U.S. News
Trump’s Vision: A New DC Monument for America’s 250th
President Donald Trump is proposing a massive triumphal arch in Washington, D.C., as part of his vision to mark America’s 250th birthday in 2026. The monument would sit near the Lincoln Memorial and permanently reshape one of the capital’s most iconic sightlines. He argues the structure would embody national pride, legacy, and unity. This arch is part of Trump’s broader effort to impose a lasting architectural legacy in the nation’s capital. His administration has already pushed classical design principles for federal buildings, and this proposal is arguably the boldest expression of that aesthetic and symbolic agenda. Design and Location: Victorious Vision The design draws heavily from classical and neoclassical traditions. It channels the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, the Washington Square Arch in New York, and Roman triumphal arches that historically celebrated victories. The intent: to communicate grandeur, strength, and continuity. Architect Nicolas Leo Charbonneau prepared a rendering featuring stylized eagles, wreaths, and a gilded winged angel holding a scepter. The angelic motif adds a mythic dimension, elevating the arch beyond a mere structure into symbolic narrative. (MORE NEWS: Trump Orders Military Pay Amid Government Shutdown) A proposal for a triumphal arch in DC for #America250, in the traffic circle in front of Arlington National Cemetery. America needs a triumphal arch! pic.twitter.com/JjwSZsOE9z — Nicolas Leo Charbonneau (@nic_charbonneau) September 4, 2025 The favored site is Memorial Circle, the green traffic circle between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery. In proposed versions, the arch would surpass the Lincoln Memorial’s 99-foot height, giving it commanding presence. The site is underutilized and that the arch would unite important historic axes in Washington while completing the monumental landscape. Trump viewed a model of the proposed layout in the Oval Office last week: On Trump’s desk in the Oval Office today was a plan for a triumphal arch on the other side of the river from the Lincoln Memorial pic.twitter.com/PyulIhlmHE — Danny Kemp (@dannyctkemp) October 9, 2025 Political Philosophy and Monumental Messaging The arch reflects this administration’s belief that federal architecture should represent tradition, permanence, and national identity. They emphasize the importance of classical design, noting that it conveys meaning, dignity, and pride in American heritage. They encourage traditional styles for new federal projects to promote beauty, balance, and timeless appeal. The triumphal arch embodies that vision. It would stand as a powerful symbol of unity and strength, showcasing the country’s enduring ideals through classical artistry. Washington, D.C., unlike many world capitals, has never had a grand arch to honor the nation’s achievements. This project would fill that gap and serve as a proud focal point for America’s 250th anniversary—a steadfast reminder of faith, freedom, and national purpose. Engineering, Funding, and Bureaucratic Hurdles The administration has not published a formal cost estimate or construction timeline, leaving many questions unanswered. (MORE NEWS: Melania Trump Helps Reunite Ukrainian Children Amid War) Integrating the arch into existing traffic flow poses additional challenges. Memorial Circle is a heavily used traffic hub, and planners must ensure the monument doesn’t disrupt access, visibility, or the integrity of adjacent landmarks. Some debate centers on whether a temporary or permanent arch is more prudent. Early reports considered a temporary structure tied to the 2026 celebrations; others now suggest a permanent installation is under serious consideration. Part of a Larger Semiquincentennial Agenda The triumphal arch is only one element in Trump’s “America 250” initiative. The broader plan includes a Great American State Fair, the Patriot Games (a national youth sports competition), and the revival of the National Garden of American Heroes. The administration aims to fill the semiquincentennial year with festivals, ceremonies, and symbolic projects. Earlier, President Trump led a grand military parade in Washington to honor the U.S. Army’s 250th anniversary. The event showcased American strength, unity, and appreciation for the men and women who serve the nation. It also reflected the pride and pageantry that will define America’s 250th birthday celebrations in 2026. The proposed monument builds on that same spirit of patriotism. It represents a lasting tribute to the country’s history, its heroes, and its bright future. Designed to stand for generations, the monument would serve as a proud symbol of national unity and achievement—a centerpiece for celebrating America’s founding ideals and lasting strength. Final Thoughts: A Monument to America’s Strength and Spirit President Trump’s triumphal arch vision stands as a proud tribute to America’s 250th birthday and its enduring legacy. The project reflects a vision of unity, strength, and faith in the nation’s future. If built, the arch would become a lasting symbol of the country’s achievements and a celebration of the values that have guided it for two and a half centuries. The Semiquincentennial celebration—“America 250”—offers a rare opportunity to honor the country’s founding ideals with dignity and pride. The proposed arch embodies those ideals in stone, representing courage, freedom, and perseverance. It would join the Lincoln Memorial, the Washington Monument, and other national landmarks as a reminder of America’s journey and the greatness of its people. As the nation prepares for this historic milestone, the triumphal arch promises to inspire generations to look forward with hope while remembering the strength and sacrifice that built the United States. Standing tall in the capital, it would serve as a powerful emblem of unity—celebrating not only America’s past but the unyielding promise of its future. Cut Through the Noise. Slice Through the Lies. Share the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t tiptoe around the narrative—we swing a machete through it. The mainstream won’t say it, so we will. If you’re tired of spin, censorship, and sugar-coated headlines, help us rip the cover off stories that matter. Share this article. Wake people up. Give a voice to the truth the powerful want buried. This fight isn’t just ours—it’s yours. Join us in exposing what they won’t tell you. America needs bold truth-tellers, and that means you.
