Politics
Trump Dismisses Rumors of Targeting Elon Musk’s Companies, Calls for American Business to “Thrive Like Never Before”
In a bold statement released Thursday, President Donald Trump shut down swirling rumors that he intends to cripple Elon Musk’s companies by cutting off federal subsidies. “Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon’s companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large scale subsidies he receives from the U.S. Government. This is not so!” Trump declared in a Truth Social post. The president emphasized his support for American innovation and business success, distancing himself from speculation that his administration might take aim at Musk’s government-backed ventures like Tesla or SpaceX. “I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before!” Trump added. He framed business success as central to America’s broader prosperity: “The better they do, the better the USA does, and that’s good for all of us. We are setting records every day, and I want to keep it that way!” The comments come amid ongoing online chatter and political speculation about the future of federal subsidies, especially for green energy and tech firms. Musk, who has occasionally clashed with Trump in the past but also shared common policy interests, has not responded publicly to the statement. For now, Trump is making it clear: he’s not after Elon’s companies — he wants them, and all of American business, to soar.
AOC’s 2028 Dreams Derailed as New Poll Shows Support Crumbling
This article was written by Jason Walsh for WokeSpy. New York Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has suffered another major setback in her dreams to become the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee in 2028. According to a new poll from Echelon Insights, conducted between July 10–14, a familiar cluster of names have emerged atop the list of preferred candidates for Democratic primary voters. (RELATED: Newsom’s Press Office Attacks Victims Of Palisades Fire For Demanding Answers) The most preferred candidate is currently Vice President Kamala Harris, garnering support from 26 percent of respondents. However, Harris’ figures slipped six percentage points compared to the poll’s previous result. In second place was former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg with 11 percent, up a single percentage point from the last survey. Both Harris and Buttigieg have polled as frontrunners across a number of pollsters throughout the early weeks and months of President Donald Trump’s second term. Greasy Gavin Surges Ahead The biggest winner was California Governor Gavin Newsom. According to the latest Echelon Insights poll, Newsom was named the preferred candidate by 10 percent of respondents. That figure is up five percentage points from the previous result and comes as the far-left governor has embarked on a podcast tour aimed at portraying himself as a moderate. In fourth place was Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ), with seven percent. Rep. Ocasio-Cortez came in fifth place with just six percent of the vote. This represents a decline of two percent from the previous survey, and comes as pro-communist New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani found himself under the national spotlight.(RELATED: USAID Quietly Sent Thousands Of Viruses To Chinese Military-Linked Biolab) Ocasio-Cortez has emerged as one of Mamdani’s primary benefactors and has held multiple rallies in support of his candidacy. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro received support from four percent of Democratic primary respondents. Shapiro is widely perceived as a moderate and has enjoyed high favorability ratings in the key swing state. Others included Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, and businessman Mark Cuban — each of whom received three percent of the vote. Other Options? Governors Andy Beshear (Kentucky) and JB Pritzker (Illinois), both of whom have signaled serious interest in a White House bid, each received two percent, as did Senators Chris Murphy (D-CT) and John Fetterman (D-PA). Meanwhile, Maryland Governor Wes Moore, U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX), Senator Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Daily Show host Jon Stewart, and longtime ESPN commentator Stephen A. Smith each received one percent of the vote. Read more at WokeSpy.com
FEMA May Receive More Funding Despite Being Largely Useless Agency
Take A Poll About This Problem via Poll2Action North Carolina lawmaker David Rouzer once again introduced a bill in 2025 that aims to provide states and Indian Tribes with increased assistance in the wake of natural disasters. A congressional summary of HR 316 reads as follows: “This bill establishes Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funding sources for unmet needs caused by major disasters, expands FEMA’s assistance for housing and home repair, and requires certain considerations in FEMA’s recommendations on presidential emergency/disaster declarations.” It further states that it will establish “the National Disaster Recovery Reserve Fund for FEMA to provide grants to states and Indian tribal governments for unmet need. The bill defines unmet need as any necessary expense for activities related to a declared major disaster, including disaster relief or resilience activities. (RELATED: Energy Department Admits Millions Of Americans Are At Risk Thanks To Grid Vulnerabilities) In addition, the bill authorizes FEMA to set aside funding from the Disaster Relief Fund to provide grants to states and Indian tribal governments for unmet needs resulting from a declared disaster, including home repair, economic recovery measures, and other services assisting disaster victims.” Recent reports from Western North Carolina suggest that FEMA does not actually allocate any of the deeply needed funding, nor does it rarely have anyone qualified to make those calls employed during times of emergency, so it is unclear why FEMA is being given any more money. Read HR 316 In Full How Do You Feel? Take The Poll Did you know that lawmakers, business leaders, and even public servants use polling data to inform their policies and practices? These might seem like simple questions, but answering them can have far-reaching impacts on the world around you. We are hoping that Poll2Action will soon start sharing their data with the masses, helping to guide policy in a way that no other polling company has done before. As soon as we know more about where to find these data, we will let you know! The responses you give to our polls don’t just sit in the random void of nothingness that is most of the Internet. Your voice goes beyond these white pages and into the ears and eyes of real change makers — so THANK YOU for helping shape our future, today.
