Politics
Democrats Rally Behind Jay Jones Despite Disturbing Texts
OPINION Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin is urging Democrat Jay Jones to drop out of the attorney general race after violent 2022 texts resurface. In those messages, Jones made violent remarks about a Republican leader and even wished harm on his children. Youngkin called the comments “beyond disqualifying.” The Texts Revealed: What Was Said The messages were sent in August 2022 to Republican Delegate Carrie Coyner. She and Jones both served in the Virginia House of Delegates. In those texts, Jones compared then-House Speaker Todd Gilbert to Adolf Hitler and Pol Pot. He wrote that Gilbert “gets two bullets to the head.” He went on to add, “Three people, two bullets: Gilbert, Hitler, and Pol Pot,” making it clear he believed Gilbert should receive both bullets. Even more shocking, Jones said he wished Gilbert’s children would die, calling them “little fascists.” He also claimed their deaths might change Gilbert’s political views. Coyner, disturbed by the messages, repeatedly asked Jones to stop, writing, “please stop.” She later said the comments revealed alarming anger and raised questions about Jones’s judgment and fitness for public office. NEW: VA Democrat AG nominee Jay Jones allegedly once fantasized about shooting House Speaker Todd Gilbert in the head and “pissing” on his grave. Jones was upset that Republicans were eulogizing recently deceased former state legislator Joe Johnson. “I will go to their funerals… pic.twitter.com/Qp0ZTIgUEj — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) October 3, 2025 Reaction, Apology, and Continued Campaigning Once the texts became public, Jones admitted sending them and issued an emotional apology. He called his words “abhorrent” and said he was “embarrassed, ashamed, and sorry.” Jones claimed he personally apologized to Speaker Gilbert and his family for the horrific remarks. Despite the outrage, Jones announced he would not withdraw from the race. He insisted that his campaign was about the people of Virginia, not his past mistakes. His campaign team echoed that message, saying he intended to stay focused on voters’ needs rather than political attacks. He then deflected with more political attacks: Here is a statement from Jay Jones in response to this story: https://t.co/Qx89kg1ih4 pic.twitter.com/FOQkPR5dLI — Brandon Jarvis (@Jaaavis) October 3, 2025 Republicans Demand Resignation as Democrats Stand Firm The backlash was immediate. Governor Glenn Youngkin and other Republican leaders condemned the text messages as vile and unacceptable. Lieutenant Governor Winsome Earle-Sears and members of the Republican Attorneys General Association also called for Jones to drop out. They argue that someone who once used violent language toward political opponents could not credibly serve as Virginia’s top law enforcement officer. Democrats, however, responded differently. While many acknowledged the texts were disturbing, no major Democrats have called for Jones to withdraw, and he has not lost a single endorsement. In fact, several prominent figures have reaffirmed their support, emphasizing forgiveness and focusing on the issues that matter to voters. Abigail Spanberger, the Democratic nominee for governor, called Jones’s comments “wrong and offensive.” But, she, along with other Democratic leaders, has chosen to move forward with party unity, stressing that one mistake should not define a candidate’s entire career. (MORE NEWS: Leavitt: $37 Trillion Debt Forces Layoffs, Shutdown Cuts) The divide underscores a sharp partisan contrast. Republicans see the remarks as disqualifying and emblematic of toxic politics, while Democrats describe the controversy as a moment for reflection, redemption, and growth. Despite the uproar, Jones’s campaign remains intact, strengthened by allies who argue that responsibility and reform can coexist in public service. Broader Context: The Race, Past Conduct, and Stakes Jay Jones’s campaign was already facing scrutiny before the texts emerged. In 2022, he was cited for reckless driving after being clocked at 116 miles per hour on a Virginia interstate. He avoided jail time by completing community service, but the incident raised concerns about his maturity and judgment. Now, with these text messages resurfacing, many voters see a troubling pattern. Critics argue that his behavior shows a lack of discipline and self-control—traits unacceptable for someone seeking to become attorney general. Jones is challenging incumbent Republican Jason Miyares in a race that had been expected to be one of the tightest in the state. Virginia is considered a political bellwether, meaning its elections often reflect broader national trends. Before the scandal, early polls showed Jones within striking distance of Miyares, but the controversy may now shift the balance. Early voting is already underway, making the timing particularly damaging. Many observers believe the release of the messages could swing undecided voters toward Miyares, especially those concerned about civility and respect in politics. (MORE NEWS: Des Moines Superintendent Arrested by ICE: Fake Degrees, Crimes) The Takeaway As the scandal continues to unfold, the pressure on Jay Jones shows no sign of easing. Political insiders are watching to see whether he will eventually bow out or double down and try to weather the storm. If he stays in the race, he faces an uphill battle to rebuild trust with voters and his own party. Democratic leaders appear determined to stand by him. Rather than distancing themselves, many have chosen to defend Jones and emphasize his apology. Their response suggests that, much like the loyalty shown to President Biden despite growing concerns about his cognitive health, Democrats will continue to support Jones no matter what. The party seems focused on unity and winning in November, even if that means backing a candidate with serious credibility issues. Governor Youngkin’s demand for Jones’s resignation underscores the seriousness of the moment. Voters will decide in November whether words spoken in anger should end a political career—or if redemption is possible just a month before the election. This election will determine whether Virginians are willing to accept a flawed and untrustworthy candidate rather than risk letting a Republican win. What happens next will not only determine Jay Jones’s future but also send a powerful message about the standards Americans expect from those seeking to lead them. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin. Deliver the truth. At The Modern Memo, we’re not here to soften the blow —…
Viral 2019 Debate Clip Shows Democrats Back Healthcare for Illegal Immigrants