Letitia James Indicted: Virginia Grand Jury Charges NY AG
A federal grand jury in Virginia has indicted New York Attorney General Letitia James on serious charges of mortgage fraud and making false statements to a financial institution. The indictment accuses her of submitting false information on loan applications and property records to secure better mortgage terms. The case has drawn national attention because of her high-profile role and her past legal battles against President Donald Trump. (RELATED NEWS: Trump Scores Legal Victory, $500M Fraud Penalty Overturned) Federal Statement on the Indictment ALEXANDRIA, Va. – Lindsey Halligan, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, announced that a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging New York State Attorney General Letitia James with Bank Fraud under 18 U.S.C. Section 1344 and False Statements to a Financial Institution under 18 U.S.C. Section 1014. “No one is above the law. The charges as alleged in this case represent intentional, criminal acts and tremendous breaches of the public’s trust,” said U.S. Attorney Halligan. “The facts and the law in this case are clear, and we will continue following them to ensure that justice is served.” If convicted, Letitia James faces penalties including up to 30 years in prison per count, fines of up to one million dollars per count, and forfeiture of any related assets. Actual sentences for federal crimes are often less than the maximum penalties. A federal district court judge will determine any final sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. Prosecutors emphasized that an indictment is merely an accusation and that the defendant remains presumed innocent until proven guilty. Statement from Letitia James In a post on X, Letitia James called the indictment “nothing more than a continuation of the president’s desperate weaponization of our justice system.” She said, “We will fight these baseless charges aggressively, and my office will continue to fiercely protect New Yorkers and their rights.” This is nothing more than a continuation of the president’s desperate weaponization of our justice system. I am not fearful — I am fearless. We will fight these baseless charges aggressively, and my office will continue to fiercely protect New Yorkers and their rights. pic.twitter.com/X9U0EsHuGM — NY AG James (@NewYorkStateAG) October 9, 2025 Allegations Against Letitia James Federal prosecutors claim that James made multiple false statements in property documents. They allege that she declared a home in Virginia as her primary residence when she primarily lived in New York. They also claim she misrepresented details of a multi-unit Brooklyn property, stating it had five units instead of four. Another part of the indictment accuses her of falsely listing her father as her spouse on a loan application. Prosecutors say these misrepresentations helped her qualify for lower interest rates and better financial terms. They believe she intentionally misled lenders for personal benefit. In contrast, James and her legal team argue that any errors were unintentional. They say she corrected them once discovered and that there was no intent to deceive. Her defense emphasizes that the alleged mistakes were routine clerical issues, not criminal acts. Political Context and Timing The indictment against Letitia James follows years of controversy over how she used her position as New York’s attorney general. Critics say she turned her office into a political weapon instead of enforcing the law fairly. They argue she targeted former President Donald Trump for political reasons, not because of solid evidence. Her civil fraud case against Trump relied on weak claims and lacked proof of intentional wrongdoing. Many experts called the ruling against Trump politically driven and legally unsound. Federal investigators began reviewing James’s own financial records after questions arose about her mortgage filings. Prosecutors built their case on hard records—loan applications, signatures, and clear inconsistencies in her disclosures. Their findings allegedly show a pattern of deception that violates federal law. Investigators insist the case has nothing to do with politics. They say they followed the facts and the evidence led directly to James. The charges focus on her own conduct, not her political affiliations. Unlike her public pursuit of Trump, which many saw as grandstanding, this case is rooted in paperwork and provable actions. The grand jury reviewed the evidence and decided the violations were too serious to ignore. Legal experts agree this is not a political fight—it is a matter of law and integrity. The indictment shows that even powerful officials must follow the same rules as everyone else. Legal Stakes and Next Steps Letitia James is scheduled to appear in court in Norfolk, Virginia, later this month. During her first hearing, she will formally respond to the charges. Her attorneys are expected to challenge the evidence and argue that the indictment lacks substance. They will likely claim the prosecution’s case is politically influenced and built on technical errors rather than deliberate fraud. Prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that James knowingly provided false information for financial gain. Establishing intent will be crucial. If the jury believes she acted with intent to defraud, the penalties could be severe. But if her defense convinces the court that she simply made mistakes without intent, she could be cleared of wrongdoing. Because James is a sitting attorney general, the case carries major legal and political consequences. A conviction would almost certainly end her career and damage public confidence in the office she leads. Even an acquittal might leave her reputation tarnished. The case will likely set a precedent for how federal authorities handle alleged misconduct by state officials. Broader Political and Public Impact This indictment is highly unusual. It is rare for a state’s top law enforcement officer to face federal criminal charges. The situation raises broader questions about how politics and justice intersect. Some view the case as proof that powerful figures are not immune from prosecution. Others see it as a troubling sign of how political divisions have influenced the justice system. For New York, the situation adds uncertainty to the leadership of the attorney general’s office. James has been a prominent figure in several high-profile cases…
Portland: Trump Defies Court, Sends 300 CA Guard Troops
President Donald Trump ordered 300 California National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, in open defiance of a federal court order. The decision, made on October 5, 2025, set off an immediate political and legal firestorm across the country. The deployment came one day after a federal judge temporarily blocked the White House from using Oregon’s own National Guard in the state. The court ruled that the administration’s justification lacked solid evidence and could violate constitutional limits on presidential authority. Despite that ruling, Trump directed troops from California to cross state lines, saying Portland needed protection from ongoing chaos and threats to federal property. President Trump reacted to the judge’s order: There’s the magic word again 👀 Trump says that “insurrectionists” are burning Portland to the ground. This is not an accident. Trump and his administration are beginning to use this word frequently for a reason. The Insurrection Act is coming. pic.twitter.com/8f9C3S0tki — Clandestine (@WarClandestine) October 5, 2025 Both Oregon Governor Tina Kotek and California Governor Gavin Newsom condemned the move. They accused Trump of abusing his power and ignoring the Constitution. Tension Builds in Portland Portland has faced waves of demonstrations since early summer. The protests began after several controversial immigration enforcement actions at a local federal facility. Over time, the gatherings drew national attention and occasional clashes between protesters and federal agents. In late September, Trump announced that his administration would send federal resources to Oregon to restore order. He blamed state leaders for failing to protect federal buildings and personnel. As part of that plan, he sought to federalize Oregon’s National Guard and place them under his command. Judge Karin Immergut halted the order. She ruled that the administration had not shown credible evidence of widespread violence or an immediate threat that justified federal intervention. Her ruling says that the president could not use the military to manage local protests without clear legal authority. Trump responded by directing troops from California