Newly Declassified Documents Expose Obama-Era Plot to Undermine Trump’s 2016 Victory
Shocking new evidence has surfaced pointing to a coordinated effort within the Obama administration and intelligence community to subvert the legitimacy of Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory—and his presidency. View the White House Briefing here A recently declassified House Intelligence Committee report, now publicly accessible, contains explosive findings that directly challenge the long-pushed narrative that Russia was actively working to elect Trump. The most damning revelations are found on page 17 of the report, which outlines a trove of highly damaging intelligence Russia held on Hillary Clinton—but crucially, chose not to release in the final weeks of the 2016 campaign. (MORE NEWS: Trump Takes On Crime In D.C.) Russia Sat on Damaging Clinton Intel The report details several stunning claims held in Russian possession, including: Internal Russian intelligence assessments that Hillary Clinton was on “heavy tranquilizers” and suffering from “intensified psycho-emotional problems.” Medical evidence suggesting Type 2 diabetes and ischemic heart disease. Private communications among Democratic Party leadership indicating that President Obama and other top officials found Clinton’s health “extraordinarily alarming.” Secret meetings with religious leaders, in which Clinton allegedly offered “significant increases in funding” from the State Department in exchange for support. Internal Democratic admissions that European allies were lukewarm about a Clinton presidency and doubted her ability to serve as head of state. If Russia had truly been working to sabotage Clinton and install Trump—as the Russia collusion narrative claimed—it’s difficult to imagine why such politically lethal material wasn’t weaponized during the campaign. In the months leading up to the election, Clinton’s lead was razor-thin according to RealClearPolitics. The release of this information could have been decisive. A Narrative Built on Lies Instead of acting on this damaging intel, Russia held it back, completely undercutting the foundational premise of the Trump-Russia collusion theory. Rather than revise their assumptions in light of this contradictory intelligence, the CIA under John Brennan and other top intelligence officials buried the material. According to the newly uncovered files, they chose instead to fabricate an alternate reality—one in which Trump was portrayed as a foreign asset and his presidency labeled illegitimate before it even began. This effort laid the groundwork for years of investigations, media smears, and partisan impeachment attempts. All the while, the real intelligence—which painted a very different picture—was suppressed. Tulsi Gabbard’s Bombshell and the Turning Tide The timing of this revelation aligns with a stunning briefing from DNI Tulsi Gabbard earlier today, where she confirmed the existence of a criminal referral related to abuses during the Obama-to-Trump transition. While Gabbard did not name individuals yet, she hinted that key figures in the intelligence community and executive branch may face accountability for weaponizing government resources against a duly elected president. “This is about restoring trust in our institutions,” Gabbard said. “No one is above the law, including those who manipulated intelligence for political gain.” The Real Election Interference These findings obliterate the narrative that Russia was a pro-Trump actor bent on sabotaging Hillary Clinton. Instead, they reveal a far more insidious threat to democracy: a domestic conspiracy, fueled by false assumptions, carried out by powerful actors within the U.S. government, and designed to overturn the will of the American people.