A debate moment from 2019 has resurfaced and gone viral again. As Congress struggles with a government shutdown, the question of health coverage for undocumented immigrants has become a major political flashpoint. Because the clip shows ten Democratic candidates raising their hands to support health benefits for those living in the country illegally, it is fueling sharp controversy now. (RELATED NEWS: Maxine Waters’ “Healthcare for Everybody” Stance Fuels Government Shutdown Fight) NBC: “Raise your hand if your government plan would provide coverage for [illegal aliens].” Democrats: *all raise their hands* pic.twitter.com/OOX5JCb0VV — Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) October 2, 2025 What Happened in the Debate Clip During a June 2019 Democratic primary debate, NBC News anchor Savannah Guthrie asked: “Raise your hand if your government plan would provide coverage for undocumented immigrants.” To the surprise of many, all ten candidates on stage raised their hands. The moment stayed mostly forgotten for years. However, it resurfaced as the government shutdown fight placed immigration and health care back in the headlines. The debate clip went viral again after former Democratic Sen. Al Franken posted on X (now deleted) questioning Vice President JD Vance’s claim. Franken wrote: “Is JD Vance a liar or just woefully ignorant when claiming that Democrats want to give health benefits to undocumented immigrants?” A user responded in the comments by sharing the debate footage, which quickly spread across social media. Because several of those candidates now serve in Congress, the clip draws direct lines between past statements and today’s policy debates. Why the Clip Matters Now The clip reignites public debate about what role, if any, undocumented immigrants should have in access to health care. At a time when budgets are tight and constituents demand accountability, opponents argue that offering benefits to people here illegally diverts resources from citizens. Meanwhile, proponents say health care is a human right and that excluding people can worsen public health. (RELATED NEWS: Rising Socialism Exposes the Democratic Party’s Identity Crisis) The timing is critical. The U.S. is currently experiencing a government shutdown, and Congress is locked in battles over funding. One central issue is whether to continue subsidies under the Affordable Care Act. The debate reveals a strategic weapon in political messaging. Republicans are using the clip to challenge Democrats on consistency and accountability. House Speaker Mike Johnson even pointed to previous Democratic votes and the language in their bills to argue the party has supported health care access for illegal immigrants. Political Stakes and Public Perception This viral clip now serves as a reminder that online memory is long. As campaigns amplify it, voters see whether politicians stick to past promises. On the one hand, Republicans argue Democrats are hiding their past positions now that publicly opposing undocumented coverage polls better. On the other hand, Democrats argue that legislative proposals have changed, and that nuance must be considered—such as differences between state and federal rules. Media coverage also shapes how the issue is perceived. For example, CNN defended Democrats by claiming that House Speaker Mike Johnson falsely said Democrats want to provide health care to undocumented immigrants. Yet the resurfaced debate clip clearly shows every Democrat on stage raising a hand in support, underscoring that Johnson’s statement was not unfounded. This clash between video evidence and media framing highlights how narratives are built and contested in real time. CNN’s ratings are in the toilet because they’re a propaganda machine for Democrats. Here are the actual FACTS: Democrats shut down the federal government to try to give taxpayer-funded benefits to illegal aliens. The funding proposal put forward by the Democrats would result… pic.twitter.com/mQzgCMLHQA — Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) October 2, 2025 Moreover, the clip intensifies scrutiny on swing districts and moderates, who must navigate pressure from both their base and opponents. Because media coverage amplifies this issue, electoral and messaging consequences could be significant. In addition, public opinion plays a role. Some Americans support limited benefits for undocumented immigrants—especially when framed around emergency care or maternal health. But outright full access is not supported by most. Therefore, this debate could shift how both parties craft future health and immigration policies. What to Watch Going Forward To see how this plays out, follow three key developments. First, legislation and budget proposals will reveal how lawmakers frame health funding and whether they include or exclude undocumented provisions. Second, state-level actions will matter because states often take independent steps. Changes in Medicaid rules, audits, or lawsuits could create new flashpoints. Third, public messaging and media coverage will shape perceptions as campaigns roll out ads or statements referencing the viral clip. Ultimately, this debate moment proves how past rhetoric can shape present politics. As the nation debates health, immigration, and funding, that raised-hand moment from 2019 now echos with powerful influence. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin. Deliver the truth. At The Modern Memo, we’re not here to soften the blow — we’re here to land it. The media plays defense for the powerful. We don’t. If you’re done with censorship, half-truths, and gaslighting headlines, pass this on. Expose the stories they bury. This isn’t just news — it’s a fight for reality. And it doesn’t work without you.
Maxine Waters’ “Healthcare for Everybody” Stance Fuels Government Shutdown Fight
OPINION Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) recently summed up the Democrat position on healthcare during a tense moment on Capitol Hill. When asked if Democrats were pushing healthcare for illegal immigrants, she replied: “Democrats are demanding healthcare for everybody.” (RELATED NEWS: Trump Meeting with Congressional Leaders as Shutdown Nears) Maxine Waters admits Democrats are going to shutdown the government to try to secure healthcare for illegal immigrants. Reporter: “Are Democrats demanding healthcare for illegal aliens?” Rep. Waters: “Democrats are demanding healthcare for everybody.” pic.twitter.com/e5rxdIJrjP — Alex Pfeiffer (@AlexPfeiffer) September 30, 2025 That statement may sound broad and compassionate, but it goes straight to the heart of why Congress is deadlocked and the government is on the brink of shutting down. Democrats are willing to tie federal spending to handouts for noncitizens, while Republicans are refusing to let taxpayer dollars be used as a magnet for illegal immigration. Why the Continuing Resolution Stalled The fight is over a continuing resolution, or CR — a short-term funding bill that keeps the government open. Republicans pushed for a “clean” CR, one that simply funds essential services without adding controversial policies. Democrats, however, blocked it in the Senate, with 44 of them voting “no.” Their reasoning? They want healthcare expansion, including coverage that extends to illegal immigrants, tied into the negotiations. This is the sticking point. Democrats are holding out for benefits that reach beyond American citizens. Republicans are standing firm, insisting that the government stay focused on its constitutional responsibilities and not on expanding handouts. The White House reacted to the shutdown by changing the official website to a government shutdown clock. Citizens Are Still Struggling This entire debate exposes misplaced priorities. Millions of American citizens still can’t afford quality healthcare. Families face skyrocketing premiums and deductibles. Veterans fight for timely care. Seniors stretch their savings to cover prescriptions. Yet Democrats are willing to risk a government shutdown to push healthcare for those who came here illegally. That choice is a slap in the face to hardworking taxpayers. It shows where their priorities lie — and it’s not with the American people. (MORE NEWS: Miami Mayor’s Warning: NYC’s Mamdani Echoes Castro) The Taxpayer Burden Healthcare is not free. Every new expansion comes with a price tag that lands on the backs of taxpayers. By demanding that healthcare extend to “everybody,” Democrats are asking American citizens to shoulder even more costs. This is ignoring basic math in the name of “compassion.” The United States already runs massive deficits. Adding millions of undocumented immigrants into our healthcare system would balloon costs, put more on already strained hospitals, and create even longer wait times for citizens. Republicans are right to push back and say “enough.” Republican members of Congress weighed in on the shutdown: Remember this: House Republicans did our job by passing a temporary funding extension to keep the government open. If there’s a shutdown, it’s because Democrats put their radical agenda ahead of the American people. — Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office (@RepTimBurchett) September 29, 2025 During shutdowns, federal workers are told to “do more with less.” Meanwhile, Congress still cashes paychecks. That’s wrong. I’ve reintroduced an Amendment to end Member pay during shutdowns. Zero. No back pay either!! pic.twitter.com/WU7fxhetH7 — Rep. Ralph Norman (@RepRalphNorman) September 30, 2025 We’re going to have a government shutdown. Why? Because the loon wing of the Democratic Party is mad at Chuck Schumer, and Chuck wants them to love him. pic.twitter.com/EiIS6MrBSz — John Kennedy (@SenJohnKennedy) September 30, 2025 A Magnet for More Illegal Immigration Offering government-funded healthcare to anyone who crosses the border is not just expensive — it’s reckless. It would act like a magnet, drawing even more people to enter illegally. Why wouldn’t they, if they know free medical care awaits? Border states are already overwhelmed with surging arrivals. Hospitals, schools, and social services feel the impact daily. Expanding healthcare access to illegal immigrants would only make the crisis worse. Republicans understand this, which is why they dug in their heels during CR negotiations. Handouts vs. Responsibility Democrats frame this as an issue of compassion. But true compassion starts with responsibility — responsibility to the citizens who built this country, pay the taxes, and follow the laws. Handouts for noncitizens are not compassionate; they are unfair. They reward illegal behavior while leaving American families behind. That’s why Republicans are saying no. This shutdown fight isn’t just about numbers in a budget; it’s about drawing a line between serving our citizens and incentivizing illegal immigration. The Bigger Picture The government shutdown showdown reveals a larger truth: Democrats are willing to gamble with government operations to advance their progressive agenda. Republicans, on the other hand, are standing on principle. They are insisting that before we even talk about expanding benefits, Washington must get its house in order, secure the border, and put citizens first. The Takeaway For once, we finally got an honest answer from someone on the left. Maxine Waters admitted that Democrats want “healthcare for everybody,” even for those here illegally. That stance is exactly why the government is on the verge of shutting down. Democrats are blocking funding because they want to slip handouts for noncitizens into the deal. Republicans are refusing because they believe citizens come first. This is the real issue at stake. Will America prioritize its own people, or will it spend taxpayer dollars on benefits for those who entered illegally? Conservatives know the answer — and that’s why they are willing to fight, even if it means enduring a shutdown to hold the line. Forget the Headlines. Challenge the Script. Deliver the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe through talking points — we swing a machete through the media’s favorite lies. They protect power. We confront it. If you’re sick of censorship, narrative control, and being told what to think — stand with us. Share the story. Wake the people. Because truth dies in silence — and you weren’t made to stay quiet.
Miami Mayor’s Warning: NYC’s Mamdani Echoes Castro
Miami Mayor Francis Suarez ignited a firestorm this week in an interview with the New York Post. He made a bold comparison that links New York City’s mayoral frontrunner to one of history’s most notorious dictators. Drawing from his family’s painful escape from Cuba, Suarez likened Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani to a young Fidel Castro. He cautions that electing Mamdani could steer the Big Apple down a “very dark path” of economic ruin and repression. As the November 4, 2025, election looms, Suarez’s words cut deep, urging New Yorkers to confront the ghosts of socialism head-on. His call to the people of NYC is rooted in personal history and political conviction. Suarez’s Family Legacy Fuels His Fierce Stance Francis Suarez, Miami’s dynamic mayor since 2017, carries the weight of his parents’ exile from Castro’s Cuba in the early 1960s. They fled a regime that promised equality but delivered despair. In an exclusive with the New York Post, Suarez channeled that trauma into a vivid warning. He recounted, “My parents fled [Cuba] . . . because a young charismatic leader said ‘Give us all your property, give us all your businesses, and don’t worry, we’ll make everybody equal.’ And he did.” Suarez didn’t mince words: “He made everybody equally poor, equally miserable, and equally repressed. And that’s all that communism has delivered throughout the history of humanity.” At 47, Suarez embodies Miami’s transformation into the “Capital of Latin America.” Term-limited and eyeing national ambitions, he refuses to watch silently as New York flirts with policies he sees as disastrous. (RELATED NEWS: Rising Socialism Exposes the Democratic Party’s Identity Crisis) His father, Xavier Suarez, Miami mayor from 1985 to 1993 and then from November 1997 to March 1998, is running again, but Francis stays neutral there. Instead, he trains his focus northward, where the stakes feel personal. Transitioning from family scars to public alarm, Suarez begs New Yorkers to heed history’s lessons before it’s too late. Mamdani’s Rise: Charisma Meets Controversy Enter Zohran Mamdani, the Queens Assemblyman positioning himself as the Democratic socialist frontrunner in the 2025 NYC mayoral race. At just 33, Mamdani pushes an agenda of so-called “affordable” housing, government-run healthcare, and heavy wealth taxes—policies critics warn could destabilize the city’s fragile economy. Despite his limited experience, Mamdani’s rhetoric has gained traction in a city already struggling with soaring costs. Polls suggest he could even unseat incumbent Eric Adams, now running as an independent. But many see his rise less as a sign of strength and more as a symptom of voter frustration. Suarez, however, sees dangerous echoes in Mamdani’s appeal. He compares the young Assemblyman’s charisma to that of Fidel Castro in his early days—the polished revolutionary who promised hope but delivered repression. Mamdani’s public missteps have only added fuel. His inability to bench-press 135 pounds at a Brooklyn “Men’s Day” event became an embarrassing moment that Suarez quickly capitalized on. The Miami mayor later posted an Instagram reel showcasing his own strength—benching 225 pounds 13 times—captioned “Socialism VS Capitalism.” The clip went viral, underlining the contrast. Mamdani’s campaign brushed off the criticism, but Suarez points to it as a broader symbol of weakness—ideological and literal. Even as supporters brand him a fresh voice against corporate greed, opponents fear his “seize the means” mindset would chase businesses and jobs out of the city. Most telling, perhaps, is Mamdani’s silence. He refused to address Suarez’s attacks, leaving voters to wonder if he can withstand scrutiny. In a city of 8.8 million, the whispers of “Castro 2.0” grow louder with each passing