instead, claiming the court’s order did not apply to National Guard units from another state. She has since issued a TRO prohibiting the Trump administration from relocating or deploying ANY federalized national guard troops to Oregon. Judge Immergut has issued her written TRO prohibiting the Trump administration from relocating or deploying federalized national guard troops to Oregon. Here it is: https://t.co/9xO5hwocck pic.twitter.com/WU11j6Or2F — Anna Bower (@AnnaBower) October 6, 2025 A Clash Over Constitutional Limits The confrontation in Portland has become a defining example of the struggle between state sovereignty and federal power. Legal scholars point to the Tenth Amendment, which reserves certain powers to the states, as central to the dispute. Governors Newsom and Kotek argue that Trump’s decision violates that principle by seizing control over state guard forces without consent. The White House insists the president has the right to protect federal property and enforce federal law. Yet critics say the order oversteps executive authority and blurs the line between military and civilian roles. The Posse Comitatus Act also lies at the heart of the debate. The law generally forbids using the military for domestic law enforcement unless Congress explicitly authorizes it. Opponents of the deployment argue that sending troops to monitor protests crosses that legal boundary. (MORE NEWS: Apple Pulls ICE-Tracking Apps from App Store) Judge Immergut’s earlier ruling complicates matters further. In her opinion, Portland had been relatively calm in recent weeks, contradicting the administration’s portrayal of the city as a “war zone.” Governors Weigh In California Governor Gavin Newsom called the order unconstitutional and reckless. He said his state would not allow its National Guard to be used for political stunts. Newsom promised immediate legal action to block the deployment and protect the rights of California’s soldiers. Oregon Governor Tina Kotek echoed his concerns. She warned that Trump’s actions could undermine federalism and increase tensions instead of reducing them. Kotek’s office confirmed that she is working with state attorneys to seek emergency relief from the courts. Both governors maintain that the situation in Portland does not justify military intervention. They insist that local and state law enforcement agencies are capable of maintaining order without federal troops. (MORE NEWS: Viral 2019 Debate Clip Shows Democrats Back Healthcare for Illegal Immigrants) On the contrary, Texas Governor Abbott authorized 400 members of the Texas National Guard. He is ready and willing to assist federal law enforcement if necessary. I fully authorized the President to call up 400 members of the Texas National Guard to ensure safety for federal officials. You can either fully enforce protection for federal employees or get out of the way and let Texas Guard do it. No Guard can match the training, skill, and… https://t.co/7SUk9XlMBn — Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) October 6, 2025 National Implications for Power and Protest The battle over Portland reaches far beyond one city or protest. It tests the boundaries of American democracy, the separation of powers, and the reach of presidential authority. The outcome could redefine how Washington interacts with state governments during times of unrest. Supporters of the deployment argue that the president is within his legal right to act, especially when local leaders order police to stand down or fail to protect federal personnel and property. Under the Insurrection Act, the president can lawfully deploy military forces if states cannot or will not uphold federal law. In this case, Trump’s allies say his decision reflects a duty to defend federal officers and facilities from escalating threats, similar to situations seen in Chicago and other cities where local enforcement retreated. The courts now face the task of determining how far the president’s powers extend under existing law. The restraining order remains in place until mid-October, giving judges time to weigh whether his actions fall within constitutional boundaries. The ruling will likely influence how future presidents handle civil unrest and the use of military forces on U.S. soil. Final Word The deployment of California National Guard troops to Portland stands as one of the most controversial moves of Trump’s second term. It has fueled intense debate over federal…
Des Moines Superintendent Arrested by ICE: Fake Degrees, Crimes
A major scandal has erupted in Iowa. Authorities arrested Ian Andre Roberts, then–superintendent of Des Moines Public Schools, raising fresh questions about his past. Investigators say his history includes drug convictions, weapons charges, fraudulent credentials, and immigration violations. As the full account unfolds, officials and the public alike are demanding answers. Background: From Education Leader to Arrested Suspect Roberts began working as superintendent in Des Moines in 2023. At first, there were few signs that serious legal trouble loomed. However, when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents moved in on September 26, Roberts attempted to flee. They pursued his vehicle, found him hiding in nearby brush, and ultimately took him into custody. His ICE arrest triggered a bombshell disclosure by the Department of Homeland Security. In a public statement, DHS asserted Roberts had a long record of criminal conduct and maintained he should never have been serving in a role overseeing children. Shortly after, Roberts resigned his position. (MORE NEWS: Apple Pulls ICE-Tracking Apps from App Store) Criminal Allegations: Drugs, Guns, and Fraud The roster of charges against Roberts is extensive and severe. Investigators allege that a search of his home revealed multiple firearms: a loaded 9 mm pistol tucked under a couch cushion, a rifle in the master bedroom closet, and a shotgun behind a headboard. Moreover, one handgun was found in a vehicle he used while fleeing ICE. 🚨Holy crap. DHS just released more info on the Iowa school superintendent and illegal alien Ian Andre Roberts. He has a very long, violent criminal record, combined with immigration fraud. He also voted in elections. pic.twitter.com/lZDeRJKmnw — Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) October 3, 2025 But weapons are not the only concern. The DHS and FBI allege Roberts has a decades-long history of drug crimes. In New York, his record reportedly includes criminal possession of narcotics with intent to sell, forgery, and related offenses dating back to the mid-1990s. In Pennsylvania, the accusation includes unlawful possession of a loaded firearm in 2022. On top of that, Maryland records allegedly show reckless driving, unsafe operation, and speeding convictions from 2012. Compounding these allegations are claims that Roberts also held fake or unverified academic credentials. He listed Morgan State University as his alma mater and claimed to be an incoming MBA candidate at MIT’s Sloan School of Management. But Morgan State confirmed to the Des Moines Register that he attended without earning a degree. MIT’s registrar also told the Register that no record exists of him ever being enrolled in that program. Immigration Violations and Status Issues Beyond criminal allegations, Roberts faces severe immigration-related accusations. DHS says he entered the U.S. multiple times under different visas—first as a visitor, then on a student visa in 1999. An immigration judge in Dallas ordered his removal in absentia in May 2024. Nevertheless, Roberts filed applications for work authorization in 2000, 2018, and 2019—each granted for just one year. Those ultimately expired. (MORE NEWS: Cartel “La Diabla” Busted for Baby, Organ Ring in Mexico) DHS also claims Roberts was illegally registered to vote as a Democrat in Maryland, raising serious concerns about voter registration controls. While some aspects remain under investigation, the combined allegations portray a complex web of alleged misconduct. Impact on Public Education and Trust The arrest has rattled the Des Moines Public Schools system. The school board initially placed Roberts on paid leave, then switched to unpaid leave, and finally accepted his resignation. Many parents, teachers, and stakeholders feel blindsided. How did someone with such a background secure a leadership role in a major school district? Furthermore, the scandal calls into question hiring and vetting practices in public education. If school systems failed to detect fictitious degrees or an extensive criminal history, then oversight mechanisms may be deeply flawed. Beyond internal processes, the case risks damaging public confidence. Schools play a central