Faith Leaders ‘Say Amen’ As Senator Predicts Legal Victories For Ten Commandments In Texas
Faith and political leaders alike are speaking up in support of returning the Ten Commandments to schools across Texas in July, despite lawsuits trying to stop this historical document from being taught to children. Senate Bill 10 passed earlier this year, mandating that all Texas classrooms display the Ten Commandments as they are seen across the state, particularly on the grounds of the Austin capitol grounds. The Ten Commandments, aside from being the foundation of law and human behavior across Western civilization for the last 3,000 years, are also part of America’s foundational history. (RELATED: EXCLUSIVE: Sen. King Explains How Texas Is Bringing Biblical Values Of Our Founding Fathers Back To Schools LEGALLY) These core laws for life were taught as part of a normal curriculum since before America became a nation, and were only removed roughly 50 years ago thanks to a short-lived legal precedent by the Supreme Court, which was overturned in 2022. What Are Pastors Saying? “As for me I would say that posting the Ten Commandments in the schools will truly promote moral values, provide a historical and cultural context for law and ethics and offer a framework for ethical behavior for the future generation,” pastor Mariya James of St. Stephen Catholic Church in Weatherford told the Weatherford Democrat in July. “Prohibitions against murder, theft, adultery and false testimony are foundational to any functioning society,” he continued. “And this must be reminded to the students often for a healthier society. … The absence of moral guidance in schools could lead to negative consequences, including a disregard for morality and an increase in anti-social behavior.” “It goes back so far,” Northside Baptist Church retired Rev. Van Houser told the same outlet. “These have been the basic tenets for many, many, many generations and civilizations. So I think in that regard they stand as something visual for children to be reminded of, things that regard common decency and basic tenets.” Lawsuits Sue To Stop Ten Commandments Displays The American Civil Liberties Union of Texas filed a suit against Senate Bill 10 in July, claiming that the new law violates the religious rights of students, despite the document technically being historical — not faith based in the context of the Texas law. “The lawsuit is no surprise,” Sen. Phil King told the Fort Worth Report while he voiced a prediction of victory against the ACLU’s position in the suit. “That’s what the left does.” “I feel very confident, if there is a lawsuit on the Texas Ten Commandments, that the Supreme Court will uphold our statute,” King said prior to the lawsuit, a sentiment he echoed in conversation with Million Voices earlier in the year. (EXCLUSIVE: ‘Stand Firm’ Says Sen. Dotson On Bringing The Ten Commandments To Classrooms) “It’s so popular,” King added of the public reaction to the law. “I can’t tell you how many people I’ve run into that bring it up. I think the general public is very excited about it.” “When we were kids, the Ten Commandments were in public buildings,” he clarified. “It was in schools. Everybody just recognized that was just a wonderful statement of morality. It was something that we were taught from day one, just like the Golden Rule.” Legal Precedent For Success Along with the overturning of multiple laws related to the removal of historical religious texts and practices from the public square, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott fought in 2005 to keep the Ten Commandments on the grounds of the state capitol. (RELATED: ‘Separation Of Church And State Is A Lie’: Legal Precedent Collapses Bringing Religious Freedom To US) Abbott won this argument when it landed all the way up in the Supreme Court, so there is huge context for any lawsuits against the Ten Commandments to lose in the country’s highest court. How To Get Involved In Bringing The Ten Commandments Back To Schools Million Voices is the instrumental leader in creating a means of you, our readers, members, and even folks who are only finding us for the first time, to bring the Ten Commandments back to classrooms. Even though there are lawsuits trying to stop the implementation of the posters of the Ten Commandments in classrooms, every classroom can still legally display the posters. But we can’t do it without your help. For generations, schools displayed the Ten Commandments to promote basic moral values—like respect, honesty, and personal responsibility. They weren’t just religious—they were viewed as a foundation for good citizenship and character. Though many were removed after a 1980 Supreme Court ruling, states are now restoring the right to display them again. With your help, we’re putting them back—one school at a time. Click here to join the Restore American Schools movement — and be the boots on the ground while using your voice to protect America’s future.