week. (MORE NEWS: Pregnant Women Take Tylenol to Defy Trump in Viral Trend) A “Dark Path” Looms: Suarez’s Dire Predictions Suarez doesn’t sugarcoat the fallout. He envisions New York crumbling under socialist weight: businesses fleeing, taxes soaring, and innovation stifled. “There’s some people that say . . . that maybe [electing a socialist mayor in NYC] is best for America in a backwards way because, once you see the abject failure that it will be, there will be a correction and a reset,” he told the New York Post. But Suarez rejects that cruelty: “I don’t want people to suffer for that to happen.” He implores New Yorkers to feel “terrified” of socialism’s track record, from Cuba’s ration lines to Venezuela’s collapse. He also praised Adams, calling him a “good relationship” ally as the two mayors have connected over shared urban challenges. Broader forces shape the narrative: National Republicans cast Mamdani’s rise as a cautionary tale, while Democrats defend his equity-driven proposals. Suarez’s Castro analogy isn’t isolated—it resonates strongly in Cuban-American communities and beyond. As election day nears, his words ripple through op-eds and talk shows, sharpening the stakes of the contest as one of freedom versus folly. Echoes in Miami: A Tale of Two Cities Contrast Miami’s boom with New York’s struggles, and Suarez’s warning becomes clearer. The Sunshine City continues to attract tech leaders and investors with its low taxes, limited regulation, and unapologetically pro-business climate. As host of the American Business Forum on November 5-6, 2025—just after the election—Suarez plans to highlight Miami’s success as a model. “Miami is a truly great global city,” he says, framing it as the antidote to socialist experiments. Attendees will see firsthand how free enterprise and hard work have turned exile stories into prosperity. Meanwhile, New York—once the envy of the world—faces a shrinking tax base, businesses leaving, and mounting fiscal troubles. Suarez warns that a Mamdani victory would only accelerate the decline, echoing the collapse seen in nations that embraced socialism and paid the price. Mamdani’s supporters push for sweeping reforms, but socialism is no bold new idea—it has been tried repeatedly, and it has failed every time. The choice is stark: stay on the proven path of growth and opportunity, or repeat history’s mistakes and risk turning America’s greatest city into another cautionary tale. Backlash and Broader Ripples Mamdani’s camp stays quiet, while allies dismiss Suarez’s warning as “fearmongering.” Progressive voices call it a smear, but critics argue it’s simply…
Pregnant Women Take Tylenol to Defy Trump in Viral Trend
We have reached a new low. Pregnant liberal women are now posting videos of themselves swallowing Tylenol pills on camera, claiming they are doing it to “own Trump.” This strange new stunt comes in response to President Trump’s recent warning about the possible risks of acetaminophen use during pregnancy. Instead of sparking a thoughtful conversation, it has triggered a wave of performative defiance on social media. Trump’s Warning on Tylenol and Pregnancy President Trump, joined by health officials, spoke about studies suggesting a link between heavy acetaminophen use during pregnancy and rising autism rates. He stressed that pregnant women should be cautious and only use the drug when truly necessary, such as to control a high fever. The president pointed out that some groups who avoid pills altogether report lower autism rates. He made it clear that women should consult with their doctors before taking any medication while pregnant. Trump did not call for a ban. He did not say women could never take Tylenol. He simply urged caution, which is not unreasonable given the sensitive nature of pregnancy. His message was about protecting babies and making decisions with medical guidance. (RELATED NEWS: Autism Hope Grows With Promising Developments) Social Media Stunts: “Taking Tylenol to Own Trump” Instead of treating this like a serious issue, some women decided to make it a political spectacle. Videos popped up online showing visibly pregnant women holding up Tylenol pills and swallowing them on camera. Their captions read things like, “I trust science, not Trump,” or, “I’m a pregnant woman and I’ll take Tylenol if I want.” This kind of behavior isn’t empowering or brave. It is reckless performance designed to score political points. What is accomplished by risking your child’s health for likes, views, and applause from strangers online? The answer is nothing—except fueling more division and cheap political theater. Doctors were speaking out online, including Dr. Nicole Saphier: Pregnant women popping Tylenol like Tic Tacs just to stick it to Trump — please stop. Don’t weaponize your pregnancy for a political point. Consider acetaminophen only when absolutely necessary, for the shortest duration and lowest dose, even the makers of Tylenol say this. — Nicole Saphier, MD (@NBSaphierMD) September 23, 2025 Accusations of an “Attack on Women” Some activists went even further, claiming Trump’s warning amounted to an “attack on women.” They tried to frame his remarks as an attempt to control female bodies. In reality, the warning was about protecting unborn children from potential risks. The notion that caution equals oppression is absurd. Every doctor gives pregnant women advice on what to eat, drink, or avoid during those nine months. No sushi, no alcohol, limited caffeine—these are all common guidelines. Nobody calls that an “attack on women.” Yet when the warning comes from Trump, activists twist it into a political weapon. A Biden-Era Warning and the Scientific Debate During the Biden administration, a Salon article highlighted how the science around acetaminophen and developmental risk has long been contested. The article pointed to the SAME STUDIES used by the Trump administration and lawsuits alleging that prenatal exposure to acetaminophen (the active ingredient in Tylenol) could increase risks of autism, ADHD, and other developmental disorders. But as the article stresses, the science is not settled. One key study, published in JAMA Psychiatry in 2019, found that acetaminophen was “associated with increased risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder in children.” Meanwhile, a 2021 review in Nature Reviews Endocrinology argued that “prenatal exposure to APAP [acetaminophen] might alter fetal development, which could increase the risks of some neurodevelopmental, reproductive and urogenital disorders.” That same review called for more research and for “precautionary action.” In the Salon story, Matthew Rozsa writes: “The period of fetal development is a very vulnerable stage,” Hugh S. Taylor, chair of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at the Yale School of Medicine, told Yale News regarding his support of a 2021 statement urging pregnant women to exercise caution before taking acetaminophen products. “Things are moving, changing quickly. The changes that occur during that time period are then programmed for the rest of our lives. Things that don’t affect adults may affect these crucial developmental windows.” A 2018 study in the American Journal of Epidemiology cautioned that although “acetaminophen use during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for ADHD, ASD, and hyperactivity symptoms,” the findings “should be interpreted with caution given that the available evidence consists of observational studies and is susceptible to several potential sources of bias.” In short: under the Biden administration, the narrative around acetaminophen in pregnancy was