role in community trust. When a leader falls under suspicion for crimes and deceit, that trust erodes quickly. Des Moines Public School Board is now suing JG Consulting: 🚨 BREAKING: The Des Moines Public School Board is now deflecting all responsibility for hiring former Superintendent Ian Roberts by taking legal action against the search firm that assisted in the hiring, JG Consulting. Roberts passed background checks conducted by both JG… pic.twitter.com/RPdqgRFPp0 — Dustin Grage (@GrageDustin) October 3, 2025 Voices from DHS and Reactions In response, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin stated: “Ian Andre Roberts, a criminal illegal alien with multiple weapons charges and a drug trafficking charge, should have never been able to work around children. When ICE officers arrested this Superintendent, he was in possession of an illegal handgun, a hunting knife, and nearly $3,000 in cash. This criminal illegal alien is now in U.S. Marshals custody and facing charges for being an illegal alien in possession of a firearms. Under Secretary Noem, ICE will continue to arrest the worst of the worst and put the safety of America’s children FIRST.” Meanwhile, local and state-level officials have faced pressure to explain how Roberts gained access to influential education roles. As more revelations emerge, the scrutiny has intensified. Conclusion: A Scandal That Demands Clarity The arrest of Ian Andre Roberts marks a serious and complicated turning point in public education oversight. The charges span drugs, weapons, fraud, and immigration violations. His alleged falsification of academic credentials only deepens the concerns. In the wake of the revelations, Des Moines Public Schools faces not only legal fallout but a crisis of credibility. As authorities move forward, stakeholders and the public alike deserve transparency and reform. Through this case, we are reminded that leadership roles—especially those entrusted with children’s lives and future—demand rigorous scrutiny. Public systems must apply higher standards, not lower them. If that standard is not met, the consequences affect more than one man—they affect the integrity of public education itself. Forget the narrative. Reject the script. Share what matters. At The Modern Memo, we call it like it is — no filter, no apology, no corporate leash. If you’re tired of being lied to,…
Atlantic Fury: North Carolina Homes Collapse into the Ocean
Recent storms battered the North Carolina coast, and the damage was dramatic. On September 30, powerful waves generated by Hurricanes Humberto and Imelda caused at least six beachfront homes in Buxton—on the Outer Banks—to crumble and fall into the sea. Fortunately, no one was hurt because the houses were unoccupied at the time. These collapses highlight how vulnerable the barrier islands are to erosion, shifting sands, and storm surge. This is not the first time it has happened. Since 2020, nearly 20 privately owned homes in the same region have already been lost to surf and erosion. (MORE NEWS: General Motors CEO Pulls Back on EV Ambitions) Storms Offshore, Damage Onshore Although both Humberto and Imelda stayed offshore, their effects reached the coast. Hurricane Imelda, despite not making landfall, pushed strong winds, rain, and heavy surf toward the U.S. East Coast. Meanwhile, Humberto added to the turmoil by sending more swells toward the shoreline of North Carolina. Because the storms remained out at sea, many inland areas escaped serious flooding and wind damage. However, the surf zones bore the full force of pounding waves. The National Park Service warned that hazardous debris and shifting sands would linger along the beaches and require caution for days. The Collapse: How It Happened In Buxton, five houses on stilts collapsed within a 45-minute span on Tuesday afternoon. Later that night, a sixth home fell. Dramatic footage showed one structure swaying precariously before disintegrating and plunging into the surf. Wood, debris, and pieces of siding littered the beach in the aftermath. Drone video captured homes that collapsed into the ocean on North Carolina’s Outer Banks on Tuesday amid rough surf from dual hurricanes off the Southeast coast. Five homes fell within a 45-minute period on Tuesday afternoon, and a sixth fell overnight. https://t.co/f8zQoRYVLd pic.twitter.com/U66IOjihPN — AccuWeather (@accuweather) October 1, 2025 These were not ordinary homes. Most were built on pilings or stilts to protect against tides, but the combined assault of waves and undermined foundations proved too much. The erosive power undercut the supports until the structures lost balance and tipped into the water. Officials closed off the area around the collapses. They also shut down parts of Highway 12 and halted ferry service between Ocracoke and Hatteras, citing danger from debris and unstable roadways. Official Response: National Park Service and Local Agencies The National Park Service (NPS) has confirmed the collapse of the homes and urged caution. A spokesperson for the Cape Hatteras National Seashore said staff were actively working to remove debris and monitor risk areas. They also told the public to avoid walking on the beach near the collapse zone. In a previous collapse in Buxton, NPS officials said they would clean the area south of the site, and the homeowner had hired a contractor to remove remaining structure and debris. That incident was the 12th home to collapse along the seashore in five years. Dare County’s Planning Director, Noah Gillman, has also weighed in. He noted that more than 30 structures in the area had been decertified for occupancy due to erosion damage, including harm to stairs and septic systems. He pointed out that many of the collapsed properties had already lost the required separation from the shoreline. Local governments are now discussing options such as potential relocations, stricter setbacks, or buyouts. Officials from the North Carolina transportation department closed parts of Highway 12 and halted ferry crossings in the area until safety could be assured. The closures aimed to protect residents and travelers from danger posed by debris, shifting sands, and instability. A Coast Under Pressure These events are part of an ongoing struggle along the Outer Banks, North Carolina. Beach erosion has steadily eaten away at the shoreline, leaving some homes standing precariously close to the surf. Even when storms remain offshore, their wave energy can be destructive enough to trigger collapses like those seen in Buxton. The geography of the barrier islands makes them particularly vulnerable. Shifting sands, narrow beaches, and exposure to open Atlantic swells mean that conditions can change quickly. For residents and property owners, this creates constant uncertainty. The Human and Policy Dimension While no one was injured in these North Carolina collapses, the impact on property owners and the community is significant. For many, these homes represented investments, memories, and part of the local economy. Their loss raises difficult questions about the future of oceanfront development. Local officials face the challenge of balancing safety, tourism, and property rights. Stronger building codes and better enforcement of setback requirements may help, but erosion continues to place many structures at risk. In some cases, officials may have to consider buyouts or relocation programs for the most threatened properties. The costs of cleanup also fall on local agencies and the National Park Service. Debris removal, beach safety patrols, and roadway repairs require time, labor, and funding. Looking Ahead: Lessons and Warnings North Carolina is no stranger to hurricanes and flooding. But the collapse of homes in Buxton is still a stark reminder that the ocean’s power should never be underestimated. Even when hurricanes remain offshore, the waves and surf they generate can cause serious destruction. When homes are built too close to the waterline in areas that see high water during hurricanes, disaster is not a surprise — it is expected. The ocean shifts beaches, pushes storm surge inland, and leaves little margin of safety for houses standing only feet from the tide. And this isn’t about climate change. You can’t blame the consequences of risky building decisions on the climate. When people choose to build in the path of storm surge and pounding waves, the risk is built in from the start. The shoreline is always moving. Homes positioned too near the surf will remain in jeopardy, and events like this will continue to shape the future of the Outer Banks. By planning ahead and preparing, local communities may reduce losses — but the ocean’s power will always be a formidable force. Unmask the Narrative….