‘Separation Of Church And State Is A Lie’: Legal Precedent Collapses Bringing Religious Freedom To US
Have you heard the good news that the Ten Commandments will soon be displayed across classrooms in multiple states? Many people think these legislations fly in the face of laws written to separate church and state, but there are no laws — and never have been — that separate the church and public spaces in America. Are you shocked? You should be! The anti-faith lobbies within lawmaking have done an amazing job convincing at least four generations of Americans that they cannot practice their faith in the spaces their taxes fund. (RELATED: Mamdani’s Shocking Claim: Blames America For al-Qaeda Terrorist’s Rise) Libraries, schools, universities, so many different public spaces are now in for a rude awakening: not only is the short-held precedent that allowed us to remove Christ from our classrooms falling apart at the federal level, but states are taking serious action to educate and implement His word in public spaces. Listen to Lakepointe Church Pastor Josh Howerton discuss this issue in a recent post on social media: What most people believe about the “separation of church and state” is a LIE ⛪️❌ pic.twitter.com/FCpGCYyJH2 — Josh Howerton (@howertonjosh) June 2, 2025 Why Do People Think The U.S. Separates Church and State? In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court voted 6-to-3 in favor of high school football coach Joseph Kennedy’s right to pray at the 5-yard line at the end of each game. The decision overturned a short-held legal precedent regarding the constitutionality of public religious displays. It’s believed the Ten Commandments were a prominent part of American education for almost three centuries prior to 1980, when the prior legal precedent was held against it. “Respect for religious expressions is indispensable to life in a free and diverse Republic. Here, a government entity sought to punish an individual for engaging in a personal religious observance, based on a mistaken view that it has a duty to suppress religious observances even as it allows comparable secular speech. The Constitution neither mandates nor tolerates that kind of discrimination. Mr. Kennedy is entitled to summary judgment on his religious exercise and free speech claims,” wrote Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch at the time. (RELATED: What’s America Gonna Look Like? Shocking Video from Rome Gives Preview) The first purely American educational textbook “New England Primer” was published by Benjamin Harris in Boston in 1690, featuring an in-depth section on the Ten Commandments. In the context of American history, 45 years, from 1980 to 2025, without having the Ten Commandments in our education system doesn’t seem like a very long time, especially when you take into account it was part of our curriculum from at least 1690 to 1980 (that’s 290 years). But ask yourself: how do the last 45 years or so compare to the previous 290? Do You Know How Your Pastor Feels About Politics? Your Sunday service doesn’t have to be political, but your day-to-day life outside of His four walls will always be dictated — in large part — by your elected officials. Ignorance of politics is like handing over control of your life to the greediest, most power-hungry serpent in the room. When we Use Our Voice, we bring a more Biblical worldview to our nation. What Is The Purpose Of Million Voices? Contacting your representatives should be easy, but there are myriad ways they can ignore your messages. That’s where we come in. Yes, Million Voices helps you with voter guides. Yes, we send letters from YOU directly to your elected officials because it’s the only way to guarantee they’ll listen to you. Yes, we publish data, articles, text messages, and help bridge the gap between education and civic action. But what do you want? Tell us today. We want to make YOU the hero of our American story by giving you the tools you need to make a difference, from your local, state, all the way up to the federal level. Join us in our mission to advocate for religious freedom, support fair and secure elections, and uphold the values that this great nation was built upon. Tell us what you want from the next four years, and we will fight to make it a reality … again!
USAID Quietly Sent Thousands Of Viruses To Chinese Military-Linked Biolab (DCNF Exclusive)