already tangled. The science shows potential signals. Political Symbolism Over Common Sense The real issue here is not Tylenol—it is symbolism. For some, taking a pill on camera became a way to show loyalty to their political tribe. What should have been a sober conversation about pregnancy and health turned into a circus act of defiance. This is what happens when politics consumes every part of life. A medical question becomes a test of party loyalty. A pain reliever becomes a culture war weapon. The baby in the womb becomes an afterthought while the spotlight shines on the mother’s political performance. Why This Matters At the heart of this mess is a deeper problem. Our culture rewards outrage and stunts more than responsibility and truth. Social media encourages people to seek attention by going to extremes. And when it comes to pregnancy, that is dangerous. Women should not be pressured into ignoring medical advice just to make a political point. Babies should not be put at risk so their mothers can rack up views on TikTok. Leaders should not be vilified for offering health warnings simply because of their political party. This story matters because it reveals how broken our discourse has become. When everything is viewed through the lens of politics, even a warning about a common over-the-counter drug becomes a battlefield. The Takeaway Trump’s point was simple: if risks exist, why not err on the side of…
AOC Slams Charlie Kirk with Scathing House Floor Comments
OPINION Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez sparked outrage this week when she voted against a House resolution meant to honor the life of Charlie Kirk. Instead of showing restraint, she used her floor speech to launch a scathing tirade against a man who is no longer alive to defend himself. Her remarks went far beyond disagreement, attacking Kirk’s beliefs and public statements in a way that ignited debate over whether lawmakers should tarnish the memory of the deceased to score political points. BREAKING: AOC just took to the House floor to defend her No vote on the Resolution honoring the life of Charlie Kirk. This is going to make your blood boil. AOC: “We should be clear about who Charlie Kirk was… His rhetoric and beliefs were ignorant, uneducated, and sought to… pic.twitter.com/MMjecCmyk5 — Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) September 19, 2025 What the Resolution Said and the Vote Breakdown The resolution proposed by House Republicans aimed to honor Kirk as a husband, father, Christian, and founder of Turning Point USA. It also condemned political violence in all forms and expressed condolences to his family after his assassination. Supporters of the measure argued that it was a chance for Congress to come together, set aside partisanship, and send a clear message that violence against public figures has no place in America. (RELATED NEWS: Charlie Kirk: A Patriot Remembered, A Legacy Unbroken) A similar resolution was passed after the death of Minnesota State House Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark Hortman. That measure condemned political violence and won unanimous support in both the House and Senate. Every single Republican in Congress voted for it. But when it came to honoring Charlie Kirk, 96 Democrats in the House either voted against the resolution or chose to vote “present.” The Senate was unanimous. Republicans have once again shown themselves to be the party willing to compromise. On issues like this, they do the right thing instead of letting partisan grudges stand in the way of basic decency. AOC’s Criticism of Kirk Instead of supporting the measure, AOC spoke forcefully against it. She labeled Kirk’s rhetoric as “ignorant” and “uneducated,” spreading falsehoods and taking his words out of context to paint him in the worst possible light. She cited past remarks—misrepresenting his stance on the Civil Rights Act, affirmative action, and minority groups—as proof of her claims. Ocasio-Cortez even pointed to his reaction after the Paul Pelosi attack, twisting his comments to suggest he minimized political violence. In her speech, AOC argued that passing a resolution in Kirk’s honor would normalize what she framed as harmful rhetoric and send the wrong message to targeted communities. For her, honoring Kirk meant overlooking her interpretation of his so-called divisive beliefs, even though her accusations rested on distortions. The Executive Producer of the Charlie Kirk Show, Andrew Kolvet was on Laura Ingraham to talk about AOC’s disgraceful words: AOC can say what she wants—Americans will respond.@AndrewKolvet: “Her words were disgraceful. Congress couldn’t even unite to condemn the assassination of Charlie Kirk, an American hero. That’s shameful.” pic.twitter.com/mhDqg6gWGt — Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) September 19, 2025 And as if the speech wasn’t bad enough, she later sent out a fundraising email, doubling down on her rhetoric. She raised money from the death of Charlie Kirk. This should tell you all you need to know. AOC just sent an email attacking Charlie Kirk, calling his views “ignorant” and claiming they “sought to disenfranchise millions.” This comes right after she voted no on a resolution honoring his legacy and calling it a “great pain” to Americans. Her moral low knows no limits. pic.twitter.com/BRx7tgpNm0 — Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) September 19, 2025 The Final Word Beyond this single vote, the real question is how we choose to honor human life. Charlie Kirk was more than his politics—he was a husband, a father, a friend, and a man who inspired millions. His death was not just a political moment; it was a tragedy that should remind us of the value of every life. At a time like this, partisanship should fade into the background. Sadly, the negative rhetoric that fills the public square played a role in his death. When leaders and commentators treat their opponents as enemies rather than fellow Americans, they stoke anger and division that can spill into violence. This isn’t the moment for score-settling or harsh tirades against someone who can no longer speak for himself. It’s a time to turn down the temperature, to step back from the toxic cycle, and to recognize the human cost of hateful words. Honoring Charlie’s life does not mean ignoring disagreements. It means showing basic decency, setting aside the harsh labels, and remembering the person beyond the politics. Every resolution, every tribute, should start with the truth that life is sacred. If we cannot unite on that, then we have lost something far greater than a vote in Congress—we have lost our sense of humanity. I’ll leave you with this. Earlier this year, Charlie shared the words of Senator John Kennedy. Wise man. “Let her speak.” Senator John Kennedy on AOC is pure gold: “I consider AOC to be the leader of the Democratic Party.” “I think she’s the reason there are directions on a shampoo bottle.” “Our plan for dealing with her is Operation Let Her Speak.” 😂😂 pic.twitter.com/o88QzFr7VB — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) April 9, 2025 Cut Through the Noise. Slice Through the Lies. Share the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe around the narrative—we swing a machete through it. The mainstream won’t say it, so we will. If you’re tired of spin, censorship, and sugar-coated headlines, help us rip the cover off stories that matter. Share this article. Wake people up. Give a voice to the truth the powerful want buried. This fight isn’t just ours—it’s yours. Join us in exposing what they won’t tell you. America needs bold truth-tellers, and that means you.