Pentagon Hosts First Gold Star Advisory Council Meeting
The Pentagon made history by hosting the first-ever Gold Star Advisory Council (GSAC) meeting. This new body gives families of fallen service members a direct line to top Department of War leadership. The goal is simple yet powerful: ensure Gold Star families are heard, respected, and included in shaping policy. Why the Council Was Created The Gold Star Advisory Council was established in May to institutionalize a permanent channel between military families and senior leaders. Unlike past initiatives, which were often short-lived, the GSAC is designed to last and meet regularly. Members will gather at least twice a year to propose reforms, identify problems, and track solutions. By creating this council, the Department of War is signaling that remembering fallen service members also means caring for those they left behind. Secretary Hegseth’s Call for Change In a statement to Fox News Digital, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth underscored the significance of the event: “Today marks the first time a Gold Star Advisory Council convened at the Secretary of War level. This council is long overdue for Gold Star families to elevate their voices directly to Department leadership, tackle real concerns, and transform the casualty process for good. It has my full backing to call out the failures, shake up the bureaucratic status quo, and drive the changes that will stick.” (MORE NEWS: Trump’s Leaked Gaza Peace Plan: A Bold 21-Point Vision for Lasting Stability) His words highlight both urgency and accountability. For families who often felt sidelined, the council represents a major step toward reform. Leadership and Representation The GSAC is co-led by Under Secretary of War for Personnel and Readiness Anthony Tata and Gold Star spouse Jane Horton. Together, they bring institutional authority and personal experience to the table. Tata expressed optimism about the council’s mission: “The Gold Star Advisory Council will enable the Department to continue remembering our fallen Service members and delivering on our promise to take care of the families they left behind,” he told Fox News Digital. He also praised Horton’s impact. Tata recognized her “extraordinary efforts” to uplift Gold Star families by “telling their stories, and keeping the memories of our fallen heroes alive.” He added appreciation for her “advocacy, representation, and leadership.” This leadership structure ensures that both high-ranking officials and those with lived experience guide the council’s direction. Goals of the Gold Star Advisory Council The council has three main priorities: Elevating Family Voices The GSAC ensures Gold Star families move from the sidelines into meaningful conversations with Pentagon leaders. Driving Lasting Reform By focusing on systemic issues, the council aims to improve casualty assistance processes and create reforms that endure. Ensuring Accountability The council will act as a watchdog, pressing leadership to uphold promises and improve transparency. These goals demonstrate that the GSAC is not a symbolic gesture but a serious commitment to long-term change. The Significance for Families Gold Star families often face immense grief while also navigating complex military systems. The GSAC offers them something new: influence. For the first time, their experiences can directly inform policies on casualty assistance, survivor benefits, and memorial practices. (MORE NEWS: Miami Mayor’s Warning: NYC’s Mamdani Echoes Castro) This shift recognizes that no one understands the challenges better than those who lived them. By institutionalizing family voices, the Pentagon signals that remembrance and reform go hand in hand. Looking Ahead The council is expected to meet twice a year and issue recommendations to Pentagon leadership. Its effectiveness will be measured by whether proposed reforms are enacted and sustained. If successful, the GSAC could become a model for how the military connects with families. Instead of top-down decision-making, it would create a loop of listening, learning, and acting. Final Word The first meeting of the Gold Star Advisory Council is more than symbolic. It represents a promise to honor sacrifice through action. As Secretary Hegseth told Fox News Digital, the council has his “full backing” to challenge bureaucracy and deliver real results. With leaders like Anthony Tata and Jane Horton guiding the effort, the council has the potential to transform how the military engages with families of the fallen. By listening, reforming, and holding itself accountable, the Department of War takes an important step toward ensuring no sacrifice is ever forgotten. Unmask the Narrative. Rip Through the Lies. Spread the Truth. At The Modern Memo, we don’t polish propaganda — we tear it to shreds. The corporate press censors, spins, and sugarcoats. We don’t. If you’re tired of being misled, silenced, and spoon-fed fiction, help us expose what they try to hide. Truth matters — but only if it’s heard. So share this. Shake the silence. And remind the powerful they don’t own the story.