By Daily Caller News Foundation investigative reporter Emily Kopp The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) shipped thousands of viral samples to a lab in Wuhan over the course of a 10-year program even though it had no formal agreement with the lab in place, according to previously unreported documents. The documents show that USAID funded the exportation of 11,000 samples from Yunnan Province, where some of the closest relatives of the COVID-19 virus circulate, to Wuhan, the epicenter of the pandemic, with no apparent plan for ensuring the samples were not misdirected to bioweapons and remained accessible to the U.S. government. Something Out Of A Horror Movie A $210 million USAID public health program called PREDICT, steered by the University of California-Davis, collected viral samples in countries throughout the globe but lacked long-term storage when funding dried up, according to rudimentary plans in 2019. USAID’s sample dispensation plan for China is sparse: “No need [sic] information from Yunnan. They were never an official lab partner for PREDICT. All samples they helped collected [sic] are sent to, tested, and stored in Wuhan.” The “lab” refers to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). WIV was a close partner of USAID contractor EcoHealth Alliance and a slated partner for a PREDICT-like program supported by the State Department. The lab has poor biosafety practices and ties to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). COVID-19 Included One of the closest known relatives of the COVID virus is among the viruses sampled with USAID funding. “Investigations involving USAID’s former funding of global health awards remain active and ongoing,” a senior State Department official said in a statement to the Daily Caller News Foundation. “The American people can rest assured knowing that under the Trump Administration we will not be funding these controversial programs.” (RELATED: COVID-19 mRNA Shots Linked To Higher Death Toll Amongst Cancer Patients) The internal documents were obtained through a FOIA lawsuit brought by U.S. Right to Know, a nonprofit newsroom and public health research group. The shuttering of USAID – which was officially completed Tuesday – has ignited a debate about its net impact on global health. A study in The Lancet projected an association between a dropoff in USAID funding and 14 million deaths based on an epidemiological model. Undermining American Interests Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement Tuesday that USAID spending has often undermined rather than strengthened American interests. “Beyond creating a globe-spanning NGO industrial complex at taxpayer expense, USAID has little to show since the end of the Cold War,” Rubio said. “Development objectives have rarely been met, instability has often worsened, and anti-American sentiment has only grown.” The now-defunct agency’s connection to the Wuhan lab complicates its global health legacy. (RELATED: China Continues Stealth Invasion Of US With More Biological Warfare) “The USAID $210 million contract for PREDICT should have included contractual terms that required all samples, or at least copies of all samples, be transferred to and stored by a US government facility,” said Rutgers University molecular biologist Richard Ebright told the DCNF. “The PREDICT grift did none of this.” UC Davis did not respond to a request for comment. The State Department did not respond to a request for comment. Did USAID Fund COVID’s Ancestor? Many of the viruses stored at the lab in Wuhan may have been sampled with U.S. funding yet remain out of reach for U.S. government entities investigating the origins of COVID. The samples were set to be preserved for testing – with human samples preserved for 10 years – the documents show. But the documents suggest that requirement was never incorporated into a formal contract with USAID. The two scientists supervising the samples were: Ben Hu, a virologist at the WIV, who reportedly became sick with COVID-like symptoms in 2019; and Peter Daszak, a scientist who was debarred from federal funding after the U.S. government deemed him a threat to public safety for inadequate oversight of the research in Wuhan. Hu and Daszak did not reply to requests for comment. The documents show PREDICT contractors discussing viral samples taken from wildlife and stored in India, Liberia, Malaysia, the Republic of Congo and China. Some of the samples were stored in virus-transport media (VTM), which allows researchers to store live viruses for later use in the lab. (RELATED: Adverse Effects Of COVID-19 Vaccination Observed In Women’s Reproductive Cycle) “It’s not rocket science to require a contract and supporting paperwork which establishes a relationship, testing protocol, and chain of custody, when one is sending out lab samples,” said Reuben Guttman, a partner at Guttman, Buschner & Brooks PLLC who specializes in ensuring the integrity of government programs, in an interview with the DCNF. “In any scientific endeavor, you need confidence in your results. That requires paperwork to prove your methodology is sound.” TMM Analysis Honestly, Emily hit it out of the park on this one. Our biggest concern is that a huge amount of our money goes to the government every year, and we are still not sure what it all gets spent on. Do you know where your tax dollars go?