Rising Socialism Exposes the Democratic Party’s Identity Crisis
OPINION The Democratic Party is moving further left, and it’s starting to show in ways that should make voters pay attention. Democrats used to keep socialism at arm’s length. Now, many are embracing it. Polls reveal that more Democrats say socialism is “great” while capitalism, the very system that built this country, is being trashed as “bad.” That shift isn’t just a talking point—it’s changing who gets power inside the party. CNN analyst Harry Enten recently admitted it’s no surprise Governor Kathy Hochul backed a socialist like Zohran Mamdani. Democrats no longer treat socialism as fringe. They celebrate it. And Hochul, a so-called centrist, clearly decided it was smarter to join the trend than fight it. (MORE NEWS: London: 100K Rally-Goers Unite Against Mass Immigration) Enten says, “The net popularity of socialism is up 29 pts since 2010 with Dems. Capitalism, however, has a net negative rating with Dems. This should leave the GOP/Trump salivating as socialism remains unpopular overall.” Re: Mamdani/Hochul, Dems see socialism as five letter word: “great”. The net popularity of socialism is up 29 pts since 2010 with Dems. Capitalism, however, has a net negative rating with Dems. This should leave the GOP/Trump salivating as socialism remains unpopular overall. pic.twitter.com/9txWvJQVuJ — (((Harry Enten))) (@ForecasterEnten) September 16, 2025 Hochul’s Gamble on Mamdani In the middle of New York City politics, Hochul decided to throw her weight behind Mamdani, a proud democratic socialist, for mayor. On the surface, it looked like a strange move. Hochul isn’t exactly running around calling herself a socialist. But her endorsement tells the story of where Democrats are heading. Rents are out of control, people feel crushed by debt, and Democrats want voters to believe socialism is the answer. By siding with Mamdani, Hochul tried to look in touch with the progressive base that has been growing louder every year. She wanted their energy on her side. She wanted to prove she wasn’t out of step. President Trump was shocked at Hochul’s endorsement: The Refusal That Exposed Her Weakness Here’s the kicker: Mamdani announced he would not endorse Hochul for her 2026 re-election campaign. For someone who just received the governor’s backing, you’d think he might return the favor. Instead, he made it clear he wasn’t going to tie himself to her. (MORE NEWS: Charlie Kirk: A Patriot Remembered, A Legacy Unbroken) That left Hochul looking weak. She took the risk of backing a socialist in hopes of winning points with progressives. But when it came time for him to stand with her, he didn’t. It proves what conservatives have said for years: trying to appease the radical left never works. They’re not interested in building bridges with moderates. They’re interested in pulling the party further to the left, no matter who gets trampled along the way. The subject came up on Fox’s The Five and here was the reaction from Kennedy: HOCHUL ENDORSES MAMDANI BUT HE DOESN’T ENDORSE HER BACK@KennedyNation : “Kathy Hochul is so bad with her political instincts” pic.twitter.com/HAa9ggOZbS — The Five (@TheFive) September 17, 2025 What This Means for Democrats This little drama shows how fractured the Democratic Party has become. Hochul wanted to bridge the gap between the establishment and the socialists. Instead, she ended up looking weak. She lost credibility with moderates, and she still didn’t win over the progressives. Meanwhile, Mamdani comes out looking strong to his base. He looks “authentic” because he refuses to cozy up to party insiders. That’s the new standard for Democrats: prove you’re independent from the establishment, even if it means throwing your own governor and state party head under the bus. A Party Pulled to the Left The rise of socialist politics isn’t about Mamdani alone. It’s part of a bigger trend. Democrats are sprinting to the left because they think that’s what younger voters want. They promise free programs, government takeovers, and redistribution schemes as if those will magically fix the economy. But let’s be honest—New York is already a test case for these ideas. High taxes, crime waves, and endless regulations are driving people and businesses out of the state. If socialism is the answer, why are so many families fleeing to Florida, Texas, and other red states that actually value capitalism and freedom? The Voter Backlash Waiting to Happen There’s a lesson here for voters across the country. Hochul thought she was being clever by endorsing a socialist. Instead, she got exposed. And Mamdani showed that socialists don’t want to share power with moderates. They want to replace them. For Democrats, this is a warning sign. If the party keeps running toward socialism, it risks alienating the very Americans who still believe in hard work, free markets, and individual liberty. Those people may not get the media attention, but they are still the backbone of the country. And they are paying attention. The Conservative Takeaway The Hochul-Mamdani feud is proof that the Democratic Party is being eaten alive from the inside. Socialists aren’t content to be part of the coalition—they want to run it. Hochul thought she could keep them close and use their energy. Instead, she ended up being used herself. That’s the reality of today’s Democratic Party. Moderates get pushed aside. Socialists get the spotlight. And voters are left to deal with the fallout: higher taxes, failed policies, and leaders who care more about ideology than results. Final Word Ultimately, Hochul’s gamble backfired. By endorsing Mamdani, she revealed just how desperate establishment Democrats are to keep up with the radical left. Mamdani’s refusal to back her only confirms that socialism is no longer a side note in the Democratic Party—it’s becoming the main act. The good news is voters have a choice. They can look at New York, see the mess created by left-wing policies, and decide they don’t want the same future for the rest of America. Conservatives must keep pointing out these failures, because if Democrats continue down this path, the country will pay the price. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin….
Fake Jobs Boom Exposed: Nearly 2 Million Vanish
OPINION Let’s be real. Numbers don’t lie—unless someone in Washington is manipulating them. That’s exactly what just happened with the Biden administration’s so-called “strong economy.” For months, they bragged about booming job growth. They paraded around charts, headlines, and talking points about how many millions of jobs were being created. And now? Almost a million of those jobs never existed. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) finally admitted it: from April 2024 to March 2025, the U.S. actually added 911,000 fewer jobs than we were told. That’s the biggest downward revision in history. Nearly a million jobs vanished with the stroke of a pen. Preliminary benchmark revision for March payroll employment is -911,000 (-0.6%) https://t.co/cooAntOaz6 #BLSdata — BLS-Labor Statistics (@BLS_gov) September 9, 2025 Spin First, Honesty Later Here’s the playbook. Announce good numbers early. Use them to score political points. Let the media pump out glowing headlines. Then, months later, when nobody’s paying attention, quietly slip out a revision that tells the truth. It’s dishonest, and it’s intentional. (MORE NEWS: LAPD Officers Pulled from Duties to Guard Kamala Harris) Jerome Powell at the Fed and Jared Bernstein at the White House used those inflated numbers to paint a rosy picture of Biden’s economy. They pointed to job growth as proof that things were humming along. Except it wasn’t real. It was smoke and mirrors. This wasn’t just a math error. It was a strategy: sell the sizzle now, hope nobody notices when they are heavily revised. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned Kirsten Welker last week on Meet the Press and she pushed back: .