Trump Meeting with Congressional Leaders as Shutdown Nears
President Donald Trump has called a high-stakes meeting with leaders from both parties as a possible government shutdown edges closer. He canceled a previous meeting with congressional Democrats, insisting their demands were “unserious and ridiculous.” As the September 30 funding deadline nears, the White House and Capitol Hill scramble to find common ground. Who Will Attend the Meeting Trump will meet with: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) These leaders will gather at the White House to negotiate a path forward and avert a government shutdown. Schumer and Jeffries released a joint statement confirming the rescheduled meeting and reaffirming their willingness to meet at “any time and with anyone.” (MORE NEWS: Trump Admin and Musk’s xAI Launch Federal AI Partnership) Why the Earlier Meeting Fell Apart The meeting that Trump had planned with Democrats last week was canceled after he accused them of pushing “radical Left policies” and making unreasonable demands. At that time, he said that a productive discussion would not be possible under current conditions. Meanwhile, Democrats had criticized a short-term funding extension proposed by Republicans as “dirty” because of policy riders and healthcare cuts embedded in it. They warned that a shutdown could disrupt hospitals and other essential services. Speaker Johnson defended the earlier cancellation, calling it premature and arguing that Republicans must first do the “basic governing work” of keeping the government open before engaging in major negotiations. Stakes and Timeline If Congress and the White House fail to reach a deal by midnight ET on September 30, a partial government shutdown would begin. Many federal services and programs would face interruption, from staffing and payments to federal agencies. Time is running out. The Senate is scheduled to reconvene on September 29 after the Jewish New Year break. The House, however, is expected to remain in recess until the deadline looms. That gap could limit the flexibility each chamber has to respond at the last minute. Key Points of Contention Healthcare and Medicaid funding A major sticking point is how the funding proposals treat healthcare policy. Trump and Republicans are fighting to keep government funding lean, rejecting Democrat demands to fund healthcare for illegal immigrants through Medicaid. Democrats’ push for over $1 trillion in new spending, including Obamacare handouts, puts a heavy burden on American families. The GOP’s smart cuts, like slashing $1 trillion in Medicaid waste, show they’re focused on putting citizens first. (MORE NEWS: James Comey Indicted for False Statements, Obstruction) House Speaker Mike Johnson says, “What Chuck Schumer is demanding…He wants to reinstate free health care for illegal aliens paid for by American taxpayers. We are not doing that. We can’t do that. That’s just one of the crazy things he’s requested.” President Trump will now bring the four top congressional leaders to the White House in an effort to avoid the potential Tuesday night government shutdown. “What Chuck Schumer is demanding…He wants to reinstate free health care for illegal aliens paid for by American… pic.twitter.com/zpXYZCPVYC — DeVory Darkins (@devorydarkins) September 28, 2025 Policy riders and “poison pill” provisions Republicans add practical rules to funding bills to protect taxpayer money, like limiting funds for controversial programs. Democrats call these “poison pills,” but they’re just common-sense steps to keep spending in check. While the GOP keeps things focused, Democrats demand pricey extras like foreign aid that inflate the budget. Political responsibility and public pressure Republicans are pushing a straightforward plan to avoid a shutdown and keep America’s priorities first. Democrats try to blame the GOP, but their $1.5 trillion wish list is what’s holding things up. Voters are backing the GOP’s focus on fiscal responsibility over Democratic political games. Lessons From Past Shutdowns Americans have seen shutdown battles before, and history offers important lessons. The most recent major shutdown came in late 2018 and lasted 35 days, the longest in U.S. history. Hundreds of thousands of federal workers went without pay, many relying on food banks and community support. In earlier shutdowns, the effects were similar: suspended paychecks, reduced services, and public frustration. While essential workers like air traffic controllers and TSA staff remained on duty, the lack of paychecks strained morale and daily life. Public opinion often turned quickly against those viewed as responsible for the impasse. This history is a reminder to both parties that the political costs of a shutdown can be steep. Leaders know that voters may punish them at the ballot box for failing to keep the government running. What to Watch Next Progress at the meeting — Whether the Oval Office discussion yields a framework or agreement will be critical. Legislative movement — Even if the meeting ends positively, legislation must pass both chambers before time runs out. Statements after the meeting — The tone and messaging from Trump and congressional leaders may signal who holds leverage. Last-minute amendments or compromises — In past shutdown fights, final deals emerged in the eleventh hour. What This Means for Americans A government shutdown could delay federal payments, furlough workers, and slow critical services. Federal employees, military families, and contractors would be among the first to feel the impact. Many public-facing functions, such as national parks, regulatory agencies, and services relying on federal funding, would face disruption. The economic impact can ripple far beyond Washington. Delayed contracts, reduced consumer confidence, and missed paychecks can drag on local economies across the country. Businesses that rely on government services or federal workers as customers often see an immediate downturn. Beyond the financial cost, shutdowns erode trust in government. Americans expect their leaders to keep the basic machinery of government functioning. Each time the system stalls, confidence weakens and frustration grows. Final Word As the deadline approaches, Trump and congressional leaders face a defining moment at the White House. The talks carry both the risk of a costly stalemate and the chance for a breakthrough. What emerges from this meeting will decide not only whether the government…
James Comey Indicted for False Statements, Obstruction
Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted on two serious charges. A grand jury brought counts of making false statements to Congress and obstruction of a congressional proceeding. These charges focus on his testimony in 2020 about the FBI’s Russia-related investigation known as “Crossfire Hurricane.” Known to many as Russiagate, this case now brings fresh attention to Comey’s past leadership at the bureau. Details of the Charges According to the indictment, Comey lied during his September 2020 testimony. Prosecutors allege he falsely denied authorizing an FBI employee to serve as an anonymous source. In addition, the obstruction charge claims he interfered with a congressional investigation into sensitive information leaks. Both charges carry potential fines and prison time if he is convicted. Importance of Timing The indictment comes at the last possible moment under the statute of limitations. Federal prosecutors had exactly five years to act, and they filed just before that deadline. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia is leading the case. This timing adds to the drama and shows the investigation had been active behind the scenes for years. Strong Reactions from Leaders Attorney General Pam Bondi responded quickly. She said that no one, regardless of status or past power, stands above the law. She explained that the Department of Justice has a duty to act when powerful people mislead Americans. No one is above the law. Today’s indictment reflects this Department of Justice’s commitment to holding those who abuse positions of power accountable for misleading the American people. We will follow the facts in this case. — Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) September 25, 2025 FBI Director Kash Patel also issued a statement. He said the FBI must hold itself accountable. According to Patel, restoring trust requires that even former leaders face consequences if they break the rules. Today, your FBI took another step in its promise of full accountability. For far too long, previous corrupt leadership and their enablers weaponized federal law enforcement, damaging once proud institutions and severely eroding public trust. Every day, we continue the fight to… — FBI Director Kash Patel (@FBIDirectorKash) September 25, 2025 President Donald Trump reacted strongly as well. He labeled Comey one of the worst figures ever to serve in government. Trump added that the indictment represents the beginning of long-delayed accountability. (RELATED NEWS: Ryan Routh Attempts To Stab Himself After Guilty Verdict For Trump Assassination Plot) Government Spying on Trump The case also ties into confirmed surveillance of Donald Trump’s campaign during the 2016 election. Under James Comey’s leadership, the FBI secured secret warrants from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. Later investigations revealed that the FBI relied heavily on the Steele dossier, which contained unverified and false claims. A Justice Department inspector general’s report found that the FBI made serious errors and omitted key facts in its FISA applications. Those mistakes misled the court and enabled improper spying on a presidential campaign. These findings confirmed that the government spied on Trump’s campaign through flawed surveillance methods. This abuse of power eroded public trust and showed how political motives can corrupt law enforcement. The surveillance scandal now serves as a backdrop to Comey’s indictment. It highlights a pattern of misconduct under his leadership that continues to raise questions about the FBI’s role in politics and justice. The Background of Crossfire Hurricane The controversy reaches back to 2016, when the FBI opened its Russia election interference investigation. Inside the bureau, officials referred to the effort as “Crossfire Hurricane.” James Comey oversaw this probe while serving as FBI Director. Later, special counsel Robert Mueller took over. In 2019, Mueller’s report concluded there was not enough evidence to prove criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives. Soon afterward, another special counsel, John Durham, began reviewing how the FBI launched the investigation in the first place. Durham’s report criticized the bureau, saying it ignored warning signs and allowed itself to be influenced by political pressure. These findings added weight to claims that FBI leadership mishandled the case. Legal Stakes for Comey If convicted, James Comey could face years in prison as well as steep fines. For making false statements to Congress, the maximum penalty is up to five years in prison and significant fines. For obstruction of a congressional proceeding, the penalty is also up to five years. Combined, Comey could face as much as 10 years in prison, though sentencing would depend on the court. His defense team is expected to argue that he did not knowingly mislead Congress. They may claim memory lapses or confusion rather than deliberate lies. Lawyers could also argue that congressional testimony often leaves room for interpretation. The burden of proof lies with prosecutors, who must show deliberate deception beyond a reasonable doubt. What Happens Next The indictment is only the beginning. The case will move to federal court, where a judge will oversee pretrial motions and hearings. Both sides will exchange evidence during discovery. After that, the court will determine whether to proceed to trial. (MORE NEWS: AOC Slams Charlie Kirk with Scathing House Floor Comments) Media attention will remain intense throughout the process. Because Comey once held one of the most powerful positions in law enforcement, every development will be closely examined. Political leaders from both parties are already weighing in, ensuring that the trial will shape public debates. Why This Case Matters The James Comey indictment matters for several reasons. It tests the principle that no government official is above the law. If prosecutors succeed, it will send a message that accountability reaches the highest levels of power. In addition, this case raises concerns about public trust in institutions. The FBI has faced criticism from across the political spectrum. By charging a former director, the Department of Justice signals that even the bureau’s top leaders must answer to the public. The Comey trial could set a powerful precedent for how cases involving Congress are handled. Lying to Congress is rarely prosecuted…
Dallas ICE Office Attack Sparks Grief and Political Uproar
Dallas woke up to tragedy on September 24, 2025. A gunman climbed onto a rooftop and opened fire on the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) field office. Three detainees were hit, and at least one died. The shooter then turned the gun on himself and didn’t survive. Investigators say this wasn’t random. They believe the attack was planned and directed at ICE officers. Now, federal, state, and local officials are digging for answers, trying to figure out why this happened and whether anyone else was involved. Who Was Behind the Gun? Authorities identified the shooter as 29-year-old Joshua Jahn. He didn’t just lash out in the heat of the moment. Police say he etched anti-ICE slogans onto his bullets, making his motive clear. That’s why investigators are treating this as more than just another crime — it looks like an ideologically driven attack. Officers searched two homes tied to Jahn — one in Fairview, Texas, and another in Durant, Oklahoma. They’re going through computers, phones, and personal records to learn what pushed him to do this and if he had help. How the Attack Happened Officials say Jahn fired “indiscriminately” from the roof. He hit the ICE building, broke through windows and lobby walls, and fired into a van transporting detainees. One of those detainees lost their life. Two more are fighting to recover in the hospital. Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons said this was more than an attack on detainees — it was a direct strike on law enforcement itself. He warned that bullets could have hit lawyers, visitors, or even drivers on Interstate 35, which runs close to the facility. (MORE NEWS: Utah Arrests: Explosive Device Found Under Fox News Vehicle) Lyons spoke with Fox News’ Martha MacCallum: Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons: “The ICE facility itself was a target… He was just firing at ICE vehicles… It wasn’t directed at the detainees.. wasn’t directed at civilians on the street. It was a definite attack on law enforcement. He was there to attack that building.”… pic.twitter.com/nhPiQcp2wt — RedWave Press (@RedWave_Press) September 24, 2025 Political Firestorm The shooting immediately sparked political reaction. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the attack was “deliberate” and warned that heated rhetoric aimed at ICE officers is dangerous. She called out comparisons that paint ICE agents as secret police, saying that kind of language makes them targets. For months, we’ve been warning politicians and the media to tone down their rhetoric about ICE law enforcement before someone was killed. These horrendous killings must serve as a wake-up call to the far-left that their rhetoric about ICE has consequences. Comparing ICE Day-in… — Secretary Kristi Noem (@Sec_Noem) September 24, 2025 President Trump went even further. He blamed “Radical Left Democrats” for fueling anti-ICE hatred and promised an executive order to crack down on domestic terrorism groups. He pointed to the messages written on Jahn’s bullets as proof the shooting was politically charged. Texas Senator Ted Cruz agreed, saying this is the third shooting in Texas directed at ICE or CBP: This needs to stop. Politicians using rhetoric that demonizes ICE and CBP need to stop. pic.twitter.com/NlcePjtD4Q — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) September 24, 2025 Dallas Responds Closer to home, Dallas Mayor Eric Johnson urged the city to pray for our nation and for the city of Dallas. He said that believes in the power of prayer and that prayer changes things. Republican Mayor of Dallas Eric Johnson opened the press conference on the ICE facility shooting with a powerful call to prayer. In a moment when Democrats are demonizing faith, he doubled down. “Let me just start off by saying that I’m a person who believes very, very strongly… pic.twitter.com/Wm3wupTCHk — Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) September 24, 2025 Police sealed off streets around the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement building and worked with federal agents to sweep the area for evidence. Tensions ran high, but local leaders stressed the need for level heads and cooperation. (MORE NEWS: Kilmar Abrego Garcia and the Deep Immigration Divide) Bigger Pattern of Violence Sadly, this isn’t the first time ICE has faced violence. Over the last year, threats against immigration facilities and border agents have been on the rise. Experts warn that when public debate turns toxic, it can encourage unstable individuals to lash out. Border Czar Tom Homan weighs in on the Charlie Kirk Show: .