memorial, organizers are urging compliance with all security measures. Guests should prepare for longer wait times at checkpoints and restrictions on personal items. There is also a no bag policy in force, similar to other large events. These precautions may be inconvenient, but they are necessary to protect lives and preserve the integrity of the service. There is a strict No Bag Policy for tomorrow’s memorial service for Charlie This includes purses, backpacks, and even clear bags Security WILL be enforcing this and you will have to go to the back Share this to prevent any confusion tomorrow with staff just doing their jobs — Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) September 20, 2025 Honoring Charlie Kirk As investigators continue their work, the nation’s attention turns to honoring the life and legacy of Charlie Kirk. His leadership, advocacy, and passion for civic engagement inspired countless young people. For his supporters, the memorial is not just a farewell but a call to continue the work he championed. (RELATED NEWS: Charlie Kirk: A Patriot Remembered, A Legacy Unbroken) This situation is a sobering reminder of the threats that come with standing boldly in the public square. Yet it also underscores why Kirk’s message mattered so deeply. He spoke about courage in the face of opposition, and that message now resonates more strongly than ever. The Final Word The events in Glendale reveal the challenges of hosting a national memorial in a time of division and unrest. But they also highlight the determination of law enforcement to safeguard Americans as they gather to mourn. With strong security measures in place, Charlie Kirk’s memorial will go forward as planned. In moments like this, unity and vigilance matter most. Security scares should not overshadow the purpose of the day: to remember a life lost too soon and to recommit to a vision of America that values faith, truth, and freedom. Update:…
Utah Arrests: Explosive Device Found Under Fox News Vehicle
Utah is once again in the national spotlight, and not for the reasons anyone would want. Not even a week after the shocking assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk during a campus event at Utah Valley University, federal agents have now arrested two men accused of planting an explosive device under a FOX 13 News vehicle in Magna. The timing of these incidents has left many asking: What is going on in Utah? The Incident in Magna According to FOX 13, one of their employees noticed something unusual under their station vehicle. Police and bomb squads rushed to the scene and confirmed the object was a functioning incendiary device. Investigators later said it had been lit but failed to explode. Even so, the vehicle was parked next to an occupied building, meaning the risk wasn’t just to the station—it was to the entire neighborhood. Nearby homes were evacuated, and specialized bomb technicians disabled the device. What could have been a devastating explosion ended instead with a massive FBI investigation. Adeeb Nasir, 58, and Adil Justice Ahmed Nasir, 31, were arrested in Magna, Utah, after their bomb placed under a FOX 13 News vehicle failed to detonate. FBI found firearms, explosives, narcotics & two weapons of mass destruction at the 2700 S 8500 W home. Both were under… pic.twitter.com/bTZsO9dO25 — GeoTechWar (@geotechwar) September 15, 2025 The Arrests Federal agents later arrested Adeeb Ahamed Nasir, 58, and his son Adil Justice Ahmed Nasir, 31, both of Magna. Court documents state they lived together in the home where the FBI executed a search warrant. (RELATED NEWS: Charlie Kirk Murder Suspect Tyler Robinson Arrested) Inside, investigators reportedly found more than just one device. Authorities say they discovered firearms, explosive materials, electronic evidence, narcotics, and even what the suspects claimed were weapons of mass destruction. That expanded the charges far beyond a single crime scene. An upside-down American flag and political signs were found in the yard. The far left refers to President Trump as “Taco.” Both men now face federal counts of terrorism threats, possession of explosives, and possession of weapons of mass destruction. They are being held without bail. Press Freedom at Risk The attack on a news outlet carries broader implications. Journalists are often on the front lines of covering news stories. If they become targets themselves, the ripple effects could be chilling. Reporters may feel less safe covering controversial stories, and the public could end up less informed. FOX 13 issued a statement to ABC News emphasizing that employee safety is their top priority, and the station is working with law enforcement and risk management teams to protect staff. Their response underscores the reality that the media landscape has become more dangerous in recent years. Law Enforcement’s Role In both the Kirk assassination and the Magna bomb case, law enforcement acted quickly. Police, FBI agents, and bomb squads coordinated to neutralize threats and bring suspects into custody. The speed of their response undoubtedly prevented further harm. Officials are now under pressure to not only prosecute these crimes but also reassure the public that Utah is not becoming a new hub for politically charged violence. What’s Next The Nasirs will face federal prosecution. Investigators will likely present evidence from the search of their home, including explosive components and digital devices, to show intent and capability. Motive, however, remains unclear. (MORE NEWS: London: 100K Rally-Goers Unite Against Mass Immigration) As for the broader picture, Utah residents are left to grapple with unsettling questions. Was the FOX 13 incident a result of the climate that produced the Kirk assassination? Is Utah now at the center of a larger trend of political anger spilling into violence? Takeaway In less than a week, two headline-grabbing incidents have made one thing clear: violence against political leaders and the free press is becoming a weapon of intimidation. The assassination of Charlie Kirk and the attempted bombing of FOX 13 News both send the same message—those who speak out are now targets. The Magna arrests may have prevented another tragedy, but they are also a warning. Communities, media outlets, and political organizations are left wondering how to protect themselves in an environment that feels increasingly unstable. The question is no longer if another incident will happen, but how much deeper this spiral of political violence will cut into the heart of American life. Expose the Spin. Shatter the Narrative. Speak the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t cover politics to play referee — we swing a machete through the spin, the double-speak, and the partisan theater. While the media protects the powerful and buries the backlash, we dig it up and drag it into the light. If you’re tired of rigged narratives, selective outrage, and leaders who serve themselves, not you — then share this. Expose the corruption. Challenge the agenda. Because if we don’t fight for the truth, no one will. And that fight starts with you.
- 1
- 2