@kwelkernbc pushed back last week when I warned that the BLS jobs data would show a massive downward revision. Now it’s official: 2024 job gains were exaggerated by nearly 1M workers, and this is on top of an already reported 577K in downward revisions. This brings the Biden… pic.twitter.com/Aaz0LirOxg — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (@SecScottBessent) September 9, 2025 Families Were Misled Think about what that means for everyday Americans. People decide whether to change jobs, buy a house, or start a business based on the state of the economy. Businesses plan hiring and investments based on job numbers. When Washington feeds them fake optimism, it’s not harmless—it leads people into bad decisions. The Biden administration didn’t level with the public. They wanted good headlines, so they chose spin over honesty. McEntarfer Shown the Door There’s a reason Erika McEntarfer, the BLS official is no longer on the job. Trump replaced her with economist E.J. Antoni, a guy who’s not afraid to call things like they are. Antoni has built his career on digging into numbers and telling the truth, even when it’s uncomfortable. That’s exactly the kind of leadership BLS needs. McEntarfer presided over years of inflated estimates followed by embarrassing revisions. At some point, it stops looking like bad luck and starts looking like a pattern. And a pattern like that demands accountability. (MORE NEWS: Insurance Drones: Hidden Home Inspections Spark Backlash) Honesty Should Trump Spin This is the heart of it: honesty should always trump the urge to cover up failings. If the jobs numbers are soft, say they’re soft. If early estimates are shaky, admit they’re shaky. Don’t pump sunshine into the headlines and then backpedal months later when the spotlight has moved on. America needs leaders who will tell the truth, even when the truth isn’t flattering. That’s how you build trust. That’s how you lead. A Pattern of Fake Wins And let’s not pretend this was a one-time slip. Last year, the numbers were quietly revised down by 818,000. Each time, Biden’s team bragged about how great things were going, only to have the rug pulled out later. It’s a pattern of fake wins followed by quiet corrections. When you add it all up, the Biden administration wasn’t just wrong—they were selling a story they knew wouldn’t hold up. .@PressSec: “This was one of the biggest revisions, in absolute terms, in decades… the job growth was VASTLY weaker during the Biden administration than ever previously reported.” pic.twitter.com/Qqehuo6bqs — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) September 9, 2025 Trump’s Course Correction Trump didn’t just point out the problem; he acted on it. He brought in Antoni to restore credibility. The message is simple: the American people deserve real numbers, not fairy tales. If the job market is struggling, say it’s struggling. If revisions are coming, say revisions are coming. Antoni has already signaled that he’s going to stop the cycle of inflated estimates and shady revisions. That’s a good start. Transparency has to be the standard. The Bottom Line The Biden team used phony numbers to push a feel-good story. Powell and Bernstein played along. McEntarfer ran cover for a process that misled the country. And when the truth came out, it wasn’t shouted—it was whispered. Trump put a stop to it. He fired the official responsible and put in someone committed to honesty. That’s what accountability looks like. The lesson is simple: spin fades, but the truth always surfaces. Americans don’t need politicians telling them fairy tales about the economy. They need straight talk, real numbers, and leaders who won’t hide the ball. That’s how you rebuild trust and move forward. Forget the Headlines. Challenge the Script. Deliver the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe through talking points — we swing a machete through the media’s favorite lies. They protect power. We confront it. If you’re sick of censorship, narrative control, and being told what to think — stand with us. Share the story. Wake the people. Because truth dies in silence — and you weren’t made to stay quiet.
Free Speech Alarm: Farage’s Wake-Up Call to Congress
Nigel Farage brought a blunt message to Washington. Speaking before the U.S. Congress, he warned that Britain is slipping into a culture of suppression, abandoning free speech. His comparison cut sharp: the nation, he said, looks more like North Korea than a free democracy. 📺MUST WATCH: @Nigel_Farage outlines the importance of free speech around the world. If we lose free speech, we lose everything. pic.twitter.com/c83XW4OFID — House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@JudiciaryGOP) September 3, 2025 The Reform UK leader appeared before the House Judiciary Committee on September 3, 2025. From the start, he accused Britain’s political class of betraying core democratic values. Laws written to fight “hate speech,” he argued, now crush open debate. Police enforce speech violations instead of protecting expression. Farage urged lawmakers to pay attention. What happens in Britain, he said, will not stay in Britain. Once censorship takes hold in one Western democracy, it spreads. America must recognize the danger and refuse to stand by silently. (RELATED: Court Nixes California AI Deepfake Law, Free Speech Wins) To drive home the point, he drew on history. Free nations, he explained, have always defended speech, even offensive or unpopular speech. Citing the spirit of Voltaire, he said, “We’ve forgotten the Voltarian principles that we’ll fight and defend to the death your right to say something that we fundamentally disagree with. That is the absolute foundation, if you think about it, of free speech, of democracy, of living in freedom. It’s kind of why we fought two world wars, at massive, massive cost. To defend that very principle for ourslves and for many, many others around the country.” His testimony framed censorship as a creeping threat. It rarely arrives with blunt force. Instead, it advances quietly, disguised as protection or safety. That, he said, makes it more dangerous. For Farage, the solution is clear: hold Britain accountable and defend free voices before they are silenced altogether. Linehan Arrest: A Comedy Writer in Handcuffs While Farage spoke in Washington, a separate story unfolded in London. Graham Linehan, the comedy writer behind hit shows like Father Ted, was arrested at Heathrow Airport. His alleged crime was not violence or fraud but a series of social media posts criticizing trans activism. One post claimed that if a “trans-identified male” entered a female-only space, the act should be treated as violent and abusive. He suggested that bystanders should make a scene, call the police, or even respond physically. The message drew swift attention from authorities. Police questioned Linehan over the post and banned him from using X, formerly Twitter, while on bail. For him, the arrest was absurd. He described it as a “dystopian clown show” and vowed to challenge it in court. In his view, the state had criminalized satire. This is how Graham Linehan shows up for trial in the UK just days after being arrested in the London airport for posting “offensive tweets” This is how you deal with the trans mob. Double down. We’re cheering you on, @Glinner 👏🏼🔥pic.twitter.com/vWVItcwUGK — Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) September 4, 2025 Linehan’s case exposes the tension between comedy and censorship. Once a staple of British humor, satire is now being dragged into police stations. To his supporters, this proves Farage’s point. What begins as regulation of speech can quickly become prosecution of thought. A Growing Storm Around Free Expression Farage’s testimony and Linehan’s arrest tell the same story from different angles. One shows political leaders tightening laws. The other shows police enforcing those laws on individuals. Together, they highlight a dangerous shift in how Britain treats free expression. (MORE NEWS: U.S. Strike on Venezuelan Drug Cartel Boat Signals New Era) Critics of these policies argue that governments are overstepping. They ask who decides where satire ends and offense begins. They warn that the power to punish speech can easily be abused. Defining “harm” too broadly, they say, allows almost any opinion to be silenced. Supporters of strict laws counter that hateful rhetoric poses real risks. They argue that social cohesion requires limits. Yet opponents point out that once the