Wealthy White Liberals Reportedly Urge Democrats To ‘Be Willing To Get Shot’ Opposing Trump
By Daily Caller News Foundation reporter Ireland Owens Some House Democrats told Axios that their constituents have encouraged them to prepare for violence and “be willing to get shot” while resisting President Donald Trump’s agenda. Democratic lawmakers said that there has been mounting anger among liberal votes that has sometimes even resulted in them calling on congressional Democrats to violate the law and be prepared for acts of violence, Axios reported on Monday. Many of the House Democrats told the outlet that these voters are often white, well-educated and wealthy. What Are They Saying? “Some of them have suggested … what we really need to do is be willing to get shot” when visiting United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities or federal government agencies, one House Democrat told Axios. (RELATED: ‘If I Was Waiting For FEMA, I Would Be Screwed’: You’ll Sob Watching What’s Happening In NC Months After Hurricane Helene) “Our own base is telling us that what we’re doing is not good enough … [that] there needs to be blood to grab the attention of the press and the public,” the Democratic lawmaker added. Some voters have recently criticized Democratic lawmakers for not doing a good enough job of pushing back against Republicans and the president’s political agenda, according to Axios. Moreover, one House Democrat told Axios that there is a “sense of fear and despair and anger” among their voters “puts us in a different position where … we can’t keep following norms of decorum.” The report comes after some recent polls have revealed that the majority of voters hold an unfavorable view of Democrats in Congress. Similarly, Democrats have reportedly been attempting to figure out what kind of policies to embrace to win back voters in the upcoming 2026 midterm elections and 2028 presidential election. (RELATED: What’s America Gonna Look Like? Shocking Video from Rome Gives Preview) “This idea that we’re going to save every norm and that we’re not going to play [Republicans’] game … I don’t think that’s resonating with voters anymore,” another anonymous House Democrat told the outlet. Should We Fear Democrat-Led Violence? One anonymous House Democrat told Axios that constituents have said that “civility isn’t working” and told them they need to be prepared for “violence … to fight to protect our democracy.” Additionally, another Democratic lawmaker told the outlet that “people online have sent me crazy shit … told me to storm the White House and stuff like that,” but added that “there’s always people on the internet saying crazy stuff.” “Democrats built this monster. Now it’s turning on them, and the 2026 primaries are going to produce some of the most unhinged candidates we’ve ever seen,” National Republican Congressional Committee Spokesman Mike Marinella said in a statement provided to the DCNF. TMM Analysis We are already looking toward the 2026 primary season. This will be a time where we have so many options to shift the direction of America’s future. We need to choose leaders and officials who want the best for all Americans, starting from our youngest generations, all the way up to supporting our elders. What are some policies you want to see your upcoming elected officials focused on? Tell us in the comments and we will start contacting candidates to find out if they actually align with your needs and values. It is truly that simple.
Scott Jennings Warns Elon Musk Third Party Could Divide ‘Forces’ Trying To ‘Save Western Civilization’
Written by Daily Caller News Foundation Reporter/Clipper Jason Cohen. CNN senior political commentator Scott Jennings warned Elon Musk on Sunday that his newly launched third party could divide the right and help Democrats win. Musk posted on X Saturday that he had just created the “America Party,” asserting it would restore “freedom” to Americans. Jennings said on “State of the Union with Jake Tapper and Dana Bash” that the effort could backfire by splitting conservatives and Republicans who otherwise share core goals. (RELATED: ‘If I Was Waiting For FEMA, I Would Be Screwed’: You’ll Sob Watching What’s Happening In NC Months After Hurricane Helene) “It’s harder than it looks to start a political party. And, you know, we’ll see where they go with it. My humble advice to Elon, who I admire very much, actually, is that you may be dividing the forces of people who want to save Western civilization to the benefit of the people who don’t,” Jennings said. “And so, to the extent that this effort would divide conservatives and Republicans against each other, that wouldn’t be helpful, because it would leave the country to people who want unfettered immigration, who don’t share your fiscal views, and so on and so forth.” “So, we’ll see where it goes. I sort of hope everybody puts the band back together the way they had it back in 2024, because when everybody was working together, things worked quite well,” he added. Musk began to repeatedly float the idea of creating the “America Party” to cater to disaffected fiscal conservatives and libertarians after becoming frustrated by Republican lawmakers’ support for President Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful” bill — which the president signed into law on Friday. (RELATED: California Dems Blame Wildfires On Trump After Their Party Created Tinderbox Of Regs) However, political experts said that Musk’s billions would be better spent buying him influence within the GOP’s existing party structure instead of challenging America’s entrenched two-party duopoly. To continue reading this article, please click here. TMM Analysis We are living through a major social revolution, whether we want to admit it or not. Sometimes it can be hard to see the forest from the trees. But rest assured, change is here. We already lived through a major disruption with the MAGA movement upending years of Republican-In-Name-Only (RINO) leadership. So, does Musk have the power to create a third party? The short answer is: yes. The long answer is: yes, but he probably won’t see it come to fruition the way he truly desires. Unless he can harness the power of all those feeling disenfranchised by Trump Republicanism, far-leftist extremist Democrats (which seem to be the only Democrats who have any type of power), and bring all young people together under one umbrella that is both pro-life and pro-choice, pro-America, while also being pro-globalist, he doesn’t really stand a chance of making the difference he hope. (RELATED: Guys, We May Have Found The Most Addictive New Outdoors Show On YouTube) In the same way that the Tea Party, Libertarians, and the Independents do very little-to-nothing to change American politics, any new party would probably face the same negligible attention. It can be easy to think that you have power, particularly if you have a lot of followers on various Internet platforms, but none of this power is real. No matter how many likes, clicks, and followers you have, almost none of it translates into macro-real-world influence. People with major followings on X, who think they are the voices within American politics, do not seem to realize they actually have less influence that the women made famous through MomTok (Secret Lives of Mormon Wives). Isn’t that insanely humbling to realize? We are interested in what you think about the chances of Musk’s potential third party changing American politics forever. Email us at [email protected] with your opinion, as we want to hear it all!