@RealTomHoman: This morning, a gunman was targeting an ICE facility in Dallas, Texas… it’s the third shooting that’s occurred in Texas against immigration officials… This is clearly a targeted attack against ICE. pic.twitter.com/c0aQ2EsHAr — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) September 24, 2025 The Dallas field office wasn’t built for long-term detention. It’s mainly a holding and processing center. ICE rules say detainees should not be kept there for more than 12 hours. But its busy role, combined with its location near major roads, makes it especially vulnerable. It isn’t just agents at risk. Civilians, lawyers, and visitors are all exposed if someone decides to attack. What Happens Next Investigators now have several big questions to answer. They’re combing through Jahn’s digital trail to see what groups he followed or talked to online. They’re reviewing his travel, finances, and social connections. And they’re asking whether he radicalized quickly or if this had been building for years. At the same time, ICE and DHS are looking hard at their security. Do facilities need better barriers? More surveillance? Stronger partnerships with local police? Those decisions could come soon. The political side won’t cool off either. Republicans are pressing for stronger protections for ICE officers. Democrats are trying to strike a balance, condemning violence while still debating immigration policy. What everyone agrees on is this: nobody wants to see another day like this. A Community Left to Heal Dallas is now dealing with both grief and fear. Families of the victims are facing unimaginable loss. ICE employees are shaken, knowing they were directly in the crosshairs. And an already divided nation is once again reminded of how dangerous…
Ryan Routh Attempts To Stab Himself After Guilty Verdict For Trump Assassination Plot
OPINION Ryan Wesley Routh has been found guilty of attempting to assassinate President Trump. A jury in Florida delivered the verdict after weeks of testimony and evidence. The 59-year-old now faces a possible life sentence. The conviction includes multiple felony counts. These charges range from attempted assassination of a presidential candidate to weapons offenses and assaulting a federal officer. Prosecutors argued that his actions were deliberate and dangerous, while the jury agreed the evidence proved intent beyond a reasonable doubt. How the Plot Unfolded The case stems from an incident in September 2024. Routh hid in the bushes near Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida. Armed with an SKS-style rifle, he aimed through a fence in the direction of Trump’s security detail. Secret Service agents spotted Routh 12 hours later. One agent opened fire, causing Routh to drop his weapon and run. He was quickly arrested after fleeing the scene. Investigators later revealed that Routh had been preparing for weeks. They found burner phones, notes tracking Trump’s movements, and detailed plans to avoid detection. Prosecutors stated that this demonstrated a high level of planning and intent. Drama Inside the Courtroom The trial reached its most dramatic moment when the guilty verdict was read. Routh suddenly grabbed a pen and tried to stab himself in the neck. Courtroom marshals immediately rushed forward, tackling him and pulling him out of the room. (MORE NEWS: Rising Socialism Exposes the Democratic Party’s Identity Crisis) As officers restrained him, his daughter, Sara Routh, screamed through tears: “Dad, I love you. Don’t do anything. I’ll get you out. He didn’t hurt anybody!” Her desperate words echoed through the courtroom as marshals dragged him away. Routh was later brought back in shackles to hear the remainder of the proceedings. The tense exchange underscored just how volatile the case had become, both for the defendant and his family. The Stakes at Sentencing Routh is scheduled to be sentenced on December 18, 2025. If the court applies the maximum penalties, he could spend the rest of his life in prison. Federal officials say the conviction sends a clear message. Political violence will not be tolerated, and attempts on the lives of public officials will be met with the harshest consequences. President Trump also responded after the verdict with a lengthy statement. He praised prosecutors and law enforcement, saying: His remarks underscored the gravity of the crime while also crediting the teamwork and vigilance that led to Routh’s capture. For Trump, the conviction represented not only justice for himself but also a reminder of the importance of security and accountability in American democracy. A Growing Concern Over Political Violence The conviction adds to growing concern about rising political violence in America. It comes just months after a separate attempt on Trump’s life in Pennsylvania in July 2024, when a gunman opened fire at a campaign rally. That earlier attempt left one person dead and another seriously injured. (RELATED NEWS: AOC Slams Charlie Kirk with Scathing House Floor Comments) Security experts warn that heated rhetoric and division can inspire dangerous actions. The Routh case demonstrates how quickly words and hostility can turn into serious threats. Law enforcement agencies are now reassessing protective measures for candidates and officials in an increasingly polarized environment. Defense Arguments and What Comes Next Routh attempted to defend himself by claiming he never intended to pull the trigger. He argued that since the gun was never fired, the government had failed to prove assassination intent. The jury rejected that argument, citing his careful planning and the position he had put himself in. His legal team may still file appeals. They could argue over how intent was defined or whether some evidence should have been excluded. However, given the jury’s unanimous verdict and the mountain of evidence, legal experts believe an appeal is unlikely to change the outcome. Why This Case Matters This conviction is not only about one man’s actions. It reflects a broader issue facing the nation: the danger of escalating political hostility. When violent plots move from threats to real attempts, the stability of the system is at risk. Routh’s sentencing in December will be closely watched. A life sentence would be a strong statement from the justice system. It would underscore that attempts to silence political leaders through violence will never succeed. At the same time, the case forces Americans to reckon with the reality of modern politics. Security for candidates must be stronger than ever. Media outlets, celebrities, and even legislators must also consider how their rhetoric and division contribute to the rise of dangerous individuals willing to act on extreme beliefs. The Takeaway The conviction of Ryan Wesley Routh marks one of the most serious legal cases in recent political history. He carefully planned, armed himself, and positioned himself to strike at President Trump. The jury’s decision shows that intent and preparation can carry the same weight as action when it comes to protecting leaders and preserving democracy. In the wake of several high-profile assassinations — including the murder of Charlie Kirk and two attempts on President Trump’s life — the time is now to turn down the temperature. But that will not happen as long as figures on the left, like former Vice President Kamala Harris, continue giving interviews where they call Trump a tyrant and compare him to a communist dictator. That kind of rhetoric only fuels hostility and division. Kamala Harris calling President Trump a “tyrant” is a masterclass in projection. Under the previous administration: – Raided political opponent’s home – Fired military members over the COVID shot – Targeted Catholics – Spied on school parents – Censored free speech pic.twitter.com/uxHv3dKOLf — Christian Collins (@CollinsforTX) September 23, 2025 The conviction of Ryan Routh speaks for itself. The reckless propaganda needs to end. Until then, we will not stay silent about it. Cut through the noise. Drown out the spin. Deliver the truth. At The Modern Memo, we’re not here to soften the blow — we’re here…