state defines harmful speech, political dissent often becomes the first casualty. In Washington, Farage urged Congress not to ignore the trend. He pressed lawmakers to use America’s influence to keep free speech alive in allied nations. Across the Atlantic, British citizens watched Linehan’s case unfold and asked whether their own freedoms were next. Why This Matters for the West Free speech shapes more than Britain. It defines the Western world. When one democracy clamps down, others copy the move. Farage warns that Britain could set the model — for censorship instead of liberty. Linehan’s arrest exhibits danger in real time. Police charged a comedian for satire. That action chills journalists, writers, and citizens who use humor to push back against authority. These events prove a hard truth: free speech survives only when people defend it. Laws must shield it, not crush it. Leaders must honor it, not bargain it away for peace. The debate cannot wait. Citizens, not governments, define acceptable thought. They must choose whether satire stays part of culture or becomes a crime by voting out of office those who threaten freedom. Conclusion: A Call to Defend Free Speech The message is clear. Societies that value freedom must defend speech in all its forms—serious or satirical, popular or unpopular. If they fail, censorship will not remain confined to Britain. It will spread across the democratic world. America once broke free from British control to secure liberty. Today, Britain drifts toward censorship, using “safety” and “tolerance” as excuses. Farage’s warning should not be ignored. If the U.K. can arrest comedians and silence debate, America must make sure it never follows down that path. Linehan’s arrest proves how quickly jokes and opinions can be turned into criminal offenses. Free nations survive only when debate is open and free speech is protected. America doesn’t need to repeat Britain’s mistakes. It needs to stand firm, defend its Constitution, and remind the world that freedom of speech is not…
LAPD Officers Pulled from Duties to Guard Kamala Harris
President Trump has revoked Kamala Harris’s extended Secret Service detail. The protection ended on September 1, 2025. Normally, former vice presidents receive only six months of coverage. President Biden had extended Harris’s protection for a year before leaving office. Trump ended that early, citing his authority over federal security assignments. California Scrambling For Local Solutions After the revocation, LAPD stepped in. The LAPD’s Metro Division assigned about 14 officers to guard Harris. These officers were pulled from regular duties, including gang suppression and active case work. An unmarked LAPD vehicle now sits outside her Brentwood home day and night. Plain-clothes officers rotate shifts to maintain constant watch—on the taypayer dime. The California Highway Patrol also offered help. However, deploying CHP security requires Governor Gavin Newsom’s approval. His office has not confirmed any final decision. Newsom’s spokesperson stressed that safety should not depend on politics. The state continues to review options for providing additional protection if needed. (MORE NEWS: Democrats Fume as Trump’s Crime Crackdown Delivers Results) Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told Fox11 LA that it is political retaliation and warned that Kamala Harris’s safety was at risk: “This is another act of revenge following a long list of political retaliation in the form of firings, the revoking of security clearances and more. This puts the former Vice President in danger and I look forward to working with the Governor to make sure Vice President Harris is safe in Los Angeles.” Governor Newsom’s office echoed her concerns: “Our office does not comment on security arrangements. The safety of our public officials should never be subject to erratic, vindictive political impulses.” Both leaders promised to coordinate on long-term solutions. They argued that protection for former national leaders must never become a partisan issue. Never mind the six-month protocol that has been in place for years. (MORE NEWS: Newsom’s Press Office Attacks Victims Of Palisades Fire For Demanding Answers) A Pattern of Cuts Trump has ended protection for several Biden-era officials and allies. The list includes former DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Dr. Anthony Fauci, John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, and Biden’s adult children. Democrats say this shows a troubling pattern and claim Trump is using security assignments to punish rivals. But should the federal government waste taxpayer money on unnecessary details? Especially when the people in question are millionaires and can afford their own security. 🚨 #BREAKING: President Donald Trump terminates Dr. Anthony Fauci’s security detail – CNN It was pulled last night. Fauci will now have to pay for his own private security. pic.twitter.com/rnkxHU5GkK — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) January 24, 2025 Harris’s Book Tour Raises Stakes The timing adds to the controversy. Kamala Harris is preparing for a nationwide book tour later this month. Her memoir, 107 Days, releases on September 23. Public appearances will draw crowds and increase exposure. Without federal protection, she will have to rely on local law enforcement and possibly private contractors—which would be her obligation as a private citizen. Officers Face New Demands For now, LAPD’s Metro Division will carry the responsibility. These officers specialize in tactical response and dignitary protection. They have experience working with the Secret Service. Still, pulling them from crime suppression adds pressure on a department already stretched thin. Rising crime rates in Los Angeles make the trade-off controversial. The Debate Over Protection and Costs Democrats in Washington called the decision dangerous. They argue it undermines security norms and sets a bad precedent. Security, they insist, should never depend on partisan rivalries. Critics fear future leaders will face the same risks if protection becomes a political weapon. As the first woman and Black person elected Vice President, Kamala Harris faced elevated threats. This move by Trump is dangerous. I saw the VP last week and was grateful for her Secret Service protection. They were incredibly professional and kept her safe. Shameful. https://t.co/ttveXPDXou — Congressman Robert Garcia (@RepRobertGarcia) August 29, 2025 The controversy raises larger questions. Who decides which former leaders deserve protection? Should states carry the burden when the federal government steps away? And how should costs be divided between taxpayers and private funds? These issues will likely shape future policy. Harris’s case shows how quickly coverage can shift. Local police now fill the gap as state officials weigh their role. The outcome will affect not just Kamala Harris but every future leader navigating life after Washington. Final Word Kamala Harris now has LAPD officers parked outside her mansion while Los Angeles struggles with rising crime. Regular citizens wait longer for police response because detectives have been reassigned to protect a former vice president who chose politics over results. Trump’s critics scream about danger, but everyday Americans face danger daily in neighborhoods where crime goes unchecked. That is the real scandal. Instead of fixing broken policies or supporting law enforcement, Democrats treat Harris’s driveway like a national emergency. They demand more taxpayer money and more political theater. Meanwhile, criminals walk free, and police are stretched thin. Protecting politicians at the expense of public safety tells you everything about their priorities. The message is simple: leaders should protect the people—not the other way around. Cut Through the Noise. Slice Through the Lies. Share the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe around the narrative—we swing a machete through it. The mainstream won’t say it, so we will. If you’re tired of spin, censorship, and sugar-coated headlines, help us rip the cover off stories that matter. Share this article. Wake people up. Give a voice to the truth the powerful want buried.