Mamdani’s Shocking Claim: Blames America For al-Qaeda Terrorist’s Rise
This article was originally published by JoePags.com Zohran Mamdani, the self-described socialist who is the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor, has faced renewed scrutiny over past comments regarding Anwar al-Awlaki, the former head of Al Qaeda in Yemen. The New York Post reports, in previous social media posts, Mamdani appeared to suggest that U.S. law enforcement actions contributed to al-Awlaki’s radicalization and eventual embrace of jihadist ideology. These remarks were made in the context of a New York Times article that criticized the FBI’s surveillance of al-Awlaki, noting his ties to the 9/11 hijackers. According to The Post, “Mamdani, in a series of tweets in 2015, bizarrely criticized the terrorism — after reading a New York Times account of the snooping, which revealed the cleric’s hooker fetish. ‘Why no proper interrogation of what it means for FBI to have conducted extensive surv. into Awlaki’s private life?’ the socialist candidate wrote. (RELATED: What’s America Gonna Look Like? Shocking Video from Rome Gives Preview) In another post, Mamdani wrote, “How could #Awlaki have ever trusted@FBI to not release surveillance esp. if he continued to critique [the] state? Why no further discussion of how #Awlaki’s knowledge of surv. eventually led him to #alqaeda? Or what FBI’s surveillance of al-Awlaki — and claimed the G-Men actually pushed him into that says about [the] efficacy of surv?” Anwar al-Awlaki, born in New Mexico to Yemeni parents, was an American Islamic who became one of the most influential figures in Al Qaeda. He was linked to several terrorist plots. According to The Post, al-Awlaki directed the failed attempt to blow up an airplane on Christmas Day in 2009. He directed the failed attempt to blow up US cargo planes in 2010,’ Obama said at the time. ‘And he repeatedly called on individuals in the United States and around the globe to kill innocent men, women and children to advance a murderous agenda.’” Anwar al-Awlaki was killed in a U.S. drone strike in Yemen in 2011. Al-Awlaki’s journey from a mainstream Muslim preacher to a prominent jihadist leader was marked by his growing hostility toward the United States, especially after being imprisoned in Yemen—a development he blamed on U.S. pressure. The cleric was regarded as such a significant threat that President Barack Obama authorized the 2011 drone strike that killed him. Mamdani’s comments have drawn criticism from opponents who argue that he was excusing or defending a notorious terrorist. (RELATED: ‘THE DISASTER CYCLE’ Trailer Will Make Your Blood Run Cold; What Do The Elites Know About What Happens Next?) According to The Post, “retired FDNY Lt. Jim McCaffrey — whose brother-in-law, FDNY Battalion 7 Chief Orio Palmer, rushed into the World Trade Center’s south tower to try to help people before the building collapsed on him and hundreds of others during the hijacked-plane strike — called Mamdani’s comments ‘very offensive’ to 9/11 victims and their families,” adding that Mamdani’s candidacy in New York City is both “eye-opening” and “frightening.” TMM Analysis It is certainly scary to think that America may elect a politician who is so open about his disdain for the nation that gave him everything. Like so many other faux-liberals before him, Mamdani is a danger to each and every citizen of this nation, as his hatred can easily bleed into the soft minds of younger generations and old, corrupting them against the only country in the world where they can truly live in freedom. (Use Your Voice Today to Stop The Degradation of American Values) If you are terrified of a future dictated to you by socialists and extremists, have you considered upping your political engagement to be an actual change maker? No one listens to your keyboard warrior attitude on platforms like Meta and X (not even your friends) so why not check out organizations like Million Voices, who actually bridge the gap between your voice and true political action?